Thursday, October 15, 2026

The Rise In Threats To Protectees?

 


Thursday, October 15, 2026 - 3:25:06 PM

 

Quick Take -----------------------------------------------------image.png


Pat, I am OK.  You are OK.

The Rise In Threats To Protectees?

60 Minutes (10/11/26)

The rise in threats to protectees,[1] I had a discussion about this issue with three FBI agents and two Federal Marshalls[2] 17 years ago on or about March 1, 2009.  They, with the help of others, put me in jail for 411 days without trial, conviction or ability to appeal[3]. 


The rise in threats to protectees is directly dependent on two things, the unconstitutional corruption of the 1st and the 2nd Amendments to the Constitution for the United States. 


15 years ago I presented my dilemma.  I had been rationally pursuing[4] my due process right to redress[5] to establish justice for 5 years then, 23 years now.  But I had run into an unconstitutional assertion of “absolute immunity.”  As we all know absolute immunity sustains absolute power which creates the inevitability of absolute corruption.  Lord Acton, the 19th-century English Catholic historian and politician wrote the famous phrase: “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.”  The only reasonable rational option I had left was violence or the threat of 2nd Amendment violence.[6]


When unconstitutional judge-made-law prohibits redress, the only option you have left is a M.A.G.A. assertion of the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed[7] i.e., the right of the people to use Arms to redress grievances and remove the government. 


You want to know why the rise In threats to protectees, the impatient and ignorant M.A.G.A. forces, whipped up by Trump and others, are utilizing what they believe is their constitutional rights of the people to use Arms to redress grievances and remove the government.


Thus, when judge-made-law unconstitutional and irrationally denies redress and the right to regulate arms, the door is open, and you force the victim to violence for their only rational redress.


It is common knowledge in the United States today you have no right of redress if you are an unfashionable indigent minority.[8] 


Of course, if you are rich like Trump you can CRIMINALLY cheat on your taxes from cradle to grave, rape and abuse your wife, rape random women, defraud your partners/subcontractors with bankruptcy, defraud bankers, cheat in elections, defraud your name-sake charity foundation, defraud your name-sake university students, kidnap people, murder people, commit war crimes, destroy historical sites, ignore due-process-of-law and proudly stand as the elected president of the United States.  “Impeachment is but a scare crow,” Thomas Jefferson 1820.”


Article III’s judge-made-law and its assertion of stare decisis is unconstitutional and irrational under Article I and II’s Constitutional statute law.  


Article III’s power is strictly Constitutionally limited by adversarial due process of law and the consent of a unique trial specific local jury.  


Any assertion, request or grant of immunity from the RULE of LAW[9], 23-939 Trump v. United States (07/01/2024), is antithetical and diametrically opposed (i.e., unconstitutional) to responsible democratic-republican[10] Constitutional government![11]


To assert otherwise would create “the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions; a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. Our judges are as honest as other men, and not more so. They have, with others, the same passions for party, for power, and the privilege of their corps.... Their power [is] the more dangerous as they are in office for life, and not responsible, as the other functionaries are, to the elective control. The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with the corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots." — Thomas Jefferson 28th September 1820, letter to Mr. JARVIS, from Monticello

 

DGJeep

www.DGJeep.com

2026 10-13-26 The rise in threats to protectees QUI CK TAKE



[1] 60 Minutes Transcript: Secret Service confronts rise in threats to protectees

By Norah O'Donnell, Pat Milton, Michael Rey, Julie Morse Goff

October 11, 2026 / 7:00 PM EDT / CBS News

[2] Mike Christian (FBI),  Lyonel Mrythill (FBI), Chris Boyce (USMS), Dan Bracco (FBI), Robert O’Connor (USMS)

[3] Charges are Dismissed without Prejudice for failure to comply with the Speedy Trial Act  (Case #4:09-cr-00659-CDP).

[4] See EIGHT Petitions through the Federal District and Circuit Courts for Writ Certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856)

[5] “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

[6] "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

[7] "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

[8] M.A.G.A., Jim Crow and Jane Crow Discrimination = Fathers are disfavored by domestic relations law in the United States of America!

