Wednesday, September 14, 2022

Congresswoman Cori Bush - Re: Civil Rights 1776-2022 and a Constitutional Judiciary



 

Congresswoman Cori Bush

563 Cannon House Office Building

Washington, DC 20515

 

Re: Civil Rights 1776-2022 and a Constitutional Judiciary

 

Dear Ms. Bush,

 

I live in your district.  I am a 66-year-old white guy.  I was born a white, I will always be a white guy -- I am going to die a white guy.  I stress that because “Civil Rights” are not just a racial issue.  Additionally, as a lifelong St. Louisan, I had the solidly middle-class advantage of going to THE proverbial old boy’s school.  I graduated CBC in 1974.  I WAS living in the best neighborhood in far west St. Louis County.  I stress that because “Civil Rights” are not an economic issue, this side of Donald Trump.  Nonetheless my CIVIL RIGHTS are ignored!

I have been engaged in a CIVIL RIGHTS issue for the last nearly 20 years.[1]  The FACTS of MY case are without question.  My issues are EXACTLY the same as every revolutionary colonist, every slave, and/or every MAN in the 21st century.  My civilized rights issue is exemplified by the rights Ida B. Wells sought in 1884-1887.  Ida B. wells was no shrinking-violet like Rosa Parks.  It took TWO men and boy to drag Ida off the train.  And then Ida B. Wells, on her own dollar, won a CIVILIZED award of $500 in 1884 US dollars.   Ida B. Wells did all this amidst “Southern Horrors: Lynch Law in All Its Phases,” she literally wrote the book.

Ida B. Wells’s 7th Amendment constitutional rights were DENIED by the Tennessee Supreme Court, which reversed the lower court's ruling in 1887.  It concluded: "We think it is evident that the purpose of the defendant in error was to harass with a view to this suit, and that her persistence was not in good faith to obtain a comfortable seat for the short ride."  The American absolutely immune “star chamber” has for too long been able to deny the rule the United States without regard to Constitution they proport to “defend against all enemies foreign or domestic”.

The 7th Amendment is CLEAR: “the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States.”

You want to fix the “star chamber” i.e., the judiciary, you want to fix the 2nd Amendment, you want to GUARANTEE civilized human rights enforce the founding father’s 7th Amendment.

The unrecognized civil rights Civil Rights 1776-2022 issue that has plagued the United States is the denial of 7th Amendment rights!  I personally have the EVIDENCE of 2003-2022 of unconstitutional immunity from the 7th Amendment:

·       a fraud (fraus omnia corrumpit[2]) on the court by an officer of the court (FRCP 60(d)(3))[3]

·       a NOT “facially valid court order”[4]

·       that was reckonably[5] issued “in the "clear absence of all jurisdictions,” [6]

·       “beyond debate” [7]

·       “sufficiently clear that every reasonable official would have understood that what he is doing violates that right”[8]

The Article III Federal Courts have been unregulated and allowed to self-servingly hold themselves immune from the very Constitution the are held to defend.  Article III section 2 states “the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.”

Judges will NOT be making anymore judge made law if they are held like the rest of the citizenry, to answer to a 7th Amendment CIVILIZED jury.

If there is anything further, please let me know.

Thank you in advance.

David G. Jeep

enclosure “The Green New Deal

 cc: www.DGJeep.com

      file



[1] www.DGJeep.com - https://drive.google.com/file/d/17Z_nJTJ7tatl57njkzWxyFopN-b5JI5M/view Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts

[2] fraus omnia corrumpit - “Fraud corrupts all.” - A principle according to which the discovery of fraud invalidates all aspects of a judicial decision or arbitral award.

[3] Rule 60(d)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure - “set aside a judgment for fraud on the court”

[4] The assertion of a misdemeanor traffic violation does not provide REASONABLE probable cause for an ex parte order of protection.  Clearly based on the original SERVED handwritten petition dated 11-03-03, there was a complete absence of jurisdiction for the stated charge.  

