"The Earth and everything that's in it"

Wednesday, May 30, 2007

Matt Blunt , Jay Nixon Report of a Crime, Cause No. CR203-1336M - SD26269

Wednesday, May 30, 2007

Matt Blunt Jay Nixon

Constituent Services Missouri Attorney General's Office

Office of the Governor Supreme Court Building

Room 216, State Capitol Building 207 W. High St.

Jefferson City MO 65101 Jefferson City, MO 65102

Re: HELP !!!! HELP!!!! HELP !!!! 1,123 Follow up without a response

Report of a Crime

Cause No. CR203-1336M - SD26269

Dear People,

I say again, HELP !!!! HELP!!!! HELP !!!! I have been openly chasing these issues for over three years. This is not an appeal issue. I should not have to appeal corruption in the courts. I should not have to prosecute criminals to clear my name. The state should prosecute the criminals. This issue is about to again attempt to destroy me as it did with my Divorce. I cannot drive. I cannot work. I cannot make next month’s rent. I need your help. I am about to be thrown in the street.

All because the criminals in the court system in Camden County fabricated evidence and thus created the issue of False Arrest, Malicious Prosecution, Perjury, Suborning Perjury, Criminal Conspiracy and Professional Malfeasants

The Issue was listed in my recent divorce. And the only thing that gives it any credibility at all is are the crimes of False Arrest, Malicious Prosecution, Perjury, Suborning Perjury, Criminal Conspiracy and Professional Malfeasants arising from the adjudication of Cause No. CR203-1336M - SD26269.

The Police, the Prosecutor were and are corrupted by their False Arrest, Malicious Prosecution, Perjury, Suborning Perjury, Criminal Conspiracy and Professional Malfeasants arising from the adjudication.

Time is of the essence. If there is anything further, I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.

Thank you in advance.

David G. Jeep

Enclosure: Copy of letter 4/23/07, Copy of letter 4/03/04

cc: St. Louis Post Dispatch, Editorial Department

File

Monday, April 23, 2007

Missouri Attorney General's Office

Supreme Court Building

207 W. High St.

P.O. Box 899

Jefferson City, MO 65102

Phone: 573-751-3321

Fax: 573-751-0774

Re: Report of a Crime

Cause No. CR203-1336M - SD26269

Dear People,

My attorney and now the Missouri State Highway Patrol tell me you are the ones that have the responsibility to investigate this type of crime. There is very little investigation required. You need only verify the documentation, I am enclosing. Please consider this a sworn complaint based on the following.

I want to report a crime. For law enforcement professionals such as yourself this is an unsavory one. The perpetrators involved in the crime are law enforcement “professionals” and Officer’s of the court. The crimes False Arrest, Malicious Prosecution, Perjury, Suborning Perjury, Criminal Conspiracy and Professional Malfeasants. The state’s prosecutors and their witnesses have fabricated evidence out of false testimony and disgraced their office and their uniforms by breaking the law.

False Arrest, the arresting officer, Mr. Little, did not give me the opportunity as prescribed by the NHSTA standard[1] to remove my 2 ½” heeled cowboy boots[2]. That the made the results of the test unreliable and the resulting arrest, false. Now if the police department had caught and admitted their error right off, this would not have been an issue.

Mr. Taylor the officer that administered the breathalyzer test and contrived the refusal perjured himself by denying his prior sworn testimony that I had blown for 15 seconds on the certified arrest report[3]. This after I had a witness from the Missouri State Health Department, the authority over the breathalyzer test confirm under oath[4], that a 20 second continuous blow should not have been necessary.

They never admitted their mistakes, this in spite of being at pretrial motions[5] that highlighted this as an issue. They chose instead to cover up and deny the issue with perjured testimony on the day of the trial. You cannot give people badges and let them make arrests if they do not know how to make arrests and or not willing to admit when they have made a False Arrest.

Malicious Prosecution, if the prosecutor had done his due diligence and confirmed the evidence and the testimony prior to trial, even a cursory review of the facts and the pretrial motions would have brought the credibility of the issue to light. They either did not due any credible investigation to determine the validity of the issue or they were just lazy, either way, I see it as Malicious Prosecution.

Perjury, given that the police officers had prior knowledge of the issues via their unusual attendance at the pretrial motions and their continued denial of the facts through their false testimony ignorance is no excuse. But even if they do want to claim ignorance at the time of the arrest, ok somebody made a mistake. Informed ignorance 8 months later on the stand is no excuse. They committed Perjury.

