Thursday, March 14, 2024

Dark Money Senate


Un-representative “dark money” CORRUPT Senate

 116th Congress (2019–2021)
Senate Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY)
Originally Published September 2020

 

    The constitutional “Unrepresentative “Dark Money" SENATE," at the time of the 1850 Missouri compromise, prior to the Civil War (1861) had equal representation in the Senate, 15 Northern senators v 15 Southern senators.  Although, the constitutional Unrepresentative “Dark Money" SENATE" population disparity was 13,342,325 for the north and 9,612,969 from the south.  There were 3,204,313 UNREPRESENTED enslaved people, could not find where 3/5 of them were allocated, added to or subtracted from, but I am betting most of them were in the south.  That population disparity of the unrepresentative “Dark Money" SENATE" MOTIVATED the Civil War and cost 600,000 lives. 



    The constitutional unrepresentativeDark Money" SENATE" was SUPERPOWERED“ in 1917.  Rule XXII of the Standing Rules of the United States Senate requires a majority of three-fifths of the senators duly chosen and sworn (60 votes if there is no more than one vacancy to end a filibuster) for cloture, a more extreme minority of senators can block a measure, even if it has the support of a simple majority. 



    With the undemocratic Senate Rule XXII the unrepresentative “Dark Money" senate only gets more corrupt.  You can elect anybody to the presidency and anybody to the House, but everything in the United States Government has to pass the “dark money” corrupted Senate. Unrepresentative “Dark Money" controls the SENATE!!! 


 



    The 50 Senators in Mitch McConnell's unrepresentative “dark money" GOP caucus represents 144,017,589 persons, 43.50% of the population.  The 50 Senators in Chuck Schumer's Democratic caucus represents 187,090,846 persons, 56.50% of the population.  The difference leaves 43,073,257 (13.01%) United States citizens without representation in the unrepresentative “dark money" unrepresentative United States senate.

 

    This is arithmetic, there is no fancy math.  Addition, subtraction, divide the sums by the totals to get the percentages, grade school arithmetic.  Be ASSURED  the unrepresentative “dark money" knows how to add, subtract and count!!

 

 Mitch McConnell's bottleneck “dark money" unrepresentative Senate is inherently and irrevocably constitutionally CORRUPTED.

 

    In a new unrepresentative “dark money" senate without regard to party, 52 of the senators, from the 26 least populous states amount to a minimum 18% of the population. 

 

  To hold a filibuster and BLOCK EVERYTHING takes 42 senators from the 21 smallest states with a minimum 11% of the population.

 

        Now you might mistakenly ASSUME that the 30 states and the 60 of 100 senators needed to overcome a filibuster would REQUIRE a majority.  WRONG!!!!  The 30 least populated states (60 senators) with a population of 80,549,406, amount to only 24% of the total population.

 

   The current UN-REPRESENTATIVE constitution produced the Civil War, sustains civil rights inequities to this day and RESISTS all improvements to our for-profit-healthcare system.


    The United States senate is irretrievably, uncontestably CONSTITUTIONALLY  CORRUPT.  The founding fathers had to compromise to maintain the union in the face of slavery.  We NOW need to do away with obscene compromise and institute the representative democracy we all know is NOW required.     


    It should be noted additionally, you can elect a president with only 23% (55,169,028) of the population, 51% of the 41 smallest states by population to get 270 electoral votes in the constitutional corrupt unrepresentative Electoral College.   And as Trump wanted, January 6, 2021, throw the presidential election to the house for election by 26 of the least populous states 16% (39,539,449).


    Now theoretically the premise of the 2 Senators from each state and the  Rule XXII (3/5 i.e., 60 senators of the senate to stop a filibuster) of the Standing Rules of the United States Senate were to stabilize government and protect it from the whim of a fickle majority.  The EXACT opposite has occurred, an EXTREME austere minority too often controls our government.  


    But the hope for sagacity of the stable long terms of the Senators have not materialized and the senate has been corrupted by the negation of a corrupt minority.



Download the MS EXCEL SPREADSHEET 



www.DGJeep.com

 

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html

 

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/if-that-is-not-absolute-corruption-of.html

 

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?Search=David+Jeep&type=Supreme-Court=Dockets

Wednesday, March 13, 2024

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK -against- DONALD J. TRUMP,

 

Wednesday, March 13, 2024

 

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., Assistant D.A.s Catherine McCaw (Counsel to the Investigation Division), Katherine Ellis (Major Economic Crimes Bureau), Rebecca Mangold (Major Economic Crimes Bureau), Christopher Conroy (Senior Advisor to the Investigation Division), Susan Hoffinger (Chief of the Investigation Division), and Matthew Colangelo (Senior Counsel to the District Attorney) 

One Hogan Place

New York, NY 10013

 

Re: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

      -against-

      DONALD J. TRUMP,

 

Dear People,

 

Do not allow yourselves to feel intimidated by Trump’s and other’s assertion this is JUST a "paperwork" crime!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Trump likes to compare himself to Capone. The upcoming document case in NY is like Capone's conviction.   They put Capone away on a "paperwork" crime, i.e., tax evasion, not for “Murder Incorporated”.  You have got Trump dead to rights on the DOCUMENTS case in NY. 

Off to jail he goes!

If there is anything further, please let me know

Thank you in advance.

 

 David G. Jeep

 cc: www.DGJeep.com

      file






www.DGJeep.com

 

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html

 

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/if-that-is-not-absolute-corruption-of.html

 

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?Search=David+Jeep&type=Supreme-Court=Dockets

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK -against- DONALD J. TRUMP,




Wednesday, March 13, 2024

 

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., Assistant D.A.s Catherine McCaw (Counsel to the Investigation Division), Katherine Ellis (Major Economic Crimes Bureau), Rebecca Mangold (Major Economic Crimes Bureau), Christopher Conroy (Senior Advisor to the Investigation Division), Susan Hoffinger (Chief of the Investigation Division), and Matthew Colangelo (Senior Counsel to the District Attorney) 

One Hogan Place

New York, NY 10013

 

Re: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

      -against-

      DONALD J. TRUMP,

 

Dear People,

 

Do not allow yourselves to feel intimidated by Trump's and other's assertion this is JUST a "paperwork" crime!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Trump likes to compare himself to Capone. The upcoming document case in NY is like Capone's conviction.   They put Capone away on a "paperwork" crime, i.e., tax evasion, not for "Murder Incorporated".  You have got Trump dead to rights on the DOCUMENTS case in NY. 

Off to jail he goes!

If there is anything further, please let me know.

Thank you in advance.

 

David G. Jeep

 

cc: www.DGJeep.com (https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/03/the-people-of-state-of-new-york-against.html )

      file

 





--

Thanks in advance...

"Agere sequitur esse" ('action follows being')

David G. Jeep, Federal Inmate #36072-044 (formerly)

www.DGJeep.com - Dave@DGJeep.com

Mobile (314) 514-5228 leave message

 

Wednesday, January 3, 2024

ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION

 My THREE BILLION DOLLAR manifesto.


This is the ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION

of

We the People’s intent to establish justice!!!


     


      We the People imprison ourselves at FOUR times the rate of the rest of the world.    Are We the People of the United States FOUR times as corrupt or violent?  NO!!!  We the People do not have the CIVILIZED justice system or forefathers provided for us in the amended Constitution for the United States of America.  We the People are subject to the Black-Robed-Royalist unconstitutional judge-made-law.