[9] Thomas Paine “Common Sense 1776” said it first and BEST, in the United STATES, “the law is king. For as in absolute governments the King is law, so in free countries the law ought to be king; and there ought to be no other. But lest any ill use should afterwards arise, let the Crown at the conclusion of the ceremony be demolished, and scattered among the people whose right it is.”’

[10] Thomas Jefferson belonged to the Democratic-Republican Party, which he co-founded with James Madison in the early 1790s… democratically representative government was and should be the goal.

[11] I am a 70-year-old, graduate of an “old boy’s school” white guy, presumably privileged(?), that has been denied my Due Process Rights; my son, my home, my car, my life has been taken and DESTROYED.  I have been impoverished screaming about it for 20+ years.  I went to the FBI, “the primary federal agency responsible for investigating possible violations of federal civil rights statutes,” to assist me with the Constitutional Civil Rights issue; they arrested me and put in jail for 411 days without trial.



--

Thanks in advance...


“Agere sequitur esse” (‘action follows being’)

David G. Jeep, Federal Inmate #36072-044 (formerly)

www.DGJeep.com - From: Dave@DGJeep.com  - David.G.Jeep@Gmail.com

Mobile (314) 514-5228 leave message


Manifesto 


David G. Jeep

1531 Pine St Apt #512

St. Louis, MO 63103-2548


Wednesday, September 23, 2026

Reform

Trump the Murder

Trump, “the Deplorable”

 

Wednesday, September 23, 2026 - 6:49:30 AM


Pat, I am OK.  You are OK.

 

Mike Johnson

Hakeem Jeffries

Washington, DC 20515


Chuck Schumer,

John Thune

Washington, DC 20510

 

Re:  Reform of the Article III supreme[1] Court – post election

 

Dear People,

 

The “Reform of the Article III supreme[2] Court” has to literally[3] be by statute law,[4] not Constitutional.[5]  Note, reliance on just a larger supreme[6] Court majority, will not do.  The corruption is way too pervasive and way too insidious.

Today’s corrupt Article III stare decisis has debased our Constitutional rights, by handing out the judge-made-law of absolute immunity[7] - like Halloween candy[8] to anyone asking.  Anyone, but the victim of the deprivation of rights[9].

What is way too often overlooked the Founding Fathers had, at a minimum, 574 years[10] of prior experience with judge-made-law i.e., the proverbial common judge-made-law[11] since the Magna Carta 15 June 1215. 

Additionally, as conceived by the Founding Fathers, Article III is the most representative and democratic of the branches.  While Article I, Congress, and Article II, the President, are subject to regular elections and time limited enumerated individual terms.  Article III appointed for life, as conceived by the Founding Fathers, has absolutely no power without the consensus of an individual time and trial specific random local representative jury. 

Article I, as placed first and conceived by the Founding Fathers, with the power to override a veto, was asserted to functionally be Supreme.  Strictly[12] speaking the UPPER House of Representatives’ power of origination[13] gives it the authority and responsibly to control the LOWER Senate[14] or starve it to irrelevance or death.

If there is anything further, please let me know.

A blue line drawn on a white background

AI-generated content may be incorrect.“Time is of the essence”

Thank you in advance.

 

 

 

David G. Jeep

 

enclosure

My “Manifesto” @ www.DGJeep.com

 

cc: www.DGJeep.com

      file



[1] Article III of the Constitution for the United States posits "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish (bolding added)."  The Constitution for the United States posits one supreme Court among the many inferior Courts, NOT a Supreme Court outside the many Courts.  The grammar of the capitalization is important for and an accurate interpretation.  Additionally, the "judicial Power" in the Constitution for the United States is ABSOLUTELY constrained by the use of a trial-specific-local-jury as originally REQUIRED 1215 - Magna Carta's Clause 39 - "No free man is to be arrested, or imprisoned, or disseised, or outlawed, or exiled, or in any other way ruined, nor will we go against him or send against him, except by the lawful judgment of his peers or by the law of the land" and as incorporated in the in our Constitution for the United states Article II Section 2.3 criminal issues and the VII Amendment for civil Issues.  The concept of judge-made-law is abhorrent to the Article I and Article II inherent authority!