Suborning Perjury is the presentation of evidence known to be false through another party. The Prosecuting attorney should have known that the issue of the 2 ½” heel was credible and he should not have allowed the police officers to commit perjury. He let them commit perjury on the stand under oath in support of their otherwise unsupportable case. They Suborned Perjury.

Criminal Conspiracy, in that both the police and the prosecutors had knowledge or should have had knowledge of the criminal actions of the other, they conspired to cover it up. They committed a Criminal Conspiracy.

Professional Malfeasants, no one received any bribes and I am not claiming that they did. But monetary benefit is not the only benefit to be had in this situation. In that neither the police nor the prosecutor did their respective duties, they were just lazy at best. They benefited from being lazy and disregarding their professional duties and there was Professional Malfeasants.

Time is of the essence, if there is anything further, I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.

Thank you in advance.

David G. Jeep

enclosure

Copy of letter dated 4/24/07 to James F. Keathley, MSHP

Copy of letter dated 4/9/07 to MSHP

Copy of letter dated 3/7/07 t o the MSHP

cc: Richard Edwards, Edwards Schramm Young and Beilenson L.L.P.

Michael Young, Edwards Schramm Young and Beilenson L.L.P.

St. Louis Post Dispatch, Editorial Department

file

Saturday, April 03, 2004

Missouri Attorney General's Office

Supreme Court Building

207 W. High St.

P.O. Box 899

Jefferson City, MO 65102

Phone: 573-751-3321

Fax: 573-751-0774

Re: Perjury and Prosecutorial Suborning of Perjury

Case # CR203-1336M, Camden County, MO

Dear Sirs,

I was arrested last year on May 17, 2003 for DWI. Now before you get all excited and afraid this is not a DWI case that involved any loss of life or property. I was pulled over for failure to use my blinker. From the beginning they had no case, just a case of zeal that has lead them to Perjury and Suborning Perjury. The state of Missouri has no defined instructions for giving the breathalyzer test. After I failed the first attempt, I blew, per the police report for a steady 15 seconds, the machine responded with an invalid result. I never refused to do anything.

The arresting officer did not know how to administer the One Leg Stand nor the Walk and Turn test, and if you can believe his testimony, he still does not know some 11 months later. You see in the prescribed National Highway and Safety Administration Standard prior to both test the suspect should be given the opportunity to remove his shoes if he has more than a 2” heel, cowboy boots have a 2 ½” heel.

Those are the facts and they are not disputed. My issue arises from the testimony given by the arresting officers and thus the testimony supported by the prosecution. At trial the arresting officer testified that it was a 4” heel not a 2” heel that required the prior notice. At trial the officer who had administered the breathalyzer test testified that I had not blown for a solid 15 seconds as he had represented in his prior statement.

You could almost believe that these two officers were idiots without the mental ability to remember the facts, but you need to be aware of an additional fact. Prior to the trial I made pretrial motions. The three key pretrial motions were:

Motion for discovery of the Standardized procedure for performing the Standardized Field Sobriety test.

Motion to exclude all reference to the Field sobriety test because I was wearing Cowboy boots with 2 ½ heel. And the high heel condition is in conflict with the state procedure for the test.

Motion to exclude the non existent refusal, having blown 15-16 seconds.

All three motions were denied. For whatever reason the prosecution had the arresting officers in court during these pretrial motions, they were therefore coach and made aware of the issues prior to trail. Therefore the prosecution at minimum by providing them the information gave them information prior to their at trial testimony. The prosecution told them what my issues were and what I would be asking them to testify to at trial. And because of that I feel the prosecution suborned perjury in that they coached them, and then they allowed them to lie at trial, on the stand.

Time is of the essence, if there is anything you need from me in this regard, please let me know.

