Sunday, March 01, 2009, revised and extended
Mike Christian at 314-280-5222 FBI Report
FBI St. Louis
2222 Market Street
St. Louis, Missouri 63103-2516
Phone: (314) 231-4324
Phone: (314) 589-2500, Fax: (314) 589-2636
E-mail: stlouis@ic.fbi.gov
Re: A Demand for an affirmative response on or before March 16, 2009
A Demand for Civil Rights and a jihad opposed to Judicial Terrorism
Writ of Certiorari (07-11115) and U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals (08-1823)
Dear Mr. Christian,
As you know I have been pursuing my civil rights peacefully for five plus years. This is not a spur of the moment “demand”. We have, face to face, discussed these issues in the past. At that time I believed in the rule of law, I believed we had a credible system of justice. But NO longer, I am and have been the victim of the denial of my “rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws ” via unconstitutional and illegal Judicial Tyranny and Terrorism. The Guild of Judges has in defiance of the Constitution declared themselves “Nobility ” and assumed a would-be sovereign’s immunity from the rule of the “Constitution and laws ”. They thus assert they are not responsible to “establish Justice ” and safeguard “We the People’s” “rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws ”.
I cannot imagine that I am alone, the only victim of their corruption, but even if I were it still is a crime against the Constitution the first time and every time it happens. This is a crime against the Rule of Law. I do not need to prove habitual violation nor my minority status for credibility; again this is a crime against the Constitution. The violations of my civil rights are numerous, manifest and unambiguous. The issues revolve around two cases. Those cases have been recognized and are referenced here as a Writ of Certiorari 07-11115 to the Supreme Court and an Appeal to the U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals 08-1823.
Under the issue in the Writ of Certiorari 07-11115 , the defendants openly and undeniably served a deficient warrant, no probably cause , and then helped the then petitioner, now defendant, to answer for the deficient warrant at the unconstitutional hearing on the infamous charge, creating specifics via surprise self-serving testilying as the basis for an illegal and unconstitutional court order. Thus denying the petitioner’s right to prior specific knowledge of the infamous charge , to defend him against said infamous charge. The defendants in this issue took everything from the petitioner WITHOUT Due Process of Law . Everything was stolen via this illegal and unconstitutional action, EVERYTHING, from his life’s blood, HIS SON and his home to his little league baseball glove and his dark socks. As a result from that day to this nearly five plus years later he literally has not had his unalienable Rights to life, liberty, and personal property.
The criminal issues at the center of the appeal (08-1823) are too numerous to detail here. They are described in the legal brief filed with the appeal, which can be provided via e-mail. Briefly, after the false imprisonment that linked the two cases and before the false unjustifiable corrupted conviction in 08-1823, the defendants withheld exculpable information , presented false evidence , perjured themselves, and suborned perjury. After the illegal, corrupt and false conviction, the defendants refused me “protection of the law ” and then acted in a conspiracy to cover up there misconduct and continue the denial of my “rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws ”. The defendants perjured and suborned perjury themselves / testilied about the specifics of their own, subsequently independently verified, police procedures and prior sworn police reports on the witness stand under oath. The defendants in this issue took the petitioner’s livelihood and gave unconstitutionally what little illegal credibility the defendants in the issue of the Writ of Certiorari (07-11115) even claimed.
I do not know nor at this point do I care if you work for the US Attorney General or you are an independent agency. I have contacted Mr. Eric Holder, the US Attorney General, in this regard. I have not heard anything from his office. I am drowning beneath the vile sophistry of the illegal and unconstitutional theft of my life, liberty, and property. If a demand sounds like a threat, it is a demand from a drowning man to a life guard that is suppose to be there to save and protect him, take it as you will.
At this point after a concerted effort for 5 years, I can say without qualification, first hand experience; there is no enforcement of the “rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws ” in the United States of America. There is no “Rule of Law”. The Supreme Court has chosen to abandon its responsibilities to “establish Justice ” based on our “rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws ” in favor of the self-serving immunity it has declared for the Guild of Judges. Thus the Constitution has been dumped, there is no government, there is no order, there is no rule of law, we live as animals in the jungle and it is survival of the fittest.
That being said, I still aspire to being a civilized man. I therefore ask you and the others referenced here to act in a unified effort to enforce our “rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws ” as described in the Writ of Certiorari (07-11115) and U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals (08-1823) and save what little dignity this country has left.
I am impoverished as a result of my five-year effort. I am homeless. I do not have postage or paper to print or mail this letter. I hope to get it printed and hand deliver a hard copy to your office on or before Monday March 02, 2009. As you should know, I have the documentation that indisputably establishes my assertions of the denial of my “rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws ” and can transmit copies electronically as requested electronically (via Dave@DGJeep.com ).