[2] Article III of the Constitution for the United States posits "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish (bolding added)."  The Constitution for the United States posits one supreme Court among the many inferior Courts, NOT a Supreme Court outside the many Courts.  The grammar of the capitalization is important for and an accurate interpretation.  Additionally, the "judicial Power" in the Constitution for the United States is ABSOLUTELY constrained by the use of a trial-specific-local-jury as originally REQUIRED 1215 - Magna Carta's Clause 39 - "No free man is to be arrested, or imprisoned, or disseised, or outlawed, or exiled, or in any other way ruined, nor will we go against him or send against him, except by the lawful judgment of his peers or by the law of the land" and as incorporated in the in our Constitution for the United states Article II Section 2.3 criminal issues and the VII Amendment for civil Issues.  The concept of judge-made-law is abhorrent to the Article I and Article II inherent authority!

[3] I stress literally for all of the “strict constructionist” and literalist!

[4] Article III, Section 2.2 “shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.”

[5] I been at this for 22 years.  I spent 411 days in Federal Custody without trial or even attempted conviction. (see. Charges are Dismissed without Prejudice for failure to comply with the Speedy Trial Act, Case #4:09-cr-00659-CDP).

[6] Article III of the Constitution for the United States posits "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish (bolding added)."  The Constitution for the United States posits one supreme Court among the many inferior Courts, NOT a Supreme Court outside the many Courts.  The grammar of the capitalization is important for and an accurate interpretation.  Additionally, the "judicial Power" in the Constitution for the United States is ABSOLUTELY constrained by the use of a trial-specific-local-jury as originally REQUIRED 1215 - Magna Carta's Clause 39 - "No free man is to be arrested, or imprisoned, or disseised, or outlawed, or exiled, or in any other way ruined, nor will we go against him or send against him, except by the lawful judgment of his peers or by the law of the land" and as incorporated in the in our Constitution for the United states Article II Section 2.3 criminal issues and the VII Amendment for civil Issues.  The concept of judge-made-law is abhorrent to the Article I and Article II inherent authority!

[7] The TOOOOO often overlooked last clause of the First Amendment makes any assertion of IMMUNITY unconstitutional.  https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2026/02/last-clause-1a.html

[8] Look at the judge-made-law in Scott, Randall, Bradely, Blyew, Cruikshank, Civil Rights Cases, Plessy, Lochner, Mapp, Pierson, Bivens, Imbler, Briscoe, Ashcroft, Loper, Trump, Slaughter

[9] Any assertion, request or grant of immunity from the RULE of LAW, 23-939 Trump v. United States (07/01/2024), is antithetical and diametrically opposed (i.e., unconstitutional) to responsible democratic-republican Constitutional government!

[10] To our current 223 year since the Unconstitutional usurpation from Marbury.  Marbury is emphatically self-contradictory, Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 177 (1803).  Marbury is pure, self contradictory BS!!!!  https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2026/06/humphreys-executor.html

[11] Day to day law was at the discretion of Judges/Magistrate.  The big bad king and/or Parliament only got involved on the BIGGEST issues.  Day to day justice was at the authority the “common” judge-made-law.

[12] I stress literally for all of the “strict constructionist” and literalist!

[13] Article I, Section 7, Clause 1:

All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills.

[14] Functionally that is how the House of Commons disposed of the House of Lords.


 

Wednesday, September 23, 2026 - 6:49:30 AM



Wednesday, August 19, 2026 - 7:32:25 PM

 

The last clause of the First Amendment makes any assertion of IMMUNITY unconstitutional.

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2026/02/last-clause-1a.html

The Constitution for the United States - Article I, II, and  Schoolhouse Rock’s[21] “I’m Just a Bill[22]” clearly define how to make law.  Show me where in the amended Constitution for the United States “judge-made-law” is called for or authorized[23]?