Regards

David G. Jeep

enclosure

cc: file

[1] See copies of the NHTSA Standard as attached to the copy of the 3/7/07 letter to the MSHP

[2] See copies of the of the arrest report dated 5/17/03 and as attached to the copy of the 3/7/07 letter to the MSHP

[3] See copies of the of the certified arrest report dated 5/18/03 and as attached to the copy of the 3/7/07 letter to the MSHP

[4] See a certified copy of the trial transcript

[5] See copies of the of the pretrial motions dated 9/30/03 as attached to the as attached to the copy of the 3/7/07 letter to the MSHP

Saturday, May 12, 2007

The unarmed truth, I am beggingm Jeep v Jeep 03FC-10670M & 03FC-12243

-->

Saturday, May 12, 2007

Gary Krautmann

St. Louis County Circuit Court, Clerk's Office

Court Clerk's Office

7900 Carondelet

Clayton MO 63105

Re: Jeep v Jeep 03FC-10670M & 03FC-12243

The unarmed truth, I am begging

Dear Mr. Krautmann,

I am begging for your help. Commissioner’s discretion got me into this, he acted without an evidentiary imperative, and judicial discretion can get US out.

I do not want to have to sue you and impugn your personal reputations and integrity. I am just asking you for a father and son’s right. But be assured, I will fight to the death for my son and my life.

DO THE RIGHT THING. If you allow this kind of creative thinking in regard to judicial rulings, next time it could be you, your son, your brother, your neighbor, your best friend. Judges have to be restrained by the evidence. They cannot be allowed to create evidence out of a figment of their imagination. All of us have to be diligent to impeach those judges that would act in a judicial capacity whimsically without an evidentiary imperative.

. Next time this could easily be you or your son. Please, I say again please, let my son go and enforce the law. Criminal law takes precedence over a civil ruling; this is a slam-dunk. My ex-wife and the would be judge, commissioner jones, both made fraudulent assertions under oath and as a delusional decree.

My wife and commissioner jones inserted their foundationless allegations to steal from my son and I, our god given rights to be “Father and Son. Would be judges who rule on an active imagination are antithetical to the rule of law. My ex-wife although fraudulently asking for an order of protection, never testified to any abuse or any threat of abuse. And point in fact since that time she has refuted her original assertion several times in open court under oath in front of the tyrannical usurper. The would be , judge commissioner jones. But the commissioner would not let go of the figment of his imagination and rewarded my ex-wife with everything.

Do not even think about WAINWRIGHT v. SYKES, 433 U.S. 72 (1977). I never hid or tried to obscure my innocents. I have from the inception openly, some would say too openly, asserted my innocents. There has never been any guile or hidden agenda in my defense. I want what is mine. This is judicial misconduct and fraud. WAINWRIGHT was never intended to be used for a cover-up of judicial misconduct and fraud. Judicial activism should be used to abate judicial misconduct and fraud at every opportunity possible. That is where Judicial Activism is universally respected.

Fraud unravels it all (fraus omnia corrumpit). There is a strong legal principle adopted internationally that a party who obtained an award through fraud should not be entitled to keep that award. Fraud cannot be allowed to pay.

If you think, I am a little crazy a little too…. I beg your indulgence. Please just picture yourself watching Monday Night Football happily with your son. The police come in and forcibly escort you from your home. You have never threatened, hit or even called anyone, a name, in anger. You are adjudicated an abuser and you are never allowed in your home again. You do not get to even see your son for 90 days. You have no realistic option. Yes I could have appealed, that would have cost at least $10,000, I had $0.00. I tried to appeal on my own, anyone that has ever tried to perfect an appeal knows that it is a nearly impossible task unless the appeals courts wants the issue.

I had been working out of the house for 2 years, it cost me $4,000 to defend myself through the abuse hearing and to get-my car. I had no furnishings; I literally did not even have a pot to piss in. I had some casual winter clothes. I lost my livelihood with my home. I was and am a man of modest means. I had a home and a retirement plan both were ripped from my control by an unfounded, unwarranted, corrupt judicial decree. My ex-wife had always controlled our savings. And even though I was my own lawyer for much of the time because I had no money, I have to date spent in excess of $30,000 on lawyers. To add indignity on top of indignity I was forced to pay my wife’s attorney’s fees, because I was deemed the abuser and I was “at fault.”

Psychologically I am sure there is a clinic name for it. I never had a psychology course. Call it clinical depression, delayed stress, overwhelming stress. I do not have a clue. I know have had thoughts of suicide and genocide. I have empathy for the disenfranchised crazies out there. But I am not a violent man, and I would never seriously consider either option.

Again I am not threatening violence, I just want to plug the dike so this never happens again.

I did nothing wrong. I am asking for my rights as a father, my rights as a person, I want my son, my home and what little property will be left after the courts get finished stealing form us with the bureaucratic nightmare of legal fees.

