Thursday, April 30, 2026 - 5:26:07 PM
Pat, I am OK. You are OK.
An unconstitutional Supreme[1] oligarchy
“We the People” need to free ourselves from an "unconstitutional Supreme[2] oligarchy." Any and all Immunity from the RULE of LAW[3], 23-939 Trump, is antithetical and diametrically opposed to responsible democratic-representative Constitutional government!
Now I will admit to the altruistic “goal” of Plato’s “Philosopher Kings” (375 BC) leading government as valid, but naïve. The 2,151 year history has proven the best We the People could have hoped for in 1776, 1789[4] or today in 2026 (2,427) thousands of years later is still the checks and balances of democratic, representative Constitutional government.
It is way too often overlooked the Founding Fathers had more experience, in 1776, with judge-made-law since the Magna Carta 1215, 561 years, than we have 250 years since.
Judge-made-law by an unconstitutional Supreme[5] oligarchy is opposed to the democratic-representative explicit requirements of the law making in Article I and Article II of the Constitution for the United States.
They were fully aware of legal precedent and judge-made-law at the writing of the Constitution with 561 years of experience since the Magna Carta, see also James Madison (Federalist Paper #47) and Alexander Hamilton (Federalist Papers #78, #79 and #81).
Judge-made-law is nowhere referenced in the original or today’s Constitution for the United States.
Judge-made-law, was most contemptibly exploited to start the American Civil War (April 12, 1861 – May 26, 1865). Chief Justice Roger B. Taney started the Civil War with his judge-made-law that said the negro "had no rights which the white man was bound to respect, and that the negro might justly and lawfully be reduced to slavery for his benefit" (Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 407 (1856)). Judge-made-law FORCED the Dredd Scott decision on the free states and new territories.
And then after the investment of 620,000 to 750,000+ deaths and untold treasure, the Civil War winners with overwhelming consensus Constitutionally established the XIII, XIV and XV Amendments with “Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation[6].”
The still corrupt unconstitutional Supreme[7] oligarchy could not let that stand. The unconstitutional Supreme[8] oligarchy could not allow the last clause of the I Amendment[9] as empowered by the XIII, XIV and XV Amendments.
The last clause of the First Amendment[10] held fast, for almost 100 years, through the Civil War (1861-1865). And then TWO unforeseen UNCONSTITUTIONAL “Jim Crow”[11] judge-made-laws within 7 years:
Ø Randall v. Brigham, 74 U. S. 536 (decided April 15, 1869) sophistry in response to the criminal liability in The Civil Rights Act of 1866 passed in to law April 9, 1866 and then..
Ø Bradley v. Fisher, 80 U.S. 335 (decided April 8, 1872) sophistry in response to civil liability in the Civil Rights Act of 1871 passed into law April 20, 1871 are the origins of unconstitutional "immunity" in the American Justice system.
i.e., thus a judge’s discretion became immune to any attempt to get “redress of grievances. [12]”
The subtle sophistry of the unconstitutional corrupt Supreme[13] oligarchy keeps the remnants of Jim Crow still today, spawned Jane Crow[14], and now wants to say Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) is wrong in voting rights and in education. Wrong because, a spoiled rich girl in Texas[15] did not get into the college of her choice and a poor black did.
We the People with an UNCIVILIZED imprisonment rate 5 times (541/100K[16]) the rate of the greater developed world (111/100K[17]), Whites @ 181/100K and Blacks @ 901/100K[18] (Jim Crow), Male @ 659/100K and Female 47/100K[19] (Jane Crow[20]) - not to mention the additional inherent economic disparities still ingrained in our government-culture-families and society are still struggling “to form a more perfect Union.”
We the People are fully WOKE and fully aware of our human fallibility, that we will always need Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) as professed and confirmed by our founding declaration “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men (and women) are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”
2026 04-30-26 An unconstitutional, Supreme oligarchy POSTS REV working.docx
\
Thursday, April 30, 2026 - 5:26:07 PM
The last clause of the First Amendment makes any assertion of IMMUNITY unconstitutional.
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2026/02/last-clause-1a.html
The Constitution for the United States - Article I, II, and Schoolhouse Rock’s[21] “I’m Just a Bill[22]” clearly define how to make law. Show me where in the amended Constitution for the United States “judge-made-law” is called for or authorized[23]?
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/06/sc.html
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FVfm-ushzCCTS5BtH1R7MeOvnDvh_kqv/view
The Issue with Trump, HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH TRUMP!
