HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
"Publicity is justly commended as a remedy for social and industrial diseases." [1]
A Docketed Petition for a Writ of Certiorari in the Supreme Court
of the United States, Jeep v. Obama et al, #11-8211
Dear People,
As you may or may not remember I contacted you as referenced above via a letter dated Tuesday, December 27, 2011. I asked "Do you have the guts to admit yours and other's mistakes[2] and work for justice, law and equity,[3] unlike your victim[4] Donna R. Andrieu,[5] an assistant district attorney in New Orleans?" The Supreme Court has now ordered "The judgment of the Orleans Parish Criminal District Court of Louisiana is reversed, and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion"[6] i.e., granted a new trial, but that does not even come close to justice, law and equity.[7] The naive idea that you can have sustain justice without equity consideration necessitates the uberempathetic[8] representation of DNA Evidence, Death Row Inmates and Guantanamo Bay atrocities every where. It just AIN'T HAPPEN… never will.
My petition has now been docketed as of Tuesday January 10, 2012 (Writ of Certiorari in the Supreme Court of the United States 11-8211) and is out for responses due by Thursday, February 09, 2012. I again ask for your help, possibly with an editorial response…
"Publicity is justly commended as a remedy for social and industrial diseases. Sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants; electric light the most efficient policeman."[9]
This is not about just me, this is about Equal Justice for ALL.[10] "Justice is the end of government. It is the end of civil society. It ever has been and ever will be pursued until it be obtained, or until liberty be lost in the pursuit. In a society under the forms of which the stronger faction[11] can readily unite and oppress the weaker, anarchy may as truly be said to reign as in a state of nature, where the weaker individual is not secured against the violence of the stronger; and as, in the latter state, even the stronger individuals are prompted, by the uncertainty of their condition, to submit to a government which may protect the weak as well as themselves; so, in the former state, will the more powerful factions or parties be gradually induced, by a like motive, to wish for a government which will protect all parties, the weaker as well as the more powerful." [12] We the People sought as the primary goals of our Constitution to establish Justice and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity.
This issue does not require a constitutional amendment, any new legislation,[13] nor does it require negation of any common law.[14] "We the People" need only demand the protection of the laws; the raisons d'etre of all civilization since the dawn of man.
Governmental accountability has been the goal of every attempt at government since at least the Magna Carta[15] (1215), if not before. For it is and has always been "a general and indisputable rule that where there is a legal right, there is also a legal remedy by suit or action at law whenever that right is invaded."[16] "It is a settled and invariable principle in the laws that every right, when withheld, must have a remedy, and every injury its proper redress." [17]" The King's prerogative as asserted without limitation, Absolute Immunity, is what instigated[18] our own Revolutionary War.
Absolute Immunity as currently sustained by our Supreme Court is an insanity of a much, much… much higher order. Not only are our leaders[19] exempt from any culpability for their actions, as was the problem in pre-Revolutionary Times but now "all (malicious, corrupt, dishonest and incompetent[20]) persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process" [21] acting under color of law NOW have immunity.
"There is no crueler tyranny than that which is exercised under cover of law, and with the colors of justice[22]"
I ask in my petition for a writ of certiorari the simple question:
Where does a person[23] go who has been damaged, if not destroyed,[24] by the denial of rights in a largely civil action[25] for a 7th Amendment remedy, a redress of grievances,[26] or the protection of the law, when the Executive's Justice Department will not enforce the law (Local, State and Federal) and the Court's Judiciary (Local, State, Federal and Supreme) have acted in an "unlawful criminal conspiracy"[27] of "deliberate indifference"[28] to ministerially[29] award themselves "Absolute Immunity"[30] "before out of Court"[31] to COVER-UP[32] "false and malicious Persecutions"[33] to wit the deprivation of rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America?[34]
Again I ask for your HELP? The raisons d'etre for a government of the people, by the people and FOR the people is accountability to We the People.
If there is anything further I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.
Thank you in advance.
"Time is of the essence"
David G. Jeep
(314) 514-5228
[1] Justice Louis D. Brandeis "Other People's Money—and How Bankers Use It" (1914).
[2] 100 years of Jim Crow's lynchings, discrimination, INEQUALITY, corruption, malice and incompetence can be directly attributed to the absolute immunity granted by OUR Supreme Court and tolerated by OUR free press EVERYDAY with Randall v. Brigham, Page 74 U. S. 536 (1868) and Bradley . Fisher, 80 U.S. 335 (1871). Lets not install another 100 years of inequality with Jane Crow's (the preference for female rights over male rights in family disputes) version of lynching (the ex parte order of protection), discrimination, INEQUALITY, corruption, malice and incompetence
[3] Any assertion of Justice that does not include both LAW AND EQUITY impoverishes its victim in pursuit of Justice.
[4] Your victims have been benumbed to Justice in both law and equity by your assertion that they like the "KING CAN DO NO WRONG." It is important to STRESS LAW and EQUITY.
[5] "Justices Rebuke a New Orleans Prosecutor" New York Times, November 8, 2011, By ADAM LIPTAK
[6] (Slip Opinion) SMITH v. CAIN, WARDEN, CERTIORARI TO THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT OF LOUISIANA, ORLEANS PARISH No. 10–8145. Argued November 8, 2011—Decided January 10, 2012
[7] Any assertion of Justice that does not include both LAW AND EQUITY impoverishes its victim in pursuit of Justice.