Time is of the essence. If there is anything further, I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.

Thank you in advance.

David G. Jeep

cc: Philip E. Jones, Sr.

Gary Krautmann, Legal Counsel to the Circuit Clerk

The St. Louis Post Dispatch

a list of selected favorites.

file

All 21st Circuit Judges Jeep v Jeep 03FC-10670M & 03FC-12243, The unarmed truth, I am begging

Saturday, May 12, 2007

Gary Krautmann

St. Louis County Circuit Court, Clerk's Office

Court Clerk's Office

7900 Carondelet

Clayton MO 63105

Re: Jeep v Jeep 03FC-10670M & 03FC-12243

The unarmed truth, I am begging

Dear Judge Krautmann,

I am begging for your help. Commissioner’s discretion got me into this, he acted without an evidentiary imperative, and judicial discretion can get US out.

My wife and commissioner jones inserted their foundationless allegations to steal from my son and I, our god given rights to be “Father and Son. Would be judges who rule on an active imagination are antithetical to the rule of law. My ex-wife although fraudulently asking for an order of protection, never testified to any abuse or any threat of abuse. And point in fact since that time she has refuted her original assertion several times in open court under oath in front of the tyrannical usurper. The would be , judge commissioner jones. But the commissioner would not let go of the figment of his imagination and rewarded my ex-wife with everything.

Again I am not threatening violence, I just want to plug the dike so this never happens again.

Time is of the essence. If there is anything further, I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.

Thank you in advance.

Reply to: Dave@DGJeep.com

David G. Jeep

cc: Philip E. Jones, Sr.

Gary Krautmann, Legal Counsel to the Circuit Clerk

The St. Louis Post Dispatch

a list of selected favorites.

file

Saturday, May 5, 2007

St. Louis County Circuit Court Division Re: The Unarmed Truth

Saturday, May 05, 2007

Joseph A. Goeke
St. Louis County Circuit Court Division
Courts Building, 2nd Floor
7900 Carondelet
Clayton MO 63105

Re: Jeep v Jeep 03FC-10670M & 03FC-12243
The unarmed truth

Dear Judge Goeke,

I am asking for your help. Commissioner’s discretion got me into this and judicial discretion can get US out.

As I am sure you know the St. Louis County Family/Civil Courts are full of biased bigoted bastards. I do not want this to be about name-calling. I am merely being guileless and factual in my descriptions. You know this, I know this, and everybody knows this, “The St. Louis County Family/Civil Courts are full of biased bigoted bastards.” Biased, because arbitrarily woman get the first right of refusal on all custody matters and marital assets. Bigoted, because they deny the rights of fathers. I want to repeat that, THEY DENY THE RIGHTS OF FATHERS arbitrarily as much or more than any racial groups were discriminated against in the past. And I say openly the Family/Civil courts must be full of bastards because it is as if the people in the courts never had, never valued or never knew their fathers.

Fathers are second, third or even fourth-class citizens in the family per the biased, bigoted bastards in the courts. A woman can be a drunk, a sex addict, or an emotional cripple and yet they have first right of refusal, by default with the biased, bigoted bastards in the courts, to be made the primary custodian and caregiver to minor children. Fathers are forced to right checks and given only limited access to their children. They are Siegenthaler-ed (every other weekend and Wednesdays nights).

I will not be swept under the rug of your apathy and bigotry. You are not over ruling a judge you are removing a rubber stamp from the cover up of the extreme bigotry and bias of a would be judge. A would be judge, a commissioner, who by job description is incapable of rendering the decision without oversight. Please read the enclosed letter I sent to commissioner jones. If you do not intervene, I will see you criminally charged for dereliction of duty. I will see you serve time for your crimes of theft, conspiracy, apathy and incompetence and I will sue you for one hundred twenty three million three hundred forty five thousand seven hundred eighty nine dollars and thirty-two cents …………………………………………………….……… $123,345,789.32.

You are about to run into the most powerful and respected force in a Free Society, an innocent man. Before this issue was taken up by the courts, I had been the primary care giver for my son. I fixed him breakfast, lunch and dinner, I took him to school every day. I went to all his school events. I was there for him when he got home from school. We went to the pool virtually every day we did not go to Six Flags during the summer. Yet he was ripped from my arms because by default the biased bigoted bastards of the St. Louis County Family/Civil Courts gave custody to my ex-wife. Of course, I could not even put a roof over my head or his. I had been thrown out into the street by the fraudulently asserted and incompetently adjudicated order of protection. I had everything I owned stolen from me by a fraudulent claim and the biased bigoted bastards of the St. Louis County Family/Civil Courts. I no longer had a home. I no longer owned anything. I was on the whim of a would be judge penniless and without any realistic options.