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/03/the-issue-with-trump.html
American Exceptionalism – NOT SO MUCH
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2023/10/american-exceptionalism-not-so-much.html
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2013/04/equal-rights-in-free-market-economy.html
A Balanced Budget for America
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2012/07/balanced-budget-for-america.html
BE AWARE, but do not be afraid, Trump is, at best and at worst, pathetically incompetent and INEFFECTIVE manager / leader!
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/be-aware.html
Trump does not know the name of the country he was or is to be president of...
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/istgtdnk.html
The constitutional small "d" undemocratic corrupt “dark money” Senate and Electoral College
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html
Trump is a convicted and diagnosed psychotic criminal, chronic degenerate, maniacal liar and a "fucking moron!"
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/be-aware.html
The constitutional small "d" unrepresentative corrupt “dark money” Senate and Electoral College
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html
The Judicial sophistry of "absolute immunity" creates "absolute power" to the ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION of We the People's unalienable rights under color of law... the AUDACITY of the INSANITY, ignorance and stupidity in support of a "fantastic or delusional" scenario.
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/if-that-is-not-absolute-corruption-of.html
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UmmaZmRkIUZ3EdC_9iI0Bpojr6LZ_lU0/view?usp=sharing
Petition Supreme Court website https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/18/18-5856/62608/20180904161503131_00000007.pdf
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2022/09/the-facts-of-my-case-are-without.html
DGJeep v. Supreme Court of the United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856)
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?Search=David+Jeep&type=Supreme-Court=Dockets
Thursday, April 30, 2026 - 5:26:07 PM
[1] Article III of the Constitution for the United States posits "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish (bolding added)." The Constitution for the United States posits one supreme Court among the many inferior Courts, NOT a Supreme Court outside the many Courts. The grammar of the capitalization is important for and an accurate interpretation. Additionally, the "judicial Power" in the Constitution for the United States is ABSOLUTELY constrained by the use of a trial-specific-local-jury as originally REQUIRED 1215 - Magna Carta's Clause 39 - "No free man is to be arrested, or imprisoned, or disseised, or outlawed, or exiled, or in any other way ruined, nor will we go against him or send against him, except by the lawful judgment of his peers or by the law of the land" and as incorporated in the in our Constitution for the United states Article II Section 2.3 criminal issues and the VII Amendment for civil Issues. The concept of judge-made-law is abhorrent to the Article I and Article II inherent authority!
[2] Article III of the Constitution for the United States posits "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish (bolding added)." The Constitution for the United States posits one supreme Court among the many inferior Courts, NOT a Supreme Court outside the many Courts. The grammar of the capitalization is important for and an accurate interpretation. Additionally, the "judicial Power" in the Constitution for the United States is ABSOLUTELY constrained by the use of a trial-specific-local-jury as originally REQUIRED 1215 - Magna Carta's Clause 39 - "No free man is to be arrested, or imprisoned, or disseised, or outlawed, or exiled, or in any other way ruined, nor will we go against him or send against him, except by the lawful judgment of his peers or by the law of the land" and as incorporated in the in our Constitution for the United states Article II Section 2.3 criminal issues and the VII Amendment for civil Issues. The concept of judge-made-law is abhorrent to the Article I and Article II inherent authority!
[3] Thomas Paine “Common Sense 1776” said it first and BEST, in the United STATES, “the law is king. For as in absolute governments the King is law, so in free countries the law ought to be king; and there ought to be no other. But lest any ill use should afterwards arise, let the Crown at the conclusion of the ceremony be demolished, and scattered among the people whose right it is.”
[4] Ratification occurred between December 1787 and May 1790, with New Hampshire becoming the critical ninth state on June 21, 1788. The process involved heated debates between Federalists and Anti-Federalists.
[5] Article III of the Constitution for the United States posits "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish (bolding added)." The Constitution for the United States posits one supreme Court among the many inferior Courts, NOT a Supreme Court outside the many Courts. The grammar of the capitalization is important for and an accurate interpretation. Additionally, the "judicial Power" in the Constitution for the United States is ABSOLUTELY constrained by the use of a trial-specific-local-jury as originally REQUIRED 1215 - Magna Carta's Clause 39 - "No free man is to be arrested, or imprisoned, or disseised, or outlawed, or exiled, or in any other way ruined, nor will we go against him or send against him, except by the lawful judgment of his peers or by the law of the land" and as incorporated in the in our Constitution for the United states Article II Section 2.3 criminal issues and the VII Amendment for civil Issues. The concept of judge-made-law is abhorrent to the Article I and Article II inherent authority!