[5] If reason (reckonabilty) does not limit jurisdiction with probable cause, nothing can."reckonability" is a needful characteristic of any law worthy of the name."  Antonin Scalia: The Rule of Law as a Law of Rules,  56 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1175, 1175-81 (1989)

[6] (Mireles v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9, 11-12, 112 S.Ct. 286, 116 L.Ed.2d 9 (1991) (per curiam) PENN v. U.S. 335 F.3d 790 (2003)

[7] (Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, 563 U. S. 731, 741 (2011), Mullenix v. Luna 577 U. S. _(2015))

[8] "To this day, I am haunted by the vivid memory of the confirming shrug from the Police Officer when I questioned it as served on November 3, 2003.  I am further haunted by the memory of the same confirming shrug when Commissioner Jones first saw the absurdity of the court order on the bench November 20, 2003 as my attorney then highlighted as he repeated his prior objections."


The GREEN New Deal

 

Stabilize the economy

·       Oil INFLATION has been at the root of EVERY surge in inflation since 1973

Defeat Putin

·       Putin and Russia are no longer a world power.  Putin and Russia are merely petroleum producers throwing their weight around

Defeat OPEC i.e., Saudi Arabi, Al Qaeda, Radical Islam, Venezuela

·       Radical Islam, Iran, Iraq and Saudi Arabia have been USING OPEC and their Petro Dollars to dictate to the free world for toooo long

Stimulate the economy

·       FDR’s original “New Deal” deficit financed WWII, the Baby Boom and the greatest economic recovery in history.  Do not believe the assertion of the nebulous assertion of Adam Smith’s “invisible hand.”  Government deficit spending has created the United States economy not stifled it!!

Save the PLANET

·       Saving the plane is an existential threat and this should stand alone as a reason to create, defend and deficit finance if need be to DEFEAT global warming.  Yes you can pay off a former Cincinnati weatherman and one or two PhD Meteorologist to say Global Warming is farce.  But any reasonable person concurs with the overwhelming majority of scientific authorities that are screaming the DEATH knell of global warming left unabated by the Green New Deal.

 

The GREEN New Deal

 

Trump’s ISSUES

 

Trump’s ISSUES

Tuesday, September 13, 2022 7:35:00 AM

Wednesday, September 14, 2022

 

    I.         Trump’s TAXES (Criminal and Civil)

1.    Trump appeals ruling backing IRS release of tax returns to House to full DC Circuit

2.    Trump Organization CFO pleads guilty to tax fraud as legal cases surround former president Aug 18, 2022 6:50 PM EDT

3.    Trump’s tax returns: The legal issues and possible outcomes - Richard Lempert Thursday, May 28, 2020

  II.         Trump’s FALSE ELECTORS

1.    The Fake Electors Scheme, Explained Published July 27, 2022 Updated Aug. 3, 2022

III.         Trump’s Georgia Call

1.    Trump–Raffensperger phone call

IV.         Trump’s Mar-a-Lago Top-Secret Documents

1.    Material on foreign nation’s nuclear capabilities seized at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago…. Updated September 6, 2022 at 10:36 p.m. EDT |Published September 6, 2022 at 7:53 p.m. EDT

2.    Trump Had More Than 300 Classified Documents at Mar-a-Lago - Published Aug. 22, 2022 -Updated Aug. 23, 2022

 V.         Trump Berman Barr-AG Accusation at the DOJ -

1.    Senate to Investigate Charge That Trump Meddled in Prosecutor’s Office- Sept. 12, 2022

VI.         Trump’s Super Pac FRAUD

1.    Trump’s Post-Election Fund-Raising Comes Under Scrutiny by Justice Dept.” - A federal grand jury has issued subpoenas seeking information about Save America PAC, which was formed as Donald J. Trump promoted baseless assertions about election fraud.








The FACTS of MY case are without question


The FACTS of MY case are without question

 

The FACTS of MY case are without question - my liberty rights, my paternity rights, my property rights, were unconstitutionally deprived on November 3. 2003, 7:55pm CT.  I have been fighting to regain them relentlessly since.[1]  The UNDISPUTED issue is and has always been – a flagrantly, infamous, fraudulent, non-exigent, extra-judicial (coram non judice) court order:

 

1.           a fraud (fraus omnia corrumpit[2]) on the court by an officer of the court (FRCP 60(d)(3))[3]

2.           a NOT "facially valid court order"[4] (Stump v. Sparkman,435 U.S. 356-57 (1978) PENN v. U.S. 335 F.3d 790 (2003)) -  

3.           that was reckonably[5] issued "in the "clear absence of all jurisdiction," (Mireles v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9, 11-12, 112 S.Ct. 286, 116 L.Ed.2d 9 (1991) (per curiam) PENN v. U.S. 335 F.3d 790 (2003)

4.           "beyond debate" (Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, 563 U. S. 731, 741 (2011), Mullenix v. Luna 577 U. S. _(2015))

5.           "sufficiently clear that every reasonable official would have understood that what he is doing violates that right" (Anderson v. Creighton, 483 U. S. 635, 640 (1987), Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, 563 U. S. 731, 741 (2011)[6]

 

"The congressional purpose[7] seems to me to be clear- NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW. A condition of lawlessness existed in certain of the States under which people were being denied their civil rights. Congress intended to provide a remedy for the wrongs being perpetrated. And its (US Congress 1871) members were not unaware that certain members of the judiciary were implicated in the state of affairs which the statute(s) (now codified as Criminal 18 U.S.C. § 241 &; 242 and Civil 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 1985) was intended to rectify…. Mr. Rainey of South Carolina noted that "[T]he courts are in many instances under the control of those who are wholly inimical to the impartial administration of law and equity.  Congressman Beatty of Ohio claimed that it was the duty of Congress to listen to the appeals of those who, by reason of popular sentiment or secret organizations or prejudiced juries or bribed judges, [cannot] obtain the rights and privileges due an American citizen. . . ."  MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, dissenting. Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 559 (1967)

 

THE GRAVITAS OF THE PERSONAL[8] ISSUE IS BEYOND QUESTION, IT TOOK AWAY PETITIONER'S SON, HOME, CAR AND EVERYTHING HE ONCE HELD DEAR IN THE WORLD.  Thus, the issue could never be construed as vexatious[9] nor is the ongoing fight against flagrant injustice "continual Calumniations"[10] nor could a near 20 year struggle against injustice be construed as an inconsequential "short ride."[11] 


At issue – a flagrantly, infamous, fraudulent, non-exigent, extra-judicial (coram non judice) COURT ORDER - a fraud (fraus omnia corrumpit[12]) on the court by an officer of the court (FRCP 60(d)(3))[13] - a NOT "facially valid court order"[14] - that was reckonably[15] issued "in the "clear absence of all jurisdiction,"[16] "beyond debate"[17] - "sufficiently clear that every reasonable official would have understood that what he is doing violates"[18]  a right that right.[19] [20] [21] [22] [23]


Jane Crow Discrimination = Fathers are disfavored by domestic relations law in the United States of America!

 

 

Jane Crow Discrimination = Fathers are disfavored by domestic relations law in the United States of America!

  


Jane Crow Discrimination = Fathers are disfavored by domestic relations law in the United States of America!

  


Jane Crow Discrimination = Fathers are disfavored by domestic relations law in the United States of America!

 

 

Jane Crow Discrimination = Fathers are disfavored by domestic relations law in the United States of America!



[2] fraus omnia corrumpit - "Fraud corrupts all." - A principle according to which the discovery of fraud invalidates all aspects of a judicial decision or arbitral award.

[3] Rule 60(d)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure - "set aside a judgment for fraud on the court"

[4] The assertion of a misdemeanor traffic violation does not provide REASONABLE probable cause for an ex parte order of protection.  Clearly based on the original SERVED handwritten petition dated 11-03-03, there was a complete absence of jurisdiction for the stated charge.  

[5] If reason (reckonabilty) does not limit jurisdiction with probable cause, nothing can."reckonability" is a needful characteristic of any law worthy of the name."  Antonin Scalia: The Rule of Law as a Law of Rules,  56 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1175, 1175-81 (1989)

[6] "To this day, I am haunted by the vivid memory of the confirming shrug from the Police Officer when I questioned it as served on November 3, 2003.  I am further haunted by the memory of the same confirming shrug when Commissioner Jones first saw the absurdity of the court order on the bench November 20, 2003 as my attorney then highlighted as he repeated his prior objections."

[7] Jim Crow and/or Jane Crow

[8] While the petitioner asserts this is not necessarily an isolated Jane Crow issue, it is a uniquely flagrant "first impression" and PERSONAL for the petitioner.  Per McCabe v. Atchison, T. & S.F. Ry. Co., 235 U.S. 151 (1914) " The essence of the constitutional right to equal protection of the law is that it is a personal one, and does not depend upon the number of persons affected"

[9] Bradley v. Fisher, 80 U.S. 335 (1871), Page 80 U. S. 348 and 349

[10] Floyd and Barker. (1607) Easter Term, 5 James I - In the Court of Star Chamber. - First Published in the Reports, volume 12, page 23.