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/06/sc.html

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FVfm-ushzCCTS5BtH1R7MeOvnDvh_kqv/view

The Issue with Trump, HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH TRUMP!

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/03/the-issue-with-trump.html

American Exceptionalism – NOT SO MUCH

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2023/10/american-exceptionalism-not-so-much.html

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2013/04/equal-rights-in-free-market-economy.html

A Balanced Budget for America

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2012/07/balanced-budget-for-america.html

BE AWARE, but do not be afraid, Trump is, at best and at worst, pathetically incompetent and INEFFECTIVE manager / leader!

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/be-aware.html

Trump does not know the name of the country he was or is to be president of...

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/istgtdnk.html

The constitutional small "d" undemocratic corrupt “dark money” Senate and Electoral College

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html

Trump is a convicted and diagnosed psychotic criminal, chronic degenerate, maniacal liar and a "fucking moron!"

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/be-aware.html

The constitutional small "d" unrepresentative corrupt “dark money” Senate and Electoral College

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html

The Judicial sophistry of "absolute immunity" creates "absolute power" to the ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION of We the People's unalienable rights under color of law...  the AUDACITY of the INSANITY, ignorance and stupidity in support of a "fantastic or delusional" scenario. 

The Emperor Has No Clothes.

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/if-that-is-not-absolute-corruption-of.html

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UmmaZmRkIUZ3EdC_9iI0Bpojr6LZ_lU0/view?usp=sharing

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2022/09/the-facts-of-my-case-are-without.html

DGJeep v. Supreme Court of the United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856)

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?Search=David+Jeep&type=Supreme-Court=Dockets

Wednesday, August 19, 2026 - 7:32:25 PM

"Fake News Donny"

 

--

Thanks in advance...


“Agere sequitur esse” (‘action follows being’)

David G. Jeep, Federal Inmate #36072-044 (formerly)

www.DGJeep.com - From: Dave@DGJeep.com  - David.G.Jeep@Gmail.com

Mobile (314) 514-5228 leave message


Manifesto 


David G. Jeep

1531 Pine St Apt #512

St. Louis, MO 63103-2548


Tuesday, September 22, 2026

Favor


Trump the Murder

Trump, “the Deplorable”

 

Tuesday, September 22, 2026 - 7:34:38 AM

 


Pat, I am OK.  You are OK.

 

Do yourself and the Democratic Party a favor...

Trump and M.A.G.A. are lying!!!!

 

1.  Progressives / Democrats do not want to defund the police!  Progressives / Democrats want to empower the police with additional training, tools, and information. 

2.  Progressives / Democrats do not want to pay anyone to mutilate minors or adults.  Progressives / Democrats do not want to force anyone into gender confusion. 

3.  Progressives / Democrats do not support Orwellian socialism/communism.  Progressives / Democrats support the PROVEN democratic socialized healthcare of the greater western world

 

Fred Wellman

Wellman for Missouri

15455 Manchester Road,

P.O. Box 36,

Ballwin, MO 63011

 

Re:  Stop Ann Wangers LIES! 

       Do yourself and the Democratic Party a favor

 

Dear Fred,

 

Do yourself and the Democratic Party a favor assert the facts not in evidence. 

1.  Progressives / Democrats do not want to defund the police!  Progressives / Democrats want to empower the police with additional training, tools, and information. 

To date traditional policing has not succeeded in appreciably eliminating crime.  In the United States today we racially and prejudicially imprison our citizens at five times the rate of the greater western world[1] and our crimes rates are at par or higher than the greater western world.  