If I had only had due process and a fair minded judge to start with. The original ex-parte order of protection should never have been signed nor ordered. Nothing in it made a case for abuse. My ex-stepdaughter supported her claim of abuse, because she had nearly flunked out of high school and had failed four consecutive semesters in college and was partying every night till 3:00am, she was warned, after 3 semesters of failure, and then asked to move out on her own after the fourth, by her Grandmother, her Uncles, her Aunts, her Mother and her Stepfather. But her mother instead enlisted her in a criminal conspiracy to feign fear to defraud me of my rights to our son, our house and our life’s savings. That is not good parenting. That was child abuse, if anything, to engage your children in your criminal conspiracy to defraud.

My ex-wife testified on the stand during the divorce proceedings and the abuse hearing that I had never abused her verbally, she testified that I never hit or threatened to hit her. She testified that I never demanded sex or deviant sex. But the thief in black robes, the biased, bigoted bastard, Commissioner Jones could not have his perception his protection order proven unwarranted. I was declared a wife abuser, a child abuser and sexual deviant in the final divorce decree.

My ex-wife was awarded what she wanted our house, unfettered custody of our son, the bulk of our family savings and a monthly support check of nearly $800/month to do with as she pleases. And she proved the easiest way to get that is to point your finger and say, “abuser,” and the biased bigoted bastards will come to your aid that is if you are female. There is no need for proof or corroboration in the St. Louis County Family/Civil Courts with the biased bigoted bastards. The whole system is designed to protect woman at the expense of the rights of fathers.

Now I am asking for your help here. As an officer of the court you are obligated to report criminal activity. I want you to ask a few questions. You will easily discover that I am the victim here. And then, I want you to request a warrant for the arrest of James J. Robinson the attorney, my ex-wife Sharon Jeep and my ex-stepdaughter Kristen Capps for fraud. And then based on that, I would ask that you grant me custody of my son. Further I would ask that you issue a stay for all previous orders issued in the divorce, orders of protection, property settlements and custody orders.

I did nothing wrong. Yet I had everything stolen from me by an ex-spouse who presented a fraudulent petition upheld and enforced by an incompetent Commissioner who was clearly a biased bigoted bastard. You have the legal obligation and the authority to issue and or request an indictment for fraud based on the clear issue of fraud and sexual bias and bigotry. This will minimize but it will not correct the criminal acts of fraud by the petitioner and of your subordinate, commissioner jones. I request a speedy trail and a hearing on the issues with a new judge. I have already suffered under this fraud for more 3 years and 6 months.

If you do not help, I am going to pursue criminal charges for negligence and sue you in court for damages. And yes per the 1983 Civil Rights Act it is criminal and you have civil liabilities for the denial of my constitutional rights. You are the overseers of commissioner jones’s. He used your authority to corrupt the system, you as a group of negligent biased bigoted bastards rubber-stamped his orders, and under your authority, he enforced them. You as elected officials, you work for the electorate. Commissioner Jones as your subordinate, your appointee, and your employee he works for you. So I am going to ask for criminal charges of negligence for you and sue you the circuit court judges and the associate circuit court judges in St. Louis County, because he is acting with your rubber stamp and under the authority of your good name (lol). I am the most powerful and respected force in a Free Society, an innocent man. And I have the will, the voice and the ability to expose you for the corrupt incompetent you are. You have stolen from me, my rights to paternity, liberty, property, and due process. You have willfully and without regard to the evidence or proof stolen from me my son, my property and my liberty.

Time is of the essence. If there is anything further, I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.

Thank you in advance.

Dave@DGJeep.com

David G. Jeep

enclosure, letter dated 4/30/07 to Jones

cc: Philip E. Jones, Sr.
The St. Louis Post Dispatch
a list of selected favorites.
file

The unarmed truth, Jeep v Jeep 03FC-10670M & 03FC-12243

Saturday, May 05, 2007

Joseph A. Goeke

St. Louis County Circuit Court Division

Courts Building, 2nd Floor

7900 Carondelet

Clayton MO 63105

Re: Jeep v Jeep 03FC-10670M & 03FC-12243

The unarmed truth

Dear Judge Goeke,

I am asking for your help. Commissioner’s discretion got me into this and judicial discretion can get US out.