[11] Ida B. Well v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railroad - Tennessee Supreme Court, which reversed the lower court's ruling in 1887. It concluded, "We think it is evident that the purpose of the defendant in error was to harass with a view to this suit, and that her persistence was not in good faith to obtain a comfortable seat for the short ride."[Southwestern Reporter, Volume 4, May 16–August 1, 1887.

[12] fraus omnia corrumpit - "Fraud corrupts all." - A principle according to which the discovery of fraud invalidates all aspects of a judicial decision or arbitral award.

[13] Rule 60(d)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure - "set aside a judgment for fraud on the court"

[14] The assertion of a misdemeanor traffic violation does not provide REASONABLE probable cause for an ex parte order of protection.  Clearly based on the original SERVED handwritten petition dated 11-03-03, there was a complete absence of jurisdiction for the stated charge.   (Stump v. Sparkman,435 U.S. 356-57 (1978) PENN v. U.S. 335 F.3d 790 (2003))

[15] If reason (reckonabilty) does not limit jurisdiction with probable cause, nothing can."reckonability" is a needful characteristic of any law worthy of the name."  Antonin Scalia: The Rule of Law as a Law of Rules,  56 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1175, 1175-81 (1989)

[16]  (Mireles v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9, 11-12, 112 S.Ct. 286, 116 L.Ed.2d 9 (1991) (per curiam) PENN v. U.S. 335 F.3d 790 (2003)

[17] (Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, 563 U. S. 731, 741 (2011), Mullenix v. Luna 577 U. S. _(2015))

[18] Anderson v. Creighton, 483 U. S. 635, 640 (1987), Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, 563 U. S. 731, 741 (2011) - "To this day, I am haunted by the vivid memory of the confirming shrug from the Police Officer when I questioned it as served on November 3, 2003.  I am further haunted by the memory of the same confirming shrug when Commissioner Jones first saw the absurdity of the court order on the bench November 20, 2003 as my attorney then highlighted as he repeated his prior objections."

[19] While the petitioner asserts this is not necessarily an isolated Jane Crow issue, it is a uniquely flagrant "first impression" and PERSONAL for the petitioner.  Per McCabe v. Atchison, T. & S.F. Ry. Co., 235 U.S. 151 (1914) " The essence of the constitutional right to equal protection of the law is that it is a personal one, and does not depend upon the number of persons affected"

[20] Ida B. Well v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railroad - Tennessee Supreme Court, which reversed the lower court's ruling in 1887. It concluded, "We think it is evident that the purpose of the defendant in error was to harass with a view to this suit, and that her persistence was not in good faith to obtain a comfortable seat for the short ride."[Southwestern Reporter, Volume 4, May 16–August 1, 1887.

[21] Bradley v. Fisher, 80 U.S. 335 (1871), Page 80 U. S. 348 and 349

[22] Floyd and Barker. (1607) Easter Term, 5 James I - In the Court of Star Chamber. - First Published in the Reports, volume 12, page 23.

[23] "The congressional purpose (now codified as Criminal 18 U.S.C. § 241 &; 242 and Civil 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 1985) seems to me to be clear- NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW. A condition of lawlessness existed in certain of the States under which people were being denied their civil rights. Congress intended to provide a remedy for the wrongs being perpetrated. And its (US Congress 1871) members were not unaware that certain members of the judiciary were implicated in the state of affairs which the statute(s) (now codified as Criminal 18 U.S.C. § 241 &; 242 and Civil 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 1985) was intended to rectify…. Mr. Rainey of South Carolina noted that "[T]he courts are in many instances under the control of those who are wholly inimical to the impartial administration of law and equity.  Congressman Beatty of Ohio claimed that it was the duty of Congress to listen to the appeals of those who, by reason of popular sentiment or secret organizations or prejudiced juries or bribed judges, [cannot] obtain the rights and privileges due an American citizen. . . ."  MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, dissenting. Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 559 (1967) THE GRAVITAS OF THE PERSONAL ISSUE IS BEYOND QUESTION, IT TOOK AWAY PETITIONER'S SON, HOME, CAR AND EVERYTHING HE ONCE HELD DEAR IN THE WORLD.  Thus the issue could never be construed as vexatious nor is the ongoing fight against flagrant injustice "continual Calumniations" nor could a near 20 year struggle against injustice be construed as an inconsequential "short ride."



Thanks in advance...

"Agere sequitur esse" ('action follows being')

David G. Jeep, Federal Inmate #36072-044 (formerly)

www.DGJeep.com - Dave@DGJeep.com

Mobile (314) 514-5228 leave message

 

David G. Jeep

1531 Pine St Apt #403

St. Louis, MO 63103-2547


Thursday, August 11, 2022

Trump is an IDIOT

Trump is an IDIOT

Trump is accustomed to doing business within in his kingdom - Trump Org.  He thinks everybody is as stupid as he is.  The issue of paperwork - tracing and maintaining custody of “top secret” information is completely foreign to Trump.

Trump had been made aware of the requirement to conserve presidential paperwork for FOUR YEARS!!!  But I am sure he still felt he could get away with pilfering documentation.  He thought if he put it in his “box” and slipped it out of the White House he was “free and clear.”

Know I am not a paperwork person.  I lose paperwork on my desk all the time.  But I have a FIRM BELIEF that there are paperwork people that LIVE FOR tracking every piece of “top secret” information every created, duplicated or in EXISTENCE. 

PROFESSIONAL “top secret” archivists are paperwork people on steroids!!!!  I am sure that the professional “top secret” archivists employed by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) know exactly how many pieces of “top secret” there were - and the current custody and location of the same.  I mean it is their PROFESSION, their livelihood.

Trump THOUGHT he was smarter than everybody.  He was spoiled by his father and has spent 70 plus years trying to lose the $750 million PLUS his father left him.

Now the professional “top secret” archivists probably have a list of every piece of paper Trump handled that came up missing from the day he took office to the day he left.  Now he probably flushed some of them down the toilet, and while in office that was clearly incompetent, but it was LEGAL.  But when he took them out of the White House and retained possession after Biden took office it became CRIMINAL. 

When the professional “top secret” archivists got the first 15 boxes from Mar-a-Lago in mid-January 2022, they compared it to the MASTER List of Trump’s missing documents.  They REALIZED that there was a scheme behind them.  With that in mind they knew that there were still some missing.  For example, AS A COMPLETE GUESS, let’s say there were 4 3 years and 9 months of “top secret” XYZ daily briefings in the 15 boxes, but the last 3 months were missing.  The professional “top secret” archivists are not stupid.  They knew that the source of the 15 boxes still had the last 3 months of “top secret” XYZ daily briefings.  And when someone with Mar-a-Lago revealed to the FBI that there still 10 boxes of documents brought from the White House in the basement, they got a search warrant.

 


 

DOWNLOAD CURRENT

Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court 

as a PDF

 

 


 

Jane Crow Discrimination = Fathers are disfavored by domestic relations law in the United States of America! 




Thanks in advance...

"Agere sequitur esse" ('action follows being')

David G. Jeep, Federal Inmate #36072-044 (formerly)

www.DGJeep.com - Dave@DGJeep.com

Mobile (314) 514-5228 leave message

 

David G. Jeep

1531 Pine St Apt #403

St. Louis, MO 63103-2547


Monday, August 8, 2022

Keep REPEATING it as long as you have breath to BREATH!!!!!


Joe Biden, President

1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW

Washington, DC 20500-0001

 

Re: Keep REPEATING it as long as you have breath to BREATH!!!!!

 

Dear Joe,

You want to vanquish, inflation,[1] Al Qaeda's petro-dollars, Putin's petro-dollars, global warming, and PEAK OIL? 

Biden's Green NEW DEAL!!!

Someone says we have an economic issue with XYZ.  "Peak Oil" is REAL and THE only existential economic issue.  Petro-dollars have been dominating the world economy for 50 years. Economically Biden's Green NEW DEAL is the only current SOLUTION and unavoidable!!! 

Someone says we need new roads, new schools, or etc.  Global Warming is REAL, and THE only existential threat to our VERY existence on this planet.  And we do not have a spare!!!.  Ecologically Biden's Green NEW DEAL is the only current SOLUTION and unavoidable!!!

You say it costs toooo much.  The New Deal and World War II were deficit financed and led to the BIGGEST Economic BOOM in recorded history!!!  Get Adam Smith's comment on that!

Peak Oil and Global Warming are DEFEATED by Biden's Green NEW DEAL. Biden's Green NEW DEAL is the only hope we have to survive physically and economically!!!!

West Virginia v. EPA AND Dobbs v. