The
issue with Trump
Do you have any issue at all with Trump?
1. Don't blame MAGA.
2. Don't blame MAGA Republicans.
3. Don't blame non-MAGA Republicans.
4. Don't blame ANY Republicans.
5. Don't blame ANY of the voters
6. Don't blame the theory of democracy
7. Don't blame Socrates.
8. Don't blame the theory of republicanism.
9. Don't blame the theory of a representative government.
10. Don't blame Putin.
11. Don't blame the Corrupt Unrepresentative Senate for the United States.
12. Don't blame the Electoral College for the United States.
13. Don't blame Americas or the United States,
14. Don't blame the love of the America or United State's citizens.
15. Don't blame any of the hatred in the Americas.
16. Don't blame the internet.
17. Don't blame "fake news."
18. Don't blame The Robert Mueller special counsel investigation.
19. Don't blame the Network News.
20. Don't blame the internet News.
21. Don't blame Plato.
22. Don't blame Mexico.
23. Don't blame Canada.
24. Don't blame print journalism.
25. Don't blame The Federalist Society.
26. Don't blame Leonard A. Leo. Co-Chairman of The Federalist Society
27. Don't blame the billions of dollars that Leonard A. Leo. Co-Chairman of The Federalist Society's DARK MONEY spent on elections.
28. Don't blame the Libertarians.
29. Don't blame the Green Party.
30. Don't blame the Democrats.
31. Don't blame the Communist.
32. Don't blame the Anti-Communist.
33. Don't blame Aristotle
34. Don't blame the European Union.
35. Don't blame Brexit.
36. Don't blame Europe.
37. Don't blame Russia.
38. Don't blame the Russians.
39. Don't blame Twitter.
40. Don't blame Face Book.
41. Don't blame "dark money".
42. Don't blame Hillary Clinton.
43. Don't blame Joe Biden.
44. Don't blame Fred Trump.
45. Don't blame Barack Obama.
46. Don't blame Goerge W. Bush.
47. Don't blame George H.W. Bush.
48. Don't blame Richard Nixon.
49. Don't blame Jim Comey.
50. Don't blame Robert Mueller.
51. Don't blame the Federalist Papers.
52. Don't blame the 4th Chief Justice of the United States John Marshall. In office February 4, 1801 – July 6, 1835
53. Don't blame John Emerich Edward Dalberg-Acton, 1st Baron Acton, 13th Marquess of Groppoli, KCVO, DL (10 January 1834 – 19 June 1902), better known as Lord Acton.
54. Don't blame The Founding Fathers.
55. Don't blame President George Washington.
56. Don't blame Alexander Hamilton.
57. Don't blame Walter Leland Cronkite Jr.
58. Don't blame Mike Pence.
None of that had anything to do with Trump.
There is one thing and the ONE THING ALONE that caused Trump and will cause despotisms much, much worse, than even Trump can conceive.
Trump and much, much worse despotism will in the future be determined by the pure and utter fiction of judge-made-law.
And EVERYONE of the above refenced factions wanted the seemingly unimpeachable FICTIOUS power of judge-made-law. For as we have recently learned and Thomas Jefferson KNEW long ago, "impeachment… is not even a scarecrow."
Any civilized organization needs a means to process law. And yes, there needs to be away to appeal any instant (particular) adjudication for errors, corruption or despotism, possibly a multi-step process e.g., district, circuit, supreme. And there needs to be a supreme court to ultimately answer any instant (particular) case.
There is no constitutional authority and/or need to create an unelected oligarchy's judge-made-law with stare decisis attached.
Plato was probably the first one to say, because of the telos of a leader, they ought to be learned and open-minded i.e., "philosopher kings." But clearly there was nothing binding in that thought, we have had soooooooooooo many corrupt and despotic leaders and kings since.
The United States Constitution was written in 1787. It was signed by the founding fathers on September 17, 1787, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The Constitution was ratified by the interpretation of We the People. We the People got the required number of states in June 1788 and igt went into effect in 1789. The Constitution as WRITTEN, as approved by We the People, as enacted, had no provision for judge-made-law.