The fascist, racist judicial system in the United States TODAY imprisons its people at 5 times (541/100K[2]) the rate of the greater developed world[3] (111/100K[4]).  The fascist United States’s imprisonment issue started out strictly as a racial issue with Jim Crow.  Today 170 years after a Article III[5] Civil War to live up to our Declaration of Independence it is still about racial and sexual injustice. Today the fascist United States NOW imprisons its citizens at 541/100K[6] that is 220th out of 224 developed Countries.  Within that number the fascist United States imprisons Whites @ 181/100K, Blacks @ 901/100K,[7] and Females @ 39/100K[8] provably unjustly and discriminatingly!  Trump, M.A.G.A. and the "unconstitutional Supreme[9] oligarchy" would tell you that Blacks, especially Black males, are just more lawless, voting rights, economic inequality, and D.E.I. be damned.[10]

2.  Progressives / Democrats do not want to pay anyone to mutilate minors or adults.  Progressives / Democrats do not want to force anyone into gender confusion. 

Progressives / Democrats naturally and overwhelmingly support heterosexual procreation.  Heterosexual procreation is the biological union of a male and a female that results in the conception of offspring.

Yet Progressives / Democrats accept the medically established existents of bisexuality and homosexuality.  Progressives / Democrats further acknowledge that gender determination is about nature and free choice not nurture. 

3.  Progressives / Democrats do not support Orwellian socialism/communism.  Progressives / Democrats support the PROVEN democratic socialized healthcare of the greater western world[11]

The democratic socialized healthcare of the greater western world[12] has proven itself with one third the cost of Ronald Reagan’s[13] universal for-profit emergency room immigrant friendly Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) healthcare.

The democratic socialized healthcare of the greater western world[14] provides at least 3 more years of life excpectancy.

The democratic socialized healthcare of the greater western world[15] provide a much lower rate of infant mortality.

If there is anything further, please let me know.

A blue line drawn on a white background

AI-generated content may be incorrect.“Time is of the essence”

Thank you in advance.

 

 

 

David G. Jeep

 

enclosure

My “Manifesto”

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ClKXVhK7dvXpUScomcHuspjZSDsGBr28/view

 

cc: Hakeem Jeffries, Democratic Minority Leader of the U.S. House of Representatives - New York's 8th congressional district.

Chuck Schumer, Democratic Minority Leader of the United States Senate, New York

      www.DGJeep.com

      file

 

 

 

RIGHT Potential POSTS REV working

 

Trump the Murder

4.  Tuesday, September 22, 2026 - 7:34:38 AM

 

5.  The last clause of the First Amendment makes any assertion of IMMUNITY unconstitutional.

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2026/02/last-clause-1a.html

6.  The Constitution for the United States - Article I, II, and  Schoolhouse Rock’s[16] “I’m Just a Bill[17]” clearly define how to make law.  Show me where in the amended Constitution for the United States “judge-made-law” is called for or authorized[18]?

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/06/sc.html

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FVfm-ushzCCTS5BtH1R7MeOvnDvh_kqv/view

7.  The Issue with Trump, HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH TRUMP!

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/03/the-issue-with-trump.html

8.  American Exceptionalism – NOT SO MUCH

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2023/10/american-exceptionalism-not-so-much.html

9.  Equal Rights in a Free Market Economy

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2013/04/equal-rights-in-free-market-economy.html

10.    A Balanced Budget for America

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2012/07/balanced-budget-for-america.html

11.    BE AWARE, but do not be afraid, Trump is, at best and at worst, pathetically incompetent and INEFFECTIVE manager / leader!

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/be-aware.html

12.    Trump does not know the name of the country he was or is to be president of...

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/istgtdnk.html

13.    The constitutional small "d" undemocratic corrupt “dark money” Senate and Electoral College

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html

14.    Trump is a convicted and diagnosed psychotic criminal, chronic degenerate, maniacal liar and a "fucking moron!"

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/be-aware.html

The constitutional small "d" unrepresentative corrupt “dark money” Senate and Electoral College

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html

15.    The Judicial sophistry of "absolute immunity" creates "absolute power" to the ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION of We the People's unalienable rights under color of law...  the AUDACITY of the INSANITY, ignorance and stupidity in support of a "fantastic or delusional" scenario. 

