Wednesday, September 23, 2026 - 6:49:30 AM
Pat, I am OK. You are OK.
Mike Johnson
Hakeem Jeffries
Washington, DC 20515
Chuck Schumer,
John Thune
Washington, DC 20510
Re: Reform of the Article III supreme[1] Court – post election
Dear People,
The “Reform of the Article III supreme[2] Court” has to literally[3] be by statute law,[4] not Constitutional.[5] Note, reliance on just a larger supreme[6] Court majority, will not do. The corruption is way too pervasive and way too insidious.
Today’s corrupt Article III stare decisis has debased our Constitutional rights, by handing out the judge-made-law of absolute immunity[7] - like Halloween candy[8] to anyone asking. Anyone, but the victim of the deprivation of rights[9].
What is way too often overlooked the Founding Fathers had, at a minimum, 574 years[10] of prior experience with judge-made-law i.e., the proverbial common judge-made-law[11] since the Magna Carta 15 June 1215.
Additionally, as conceived by the Founding Fathers, Article III is the most representative and democratic of the branches. While Article I, Congress, and Article II, the President, are subject to regular elections and time limited enumerated individual terms. Article III appointed for life, as conceived by the Founding Fathers, has absolutely no power without the consensus of an individual time and trial specific random local representative jury.
Article I, as placed first and conceived by the Founding Fathers, with the power to override a veto, was asserted to functionally be Supreme. Strictly[12] speaking the UPPER House of Representatives’ power of origination[13] gives it the authority and responsibly to control the LOWER Senate[14] or starve it to irrelevance or death.
If there is anything further, please let me know.
“Time is of the essence”
Thank you in advance.
David G. Jeep
enclosure
My “Manifesto” @ www.DGJeep.com
cc: www.DGJeep.com
file
[1] Article III of the Constitution for the United States posits "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish (bolding added)." The Constitution for the United States posits one supreme Court among the many inferior Courts, NOT a Supreme Court outside the many Courts. The grammar of the capitalization is important for and an accurate interpretation. Additionally, the "judicial Power" in the Constitution for the United States is ABSOLUTELY constrained by the use of a trial-specific-local-jury as originally REQUIRED 1215 - Magna Carta's Clause 39 - "No free man is to be arrested, or imprisoned, or disseised, or outlawed, or exiled, or in any other way ruined, nor will we go against him or send against him, except by the lawful judgment of his peers or by the law of the land" and as incorporated in the in our Constitution for the United states Article II Section 2.3 criminal issues and the VII Amendment for civil Issues. The concept of judge-made-law is abhorrent to the Article I and Article II inherent authority!
[2] Article III of the Constitution for the United States posits "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish (bolding added)." The Constitution for the United States posits one supreme Court among the many inferior Courts, NOT a Supreme Court outside the many Courts. The grammar of the capitalization is important for and an accurate interpretation. Additionally, the "judicial Power" in the Constitution for the United States is ABSOLUTELY constrained by the use of a trial-specific-local-jury as originally REQUIRED 1215 - Magna Carta's Clause 39 - "No free man is to be arrested, or imprisoned, or disseised, or outlawed, or exiled, or in any other way ruined, nor will we go against him or send against him, except by the lawful judgment of his peers or by the law of the land" and as incorporated in the in our Constitution for the United states Article II Section 2.3 criminal issues and the VII Amendment for civil Issues. The concept of judge-made-law is abhorrent to the Article I and Article II inherent authority!
[3] I stress literally for all of the “strict constructionist” and literalist!
[4] Article III, Section 2.2 “shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.”
[5] I been at this for 22 years. I spent 411 days in Federal Custody without trial or even attempted conviction. (see. Charges are Dismissed without Prejudice for failure to comply with the Speedy Trial Act, Case #4:09-cr-00659-CDP).
[6] Article III of the Constitution for the United States posits "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish (bolding added)." The Constitution for the United States posits one supreme Court among the many inferior Courts, NOT a Supreme Court outside the many Courts. The grammar of the capitalization is important for and an accurate interpretation. Additionally, the "judicial Power" in the Constitution for the United States is ABSOLUTELY constrained by the use of a trial-specific-local-jury as originally REQUIRED 1215 - Magna Carta's Clause 39 - "No free man is to be arrested, or imprisoned, or disseised, or outlawed, or exiled, or in any other way ruined, nor will we go against him or send against him, except by the lawful judgment of his peers or by the law of the land" and as incorporated in the in our Constitution for the United states Article II Section 2.3 criminal issues and the VII Amendment for civil Issues. The concept of judge-made-law is abhorrent to the Article I and Article II inherent authority!