[6] The note was added because of Chief Justice Roger B. Taney’s judge-made-law up holding the NOT Constitutionally authorized Fugitive Slave Acts - Definition, 1793 & 1850
[7] Article III of the Constitution for the United States posits "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish (bolding added)." The Constitution for the United States posits one supreme Court among the many inferior Courts, NOT a Supreme Court outside the many Courts. The grammar of the capitalization is important for and an accurate interpretation. Additionally, the "judicial Power" in the Constitution for the United States is ABSOLUTELY constrained by the use of a trial-specific-local-jury as originally REQUIRED 1215 - Magna Carta's Clause 39 - "No free man is to be arrested, or imprisoned, or disseised, or outlawed, or exiled, or in any other way ruined, nor will we go against him or send against him, except by the lawful judgment of his peers or by the law of the land" and as incorporated in the in our Constitution for the United states Article II Section 2.3 criminal issues and the VII Amendment for civil Issues. The concept of judge-made-law is abhorrent to the Article I and Article II inherent authority!
[8] Article III of the Constitution for the United States posits "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish (bolding added)." The Constitution for the United States posits one supreme Court among the many inferior Courts, NOT a Supreme Court outside the many Courts. The grammar of the capitalization is important for and an accurate interpretation. Additionally, the "judicial Power" in the Constitution for the United States is ABSOLUTELY constrained by the use of a trial-specific-local-jury as originally REQUIRED 1215 - Magna Carta's Clause 39 - "No free man is to be arrested, or imprisoned, or disseised, or outlawed, or exiled, or in any other way ruined, nor will we go against him or send against him, except by the lawful judgment of his peers or by the law of the land" and as incorporated in the in our Constitution for the United states Article II Section 2.3 criminal issues and the VII Amendment for civil Issues. The concept of judge-made-law is abhorrent to the Article I and Article II inherent authority!
[9] Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
[10] Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
[11] In The United States today “Jane Crow Discrimination = Fathers are disfavored by domestic relations law in the United States!” “The FACTS of MY case are without question” https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2022/09/the-facts-of-my-case-are-without.html
DGJeep v. Supreme Court of the United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856) https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?Search=David+Jeep&type=Supreme-Court=Dockets
[12] Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
[13] Article III of the Constitution for the United States posits "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish (bolding added)." The Constitution for the United States posits one supreme Court among the many inferior Courts, NOT a Supreme Court outside the many Courts. The grammar of the capitalization is important for and an accurate interpretation. Additionally, the "judicial Power" in the Constitution for the United States is ABSOLUTELY constrained by the use of a trial-specific-local-jury as originally REQUIRED 1215 - Magna Carta's Clause 39 - "No free man is to be arrested, or imprisoned, or disseised, or outlawed, or exiled, or in any other way ruined, nor will we go against him or send against him, except by the lawful judgment of his peers or by the law of the land" and as incorporated in the in our Constitution for the United states Article II Section 2.3 criminal issues and the VII Amendment for civil Issues. The concept of judge-made-law is abhorrent to the Article I and Article II inherent authority!
[14] Jane Crow Discrimination = Fathers are disfavored by domestic relations law in the United States!
[15] Fisher v. University of Texas, 579 U.S. 365 (2016) Plaintiffs Abigail Noel Fisher and Rachel Multer Michalewicz
[16] List of countries by incarceration rate
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_incarceration_rate
[17] Eurostat Data extracted in April 2025, Planned article update: 7 May 2026 https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/SEPDF/cache/81252.pdf
[18] Prisoners in 2021 – Statistical Tables U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics Table 5 Imprisonment rates of U.S. residents of all ages, based on sentenced prisoners under the jurisdiction of state or federal correctional authorities, by jurisdiction, sex, and race or Hispanic origin, 2011–2021 https://bjs.ojp.gov/media/68246/download
[19] Prisoners in 2021 Table 7 https://bjs.ojp.gov/media/68246/download
[20] Jane Crow Discrimination = Fathers are disfavored by domestic relations law in the United States!
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FVfm-ushzCCTS5BtH1R7MeOvnDvh_kqv/view--
Thanks in advance...
“Agere sequitur esse” (‘action follows being’)
David G. Jeep, Federal Inmate #36072-044 (formerly)
www.DGJeep.com - From: Dave@DGJeep.com - David.G.Jeep@Gmail.com
Mobile (314) 514-5228 leave message
My “Manifesto”
David G. Jeep
1531 Pine St Apt #512
St. Louis, MO 63103-2548