As I have stated before, I am at my wits end, this has been a five-year peaceful struggle for me. I have nothing left but the irresistible instinctual innocent need to violently fight the terrorism. In one last hope for a peaceful settlement, I am DEMANDING, yes DEMANDING a response, in the affirmative, that the FBI and others are prosecuting the criminals, referenced here as defendants, with a timetable for said prosecution on or before March 16, 2009. If a demand sounds like a threat, it is a demand from a drowning man to a life guard that is suppose to be there to save and protect him, take it as you will.
I realize no one has any accountability. Everyone, but the victim, has immunity. For that reason this is an unseen issue for most of America; they sleep ignorant and unaware of the issue of the Guild of Judge’s unconstitutional and illegal assertion of Nobility, Sovereign and Absolute immunity. That by no means makes it justifiable anymore than a thief unseen working under the cloak of darkness. I have tried for 5 years to peacefully bring this to the attention of those responsible for this issue. I feel obligated to initiate a jihad to bring it to their attention and to fight the unconstitutional judicial terrorism that threatens us all. They want us to believe we are not “persons” as defined by “We the People ” in our constitution. They want us to believe they do not have an obligation to maintain and/or “establish Justice ” as required by “We the People ” in our constitution.
Death and destruction are the only things that are of any consequence in our all too insulated world. There will be consequences; we live in a jungle. “People are going die .” There is no rule of law; we do not have the protection of the “rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws ”. If all of us do not have equal and unfettered “rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws ” none of us have the “rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws ”. If a demand sounds like a threat, it is a demand from a drowning man to a life guard that is suppose to be there to save and protect him, take it as you will.
And for what it is worth you (The FBI), The United States Supreme Court, The Attorney General, Mr. Eric Holder, and the local United States Attorney’s Office Eastern District of Missouri, Catherine L. Hanaway all work for me as a Citizen of the United States. Your function in case you are unfamiliar is to work for “We the People” and enforce the “rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws ”. And if you refuse to act in accordance with the constitution and the established law of “We the People”, you are all additionally culpable as co-conspirators for any consequences as a result of your deliberate indifference to your professional and public obligations as government employees to enforce and protect our “rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws ” “under color of law” along with the listed defendants in the original complaints.
I am not the criminal; I am the victim of the criminal denial of our “rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws ”. You allow me a courtroom and take away your rights to Due Process and I will pronounce you to be a father rapper, a child molester, a wife beater and take all your money with court order and two strokes of my gavel. I have suffered through this for five long years. When corned, EVERY animal will eventually instinctively, innocently and violently fight against terrorism as the only available means of self-preservation.
You do realize, you have no power other than to comply. The right will prevail over the tyranny and terrorism if not now in the future. I have faith and hope that will endure even if I am forced to give up the precious gift of life in defense of our liberty, “Give me Liberty, or give me Death!” If a demand sounds like a threat, it is a demand from a drowning man to a life guard that is suppose to be there to protect him, take it as you will.
If there is anything further I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.
Thank you in advance.
Dave@DGJeep.com
David G. Jeep
Enclosure
“I am a Card Carrying Pacifist REV03
cc: The United States Supreme Court
Eric H. Holder Jr.
President Barack Hussein Obama
e-mailed to a list of select group of favorites
file
"True peace is not merely the absence of tension: it is the presence of justice." Martin Luther King, Jr.
Showing posts with label Hanaway AUSA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hanaway AUSA. Show all posts
Sunday, March 1, 2009
Monday, August 11, 2008
Catherine L. Hanaway, United States Attorney / Jay Nixon Governor State of Missouri
Monday, August 11, 2008
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
Catherine L. Hanaway, United States Attorney
111 S. 10th Street, 20th Floor
St. Louis, MO 63102
Telephone: 314.539.2200
Fax: 314.539.2309
Re: David G. Jeep v State of Missouri, Case # CR203-1336M
8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals for Missouri as Appeal #08-1823
A repeated request for protection of Civil Rights via prosecution of the US Criminal Code
Dear Ms. Hanaway,
I contacted you on or about Friday, October 20, 2006 in regard to the above referenced issue. This issue has not and will not go away, as long as I have air to breath. Jay Nixon the current Democratic candidate for Governor in the state of Missouri is a party to if not the main criminal conspiracy to cover up the denial of my civil rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws.
Civil rights violations by the police and other public officials are not limited to racial discrimination and the excessive or illegal use of force. As the Supreme Court has said several times the prosecutors and the police can be guilty of violating a citizen’s by Deliberate Indifference to said Civil Rights. The supreme court has said additionally that this can be done by fraud, by withholding exculpable material and by being incompetent as a result of a failure to train, supervise and discipline.