Now if judge-made-law is assumed because of an obscure original unwritten meaning, judicial precedent, pragmatism, moral reasoning, national identity (or ethos), structuralism; historical practices or the living document theory; we need to take another look.
Because 150+ years of racial inequality after a civil war to oppose state's rights, maintain the union, eliminate slavery, the clear expression of the 13th, 14th, 15thAmendemtns, and their constitutionally authorize Congressional enforce laws judge-made-las has failed BIG TIME and it was always a FICTION!!!!!!!!
And yes, Article III of the Constitution created a justice system. BUT, and that this a very big BUT, Article III justice is explicitly limited by the use a jury. Nothing in Article III of the Constitution authorizes judges to direct or overrule a jury. The founding fathers had happily and effectively been living under the JURY rules of the Magan Carta (1215) for some 560+ years. I am sure the enthusiastic devotees of government among the founding father were fully aware of the Act of Parliament for the Abolition of the Star Chamber (July 5, 1641) not to mention the "Bloody Assize" that admitted the potential for judicial corruption.
Alexander Hamilton expressed a need in Federalist Papers 78-83 (1788), he anonymously talked about a desire and a need for a learned Judiciary. But it could never have made it into the binding 4,000 words of the actual constitution written and signed a year prior to the Federalist Papers.
In 1803 the 4th Supreme Court Chief Justice in the first 12 years of the constitution, John Marshal wrote a very complex opinion in Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803). John Marshal SELF-SERVINGLY talked about what was then and is still NOW non-binding Judicial interpretation. John Marshal went on to serve 34 years and 152 days, the longest serving Chief Justice ever. To general knowledge he never used the stare decisis his presumed opinion had created. Yes, he decided many "instant (particular) cases" but he never presumed to have created judge-made-law for all time, i.e. stare decisis attached.
This was all confirmed as understood and foretold by Thomas Jefferson in 1820 and many times before and thereafter:
"You seem to consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions; a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. Our judges are as honest as other men, and not more so. They have, with others, the same passions for party, for power, and the privilege of their corps.... Their power [is] the more dangerous as they are in office for life, and not responsible, as the other functionaries are, to the elective control. The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with the corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots." [1]
The first use of the despotism of judge-made-law was at the start of the Civil War.
On March 6, 1857, Chief Justice Roger B. Taney read the majority opinion of the Court of the then new judge-made-law. Taney effectively started the Civil War by asserting "that they (Blacks) had no rights which the white man was bound to respect" and that the new Territories had no binding right to self-determination as regards slavery as property rights.
Slavery as property rights had never been and would never be accepted as law in non-slave states.
The Civil War started.
Judge-made-law is a FICTION!
Judge-made-law is the biggest most corrupt FICTION ever perpetrated on free people. Judge-made-law NEVER EXISTED in any of America or in the United States.
Judge-made-law was never a part of the constitution. I love to ask every strict constructionist, textualist, originalist where in the 4,000 words of the constitution does it authorize an unelected appoint for life political oligarchy to make binding (stare decisis) law for all time?
Lord Acton to my knowledge expressed it first and best in an 1887 letter to an Anglican bishop, he famously wrote, "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely."
The concept of judge-made-law with Supreme Court stare decisis attached creates absolute power. And as we will all agree "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely."
You want proof of the supreme court's corrupt "star chamber" status look at the specifics in Scott[2] Bradely[3], Blyew[4], Cruikshank[5], Plessy[6], Lochner[7], Mapp[8], Pierson[9], Bivens[10], Imbler[11], Briscoe[12], Dobbs[13] Loper.[14]
In Roe the Supreme Court said they had to standardize abortion laws because of the many differences in the individual state laws. In Dobbs the Supreme Court said they wanted to overrule because they wanted to now interpret the law as before the war that settled the states rights issue once and for all and let the many states decide individually in defiance of the United States, lol. Sad, soooooo SAD!!!
