"The Earth and everything that's in it": Petition for Writ of Certiorari

Tuesday, June 7, 2022

Petition for Writ of Certiorari - Jeep v United States of America

Tracking Number: 70212720000345764332

Expected Delivery by THURSDAY 9-JUNE-2022 by 9:00pm

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Status

Delivered, PO Box

June 10, 2022 at 10:59 am

WASHINGTON, DC 20543

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Download PDF of John Roberts Letter

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Download PDF for all Letters sent w/Money Order

John G. Roberts, Jr., Chief Justice of the United States

1 First St., NE

Washington, D. C. 20543-0001

Re: Petition for Writ of Certiorari - Jeep v United States of America

Dear People,

This must be a case of original jurisdiction for the Supreme Court of the United States. No state or federal court in this country will risk their self-serving for life tenure royalist absolute judicial immunity without the Supreme Court affirming judicial liability. Yet, NO ONE is immune from the Constitution or the Congressional power to enforce the provisions of the constitution, by appropriate legislation.[1] I include by digital reference, my 8 prior Petitions for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court, to save trees.[2]

I ask the ORIGINALIST and the historians to remember the low regard in which the judiciary was held in the 18^th century at the time of the Revolution and / or Constitution. The judiciary in the 18^th century was despised as having been pawns of the royalty, they were given no authority / power, without the check of individual trial juries, in the constitution. The royalist judiciary of today are just as dictatorial as the royalist of the 18^th century. They are pawns of their self-serving interests i.e., royalist "absolute immunity" and / or minority ideologues. The establishment of Justice, with individual civil and criminal juries, their PRIMARY if not ONLY constitutional purpose -- be dammed.

Please note, Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)'s naïve creationism is wishful thinking WITHOUT basis in the 18th century constitutional conception of judicial authority / power. Any tyrannical use of stare decisis is antithetical to self-governing. And while the Warren Court might have appeared benevolent, the many MALEVOLENT Supreme Courts in Blyew v. United States, 80 U.S. 581 (1871), United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875), United States v. Harris, 106 U.S. 629 (1883), Civil Rights Cases, 109 U.S. 3 (1883), Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896), Lochner v. New York, 198 U.S. 45 (1905)," Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U. S. 409 (1976)," Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349 (1978), and Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983) ACTED UNASHAMEDLY, INCOMPETENTLY, CORRUPTLY, and MALICIOUSLY!!!

The FACTS of the case are without question, my liberty rights, my paternity rights, my property rights, were unconstitutionally deprived on November 3. 2003, 7:55pm CT. I have been fighting to regain them relentlessly since.[3]

Not that it should matter but I am a "white" guy, I was born a "white" guy, and I will always be a "white" guy. I even had the privilege of attending the proverbial "old boy's school."

Again, not that this should matter either, but in 1960 1 in 20 (5%) children grew up without a father in the home. In 2014 the FATHERLESS rate had increased to 1 in 2 ½ (40%). "Anything that spikes from 5 percent to 40 percent is a big change. But when you're talking about something as elemental as family structure — what does that mean?"^{^[4]} It means that "Jane Crow" discrimination is REAL in the United States of America today! Jane Crow Discrimination = Fathers are disfavored by domestic relations law in the United States of America!

The United States Supreme Court says "The essence of the constitutional right to equal protection of the law is that it is a personal one, and does not depend upon the number of persons affected" (McCabe v. Atchison, 235 U.S. 151 (1914)).

It has been nearly 20 years, and to this date, the deprivation of my paternal, property and liberty rights WITHOUT reasonable probable cause has never been recognized. I was, literally, forced into a "Jane Crow era" all-consuming conspiracy against rights (18 U.S. Code § 241).

Now I realize you and your brethren would prefer I act insane and violently attack someone or even myself. THAT AIN'T GONNA HAPPEN!!! 10 years ago, your royalist absolute immune brethren had me arrested, subjected me to TWO psychological exams held me for 411 days in jail, BEFORE finding me sane and DISMISSING ALL CHARGES.[5] I am STILL sane and STILL demanding my 1^st Amendment right "to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.[6]"

I enclose a U.S. Postal money order for $300 for fees. I am holding the Supreme Court, the justices and former justices personally and professionally liable DEMANDING $100,000,000.00 (One Hundred Million Dollars and No Cents) for redress of 20+/- years of TORTURE, struggle, and deprivation of rights (42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 1985).

If there is anything further in this regard, please let me know.

Thank you in advance.

David G. Jeep

enclosure (to John G. Roberts, Jr., $300 US Postal Money Order for court fees)

cc: John G. Roberts, Jr., Chief Justice of the United States, Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice Stephen G. Breyer, Associate Justice, Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Associate Justice, Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice, Elena Kagan, Associate Justice, Neil M. Gorsuch, Associate Justice, Brett M. Kavanaugh, Associate Justice, Amy Coney Barrett, Associate Justice, Sandra Day O'Connor (Retired), Associate Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, Associate Justice David H. Souter (Retired), Associate Justice

www.DGJeep.com – file

[1] Criminal 18 U.S.C. § 241 &; 242 and Civil 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 1985

[2] Petitions 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856

^{^[3]} Petitions 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856

[4] "The Economics of Non-Marital Childbearing and The "Marriage Premium for Children"," Melissa Kearney and Phillip Levine (2017), Male Earnings, Marriageable Men, and Nonmarital Fertility: Evidence from the Fracking Boom (2017) JULY 5, 2017, EPISODE 294, FREAKONOMICS, The Fracking Boom, a Baby Boom, and the Retreat From Marriage," Are Children "Normal"?" (2013), "Births to Unmarried Women," Child Trends ( 2016), "An Economic Analysis of Fertility," Gary Becker (1960),