Saturday, July 22, 2023
Chuck Schumer, Senate Majority Leader
United States Senate
Washington, DC 20510
Dick Durbin, Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee
United States Senate
Washington, DC 20510
Re: An "Article III Code of Ethics" has to correctly be REGULATED to include a VII Amendment, Title 42§1983 & 1985 civil remedy for the deprivation of individual rights.
Dear People,
In the "Jim Crow Era," "Jane Crow Era," and it should have been obvious from day one (ratification of the Bill of Rights December 15, 1791) judges have to be VII Amendment culpable for constitutional rights. Every Federal Employee is sworn to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic."[1] Article III Judges are more particularly bound to "faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as ___ under the Constitution and laws of the United States."[2] But "We the People" cannot get an individual VII Amendment Civil 42 U.S. Code § 1983 & 1985 remedy "under color of law" for Judicial corruption or incompetence.
The Founders never thought to empower for life an unregulated oligarchy to have the ultimate power over anything and everything. Article III clearly states, "Supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction, both as to law and fact, with such exceptions, and under such regulations as the Congress shall make." A simple statute from congress can and SHOULD call out exception and REGULATIONS for the Article III Judiciary.
The Article III judiciary has hidden behind the assertion that impeachment is the constitutional remedy available for a would-be aggrieved person against a royalist judiciary[3], appointed for life with a guaranteed income. As Thomas Jefferson asserted and Trump has shown "impeachment is scarcely a scare-crow"[4] even with a majority of the house and senate supporting impeachment.
But beyond even that, impeachment alone is, at best, retribution. Impeachment alone is never a remedy. The VII Amendment and Civil 42 U.S. Code § 1983 & 1985 are the only remedies for the individual deprivation of rights under "color of law."
After the Civil War with the XIII, XIV and XV Amendments "We the People" added to those with statute law… "The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article" with the now codified Civil 42 U.S. Code § 1983 & 1985, Criminal 18, U.S. Code § 241 & 242 statute law.
But with all that in the "Jim Crow Era," Ida B. Wells could not get her rights as GUARANTEED by VII Amendment and statute law i.e. Chesapeake, O. & S. R. Co. v. Wells, (1887).
And with the VII Amendment, Civil War Amendments, statute law, Civil Rights affirmation from 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s in new Century of the "Jane Crow Era" CIVIL RIGHTS in 2003 rights are not worth the parchment they were written on. I was served with a flagrantly fraudulent court order ex parte (11/3/03) and then in court it was sustained over my attorney's timely objection (11/20/03). It was and is fraud on the court, by an officer of the court. In the 20 years since it has been sustained without specific comment, just an offer of immunity by "Black Robed Royalist" judiciary in state court, federal court and the Supreme Court (DGJeep v. United States [Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856] and DOJ report # 265705-BPB).
But even if I could have gotten an impeachment; impeachment is retribution, not a remedy. Article III has to be regulated with liable for a VII Amendment, Title 42§1983 & 1985 civil remedy. Judges are corrupted by their incompetence if not their rapacity. Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. The Founders never thought to empower for life an unregulated oligarchy to have the ultimate power over anything and everything They new better.
Now the royalist will try and tell you that Juries alone cannot make such consequential decisions. And there will be "OJ" like mistakes. But "OJ" like mistakes will be the rare exception rather than the stuck in the mud (stare decisis) "Jim Crow" or "Jane Crow" Article III judiciary rule.
People are self-servingly honest, if they condone lying they are more likely to be lied to. I know you have heard it before, you can fool all the people some of the time and some of the people all the time but you can never fool all the all the time. The Jury system may not be perfect, but it is the best form of judicial decision making we have.
If there is anything further, please let me know.
Thank you in advance.
David G. Jeep
enclosure
cc: www.DGJeep.com
file
[1] 5 U.S. Code § 3331 - Oath of office
[2] 28 U.S.C. § 453 - Oaths of justices and judges
[3] In my case a "90 day wonder" less than a month on the job has been sustained as an absolutely immune judicial officer
[4] Thomas Jefferson Letter to Charles Hammond, 1821
Thanks in advance...
"Agere sequitur esse" ('action follows being')
David G. Jeep, Federal Inmate #36072-044 (formerly)
www.DGJeep.com - Dave@DGJeep.com
Mobile (314) 514-5228 leave message
David G. Jeep
1531 Pine St Apt #403
St. Louis, MO 63103-2547
No comments:
Post a Comment