In that it is your obligation to defend “We the People(s)” civil rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws per the United States Criminal Code Title 18 Part I, Chapter 19 § 371. Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States, Title 18 Part I, Chapter 47 § 1001. Fraud Statements or entries generally, Title 18, Part I, Chapter 13, § 241-248 Civil Rights and specifically in this case by Title 18 Chapter 79 § 1621 Perjury generally, § 1622 Subornation of perjury, and § 1623 False declarations before grand jury or court. And it is your responsibility to see that this issue is before the courts and available to my fellow citizens for their consideration as regards their vote for Jay Nixon as Governor.
As you know I have been consistently and unrelentingly for the past four years been attempting to get Jay Nixon to recognize the criminal denial of my civil rights. I feel it my duty as a citizen to make you and my fellow citizens aware of this man’s criminal past prior to his election. Mr. Nixon and others are claiming immunity. We do not live in a police state! We live in a free country where “We the People” have unalienable rights. Everyone even the police are equally subject to the law. Immunity is granted to public officials only when and if they are making a good faith effort to do their jobs fairly and professionally. Public Officials do not have the right to act with impunity without regard to the standards of their own profession and the standards for honesty as required by their oath of office and the oath all witnesses take as they testify in court.
I would ask you to investigate based on my fully briefed civil suit currently under consideration by the 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals for Missouri as Appeal# 08-1823 and then prosecute him and the other appellee per United States Criminal Code Title 18 Part I, Chapter 19 § 371. Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States, Title 18 Part I, Chapter 47 § 1001. Fraud Statements or entries generally, Title 18, Part I, Chapter 13, § 241-248 Civil Rights and specifically in this case by Title 18 Chapter 79 § 1621 Perjury generally, § 1622 Subornation of perjury, and § 1623 False declarations before grand jury or court for their criminal activity in this regard.
The evidence as referenced in October of 2006 as proven and described in my civil action as Appeal #08-1823 is irrefutable; they are guilty. You can investigate now and partially redeem your earlier incompetence or you can await the forthcoming public humiliation for your prior bad acts as the evidence makes it way through the courts and the truth be told. The Officers were incompetent to make the original arrest; it was a false arrest. The prosecutors maliciously prosecuted what they new to be an incompetent and false arrest. At the trial the prosecutors allowed the arresting officers to perjure themselves and thus suborned perjury. The Judges involved Judge Bennett, committed false imprisonment and openly denied me due process of law. Judge Colyer sanctioned it all with informed consent of the prior bad acts and his court order denying me a miss trial. Jay Nixon as the chief law enforcement officer, the Attorney General of the Sate of Missouri, refused to prosecute the Officers, the Prosecutors and the Judges for their criminal acts and their conspiracy of deliberate indifference to my Civil Rights. Jay Nixon’s refusal to prosecute after 4 years and 10-20 letters and who knows how many phone calls was and is malfeasance in office and the denial of his public obligation and duty as the chief prosecutor of the state of Missouri.
If I can be of assistance providing any of the above referenced briefs or supporting documents, please let me know via e-mail as referenced below.
Thank you in advance.
David G. Jeep
David **G. Jeep
cc: Press Release
file
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
Catherine L. Hanaway, United States Attorney
111 S. 10th Street, 20th Floor
St. Louis, MO 63102
Telephone: 314.539.2200
Fax: 314.539.2309
Re: David G. Jeep v State of Missouri, Case # CR203-1336M
8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals for Missouri as Appeal #08-1823
A repeated request for protection of Civil Rights via prosecution of the US Criminal Code
Dear Ms. Hanaway,
I contacted you on or about Friday, October 20, 2006 in regard to the above referenced issue. This issue has not and will not go away, as long as I have air to breath. Jay Nixon the current Democratic candidate for Governor in the state of Missouri is a party to if not the main criminal conspiracy to cover up the denial of my civil rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws.
Civil rights violations by the police and other public officials are not limited to racial discrimination and the excessive or illegal use of force. As the Supreme Court has said several times the prosecutors and the police can be guilty of violating a citizen’s by Deliberate Indifference to said Civil Rights. The supreme court has said additionally that this can be done by fraud, by withholding exculpable material and by being incompetent as a result of a failure to train, supervise and discipline.
In that it is your obligation to defend “We the People(s)” civil rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws per the United States Criminal Code Title 18 Part I, Chapter 19 § 371. Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States, Title 18 Part I, Chapter 47 § 1001. Fraud Statements or entries generally, Title 18, Part I, Chapter 13, § 241-248 Civil Rights and specifically in this case by Title 18 Chapter 79 § 1621 Perjury generally, § 1622 Subornation of perjury, and § 1623 False declarations before grand jury or court. And it is your responsibility to see that this issue is before the courts and available to my fellow citizens for their consideration as regards their vote for Jay Nixon as Governor.