As I am sure you know the St. Louis County Family/Civil Courts are full of biased bigoted bastards. I do not want this to be about name-calling. I am merely being guileless and factual in my descriptions. You know this, I know this, and everybody knows this, “The St. Louis County Family/Civil Courts are full of biased bigoted bastards.” Biased, because arbitrarily woman get the first right of refusal on all custody matters and marital assets. Bigoted, because they deny the rights of fathers. I want to repeat that, THEY DENY THE RIGHTS OF FATHERS arbitrarily as much or more than any racial groups were discriminated against in the past. And I say openly the Family/Civil courts must be full of bastards because it is as if the people in the courts never had, never valued or never knew their fathers.

Fathers are second, third or even fourth-class citizens in the family per the biased, bigoted bastards in the courts. A woman can be a drunk, a sex addict, or an emotional cripple and yet they have first right of refusal, by default with the biased, bigoted bastards in the courts, to be made the primary custodian and caregiver to minor children. Fathers are forced to right checks and given only limited access to their children. They are Siegenthaler-ed (every other weekend and Wednesdays nights).

I will not be swept under the rug of your apathy and bigotry. You are not over ruling a judge you are removing a rubber stamp from the cover up of the extreme bigotry and bias of a would be judge. A would be judge, a commissioner, who by job description is incapable of rendering the decision without oversight. Please read the enclosed letter I sent to commissioner jones. If you do not intervene, I will see you criminally charged for dereliction of duty. I will see you serve time for your crimes of theft, conspiracy, apathy and incompetence and I will sue you for one hundred twenty three million three hundred forty five thousand seven hundred eighty nine dollars and thirty-two cents …………………………………………………….……… $123,345,789.32.

You are about to run into the most powerful and respected force in a Free Society, an innocent man. Before this issue was taken up by the courts, I had been the primary care giver for my son. I fixed him breakfast, lunch and dinner, I took him to school every day. I went to all his school events. I was there for him when he got home from school. We went to the pool virtually every day we did not go to Six Flags during the summer. Yet he was ripped from my arms because by default the biased bigoted bastards of the St. Louis County Family/Civil Courts gave custody to my ex-wife. Of course, I could not even put a roof over my head or his. I had been thrown out into the street by the fraudulently asserted and incompetently adjudicated order of protection. I had everything I owned stolen from me by a fraudulent claim and the biased bigoted bastards of the St. Louis County Family/Civil Courts. I no longer had a home. I no longer owned anything. I was on the whim of a would be judge penniless and without any realistic options.

If I had only had due process and a fair minded judge to start with. The original ex-parte order of protection should never have been signed nor ordered. Nothing in it made a case for abuse. My ex-stepdaughter supported her claim of abuse, because she had nearly flunked out of high school and had failed four consecutive semesters in college and was partying every night till 3:00am, she was warned, after 3 semesters of failure, and then asked to move out on her own after the fourth, by her Grandmother, her Uncles, her Aunts, her Mother and her Stepfather. But her mother instead enlisted her in a criminal conspiracy to feign fear to defraud me of my rights to our son, our house and our life’s savings. That is not good parenting. That was child abuse, if anything, to engage your children in your criminal conspiracy to defraud.

My ex-wife testified on the stand during the divorce proceedings and the abuse hearing that I had never abused her verbally, she testified that I never hit or threatened to hit her. She testified that I never demanded sex or deviant sex. But the thief in black robes, the biased, bigoted bastard, Commissioner Jones could not have his perception his protection order proven unwarranted. I was declared a wife abuser, a child abuser and sexual deviant in the final divorce decree.

My ex-wife was awarded what she wanted our house, unfettered custody of our son, the bulk of our family savings and a monthly support check of nearly $800/month to do with as she pleases. And she proved the easiest way to get that is to point your finger and say, “abuser,” and the biased bigoted bastards will come to your aid that is if you are female. There is no need for proof or corroboration in the St. Louis County Family/Civil Courts with the biased bigoted bastards. The whole system is designed to protect woman at the expense of the rights of fathers.