[7] The TOOOOO often overlooked last clause of the First Amendment makes any assertion of IMMUNITY unconstitutional. https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2026/02/last-clause-1a.html
[8] Look at the judge-made-law in Scott, Randall, Bradely, Blyew, Cruikshank, Civil Rights Cases, Plessy, Lochner, Mapp, Pierson, Bivens, Imbler, Briscoe, Ashcroft, Loper, Trump, Slaughter
[9] Any assertion, request or grant of immunity from the RULE of LAW, 23-939 Trump v. United States (07/01/2024), is antithetical and diametrically opposed (i.e., unconstitutional) to responsible democratic-republican Constitutional government!
[10] To our current 223 year since the Unconstitutional usurpation from Marbury. Marbury is emphatically self-contradictory, Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 177 (1803). Marbury is pure, self contradictory BS!!!! https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2026/06/humphreys-executor.html
[11] Day to day law was at the discretion of Judges/Magistrate. The big bad king and/or Parliament only got involved on the BIGGEST issues. Day to day justice was at the authority the “common” judge-made-law.
[12] I stress literally for all of the “strict constructionist” and literalist!
[13] Article I, Section 7, Clause 1:
All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills.
[14] Functionally that is how the House of Commons disposed of the House of Lords.
Wednesday, September 23, 2026 - 6:49:30 AM
Wednesday, August 19, 2026 - 7:32:25 PM
The last clause of the First Amendment makes any assertion of IMMUNITY unconstitutional.
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2026/02/last-clause-1a.html
The Constitution for the United States - Article I, II, and Schoolhouse Rock’s[21] “I’m Just a Bill[22]” clearly define how to make law. Show me where in the amended Constitution for the United States “judge-made-law” is called for or authorized[23]?
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/06/sc.html
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FVfm-ushzCCTS5BtH1R7MeOvnDvh_kqv/view
The Issue with Trump, HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH TRUMP!
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/03/the-issue-with-trump.html
American Exceptionalism – NOT SO MUCH
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2023/10/american-exceptionalism-not-so-much.html
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2013/04/equal-rights-in-free-market-economy.html
A Balanced Budget for America
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2012/07/balanced-budget-for-america.html
BE AWARE, but do not be afraid, Trump is, at best and at worst, pathetically incompetent and INEFFECTIVE manager / leader!
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/be-aware.html
Trump does not know the name of the country he was or is to be president of...
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/istgtdnk.html
The constitutional small "d" undemocratic corrupt “dark money” Senate and Electoral College
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html
Trump is a convicted and diagnosed psychotic criminal, chronic degenerate, maniacal liar and a "fucking moron!"
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/be-aware.html
The constitutional small "d" unrepresentative corrupt “dark money” Senate and Electoral College
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html
The Judicial sophistry of "absolute immunity" creates "absolute power" to the ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION of We the People's unalienable rights under color of law... the AUDACITY of the INSANITY, ignorance and stupidity in support of a "fantastic or delusional" scenario.
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/if-that-is-not-absolute-corruption-of.html
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UmmaZmRkIUZ3EdC_9iI0Bpojr6LZ_lU0/view?usp=sharing
Petition Supreme Court website https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/18/18-5856/62608/20180904161503131_00000007.pdf
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2022/09/the-facts-of-my-case-are-without.html
DGJeep v. Supreme Court of the United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856)
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?Search=David+Jeep&type=Supreme-Court=Dockets
Wednesday, August 19, 2026 - 7:32:25 PM
Thanks in advance...
“Agere sequitur esse” (‘action follows being’)
David G. Jeep, Federal Inmate #36072-044 (formerly)
www.DGJeep.com - From: Dave@DGJeep.com - David.G.Jeep@Gmail.com
Mobile (314) 514-5228 leave message
David G. Jeep
1531 Pine St Apt #512
St. Louis, MO 63103-2548