As you know I have been consistently and unrelentingly for the past four years been attempting to get Jay Nixon to recognize the criminal denial of my civil rights. I feel it my duty as a citizen to make you and my fellow citizens aware of this man’s criminal past prior to his election. Mr. Nixon and others are claiming immunity. We do not live in a police state! We live in a free country where “We the People” have unalienable rights. Everyone even the police are equally subject to the law. Immunity is granted to public officials only when and if they are making a good faith effort to do their jobs fairly and professionally. Public Officials do not have the right to act with impunity without regard to the standards of their own profession and the standards for honesty as required by their oath of office and the oath all witnesses take as they testify in court.
I would ask you to investigate based on my fully briefed civil suit currently under consideration by the 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals for Missouri as Appeal# 08-1823 and then prosecute him and the other appellee per United States Criminal Code Title 18 Part I, Chapter 19 § 371. Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States, Title 18 Part I, Chapter 47 § 1001. Fraud Statements or entries generally, Title 18, Part I, Chapter 13, § 241-248 Civil Rights and specifically in this case by Title 18 Chapter 79 § 1621 Perjury generally, § 1622 Subornation of perjury, and § 1623 False declarations before grand jury or court for their criminal activity in this regard.
The evidence as referenced in October of 2006 as proven and described in my civil action as Appeal #08-1823 is irrefutable; they are guilty. You can investigate now and partially redeem your earlier incompetence or you can await the forthcoming public humiliation for your prior bad acts as the evidence makes it way through the courts and the truth be told. The Officers were incompetent to make the original arrest; it was a false arrest. The prosecutors maliciously prosecuted what they new to be an incompetent and false arrest. At the trial the prosecutors allowed the arresting officers to perjure themselves and thus suborned perjury. The Judges involved Judge Bennett, committed false imprisonment and openly denied me due process of law. Judge Colyer sanctioned it all with informed consent of the prior bad acts and his court order denying me a miss trial. Jay Nixon as the chief law enforcement officer, the Attorney General of the Sate of Missouri, refused to prosecute the Officers, the Prosecutors and the Judges for their criminal acts and their conspiracy of deliberate indifference to my Civil Rights. Jay Nixon’s refusal to prosecute after 4 years and 10-20 letters and who knows how many phone calls was and is malfeasance in office and the denial of his public obligation and duty as the chief prosecutor of the state of Missouri.
If I can be of assistance providing any of the above referenced briefs or supporting documents, please let me know via e-mail as referenced below.
Thank you in advance.
David G. Jeep
David **G. Jeep
cc: Press Release
file
Friday, October 20, 2006
CATHERINE L. HANAWAY, United States Attorney
Friday, October 20, 2006
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
CATHERINE L. HANAWAY
United States Attorney
Thomas Eagleton U.S. Courthouse
111 S. 10th Street, 20th Floor
St. Louis, MO 63102
Telephone: 314.539.2200
Fax: 314.539.2309
Re: David G. Jeep v State of Missouri, Case # CR203-1336M
Jeep v Jeep Case No.: 03FC-10670M, ED84021, 03FC-12243, & ED85754
Dear People,
I am seeking my constitutional rights to due process and a fair trial in the two above referenced issues. In the first Jeep v State of Missouri, the State of Missouri testified to false evidence, fabricated false evidence and offered them as proof of their incompetently asserted and unsupportable claim. They put forward false testimony and a corrupted piece of mechanical evidence to make their case and thus convict me.
The second issue Jeep v Jeep is a divorce action where The Judge denied my paternity, my property, my privacy and my liberty without affording me access to due process.
Both of these issues are crimes against my rights as a citizen of the United States and I would like you to prosecute them as such. Time is of the essence, if there is anything further, I can do for you in this regard and please let me know.
Thank you in advance.
David G. Jeep
David G. Jeep
cc: file
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
CATHERINE L. HANAWAY
United States Attorney
Thomas Eagleton U.S. Courthouse
111 S. 10th Street, 20th Floor
St. Louis, MO 63102
Telephone: 314.539.2200
Fax: 314.539.2309
Re: David G. Jeep v State of Missouri, Case # CR203-1336M
Jeep v Jeep Case No.: 03FC-10670M, ED84021, 03FC-12243, & ED85754
Dear People,
I am seeking my constitutional rights to due process and a fair trial in the two above referenced issues. In the first Jeep v State of Missouri, the State of Missouri testified to false evidence, fabricated false evidence and offered them as proof of their incompetently asserted and unsupportable claim. They put forward false testimony and a corrupted piece of mechanical evidence to make their case and thus convict me.
The second issue Jeep v Jeep is a divorce action where The Judge denied my paternity, my property, my privacy and my liberty without affording me access to due process.
Both of these issues are crimes against my rights as a citizen of the United States and I would like you to prosecute them as such. Time is of the essence, if there is anything further, I can do for you in this regard and please let me know.
Thank you in advance.
David G. Jeep
David G. Jeep
cc: file
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)