WE NEED TO KEEP OUR EYES ON THE “BALL.”

REMEMBER IF YOU DON’T VOTE THE CRAZY PEOPLE WILL!!!!!

REGISTER AND VOTE BLUE

WE NEED TO KEEP OUR EYES ON THE “BALL.”  Neither Bernie or Hillary will run a third party against the MAIN PROGRESSIVE MOVEMENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

WE CAN have a TRUE PROGRESSIVE COUNTRY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

1.Elect Hillary/Bernie - WE CAN DO IT!

2.Take congress BACK from the OBSTRUCTIONIST, Flint Michigan Trickle Down economist    - WE CAN DO IT!

3.Hillary/Bernie nominates Barack Obama for the Supreme Court - WE CAN DO IT!

4.NEW Democratic Congress ratifies!!!!!!!!!!!!! - WE CAN DO IT!

The senate RACES Ohio, Florida, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, New Hampshire, Illinois, Indiana, Missouri and Arizona ARE ALL WINNABLE. The TEA PARTY OBSTRUCTIONIST, Flint Michigan Trickle Down economist took them in in the midterm elections six years ago (2010).

The Last Word with Lawrence O'Donnell 11/17/14 Dear Republican Uncle, Re: 2014 GOP victories

Lawrence has the 2014 midterm election rewrite to email that Republican uncle!!!!

http://www.msnbc.com/the-last-word/watch/dear-republican-uncle--re--2014-gop-victories-360070723849

THINK!!!!!!!! PLEASE!!!!!!!! THINK!!!!!!!!

“Every sulfurous belch from the molten interior of the volcanic TRUMP phenomenon injures the chances of a Republican presidency.” (GFWill) There is no way trump wins! Trump is going to skim off all the crazies and make the democratic winner’s coat tails that much longer!!!!!

Nixon (the Tea Party and Trump) COURTED Senator Strom Thurmond’s (1902-2003) Southern  DIXIECRATS in his much exalted "southern strategy."  We are seeing the fruits of that in Donald Trump's avowed racism and MASS INCARCERATION!!!!!!!!

THINK!!!!!!!! PLEASE!!!!!!!! THINK!!!!!!!!

VOTE BLUE and confirm “the willingness to put the interests of the community ahead of private interests.” (Y) (Y) (Y) (Y) (Y) (Y) (Y) (Y) (Y)

Remember if you don’t vote the CRAZY people will!!!!! REGISTER AND VOTE BLUE!!!!!!

We APPARENTLY need a constitutional amendment to END the judicial sanction of malice, corruption, dishonesty, sincere ignorance, conscientious stupidity and Incompetence

http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2014/11/a-petition-for-constitutional-amendment.html

List of Docketed and DENIED Petitions for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States With links to the verbiage for same at DGJeep.Blogspot.com

http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2015/12/list-of-docketed-and-denied-petitions.html

http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2011/05/criminals-are-in-our-judicial-process.html

15-3403 PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

for the Eighth Circuit

David G. Jeep and heir,      Plaintiff,             vs. Government (corporation) of the United States of America, et al Defendants/Respondents

) ) ) ) )

Circuit Appeal Case #: 15-3403  District Case #: 4:15CV1533HEA

PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

______                                           ________________________________________

                                                                                                                I.         

Per RULE 35A and RULE 40A, I David G. Jeep PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC Circuit Appeal Case #: 15-3403

(Cross-References: FRAP 35; 8th Cir. R. 4OA(b). and FRAP 27, 32(b), 35, 40; 8th Cir. R. 27A.)

I ask how reckonablely[1] speaking can constitutional wording, intent and understanding of “No State shall make or enforce any law” and “any person” in the 14^th Amendment, non-exigent, have ANY EXCEPTIONS?

How can any person’s[2] reckonable[3] "rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws"[4] of the United States of America

and

immunity for the "the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America" under color of JUDGE MADE[5] law BOTH BE CONSTITUTIONAL?[6]”

___________________________________________________

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Signed this Tuesday, February 16, 2016

Signature of Plaintiff(s)

______________________________________________

David G. Jeep

GENERAL DELIVERY

Saint Louis, MO  63155-9999

E-Mail Dave@DGJeep.com (preferred)

(314) 514-5228

---

[1] "reckonability" is a needful characteristic of any law worthy of the name."  Antonin Scalia: The Rule of Law as a Law of Rules,  56 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1175, 1175-81 (1989)

[2] “This argument (Connick, District Attorney, et al. v. Thompson No. 09–571 Decided March 29, 2011) with respect to volume of traffic seems to us to be without merit. It makes the constitutional right depend upon the number of persons who may be discriminated against, whereas the essence of the constitutional right is that it is a personal one.” McCabe v. Atchison, T. & S.F. Ry. Co., 235 U.S. 151 (1914)

[3] "reckonability" is a needful characteristic of any law worthy of the name."  Antonin Scalia: The Rule of Law as a Law of Rules,  56 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1175, 1175-81 (1989)

[4] § 2 of the Civil Rights Act of 1866, 14 Stat. 27. (now codified in Federal Statute laws as Criminal 18 U.S.C. § 241 & 242) & The Civil Rights Act of 1871 (now codified in Federal Statute laws as Civil 42 USC §1983 - §1985)

[5] a)     Pierson v. Ray, 386 U. S. 57 (1967) - William O. Douglas dissenting "It is one thing to say that the common law doctrine of judicial immunity is a defense to a common law cause of action. But it is quite another to say that the common law immunity rule is a defense to liability which Congress has imposed upon "any officer or other person" as in Ex parte Virginia, or upon "every person," as in these cases." 

b)       Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 345 (1983))Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 564 (1967), the malicious, corrupt, dishonest, sincerely ignorant and conscientiously stupid  actions of “all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who (spouses) were integral parts of the judicial process”

c)       Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349 (1978)), 

d)       Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U. S. 428 (1976) “the “malicious or dishonest” prosecutor”,  

e)       Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 345 (1983)  the “knowingly false testimony by police officers"

f)       Bogan v. Scott-Harris - 523 U.S. 44 (1997) Tenney v. Brandhove, 341 U. S. 367, 372, 372-376; Amy v. Supervisors, 11 Wall. 136, 138)  the corrupt, malicious, dishonest, sincerely ignorant and conscientiously stupid  actions  of federal, state, local, and regional legislators

g)       Mireles v. Waco (1991) 502 U.S. 9, 112

h)       Connick, District Attorney, et al. v. Thompson No. 09–571 Decided March 29, 2011 where liability for individual rights was reduced from what should have been Strict Liability to somewhere less than respondeat superior liability.  

i)        Ashcroft V. Al-Kidd 563 U. S. _(9)_ (2011)- Decided May 31, 2011

[6] Martin Luther King, Jr. knew when he said… "Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity."