Eric H. Holder, Jr.
Attorney General
U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001
Re: Judicial "absolute immunity" makes inalienable
rights unsecured!
The Attorney General should be relentlessly
prosecuting "absolute immunity" in defense of
We the People's reckonable Supreme Law of the
Land - Petition for Writ of Certiorari 13-7030 Jeep
v. United States!
Dear "Uncle Tom,"
the CRIMINALS?
I hate to resort to name calling, but in
this case nothing else seems to work. I
have contacted you, and your immediate supervisor, SEVERAL times on this
issue!!!! If either of you were anything
more than, an “Uncle Tom,” a front for
the Black Robed Royalist Judiciary you would be RELENTLESSLY prosecuting the
“sense and reason”[2] of the law to QUASH “absolute
immunity” at any and all opportunity.
“Absolute immunity” is
diametrically opposed to the Constitutional rule of Law!!!! I mean that is your job isn’t it, to “defend
the Constitution of the United
States against all enemies, foreign and
domestic” via PROSECUTION[3] of the law?
“Absolute
immunity” has for the last 148 years empowered the unrestrained “deprivation of any rights, privileges, or
immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.” [4] The Black Robed Royalist Judiciary sophistry[5]
asserts “strict scrutiny” for “constitutional rights” but as we both know that
is just judicial sophistry without the commensurate obligatory “strict
liability” to support it. And per the
“difficult problems of proof” asserted in Connick, District Attorney,
et al. v. Thompson No. 09–571 Decided March 29, 2011 We
the People do not even have “respondeat superior” liability to rely on for the security of our inalienable rights from
our supposed “government of the
people, by the people, for the people.”[6]
Let us just think about that for a second. We the People, wrote a constitution
to “secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity” among other
things. This constitution was almost
immediately amended by a “Bill of Rights” to give further definition to the
Declaration of Independence’s assertion of “certain unalienable Rights” and
“the blessings of liberty.” But somehow We
the People “intended sub silentio”[7]
not to hold our government liable for the security of We the People’s
rights? THAT IS INSANITY - an
“incredible,”[8]
“fantastic
or delusional”[9]
scenario. I know the Black Robed
Royalist Judiciary’s job is a lot more fun for THEM if they can avoid any and
all liability for anything they do, but that is not what We the People had
planned. We the People clearly
intended to hold the “government of the people, by the people, for the people”[10]
liable for said rights! Why would We
the People invest the time and effort in a constitution.
The Black Robed Royalist Judiciary is
quite LITERALLY “do(ing) not only what their powers do not authorize, but what
they forbid,”[11]
the “deprivation
of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the
Constitution or laws of the United
States.” [12] They have BEEN HISTORICALLY and repeatedly doing
this and yet there has NEVER been an Attorney General willing to
PROSECUTE the Black Robed Royalist Judiciary. I should not need to point this out to you, a
supposed African American victim of
the “deprivation”
of RIGHTS!
We the People fought a Revolutionary
War and then a Civil War investing some 646,392 lives to maintain the union
devoid of slavery and establish the “Constitutional provisions, adopted in the
interest of liberty and for the purpose of securing, through national
legislation, if need be, rights inhering in a state of freedom and belonging to
American citizenship”[13]
i.e., the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments to We
the People’s constitution. We
the People went further and passed into law the constitutionally
authorized “ex industria” [14]
statute law the 1866 Civil Rights Act,
14 Stat. 27-30, April 9, 1866 (now codified as Title Criminal 18,
U.S.C, § 241 & 242) into the
United States Code of Law to hold UNQUALIFIED
“Whoever”
criminally liable for the
deprivation of rights under color of law,
The Civil Rights Act of 1871,
17 Stat. 13, enacted April
20, 1871 (now codified as Title Civil 42 U.S.C. § 1983 & 1985) into the United States Code of Law to hold UNQUALIFIED “Every
person” civilly liable
for the deprivation of rights under color
of law and "An Act to protect
all citizens in their civil and legal rights." 18 Stat. 335, enacted March 1, 1875, (now codified as Civil Rights Act of 1964 Pub.L. 88–352, 78 Stat. 241, enacted July 2, 1964) “The purpose
of the first section of the act of
Congress of March 1, 1875, was to prevent race discrimination in respect of the
accommodations and facilities of inns, public conveyances, and places of public
amusement. It does not assume to define the general conditions and limitations
under which inns, public conveyances, and places of public amusement may be
conducted, but only declares that such conditions and limitations, whatever
they may be, shall not be applied so as to work a discrimination solely because
of race, color, or previous condition of servitude. The second section provides a penalty against anyone
denying, or aiding or inciting the denial, of any citizen, of that equality of
right given by the first section except for reasons by law applicable to
citizens of every race or color and regardless of any previous condition of
servitude.”[15]
Post-Civil War We the People did
everything RIGHT! But that has all been defeated
by the corrupt, malicious, dishonest, sincerely ignorant and conscientiously
stupid[16]
actions[17]
of our Black Robed Royalist Judiciary. I
mean just look at the cases, Randall v. Brigham, 74 U.S. 7 (1868) origin Judicial
criminal “Absolute Immunity” circumventing the recently enacted 1866 Civil Rights Act, Bradley v. Fisher, 13 Wall. 335
(1872) origin Judicial civil “Absolute Immunity circumventing the
recently enacted Civil Rights Act of 1871, Blyew v. United States, 80 U.S. 581 (1871) overturned
a mass murder conviction, United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875) overturned
a conviction for a massacre/pogrom, Civil Rights
Cases, 109 U.S. 3 (1883)
creating the ongoing Jim Crow discrimination over the necessary and properly
enacted "An Act to protect all citizens in their civil and legal
rights." 18 Stat. 335, enacted March
1, 1875, Plessy
v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896) separate and UNEQUAL clarifying segregation over the necessary and
proper enacted "An Act to protect all citizens in their civil and legal
rights." 18 Stat. 335, enacted March
1, 1875, Pierson v. Ray, 386
U.S. 547 (1967) reaffirmed Judicial “Absolute Immunity”, Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U. S. 409 (1976) prosecutorial
“Absolute Immunity”, Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349 (1978) “Absolute Immunity” for forced sterilization,
and Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983) “Absolute
Immunity” for “knowingly false
testimony by police officers," and “all persons that were integral in the
Judicial Process.”
Not to mention the current malicious
corruption of what We the People deemed necessary and proper with District of
Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), that abolished gun control and
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), the abolished
credibility in election campaign financing.
Do we have to have another CIVIL WAR to establish the
inalienable rights our Revolution and our Constitution as amended post-Civil
War are supposedly built on?
TODAY in October of 2013 everybody has “absolute
immunity” but the innocent individual person, the victims! The innocent individual person has “absolute liability
for the “malicious or
corrupt” judges,[18] the “malicious or dishonest” prosecutor, [19] the “knowingly false testimony by police
officers,"[20] corrupt, malicious, dishonest,
sincerely ignorant and conscientiously stupid[21]
actions[22]
of federal, state, local, and regional legislators[23] and the malicious, corrupt, dishonest, sincerely ignorant and conscientiously
stupid[24] actions
of “all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral
parts of the judicial process.” [25]
The innocent individual person can be irreparably injured, if not DESTROYED;
the innocent individual person has no
remedy, no redress.
I think it is undisputable that the founding
fathers sought to “establish Justice,”[26]
as expressed 15 years after the ratification (1788) of the constitution in Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 163
(1803) by Chief Justice John
Marshall[27]
the MOST influential constitutional authority of his day and TODAY, with the unqualified
assertions, I quote, “it is a general and indisputable rule that where there is a legal
right, there is also a legal remedy by suit or action at law whenever that
right is invaded” and “that every right, when withheld, must have a remedy, and every injury its proper redress.”
We
the People have fallen
under the despotic[28]
spell of the “excess of power”[29] in the Supreme Court that has constructed[30] ABSOLUTE POWER[31]
from ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY for all to render ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION[32] of
We
the People’s desire to “establish Justice” under color of law i.e., ABSOLUTE
IMMUNITY for the “malicious or corrupt” judges,[33] the “malicious or dishonest” prosecutor, [34] the “knowingly false testimony by police
officers,"[35] corrupt, malicious, dishonest,
sincerely ignorant and conscientiously stupid[36]
actions[37]
of federal, state, local, and regional legislators “are entitled to
absolute immunity”[38] and the malicious, corrupt, dishonest, sincerely ignorant and conscientiously stupid[39]
actions of “all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were
integral parts of the judicial process” [40]
acting under color of law to render ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION[41]
of inalienable rights under color of law.
We the People in essence traded the “absolute
immunity” of the nobility[42]
for the “absolute immunity” of the “malicious
or corrupt” judges,[43] the “malicious or dishonest” prosecutor, [44] the “knowingly false testimony by police
officers,"[45] the
malicious, corrupt, sincerely ignorant
and conscientiously stupid[46] actions[47]
of federal, state, local, and regional legislators[48] and the malicious, corrupt, dishonest, sincerely ignorant and conscientiously
stupid[49] actions
of “all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral
parts of the judicial process” [50]
acting under color of law to wit, ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION.[51]
If there is anything further I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.
Thank you in advance.
“Time is of the
essence”
David G. Jeep
[1] Under the
Constitutionally authorized ex industria
federal statute law 18 USC §241-§242 Criminal Deprivation of rights
under color of law against the respondents in Petition for Writ of Certiorari 13-7030
Jeep v. United States
[3] The President
“shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed” per Article II, Section3
of the Constitution for the United
States of America.
[4] The
Constitutionally authorized ex industria
federal statute law 18 USC §241-§242 Criminal Deprivation of rights
under color of law and 42 USC §1983-§1985 Civil action for deprivation
of rights
[5] “We have long
enough suffered under the base prostitution of law to party passions in one
judge, and the imbecility of another. In the hands of one the law is nothing
more than an ambiguous text, to be explained by his sophistry into any meaning
which may subserve his personal malice” (Thomas Jefferson, To John Tyler
Monticello, May 26, 1810)
[6] A. Lincoln Gettysburg, Pennsylvania,
November 19, 1863
[7] BRISCOE V. LAHUE,
460 U. S.
362 (1983)
[8] Briscoe v. LaHue,
460 U.S.
363 (1983)
[10] A. Lincoln Gettysburg, Pennsylvania,
November 19, 1863
[11] FEDERALIST No. 78,
“The Judiciary Department” From McLEAN'S Edition, New York. Wednesday, May 28, 1788 Alexander
Hamilton
[12] The
Constitutionally authorized ex industria
federal statute law 18 USC §241-§242 Criminal Deprivation of rights
under color of law and 42 USC §1983-§1985 Civil action for deprivation
of rights
[16] “Nothing in the
world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.”
Martin Luther King “Strength to Love” 1963
[17] The recent
Government Shut Down comes to mind, but the Black Robed Royalist Article III
Supreme Court had already handed our legislators absolute immunity for their
legislative actions, Bogan v. Scott-Harris - 523 U.S. 44 (1997).
[18] Bradley
v. Fisher, supra, 80 U.
S. 335, 80 U.
S. 349, note, at 80 U. S. 350, Pierson v. Ray, 386 U. S. 57
(1967) Judicial ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY is based on a skewed reading, overlooking the noted exception that absolute ANYTHING creates,
of Lord Coke, Floyd
and Barker (1607) ruling from an acknowledged CORRUPT
court, the Star Chamber.
[19] Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U. S. 428 (1976)
Prosecutorial ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY
[20] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 345 (1983)
Police ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY
[21] “Nothing in the
world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.”
Martin Luther King “Strength to Love” 1963
[22] The recent
Government Shut Down comes to mind, but the Black Robed Royalist Article III
Supreme Court had already handed our legislators absolute immunity for their
legislative actions, “are entitled to
absolute immunity” Bogan v. Scott-Harris - 523 U.S. 44 (1997).
[23] “are
entitled to absolute immunity” Bogan v. Scott-Harris - 523 U.S. 44 (1997) Tenney
v. Brandhove, 341 U. S. 367,
372, 372-376; Amy v. Supervisors, 11 Wall. 136, 138
[24] Incompetence is the most
insidious and it is covered up by the gratuitous grants of dishonesty, malice
and corruption. Martin Luther King said
it better, “Nothing in all the world is
more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity” (MLK
Jr., Strength to Love, 1963).
As regards state Prosecutors, "States can discipline federal prosecutors,
rarely do" 12/08/2010 USAToday by Brad Heath & Kevin McCoy ("Federal prosecutors
series"). The "OPR is a black hole. Stuff goes in, nothing
comes out," said Jim Lavine, the president of the National
Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. "The public, the defense attorneys and the judiciary have lost respect
for the government's ability to police themselves."
As regards law enforcement
"Convicted defendants left uninformed of
forensic flaws found by Justice Dept."
By Spencer S. Hsu, The Washington Post published The Washington Post reported on cases that demonstrate problems
of COMPETENCY in forensic analysis that have been known for nearly 40
years by the Justice
Department.
[25] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 345 (1983)
ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY for “all
persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial
process”
[26] Preamble to the
Constitution for the United
States of America
[27] In 1788, Marshall was selected as a delegate to the Virginia convention
responsible for ratifying or rejecting the United States Constitution, which
had been proposed by the Philadelphia Convention a year earlier. Together with
James Madison and Edmund Randolph, Marshall
led the fight for ratification. He was especially active in defense of Article
III, which provides for the Federal judiciary.
[28] Montesquieu in his “De
l'Espirit des Lois” (1748) (The Spirit of the Law) defines three main kinds of
political systems: republican, monarchical, and despotic. Driving each classification of political
system, according to Montesquieu, must be what he calls a
"principle". This principle acts as a spring or motor to motivate
behavior on the part of the citizens in ways that will tend to support that
regime and make it function smoothly. For democratic republics (and to a
somewhat lesser extent for aristocratic republics), this spring is the love of virtue -- the willingness
to put the interests of the community ahead of private interests. For
monarchies, the spring is the love
of honor -- the desire to attain greater rank and privilege.
Finally, for despotisms, the spring is the fear of the ruler.
We the People have currently
despotic system in that we have NO
enforceable rights in America
TODAY!!!!!!!!!!
[29] James Madison
(1751–1836), the 4th President of the United States (1809 – 1817), often
referred to as the “Father of the Constitution,” in his essay “Property” for
the National Gazette March 27, 1792
[30] Alexander
Hamilton’s assertions of danger of “constructive power” to rights with in
Federalist number 84
[31] “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Great men are almost always bad men, even when they exercise influence and not
authority, still more when you superadd the tendency or the certainty of
corruption by authority. There is no worse heresy than that the office
sanctifies the holder of it.” Lord Acton in a letter he wrote to scholar and
ecclesiastic Mandell Creighton, dated April 1887.
[32] “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Great men are almost always bad men, even when they exercise influence and not
authority, still more when you superadd the tendency or the certainty of
corruption by authority. There is no worse heresy than that the office
sanctifies the holder of it.” Lord Acton in a letter he wrote to scholar and
ecclesiastic Mandell Creighton, dated April 1887.
[33] Bradley
v. Fisher, supra, 80 U.
S. 335, 80 U.
S. 349, note, at 80 U. S. 350, Pierson v. Ray, 386 U. S. 57
(1967) Judicial ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY is based on a skewed reading, overlooking the noted exception that absolute ANYTHING creates,
of Lord Coke, Floyd
and Barker (1607) ruling from an acknowledged CORRUPT
court, the Star Chamber.
[34] Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U. S. 428 (1976)
Prosecutorial ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY
[35] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 345 (1983)
Police ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY
[36] “Nothing in the
world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.”
Martin Luther King “Strength to Love” 1963
[37] The recent
Government Shut Down comes to mind, but the Black Robed Royalist Article III
Supreme Court had already handed our legislators absolute immunity for their
legislative actions, “are entitled to absolute immunity” Bogan v. Scott-Harris
- 523 U.S. 44 (1997).
[38] “are entitled to absolute immunity” Bogan v.
Scott-Harris - 523 U.S. 44
(1997) Tenney v. Brandhove, 341 U. S. 367,
372, 372-376; Amy v. Supervisors, 11 Wall. 136, 138
[39] Incompetence is the most
insidious and it is covered up by the gratuitous grants of dishonesty, malice
and corruption. Martin Luther King said
it better, “Nothing in all the world is more
dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity” (MLK Jr.,
Strength to Love, 1963).
As regards state Prosecutors, "States can discipline federal prosecutors,
rarely do" 12/08/2010 USAToday by Brad Heath & Kevin McCoy ("Federal prosecutors
series"). The "OPR is a black hole. Stuff goes in, nothing
comes out," said Jim Lavine, the president of the National
Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. "The public, the defense attorneys and the judiciary have lost respect
for the government's ability to police themselves."
As regards law enforcement
"Convicted defendants left uninformed of forensic
flaws found by Justice Dept." By Spencer S. Hsu, The Washington Post published The Washington Post reported on cases that demonstrate problems
of COMPETENCY in forensic analysis that have been known for nearly 40
years by the Justice
Department.
[40] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 345 (1983)
ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY for “all persons
-- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process”
[41] “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Great men are almost always bad men, even when they exercise influence and not
authority, still more when you superadd the tendency or the certainty of
corruption by authority. There is no worse heresy than that the office
sanctifies the holder of it.” Lord Acton in a letter he wrote to scholar and
ecclesiastic Mandell Creighton, dated April 1887.
[42] There are TWO
constitutional prohibitions for the grant of Nobility i.e., "Absolute
Immunity," Article 1, Section 9,
7th paragraph "No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United
States" and Article 1, Section 10,
1st paragraph "No State shall… grant any Title of Nobility."
You some how want
to argue that “the grant of Nobility” was about something other than the ROYAL
Status of IMMUNITY. You want to argue that hereditary property rights were
linked to a Colonial interpretation of Nobility? That would undermine Free-Enterprise.
There is not now
and there was not then any titular value other than Royal status as immunity -
being above the law? Did Nat “King” Cole
violate the constitution? No one is that
petty. Nobility conferred ONE-THING of
interest now and then, IMMUNITY from the RULE OF LAW!!!!!!!!!!!!!
[43]
Bradley v. Fisher, supra, 80 U. S. 335, 80 U. S. 349,
note, at 80 U. S. 350, Pierson v. Ray, 386 U. S. 57
(1967) Judicial ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY is based on a skewed reading, overlooking the noted exception that absolute ANYTHING creates,
of Lord
Coke, Floyd
and Barker (1607) ruling from an acknowledged CORRUPT court, the
Star Chamber.
[44] Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U. S. 428 (1976)
Prosecutorial ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY
[45] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 345 (1983)
Police ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY
[46] Incompetence is the most
insidious and it is covered up by the gratuitous grants of dishonesty, malice
and corruption. Martin Luther King said
it better, “Nothing in all the world is
more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity” (MLK
Jr., Strength to Love, 1963).
As regards state Prosecutors, "States can discipline federal prosecutors,
rarely do" 12/08/2010
USAToday by Brad Heath & Kevin McCoy ("Federal prosecutors series"). The "OPR is a
black hole. Stuff goes in, nothing comes out," said Jim Lavine, the
president of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. "The public, the defense attorneys and the
judiciary have lost respect for the government's ability to police themselves."
As regards law enforcement "Convicted defendants left uninformed of
forensic flaws found by Justice Dept." By Spencer S. Hsu, The Washington Post published The Washington Post reported on cases that demonstrate problems
of COMPETENCY in forensic analysis that have been known for nearly 40
years by the Justice
Department.
[47] The denial of the
“The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, “the
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), commonly called the
Affordable Care Act (ACA) or Obamacare,” shall not be questioned.”
[48] “are entitled to absolute immunity” Bogan v.
Scott-Harris - 523 U.S. 44
(1997) Tenney v. Brandhove, 341 U. S. 367,
372, 372-376; Amy v. Supervisors, 11 Wall. 136, 138
[49] Incompetence is the most
insidious and it is covered up by the gratuitous grants of dishonesty, malice
and corruption. Martin Luther King said
it better, “Nothing in all the world is
more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity” (MLK
Jr., Strength to Love, 1963).
As regards state Prosecutors, "States can discipline federal prosecutors,
rarely do" 12/08/2010
USAToday by Brad Heath & Kevin McCoy ("Federal prosecutors series"). The "OPR is a
black hole. Stuff goes in, nothing comes out," said Jim Lavine, the
president of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. "The public, the defense attorneys and the
judiciary have lost respect for the government's ability to police themselves."
As regards law enforcement "Convicted defendants left uninformed of forensic
flaws found by Justice Dept." By Spencer S. Hsu, The Washington Post published The Washington Post reported on cases that demonstrate problems
of COMPETENCY in forensic analysis that have been known for nearly 40
years by the Justice
Department.
[50] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 345 (1983)
ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY for “all persons
-- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process”
[51] “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Great men are almost always bad men, even when they exercise influence and not
authority, still more when you superadd the tendency or the certainty of
corruption by authority. There is no worse heresy than that the office
sanctifies the holder of it.” Lord Acton in a letter he wrote to scholar and
ecclesiastic Mandell Creighton, dated April 1887.
Thanks in advance
To Kill a Mocking Bird, The Denial of Due Process
"agere sequitor esse"
"Time is of the essence"
David G. Jeep
http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/
E-mail is preferred Dave@DGJeep.com, DGJeep@DGJeep.com
(314) 514-5228
David G. Jeep
GENERAL DELIVERY
Saint Louis, MO 63155-9999