    Supreme Court’s precedent / sophistry tell us, “We the People” sub silentio[2] traded the “King can do no WRONG” for the ABSOLUTELY IMMUNE actions of the “malicious or corrupt” judges,[3] the “malicious or dishonest” prosecutor[4], the “knowingly false testimony by police officers"[5], the malicious, corrupt, dishonest, sincerely ignorant and conscientiously stupid actions of “all persons (spouses) -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process”[6], the corrupt, malicious, dishonest, sincerely ignorant, conscientiously stupid actions of federal, state, local, and regional legislators[7] and NOW PRESIDENTS[8].... to render absolute corruption of inalienable rights under color of law

 

         For additional support of CORRUPT rulings of the Supreme Court I submit their own published precedents[9] examples of the Judicial sophistry[10], that has corrupted We the People’s unalienable rights under color of law, I submit, sophisticated “absolute immunity” for racially motivate mass murder,[11] sophisticated immunity for a racially motivated  sophisticated deprivation of the 15th Amendment’s Suffrage[12] Rights protection with the subterfuges of poll taxes, literacy tests, and grandfather clauses,[13] sophisticated “absolute immunity” for racially motivated massacre[14] (Colfax Riot/pogrom), sophisticated “absolute immunity” for the state’s sanctioned kidnapping, assault and murder without regard to the 14th Amendment’s security,[15] creating sophisticated racial segregation and the ongoing Jim Crow discrimination over the “necessary and proper” “Act to protect all citizens in their civil and legal rights."[16] 18 Stat. 335, enacted March 1, 1875, separate and UNEQUAL, clarifying sophisticated segregation[17] over the necessary and proper "Act to protect all citizens in their civil and legal rights." 18 Stat. 335, enacted March 1, 1875, reaffirmed Judicial sophisticated “absolute immunity,”[18] prosecutorial sophisticated “absolute immunity,”[19] sophisticated “absolute immunity” for forced sterilization,[20] and sophisticated “absolute immunity” for “knowingly false testimony by police officers," and “all persons that were integral in the Judicial Process.”[21]

 

         There were several post 9/11 sophisticated precedents[22] to sustain the SUPER DUPER absolute immunity to wage WAR without congressional justification issue an unreasonable court order  - that was reckonably issued "in the "clear absence of all jurisdiction,"[23] that was "beyond debate"[24] "sufficiently clear that every reasonable official would have understood that what he is doing violates that right"[25][26]

 

    If that is not ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION of “We the People’s” intent to establish justice, I cannot imagine what is.



[1] Sophistry(?) is a logical fallacy that involves the use of deceptive, superficial arguments.

[2] sub silentio is a Latin phrase that means "under silence" or "in silence". It's often used in legal contexts to describe something that's implied but not explicitly stated. For example, a court might overrule a case's holding sub silentio without explicitly stating that it's doing so.  Briscoe v. LaHue,  460 U. S. 362

[3] Bradley v. Fisher, supra, 80 U. S. 335, 80 U. S. 349, note, at 80 U. S. 350, Pierson v. Ray, 386 U. S. 57 (1967) Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349 (1978)

[4] Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U. S. 428 (1976)

[5] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 345 (1983)

[6] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 345 (1983)

[7] Bogan v. Scott-Harris - 523 U.S. 44 (1997) Tenney v. Brandhove, 341 U. S. 367, 372, 372-376; Amy v. Supervisors, 11 Wall. 136, 138

[9] Sophistry is a logical fallacy that involves the use of deceptive, superficial arguments.

[10] Sophistry is a logical fallacy that involves the use of deceptive, superficial arguments.

[11] Blyew v. United States, 80 U.S. 581 (1871)

[12] United States v. Reese, 92 U.S. 214 (1875)

[13] United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875)

[14] United States v. Harris, 106 U.S. 629 (1883)

[15] Civil Rights Cases, 109 U.S. 3 (1883)

[16] Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896)

[17] Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U. S. 409 (1976)

[18] Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547 (1967)

[19] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983), Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U. S. 428 (1976)

[20] Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349 (1978)

[21] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983)

[22] Sophistry is a logical fallacy that involves the use of deceptive, superficial arguments.

