Supreme Court of the United States
One First Street N.E.
Washington, DC 20543-0001
Re: DGJeep v. United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856) and DOJ report # 265705-BPB FOLLOW UP
Dear People,
Corruptio optimi pessima, it is going to be ugly. That is not a threat; that is a certainty. Other than holding myself as an example of your undeniable corruption, writing letters and filing petitions, I will have nothing to do with it. I want civil justice, not violence. I have never owned a gun, never felt the need.
"To consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions [is] a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy (Thomas Jefferson 1821)." The hubris of "power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely." Nonetheless, corruption of those we rely on is always the worst.
"The germ of destruction of our nation is in the power of the judiciary, an irresponsible body (i.e., asserted absolutely immune) — working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little today and a little tomorrow, and advancing its noiseless step like a thief over the field of jurisdiction, until all shall render powerless the checks of one branch over the other and will become as venal and oppressive as the government from which we separated."
The germ of destruction of the current - prevailing - judiciary is in their corrupting hubris. Roe was a judicious decision. Dobbs was/is based on hubris alone. Roe humbly and accurately asserted that no one knows when intrauterine life begins. Roe did not force anyone into an abortion. Dobbs presumptuously attempts to force itself intrauterine to force someone to bear an unloved child.
If life was a finite commodity a case could be made for Dobbs. But we live in a still growing Malthusian world of 8,000,000,000. We can control population via pestilence and war, or we can control it via a civilized society's birth control and reasonable abortion. To deny the scientific advancement of abortion, you would have to also deny the scientific advancement of Borlaug's wheat that feeds Malthus's world. A valid judicial decision would seek to sustain both human life and liberty. Both life and liberty are required in equal ration for viability. "Give me liberty or give me death."
As a school-boy I learned how the purportedly heroic Warren Court (October 5, 1953 – June 23, 1969 -- (15 years, 261 days)) lead the way on a renewal of Civil Rights e.g., Brown v. Board of Education (racial), Reynolds v. Sims (voting/representation), Miranda v. Arizona (criminal), Griswold v. Connecticut (birth control) and Roe v. Wade (reproductive) to overcome THEIR 100+ yeas of JUDICIAL hubris and corruption.
We need to get away from the immoveable lifetime arbitrary judicial decree and return the fundamentals of liberty with the Magna Carta's (1215) iconic reference to 'the lawful judgment of peers' as a precondition for loss of life, liberty or property. Juries for decades, if not centuries, have been able to decide based on the fair presentation of public trial specific evidence. There is no need for the hubris of supposed learned men to tell us right from wrong.
"Our judges are as honest as other men, and not more so. They have, with others, the same passions for party, for power, and the privilege of their corps...." (Thomas Jefferson).
The germ of destruction of the current - prevailing – judiciary, again, is their throwback to corrupting judicial hubris. As we re-establish our civil rights, post Dobbs. We are going to look back at the inescapable corrupting hubris of the judiciary as a despotic oligarchy AND LEARN from our history.
For example, everybody knows the name Rosa Parks (December 1, 1955), fewer people know Ida B. Wells (May 4, 1884). Rosa Parks lost her case at origination and through her appeals. Ida B. Wells' won in her case 71 years prior (December 24, 1884), when the local circuit court granted her a $500 award. If that had held, the world would NOW be a much different place. Unfortunately, Ida B. Wells, on the appeal by the railroad, lost to the absolutely immune judge made figment of law asserting "We think it is evident that the purpose of the defendant in error was to harass with a view to this suit, and that her persistence was not in good faith to obtain a comfortable seat for the short ride."
The XIII Amendment was ratified and then proclaimed December 6, 1865. The Civil Rights Act of 1866, pursuant to Section 2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation made it a federal crime for anyone to deny the civil rights of any person (see 18 U.S. Code § 241 & 242). The Supreme Court's self-serving judge made figment of law Randall v. Brigham, 74 U.S. 7 Wall. 523 523 (1868) created judicial ABSOLUTE CRIMINAL immunity.
The XIV Amendment was ratified on July 9, 1868. The Civil Rights Act of 1871, pursuant to Section 5. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation created a federal "civil action for deprivation of rights" (see 42 U.S. Code § 1983 & 1985). The Supreme Court's self-serving judge made figment of law Bradley v. Fisher, 80 U.S. 13 Wall. 335 335 (1871) created judicial ABSOLUTE CIVIL immunity.
The judge made figment of judicial criminal and civil absolute immunity, "working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little today and a little tomorrow, and advancing its noiseless step like a thief over the field of jurisdiction, until all shall render powerless the checks of one branch over the other and will become as venal and oppressive as the" slavery form which we had hoped to overcome. The Supreme Court created and then sustained a sanctified slavery by a different name – Jim Crow – for 100 years. We are still struggling beneath the corruption 158 years after winning the civil war.
After 230+ years of CORRUPT Supreme Court figment, open your eyes, do the RESEARCH!!!!!!!!
As examples of the Judicial sophistry/figment, that has corrupted We the People's unalienable rights under color of law, I submit, Randall v. Brigham, 74 U.S. 7 (1868) the origin of judicial criminal sophisticated/figment "absolute immunity," Bradley v. Fisher, 13 Wall. 335 (1872) origin of sophisticated/figment Judicial civil "absolute immunity," Blyew v. United States, 80 U.S. 581 (1871) sophisticated/figment "absolute immunity" for racially motivate mass murder, United States v. Reese, 92 U.S. 214 (1875) sophisticated/figment deprivation of the 15th Amendment's Voting Rights protection with the subterfuges of poll taxes, literacy tests, and grandfather clauses, United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875) sophisticated/figment "absolute immunity" for racially motivated massacre (Colfax Riot/pogrom),
United States v. Harris, 106 U.S. 629 (1883) sophisticated/figment "absolute immunity" for the state's sanctioned kidnapping, assault and murder without regard to the 14th Amendment's security, Civil Rights Cases, 109 U.S. 3 (1883) creating sophisticated/figment racial segregation and the ongoing Jim Crow discrimination over the "necessary and proper" "Act to protect all citizens in their civil and legal rights." 18 Stat. 335, enacted March 1, 1875, Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896) separate and UNEQUAL, clarifying sophisticated/figment segregation over the necessary and proper "Act to protect all citizens in their civil and legal rights." 18 Stat. 335, enacted March 1, 1875; Lochner v. New York 1905, opposing the 40 hour work week, Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547 (1967) reaffirmed Judicial sophisticated/figment "absolute immunity,"Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U. S. 409 (1976) prosecutorial sophisticated/figment "absolute immunity," Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349 (1978) sophisticated/figment "absolute immunity" for forced sterilization, and Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983) sophisticated/figment "absolute immunity" for "knowingly false testimony by police officers," and "all persons that were integral in the Judicial Process." If that is not ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION of We the People's intent to establish justice, I cannot imagine what is. There were several post 911 precedents that extended absolute immunity by adding a "super-duper" to "super-duper absolute immunity." They slipped those in, fueled by the hate of the OTHER. The Black Robed Royalist "absolutely immune" Judiciary with a few haters along for the ride have now created the "Jane Crow" era in domestic law. In 1960 one in twenty kids grew up in a home without a father. In 2014 that had risen to fewer than one in three. In the United States TODAY, there are over SEVEN times as many kids today without fathers as there were in 1960.
My son was taken, I was thrown out of my house, my car and everything I ever cared for in life was taken on two court dates November 3 and then 19, 2004. There was no reasonable probable cause or due process of law. While trying peacefully to regain my rights, I was impoverished, I was thrown in jail for 411 days, all again without probable cause or due process of law.
I submit DGJeep v. United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856) and DOJ report # 265705-BPB for reconsideration without the self-serving judge made figment of law i.e., absolute criminal and civil immunity.
Corruptio optimi pessima, ultimately it is going to be ugly.
If there is anything further, please let me know.
Thank you in advance.
David G. Jeep
cc: Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice, Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Associate Justice, Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice, Elena Kagan, Associate Justice, Neil M. Gorsuch, Associate Justice, Brett M. Kavanaugh, Associate Justice, Amy Coney Barrett, Associate Justice, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Associate Justice, Sandra Day O'Connor (Retired), Associate Justice , Anthony M. Kennedy, (Retired) Associate Justice , David H. Souter (Retired), Associate Justice, Stephen G. Breyer, (Retired), Associate Justice, Lisa Nesbit c/o Scott S. Harris Supreme Court Clerk, Joe Scarborough, Mika Brzezinski and Willie Geist - Morning Joe - MSNBC Network, Attorney General Merrick Garland, DOJ Civil Rights Division
www.DGJeep.com, file
