This in effect denies
me my day in court and relieves the Federal Government of any liability, although
I am disputing the denial of liability.
This was a violation of my Civil Rights per the US Supreme Court, UnitedStates of America, Appellee, v. Russell Kelner, Appellant, United States Court ofAppeals, Second Circuit. - 534 F.2d 1020 Argued Oct. 29, 1975.Decided April 9, 1976,
“The purpose and effect of the Watts constitutionally-limited definition of the
term "threat" is to insure that only unequivocal, unconditional and specific
expressions of intention immediately to inflict injury may be punished only such
threats, in short, as are of the same nature as those threats which are, as Judge
Wright recognizes, "properly punished every day under statutes prohibiting
extortion, blackmail and assault without consideration of First Amendment issues."
Watts
v. United States, 394 U.S. 705 (1969), supra. The Watts requirement of
proof of a "true threat," it may be seen, works ultimately to much the
same purpose and effect as would a requirement of proof of specific intent to execute
the threat because both requirements focus on threats which are so unambiguous and
have such immediacy that they convincingly express an intention of being carried
out.”
I spent 411 day in federal custody denied my liberty and basic human rights,
subject to the humiliation and intimidation of County Jail incarceration.