[8] 2007, "Equality in the War on Terror" by Neal K. Katyal 59 Stan. L. Rev. 1365-1394 (2007)
[9] Justice Louis D. Brandeis "Other People's Money—and How Bankers Use It" (1914).
[10] AMENDMENT XIV Passed by Congress June 13, 1866. Ratified July 9, 1868 "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
[11] See the Jim Crow Era, the Jane Crow Era (where a woman's rights in domestic disputes are unequally empowered over a man's) or the criminally zealous persecution of the law (the Orleans Parish Prosecutors, City of Osage Beach Police (USCA 08-1823), Camdenton County Prosecutors (USCA 08-1823) and others) with out regard to truth, rights or justice.
[12] FEDERALIST No. 51, The Structure of the Government Must Furnish the Proper Checks and Balances Between the Different Departments For the Independent Journal. Wednesday, February 6, 1788. James Madison
[13] Judicial Accountability & Integrity Legislation
[14] Bradley v. Fisher, supra, 80 U. S. 335, 80 U. S. 349, note, at 80 U. S. 350, Pierson v. Ray, 386 U. S. 57 (1967) Judicial ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY is based on a skewed (eliminate the skewedness) reading, overlooking the noted exception, but if he hath conspired before out of Court, that absolute ANYTHING creates, of Lord Coke, Floyd and Barker (1607) ruling from an acknowledged CORRUPT court, the Star Chamber. Lord Coke three years later in The Case of Proclamations (1610) EWHC KB J22, declared the King to be subject to the law, and the laws of Parliament to be void if in violation of "common right and reason".
Lord Coke Floyd and Barker (1607) ibid.
[15] The Magna Carta in 1215 (§ 61), the first modern attempt at making government accountable, established the FIRST right of redress: "If we, our chief justice(judges), our officials, or any of our servants offend in any respect against any man, or transgress any of the articles of the peace or of this security… they shall come to us - or in our absence from the kingdom to the chief justice - to declare it and claim immediate redress… by seizing our castles, lands, possessions, or anything else saving only our own person and those of the queen and our children, until they have secured such redress as they have determined upon."
[16] Chief Justice John Marshal Quoting Blackstone's "Common Law" into Supreme Court stare decisis binding to all that follow. 5 U.S. 163
[17] Chief Justice John Marshal Quoting Blackstone's "Common Law" into Supreme Court stare decisis binding to all that follow. 5 U.S. 163
[18] "In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury." IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America
[19] "And if you think that is a national problem, consider that the United States is by far the World's greatest power; it is not accountable to its own people for its abuses of power, and that abuse of power flows freely into international circles. Given that reality, there is not a nation in the world that should not fear us in the same way that a reasonable person fears a child (or a thief) with a gun." 31 U. WEST L.A. L. REV. ( Summer 2000 ) JOHN E. WOLFGRAM e.g., George Bush's false representations of Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq i.e., "The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder" by Famed prosecutor and #1 New York Times bestselling author Vincent Bugliosi - Underlining and parenthetical text added for emphasis.
[20] Incompetence is the most insidious and it is covered up by the grant of malice, corruption and dishonesty!!!!
[21] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 345 (1983) ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY for "all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process"
[22] Charles-Louis de Secondat, baron de La Brède et de Montesquieu, "De l'Espirit des Lois" (1748) (The Spirit of the Law)
[23] It should be noted that the petitioner is pro se and does not have the uberempathetic representation of a pro bono high priced law firm that is afforded a death row inmate (i.e., , Connick, District Attorney, et al. v. Thompson No. 09–571 Decided March 29, 2011 Smith v. Cain, No. 10-8145) much like most of the Supreme Court's victims in this government of the people, by the people and FOR THE PEOPLE. The only hope he has if the 1st and 7th remedy
[24] I have spent every penny I have in 8.51 years struggle (3,107 days). I was incarcerated for 411 days, and then denied my day in court, on a false charge ("We live in a Lawless Society" via Eastern District Court of Missouri Case #4:09-cr-00659-CDP Document #78, Attachments #(1) Exhibit, time stamped 3/25/2010, 5:30 PM CDT). I have been indigent and living on the street for 4.04 years (1,474 days) in my struggle to regain my rights!
[25] While injunctive relief is a component of my petition monetary damages are the essential component of the remedy.
[26] 1st Amendment: "Congress shall make no law abridging the right of the people to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
[27] Lord Coke, Floyd and Barker (1607), ibid.
[29] Ministerially created rules are SECONDARY, in a Democratic Constitutional form of government, to the will of the people as specifically expressed in the Constitution and the Statute law. For anyone to ministerially grant immunity from the Constitution and Statute law is to act in direct conflict with the tenor of the commission under which the MINISTERIAL authority was granted.
[30] "absolute immunity… for all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process" for the "deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws." Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983) @ Page 460 U. S. 335
[31] Lord Coke, Floyd and Barker (1607), ibid.
[32] 100 years of Jim Crow Laws denial of basic human rights can be directly linked to this cover-up… IMMUNITY
[33] Lord Coke, , Floyd and Barker (1607), ibid.
To Kill a Mocking Bird, The Denial of Due Process
"agere sequitor esse"
"Time is of the essence"
David G. Jeep
http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/E-mail is preferred Dave@DGJeep.com, DGJeep@DGJeep.com
(314) 514-5228
David G. Jeep
c/o The Bridge
1610 Olive Street,
Saint Louis, MO 63103-2316
