Friday, March 7, 2025
Circuit Court of The County of St. Louis,
Probate Division State of Missouri
105 South Central Avenue,
Clayton, MO 63105
Re: A concerned VOTING citizen
Cause No.: 24SL-PRO2152
Dear People,
You are pathetic! You got the above referenced cause off your docket as expeditiously as possible; statue and probated justice be damned! And I am sure it appeased the undo pressure the "white shoe" attorneys on the case had been applying.
I am responding here as a retired concerned VOTING citizen. I have no vested interest in the issue other than as a retired concerned VOTING citizen, familial relation creating a record.
Then I think of my 71-year-old brother, Jim, living and dying alone in the wild without the $100,000 he was due from my Father's and Mother's un-probated estate. My sisters are ALL CORRUPTED by their un-probated GREED with our Father's and Mother's estate! My only excuse is I trusted my familial relation. I did not care about the money and I still do not care about the money now. Although the thought of being fucked over by anyone does bother me.
It is all too damned cold hearted for me!
I have no idea how much of Cathy's estate came from the un-probated estate of my mother and father. I know for a fact that the ($500,000 @ death, now 20 years later $1,000,000) house my father and mother had struggled to purchase with a 30-year mortgage for their seven kids has never had a prime mortgage for the purchase price amount since their passing on the title. Somebody got it for free!
One of those sisters the now deceased Cathy, thought she had covered her ass, with a trust enumerating the 14 niblings as soul heirs. Why did she think to do that. She had handled my mother's and father's similarly sized estate without probate and overlooking my Father's will attached to the title? I kind of think she knew what she had done with our mother's and father's estate was WRONG.
Maybe she knew better than I, that she could rely on getting an incompetent or corrupt judge on her case. I do not know.
You and your untimely ilk[1] are engaging in CRIMINAL tax fraud!
You untimely[2] but justifiably took jurisdiction of the case as requested under:
Missouri Revised Statute 473.087. Will not effective until probated. — No will is effectual for the purpose of proving title to, or the right to the possession of, any real or personal property, disposed of by the will, until it has been admitted to probate.
Eight of the fourteen (8/14) heirs to the trust requested, in a timely manner[3], a professional appraisal of the property at 735 E Swon Ave. (Locator # 23K340451)[4] before distribution of the assets. Before the corrupt order in question, LEGALLY per a fair reading of the above statute no one has or had the right to the possession of, any real or personal property, disposed of by the will, until it has been admitted to probate. Nonetheless the untrustworthy NON-beneficiary trustee, Aunt Judy, had illegally FORCED a sale and allowed the NON-beneficiary Aunt Jenny to illegally occupy the property.
With your untimely "COURT ORDER AND JUDGMENT" dated 2/18/25 you denied, the majority of the heirs to the trust, their RIGHT and the State's right to a fair market appraisal of the property and created a self-serving ONGOING TAX FRAUD for the NON-heirs to the estate. The TWO tax frauds you sanctioned with your criminal oversight:
1. BELOW market price for the property at 735 E Swon Ave. (Locator # 23K340451). This will, for PROPERTY TAX purposes, create a FRAUD. Property values are NOT established by convoluted assertion as the non-beneficiary Trustee asserted. There must be a fair-market-value-BASIS!!! I would think the court would want a professional appraisal just to cover its ass.
2. Refused to enumerate the NON-heir Trustee's "fee for service" as income with a 1099 and not as an inheritance.
That all being said, it is impeachable and disputed.
Now I am going to talk you - REAL LIFE. Not some by the book want-be-legal law school graduate. This is still a free country and I am going to use my FREE SPEECH. You can read it or ignore it - but it is all going on my blog for future globally searchable reference by anyone.
You and your ilk are ALL going down![5]
Thomas Jefferson enumerated your inescapable despotism first and BEST in 1820:
"You seem to consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions; a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. Our judges are as honest as other men, and not more so.[6] They have, with others, the same passions for party, for power, and the privilege of their corps.... Their power [is] the more dangerous as they are in office for life, and not responsible, as the other functionaries are, to the elective control. The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with the corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots."(bolding and underlining added) [7]
The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal! Article III power both at the federal and at the state level is RESTRICTED by the need for a criminal or civil jury verdict before it has any outside courtroom authority, and then only in the instant case.
Judge-made-law is a FICTION.
150 years of racial discrimination - PRECEDED by the Civil War instigation by judge-mad-law[8], 600,000 dead Citizens, the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments and the enforcement laws congress was authorized by said amendments to enact[9] is the proof of the ongoing DESPOTISM. Before we even get to the specifics of any case today, in Missouri, we have to clear Scott[10], Bradely[11], Blyew[12], Cruikshank[13], Plessy[14], Lochner[15], Mapp[16], Pierson[17], Bivens[18], Imbler[19], Briscoe[20], Dobbs[21] Loper[22], Trump[23]
Thomas Jefferson was posted by the Articles of Confederation in France/Europe and was unable to attend the constitutional convention in September of 1787. Jefferson followed it as closely as possible, 3,000 miles +/- away in the 18th century:
You made two additional non tax related incriminating assertions in your "COURT ORDER AND JUDGMENT" dated 2/18/25.
First you tried to intimidate ME, a contractor with 40+ year of experience; by noting that a do-it-yourself basement remodel I related on the stand as "unpermitted" was dubious. You again made note of it in your decision dated 2/18/25. I bet you thought you were going to intimidate me!
I laugh at your EFFORT at attempted intimidation!!!!
REAL WORLD - I would submit fully 90-100% of Lowe's, Home Depot's and etc. business could fall under the same "unpermitted" do it yourself heading. I ran a Home Center for 10 years. Do It Yourselfers NEVER GET PERMITS! My father a consummate for FUN handy-man, did HIS basement and my sister's basement remodel, 40 year ago after his retirement in 1983 +/- for FREE. He never even considered getting a permit for either, but of course you know better. Even if he had gotten a permit, his for free labor would have distorted the "for assessment value" of any permit.
You want to question unpermitted do-it-yourself home improvements. Lowes, Home Depot and every do-it-yourselfer in the country are coming AT YOU from a million different sides.
Now I have filled out many residential and commercial-construction-permits. And I know for a FACT where and how the value I put on the permit is used as a cost basis for my permit and for the initial and future Property Tax assessment. It is fungible to say the least. There is NO way to enforce any scarry threat that you might think you have on my son's interest or on my then retired, now deceased Father's memory! I have NO INTEREST in anything other than making a record of your IMPEACHABLE actions.
Even though you are big-bad probate court judge, you clearly do not know how building permits, assessed values, market values and ACTUAL property tax valuations RELATE! I would think, a big-bad probate judge like you would know something about the tax assessment process. The ESSENCE of tax assessment is based on fair market values from the at market sale of property or second best, a professional fair market appraisal, nine of the fourteen heirs requested.
Secondly you scoffed at my assertion of a "Generally Accepted Accounting Procedures (GAAP)." The deceased died in April of 2023. At her death she had money in her pocket and money in her accounts. Now the cash on hand, the money in her mattress, we will never know.
Now I am just a college-flunk-out, but I wanted some detail in the accounting of the $1,500,000 estate. The one page 15 line +/- accounting just did not give me enough.
Recently on an unrelated issue I had to provide proof of my income for the last two years. It was nowhere near $1,500,000 estate. I literally said "WTF."
But I had to get passed the minimum waged uneducated bureaucrat. This person was neither a licensed legal professional nor authorized to judge. But she knew what and how to comply with the minimum General Accepted Counting Principles (GAAP). She may not have even read about or watched any of the Trump Fraud trial that used the "legal term" repeatedly.
She told me in detail where and how to comply legally. She told me to go to any of my account providers and ask for 24 months of the monthly statements. Additionally, she told me, I should be able to do it all online by myself with internet access. With minimal effort and no expense.
I went to my account and did it all online, I created 24 PDF files, never had to kill a tree or print anything. The bureaucrat now has an accounting of EVERYTHING I spent for the last two years, down to an occasional morning coffee, the NYTimes digital subscription, rent, electricity, phone, groceries, beer on the random Friday night and etc. The actual total turn around by email took 45 minutes TOPS! The Trustee in the above referenced case, with her non-beneficiary $30,000 fee for service. could have easily done the same.
The FEE FOR SERVICE non-beneficiary, legally represented, trustee -- I guess -- did not have the benefit or the expertise of an uneducated minimum wage clerical to help her. The non-beneficiary trustee did have YOU and some sort of paid professional(?) attorney to help her I thought?
I think the legal term or acronym e.g., General Accepted Counting (GAAP) is self-explanatory to anyone that wants to help. You have proven YOUR probate judicial incapacity, being too stupid to be believed!!!
If there is anything further, please let me know.
"Time is of the essence"
Thank you in advance.
David G. Jeep
cc: heirs to Aunt Cathy's estate
file
[1] Trump's blatant criminality is going to bring you all down.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1lduzjR9TEz-3g4g9mgJ4GLABbAeGsorQ/view
[2] My Son's petition dated 6/24/24
[3] See Email from Rachel Jeep dated Oct 19, 2023 at 7:17 PM, "PETITION FOR PROBATE OF THE CATHERINE ANN JEEP ESTATE" dated 6/22/24", The Agreed Facts" dated Wednesday, November 13, 2024 and Case called, heard and submitted 11/14/24
[4] Note: at the time of the hearing in November of 2024 the frauds had already been in possession / occupying said property without probate for 12-14 month.
[5] You are ALL going down https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/02/yaagd.html
[6] See the unconstitutional JUDGE-MADE-LAW Bradley v. Fisher, 80 U.S. 335 (1871)
[7] Thomas Jefferson 28th September 1820, in writing to Mr. JARVIS, from Monticello - bolding/underlining and internal foot notes added
[8] Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857)
[9] ENFORCEMENT Acts now codified into statute law Criminal 18 U.S.C. § 241 &; 242 and Civil 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 1985.
[10] Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857)
[11] Bradley v. Fisher, 80 U.S. 335 (1871)
[12] Blyew v. United States, 80 U.S. 581 (1871)
[13] United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1876)
[14] Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896)
[15] Lochner v. New York, 198 U.S. 45 (1905)
[16] Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961)
[17] Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547 (1967)
[18] Bivens v. Six Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971)
[19] Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409 (1976)
[20] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983)
[21] Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, 597 U.S. ___ (2022)
[22] LOPER BRIGHT ENTERPRISES ET AL. v. RAIMONDO, SECRETARY OF COMMERCE, ET AL. - Decided June 28, 2024
[23] TRUMP v. UNITED STATES - Decided July 1, 2024
Saturday, March 8, 2025 - 12:23:16 PM
The Issue with Trump
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/03/the-issue-with-trump.html
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/02/this-is-how-naive-teenage-high-school.html
BE AWARE, but do not
be afraid, Trump is, at best and at worst, pathetically incompetent and INEFFECTIVE
manager / leader!
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/be-aware.html
Trump does not know the
name of the country he was or is to be president of...
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/istgtdnk.html
The constitutional small
"d" undemocratic corrupt “dark money” Senate and Electoral College
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html
Trump is a convicted
and diagnosed psychotic criminal, chronic degenerate, maniacal liar and a "fucking
moron!"
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/be-aware.html
Small "d"
Un-Democratic “dark money” Senate
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html
The Judicial sophistry
of "absolute immunity" creates "absolute power" to the ABSOLUTE
CORRUPTION of We the People's unalienable rights under color of law... the AUDACITY of the INSANITY, ignorance and stupidity
in support of a "fantastic or delusional" scenario. The Emperor Has No Clothes.
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/if-that-is-not-absolute-corruption-of.html
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2022/09/the-facts-of-my-case-are-without.html
DGJeep v. Supreme Court
of the United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030,
13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856)
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?Search=David+Jeep&type=Supreme-Court=Dockets
Thanks in advance...
"Agere sequitur esse" ('action follows being')
David G. Jeep, Federal Inmate #36072-044 (formerly)
www.DGJeep.com - Dave@DGJeep.com - David.G.Jeep@Gmail.com
Mobile (314) 514-5228 leave message
David G. Jeep
1531 Pine St Apt #512
St. Louis, MO 63103-2548