16. The Emperor Has No Clothes.

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/if-that-is-not-absolute-corruption-of.html

17. PWC 18-5856 as 55 Page August 22, 2018

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UmmaZmRkIUZ3EdC_9iI0Bpojr6LZ_lU0/view?usp=sharing

18.    Petition Supreme Court website https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/18/18-5856/62608/20180904161503131_00000007.pdf

19. The FACTS of MY case are without question

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2022/09/the-facts-of-my-case-are-without.html

20.    DGJeep v. Supreme Court of the United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856)

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?Search=David+Jeep&type=Supreme-Court=Dockets

21.    Tuesday, September 22, 2026 - 7:34:38 AM

"Fake News Donny"

 

 

 



[1] United Kingdom, European Union, Australia, Canada, Japan and large parts of Oceania - 37 of the 38 OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) developed countries have government sponsored universal socialized healthcare.  The United States is the only OECD country still with for-profit-healthcare!

[3] United Kingdom, European Union, Australia, Canada, Japan and large parts of Oceania

[4] Eurostat Data extracted in April 2025, Planned article update: 7 May 2026 

https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/SEPDF/cache/81252.pdf

[5] The want-to-be Supreme despotic oligarch started their Article III[5] Civil War with the obiter dictum of Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1856).

The Free States in the Union had assumed the common law of Lord Henley’s , obiter dictum; the Lord Chancellor of England, in Shanley v Harvey (1763) 2 Eden 126.  In his judgment he held that as soon as a person set foot on English soil, he or she became free and that a "negro" might maintain an action against his or her master for ill usage, together with an application for habeas corpus if detained. However, such comments were not necessary for the decision in the case, and in law were only obiter dictum.

[7] Prisoners in 2021 – Statistical Tables U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics Table 5 Imprisonment rates of U.S. residents of all ages, based on sentenced prisoners under the jurisdiction of state or federal correctional authorities, by jurisdiction, sex, and race or Hispanic origin, 2011–2021  https://bjs.ojp.gov/media/68246/download

[8] TABLE 2 Prisoners under the jurisdiction of state or federal correctional authorities, by sex and jurisdiction, 2022 and 2023 https://bjs.ojp.gov/document/p23st.pdf

[9] Article III of the Constitution for the United States posits "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish (bolding/underling added)."  The Constitution for the United States posits one supreme Court among the many inferior Courts, NOT a Supreme Court outside the many Courts.  The grammar of the capitalization is important for an accurate interpretation.  As is the "judicial Power" in the Constitution for the United States is ABSOLUTELY constrained by the use of a trial-specific-local-jury as originally REQUIRED 1215 - Magna Carta's Clause 39 - "No free man is to be arrested, or imprisoned, or disseised, or outlawed, or exiled, or in any other way ruined, nor will we go against him or send against him, except by the lawful judgment of his peers or by the law of the land" and as incorporated in the in our Constitution for the United states Article II Section 2.3 criminal issues and the VII Amendment for civil Issues.

[10] Only would be Gods believe they know it all.  The rest of us have to rely on Diversity Equity and Inclusion to stay fully aware, informed and have any hope of winning long term. https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2026/03/owbgods.html

[11] United Kingdom, European Union, Australia, Canada, Japan and large parts of Oceania  

[12] United Kingdom, European Union, Australia, Canada, Japan and large parts of Oceania  

[13] President Ronald Reagan signed the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) in 1986, which legally requires emergency rooms to screen and stabilize patients regardless of their ability to pay.

[14] United Kingdom, European Union, Australia, Canada, Japan and large parts of Oceania  

[15] United Kingdom, European Union, Australia, Canada, Japan and large parts of Oceania  




--

Thanks in advance...


“Agere sequitur esse” (‘action follows being’)

David G. Jeep, Federal Inmate #36072-044 (formerly)

www.DGJeep.com - From: Dave@DGJeep.com  - David.G.Jeep@Gmail.com

Mobile (314) 514-5228 leave message


Manifesto 


David G. Jeep

1531 Pine St Apt #512

St. Louis, MO 63103-2548