"The Earth and everything that's in it": The Jane Crow Era - Fathers are disfavored by domestic relations law in the United States

Tuesday, June 4, 2024

The Jane Crow Era - Fathers are disfavored by domestic relations law in the United States

Monday, June 3, 2024

Richard V. Reeves - American Institute for Boys and Men

Brookings Institute

1775 Massachusetts Ave., NW

Washington, DC 20036

Scott Galloway

Leonard N. Stern School of Business

Tisch Hall

40 West Fourth Street, 904

New York, NY 10012

Re: The Jane Crow Era - Fathers are disfavored by domestic relations law in the United States

Dear People,

Saw you both on Morning Joe this morning June 1, 2024, 7:45am ET. You were speaking in regard to Mellinda French Gates's grant.

You try to blame the failure of boys and men on individual failings, WRONG. While NO one is perfect, individual failings are NOT a societal problem. Men and boys are failing in the United States's society today because of "The Jane Crow Era" where men and boys are discounted into near oblivion by domestic relations law in the United States and, the failure of the 7^th Amendment to provide its designed remedy. Fathers are increasingly, though far toooooo sparingly, granted joint custody, but rarely if ever granted sole custody. Equal custody has to be the rule!

20+ years ago, on Monday November 3, 2003 @ approximately 7:45pm CT, I was served am ex parte order of protection that listed no abuse and no abuse was ever claimed. Everything I ever cared about in the world was taken form me, my son, my home of 10 years, my dark socks, my car, my tools, my computers everything…

And EVERYTHING was handed over to my adversary in the domestic relations dispute. I was on the street alone, without the proverbial "pot to piss in.

Now I will give you 90%-100% of the physical abuse in domestic relations is and probably always will be instigated by men. And that is statistical FALLACY in how the extra-judicial (coram non judice) judges justify handing out ex parte orders of protection for the asking to virtually 100% of women for their CLAIMED protection.

Where the men are maybe responsible for 90%-100% of the physical abuse. It does not follow that 90%-100% of men instigate abuse. I would be willing to bet, that before the Jane Crow Era, there was CREDIBLE physical or mental abuse in maybe 10%, tops 20% of the couples. But today in the Jane Crow Era, when the Judges are ALLOWED to extra-judicially act without probable cause the first thing every woman does in a domestic relation's dispute is petition for an ex parte protection order to get the upper hand. Ex parte orders were and still are granted for the asking, like Halloween candy, in virtually all of the United States today.

Men and boys are DISFAVORED by domestic relations law in the United States TODAY!!!!!!!!!! And since post-civil war's Bradley v. Fisher: 80 U.S. 335 (1871)[1] judges have been able to absolutely ignore the civil rights of former slaves[2] in the Jim Crow and now in the Jane Crow Era ignore the rights of fathers, men and boys. Anybody that believes that criminal and civil absolute immunity for constitutional rights is ANY WAY to enforce said rights has never anyone in the Jim Crow Era, Jane Crow Era, Mass Incarceration Era or the much shorter, hopefully, Donald Trump Era. Any assertions of absolute immunity for rights is a denial of justice and or Article III constitutional due process of law.

The issue today in the united States is not about individual failings, it is about GIVING renewed credibility to the ex parte order of protection and making JOINT physical custody the rule instead of the rare exception!!!! You want boys to grow into good fathers, you have to afford them the inalienable NATURAL paternal rights to their FATHERS!!!!

If there is anything further, please let me know.

"Time is of the essence"

Thank you in advance.

David G. Jeep

enclosure

cc: Joe Scarborough, Mika Brzezinski and Willie Geist - Morning Joe - MSNBC Network

www.DGJeep.com

file

[1] The post-Civil-War Supreme Court created the judge-made-law in the December Term, 1871 to free themselves from any and all responsibility for the Third Ku Klux Klan Act Signed into law by President Ulysses S. Grant on April 20, 1871, 8 months prior and any and all constitutional civil rights via the 7^th Amendment going forward.

[2] Enforcement Act of 1871 (17 Stat. 13), also known as the Ku Klux Klan Act, Third Enforcement Act, Third Ku Klux Klan Act, Civil Rights Act of 1871, or Force Act of 1871 (now codified into Federal Law Title 42 U.S. Code § 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights), Signed into law by President Ulysses S. Grant on April 20, 1871