Now I am asking for your help here. As an officer of the court you are obligated to report criminal activity. I want you to ask a few questions. You will easily discover that I am the victim here. And then, I want you to request a warrant for the arrest of James J. Robinson the attorney, my ex-wife Sharon Jeep and my ex-stepdaughter Kristen Capps for fraud. And then based on that, I would ask that you grant me custody of my son. Further I would ask that you issue a stay for all previous orders issued in the divorce, orders of protection, property settlements and custody orders.

I did nothing wrong. Yet I had everything stolen from me by an ex-spouse who presented a fraudulent petition upheld and enforced by an incompetent Commissioner who was clearly a biased bigoted bastard. You have the legal obligation and the authority to issue and or request an indictment for fraud based on the clear issue of fraud and sexual bias and bigotry. This will minimize but it will not correct the criminal acts of fraud by the petitioner and of your subordinate, commissioner jones. I request a speedy trail and a hearing on the issues with a new judge. I have already suffered under this fraud for more 3 years and 6 months.

If you do not help, I am going to pursue criminal charges for negligence and sue you in court for damages. And yes per the 1983 Civil Rights Act it is criminal and you have civil liabilities for the denial of my constitutional rights. You are the overseers of commissioner jones’s. He used your authority to corrupt the system, you as a group of negligent biased bigoted bastards rubber-stamped his orders, and under your authority, he enforced them. You as elected officials, you work for the electorate. Commissioner Jones as your subordinate, your appointee, and your employee he works for you. So I am going to ask for criminal charges of negligence for you and sue you the circuit court judges and the associate circuit court judges in St. Louis County, because he is acting with your rubber stamp and under the authority of your good name (lol). I am the most powerful and respected force in a Free Society, an innocent man. And I have the will, the voice and the ability to expose you for the corrupt incompetent you are. You have stolen from me, my rights to paternity, liberty, property, and due process. You have willfully and without regard to the evidence or proof stolen from me my son, my property and my liberty.

Time is of the essence. If there is anything further, I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.

Thank you in advance.

Dave@DGJeep.com

David G. Jeep

enclosure, letter dated 4/30/07 to Jones

cc: Philip E. Jones, Sr.

The St. Louis Post Dispatch

a list of selected favorites.

file

Tuesday, May 1, 2007

Differences in Frequency of Violence and Reported Injury Between Relationships With Reciprocal and Nonreciprocal Intimate Partner Violence

Differences in Frequency of Violence and Reported Injury Between Relationships With Reciprocal and Nonreciprocal Intimate Partner Violence

Results. Almost 24% of all relationships had some violence, and half (49.7%)
of those were reciprocally violent. In nonreciprocally violent relationships, women
were the perpetrators in more than 70% of the cases. Reciprocity was associated
with more frequent violence among women (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=2.3; 95%
confidence interval [CI]=1.9, 2.8), but not men (AOR=1.26; 95% CI=0.9, 1.7). Regarding
injury, men were more likely to inflict injury than were women (AOR=1.3;
95% CI=1.1, 1.5), and reciprocal intimate partner violence was associated with
greater injury than was nonreciprocal intimate partner violence regardless of the
gender of the perpetrator (AOR=4.4; 95% CI=3.6, 5.5).

Published May 2007, Vol 97, No. 5 | American Journal of Public Health

Women are Just as Likely as Men to Commit Domestic Violence...

U.S. CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION
Differences in Frequency of Violence and Reported Injury Between Relationships With Reciprocal and Nonreciprocal Intimate Partner Violence

MELANIE PHILLIPS
Man Beaters Behind Closed Doors

RICHARD GELLES
The Hidden Side of Domestic Violence: Male Victims

MARTIN FIEBERT
References Examining Assaults by Women on Their Spouses or Male Partners: An Annotated Bibliography

RICHARD B. FELSON and MAUREEN C. OUTLAW
The Control Motive and Marital Violence

RENEE McDONALD
Estimating the Number of American Children Living in Partner-Violent Families

MURRAY STRAUS
Processes Explaining the Concealment and Distortion of Evidence on Gender Symmetry in Partner Violence

NICOLA GRAHAM-KEVAN
Distorting Intimate Violence Findings: Playing With Numbers

MURRAY STRAUS
32 Nation Study of Dating Violence Finds Female-Only Violence More Common than Male-Only

MURRAY STRAUS
Why the Overwhehning Evidence on Partner Physical Violence Has Not Been Perceived and Is Often Denied