Friday, May 26, 2023

Premise - “you have to be rich or a shibboleth to have constitutional civil rights in the U.S.,”



Expected Delivery by TUESDAY 30 May, 2023 - by 9:00pm
USPS is now in possession of your item as of 2:21 pm on May 25, 2023 in SAINT LOUIS, MO 63155.

Thursday, May 25, 2023

Attorney General Merrick Garland

U.S. Department of Justice

Civil Rights Division

950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, D.C. 20530-0001

 

Re: Clinton Priest #169480[1] return of form letter dated May 5, 2023,

Premise - "you have to be rich or a shibboleth to have constitutional civil rights in the U.S.,"

DGJeep v. United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856) and DOJ report # 265705-BPB FOLLOW UP

 

Dear People,

 

You sent me the above referenced "form letter" addressed to Clinton Priest #169480.  I knew you were never perfect.  Never deserving of the "absolute civil and criminal immunity[2] you unwarrantedly claim.  Your clerical error in sending me Clinton Priest's (#169480) form letter is minor but additional and undeniable proof of your fallibility. 

Now we all know that Donald Trump has full possession of his constitutional rights.  He has been exploiting them for 70+ years to rape,[3] steal,[4] defraud the United States[5] and unknown others.[6]  Be assured that making an example of Trump at this late stage will do nothing more than make a humorous show.  IT WILL DO NOTHING to correct the problem you and the would be unrepresentative "Black Robed Royalists" oligarchy have created.

The problem you and your ilk have created and sustained arises out of the hubris of your uncivilized, unconstitutional, and criminal assertion of absolute immunity - from the fourth, fifth, sixth, SEVENTH, eighth, and the fourteenth amendments.  Along with the statute laws (Civil 42 U.S. Code § 1983 & 1985, Criminal 18, U.S. Code § 241 & 242) the congress was authorized to enforce them with.[7]

Now our forefather had no worry with judicial absolute immunity.  Because their forefathers in British parliament had the  Act of Parliament "Abolition of the Star Chamber" July 5, 1641.  The abolition of the absolutely immune "Star Chamber" had been impinging upon the much prior Magna Carta's (June 15, 1215) subsection § 61 right to a trial by jury of their peers.  Our forefathers foolishly thought they could rely on prior precedent of the Magna Carta's subsection § 61 jury trial, 574 years prior, and the "Abolition of the Star Chamber" 148 years prior.  It would almost be funny if it were not so tragically sad but the two post-civil war precedents[8] that created "Jim Crow" and now "Jane Crow" absolute immunity attached were both based on the legal fallacy of Floyd and Barker. [(1607) Easter Term, 5 James I] from the Court of Star Chamber that had been abolished in 1641 for MISUSE of AUTHORITY.

I am 66 years old.  "The FACTS of MY case are without question.[9]"  I am a white man.  I actually went to an "old boys' school." I was at one time successful.  I have been at his struggle for 20+ years.  I have been impoverished.  I am retired living below the poverty level.  I was put in jail for 411 days for talking to the FBI and USMS[10] about the issue of YOUR ilk's CORRUPTION.  I have experience!  I know for a FACT;

Constitutional Civil Rights are untenable unless you have massive wealth or a shibboleth to acquire them!!!

If there is anything further, please let me know.

Thank you in advance.

 

David G. Jeep

 

enclosure

 

cc: Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr.

      Clinton Priest #169480

      www.DGJeep.com

      file



[1] I have no idea who, what or where Priest issue arises.

[2] "King can do no WRONG" for the of the ABSOLUTELY IMMUNE actions of the "malicious or corrupt" judges (Bradley v. Fisher, supra, 80 U. S. 335, 80 U. S. 349, note, at 80 U. S. 350, Pierson v. Ray, 386 U. S. 57 (1967) Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349 (1978)),  the "malicious or dishonest" prosecutor (Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U. S. 428 (1976)), the "knowingly false testimony by police officers" (Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 345 (1983)),  corrupt, malicious, dishonest, sincerely ignorant and conscientiously stupid  actions of federal, state, local, and regional legislators (Bogan v. Scott-Harris - 523 U.S. 44 (1997) Tenney v. Brandhove, 341 U. S. 367, 372, 372-376; Amy v. Supervisors, 11 Wall. 136, 138) , Connick, District Attorney, et al. v. Thompson No. 09–571 Decided March 29, 2011 and "fraud upon the court" with Ashcroft v. al-Kidd No. 10–98  Decided May 31, 2011  and the malicious, corrupt, dishonest, sincerely ignorant and conscientiously stupid  actions of "all persons (spouses) -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process" (Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 345 (1983)) acting under color of law to render ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION of INALIENABLE RIGHTS under color of law.

[3] Two of the allegations (by Ivana Trump and Jill Harth) became public before Trump's candidacy for president, but the rest arose after a 2005 audio recording was leaked during the 2016 presidential campaign.  Donald Trump sexual misconduct allegations from Wikipedia 05-25-23

[7] See the fugitive slave laws from before the Civil War and the last section of all three Civil War Amendment e.g., "The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation."






Thanks in advance...

"Agere sequitur esse" ('action follows being')

David G. Jeep, Federal Inmate #36072-044 (formerly)

www.DGJeep.com - Dave@DGJeep.com

Mobile (314) 514-5228 leave message

 

David G. Jeep

1531 Pine St Apt #403

St. Louis, MO 63103-2547