In Loper they said we care not what the Congress, the law giver, says; we care not what the President, the enforcer says; WE WANT the Supreme Court's judge-made-law to settle ALL the issue law for now and for all time!!!
Please especially look at the recent Trump v. United States - Decided July 1, 2024. The Supreme Court FIRST delayed the case while he was a private citizen and then said don't worry we will limit his "absolute immunity" when and if we feel like it. They gave him absolutely immunity via judge-made-law for now and for the infinite future if they even want to ever consider it!!!
I have been fighting judge-made-law for 21 years impoverished, 12 years homeless, 411 days in jail. Now my issue is nothing new or unique, nothing worthy of the supreme court say because judge-made-law is unimpeachable. .
I am fighting possibly the second despotic judge-made-law ever made. You see after the civil war, and immediately after the Congress passed the constitutionally authorized enforcement acts[15] because of the potential for "bribed judges"[16] The supreme court made the self-serving judge-made-law "judicial absolute immunity"[17] so any attempted to expose judicial incompetence, apathy or corruption could never be considered by due process of law. That was in 1871.
Now the self-serving DESPOTIC supreme court has many times reconfirmed and expanded this judge-made-law see Blyew[18], Cruikshank[19], Plessy[20], Lochner[21], Mapp[22], Pierson[23], Bivens[24], Imbler[25], Briscoe[26], Dobbs[27] Loper.[28] Most recently in Trump[29] where they delayed his out of office prosecution and told us not worry they will limit his presumed absolute immunity later if they feel like it.
Corrupt judge-made-law has been destroying We the People's representative government for at least 160 years!!!
In my opinion we do not need a constitutional amendment to address it. Judge-made-law was never authorized by the Constitution of the United States! In a perfect world we would have learned open minded philosopher kings for judges like Plato, the founding fathers, Alexander Hamilton, and John Marshal had ALL HOPED FOR and they would abdicate any and all past or future judge-made-law. And effectuate the jury law that most of the developed world works with.
Is that going to happen, I have been asking for it for 21 LONG years. I am under the impression that our Article III Supreme Court is just as corrupt and despotic as any of the past, Scott[30] Bradely[31], Blyew[32], Cruikshank[33], Plessy[34], Lochner[35], Mapp[36], Pierson[37], Bivens[38], Imbler[39], Briscoe[40], Dobbs[41] Loper.[42].
But again, we do not need a constitutional amendment. The forefather probably assumed that the corrupt unrepresentative Senate and corrupt unrepresentative Electoral College Presidency would assure We the People would never be subject to an unelected appointed for life "despotism of an oligarchy". But it was not a complete assumption, because they Founding Fathers did leave us Article III, Section 2, Clause 2 "In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make" And congress with a simple act of congress singed by a president can EXCLUDE any and all use of a corrupt oligarchy's stare decisis judge-made-law.
The issue with Trump, has nothing to do with TRUMP. This is going to damage his ego BIGTIME,
The issue with Trump is the constitutional FICTION of an oligarchy's apppionted for life judge made law!!!!!!
As Jefferson said in 1820 "The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with the corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots."
The issue with Trump, has nothing to do with TRUMP. Know that the issue RIGHT now is the oligarchy's super sercret weapon, delay, delay, delay, delay delay.
Created 2-Mar-25, Print/Publish 2-Mar-25 05:46:00, Saved 6-Mar-25 07:50:00
[1] Thomas Jefferson 28th September 1820, in writing to Mr. JARVIS, from Monticello UNDERLINING added
[2] Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1856)
[3] Bradley v. Fisher, 80 U.S. 335 (1871)
[4] Blyew v. United States, 80 U.S. 581 (1871)
[5] United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1876)
[6] Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896)
[7] Lochner v. New York, 198 U.S. 45 (1905)
[8] Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961)
[9] Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547 (1967)
[10] Bivens v. Six Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971)
[11] Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409 (1976)
[12] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983)
[13] Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, 597 U.S. ___ (2022)
[14] LOPER BRIGHT ENTERPRISES ET AL. v. RAIMONDO, SECRETARY OF COMMERCE, ET AL. - Decided June 28, 2024
[15] The Enforcement Act of 1870, also known as the Civil Rights Act of 1870 or First Ku Klux Klan Act, or Force Act (41st Congress, Sess. 2, ch. 114, 16 Stat. 140, enacted May 31, 1870
[16] "Cong. Globe, 42d Cong., 1st Sess., 374. Mr. Rainey of South Carolina noted that '(T)he courts are in many instances under the control of those who are wholly inimical to the impartial administration of law and equity.' Id., at 394. Congressman Beatty of Ohio claimed that it was the duty of Congress to listen to the appeals of those who 'by reason of popular sentiment or secret organizations or prejudiced juries or bribed judges, (cannot) obtain the rights and privileges due an American citizen * * *.'" As quoted by Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, dissenting United States Supreme Court 386 U.S. 547 Pierson v. Ray Argued: Jan. 11, 1967. --- Decided: April 11, 1967
[17] Bradley v. Fisher, 80 U.S. 335 (1871)
[18] Blyew v. United States, 80 U.S. 581 (1871)
[19] United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1876)
[20] Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896)
[21] Lochner v. New York, 198 U.S. 45 (1905)
[22] Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961)
[23] Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547 (1967)
[24] Bivens v. Six Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971)
[25] Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409 (1976)
[26] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983)
[27] Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, 597 U.S. ___ (2022)
[28] LOPER BRIGHT ENTERPRISES ET AL. v. RAIMONDO, SECRETARY OF COMMERCE, ET AL. - Decided June 28, 2024
[29] TRUMP v. UNITED STATES - Decided July 1, 2024
[30] Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1856)
[31] Bradley v. Fisher, 80 U.S. 335 (1871)
[32] Blyew v. United States, 80 U.S. 581 (1871)
[33] United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1876)
[34] Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896)
[35] Lochner v. New York, 198 U.S. 45 (1905)
[36] Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961)
[37] Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547 (1967)
[38] Bivens v. Six Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971)
[39] Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409 (1976)
[40] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983)
[41] Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, 597 U.S. ___ (2022)
[42] LOPER BRIGHT ENTERPRISES ET AL. v. RAIMONDO, SECRETARY OF COMMERCE, ET AL. - Decided June 28, 2024
Thursday, March 6, 2025 - 9:46:46 PM
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/02/this-is-how-naive-teenage-high-school.html
BE AWARE, but do not be afraid, Trump is, at best and at worst, pathetically incompetent and INEFFECTIVE manager / leader!
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/be-aware.html
Trump does not know the name of the country he was or is to be president of...
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/istgtdnk.html
The constitutional small "d" undemocratic corrupt "dark money" Senate and Electoral College
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html
Trump is a convicted and diagnosed psychotic criminal, chronic degenerate, maniacal liar and a "fucking moron!"
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/be-aware.html
Small "d" Un-Democratic "dark money" Senate
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html
The Judicial sophistry of "absolute immunity" creates "absolute power" to the ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION of We the People's unalienable rights under color of law... the AUDACITY of the INSANITY, ignorance and stupidity in support of a "fantastic or delusional" scenario. The Emperor Has No Clothes.
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/if-that-is-not-absolute-corruption-of.html
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2022/09/the-facts-of-my-case-are-without.html
DGJeep v. Supreme Court of the United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856)
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?Search=David+Jeep&type=Supreme-Court=Dockets
Thanks in advance...
"Agere sequitur esse" ('action follows being')
www.DGJeep.com - Dave@DGJeep.com - David.G.Jeep@Gmail.com
Mobile (314) 514-5228 leave message
David G. Jeep
1531 Pine St Apt #512
St. Louis, MO 63103-2548
No comments:
Post a Comment