[24] Mireles v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9, 11-12, 112 S.Ct. 286, 116 L.Ed.2d 9 (1991) (per curiam)  PENNv. U.S. 335 F.3d 790 (2003))

[25]  Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, 563 U. S. 731, 741 (2011), Mullenix v. Luna 577 U. S. _(2015)

Friday, December 29, 2023

DGJeep[1] v. Supreme Court of the United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856)



 

Tracking Number: 70221670000115162373 





Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr.
Supreme Court of the United States
One First Street N.E.
Washington, DC 20543-0001

Re:     DGJeep[1] v. Supreme Court of the United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856)

 Dear People,

 I am suing the Supreme Court of the United States for $666,740,000.00[2] via the VII Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

I am STILL sane[3] even though my son, my friends, my family may have asserted otherwise during this 20+ year struggle.  Just so we are all “sane” and on the same terra firma, I want you to know that neither fraud or the deprivation of constitutional rights can be limited by any financial / statute of limitation. 

I have got a 20 yr., ever increasing, $666,740,000.00 +/- problem.  If you have any questions as to the viability or specifics of my claims for the deprivation of constitutional rights [4] via fraud on the court by officers of the court,[5] please review the prior, timely, repeatedly, submitted Petitions for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856.  You have them, they are out there in the “cloud.”

But your problem is bigger.  The Supreme Court of the United States as the uncontested Judicial Authority of the Article III Justice department has created judge-made-law that supports and sustains, a fascist financially unfair justice system.[6]  I fully admit, I could have avoided this entire problem if I had paid-off[7] the system and gotten my traffic ticket “FIXED” 20+ years ago.  I refused!  If you have cash, under Supreme Court precedent - as Donald J. Trump does - you can avoid traffic law, criminal law, civil law, tax law, matrimonial law and VII Amendment constitutional law in State and Federal Article III Courts.

“Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts.”

― Winston S. Churchill

If there is anything further, please let me know.

Thank you in advance.

 

David G. Jeep

enclosure

cc: Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice, Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Associate Justice, Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice, Elena Kagan, Associate Justice, Neil M. Gorsuch, Associate Justice, Brett M. Kavanaugh, Associate Justice, Amy Coney Barrett, Associate Justice, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Associate Justice, Anthony M. Kennedy, (Retired) Associate Justice , David H. Souter (Retired), Associate Justice, Stephen G. Breyer, (Retired), Associate Justice, Lisa Nesbit c/o Scott S. Harris Supreme Court Clerk, Joe Scarborough, Mika Brzezinski and Willie Geist - Morning Joe - MSNBC Network, Attorney General Merrick Garland, DOJ Civil Rights Division

      www.DGJeep.com, file



[1] It should be noted that my middle-class family roots had the Jeep name centuries in advance of the Willys Motor Co creation of their General Purpose (GP) for the U.S. Army.  My paternal grandfather was born 21 NOV 1888 • my father fought in WWII and drove / rode a GP.

[2] See the enclosed spread sheet originating Tuesday June 14, 2011 12:00 AM and calculated to THE second Thursday December 21 2023 08:21 AM.  Note: as a comparable, Donald J. Trump has spent a comparable amount in sustaining his fascist financial interest in the deprivation of Constitutional Rights.

[3] I have Article III mandated certifications of my sanity.

[5] Federal Rules of Civil Procedures Rule 56 (d) (2) Establishing Liability

[6] Just think where we would be if Ida B. Wells had been able to sustain her $500 judgement for damages, for getting FORCIBLY REMOVED from a train instead of the judge-made-law of "We think it is evident that the purpose of the defendant in error was to harass with a view to this suit, and that her persistence was not in good faith to obtain a comfortable seat for the short ride (Chesapeake, O. & S. R. Co. v. Wells, 1887, p. 5.)."

[7] I had a proposal form an attorney of $5,000 to handle it.   


 






www.DGJeep.com

 

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html

 

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/if-that-is-not-absolute-corruption-of.html

 

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?Search=David+Jeep&type=Supreme-Court=Dockets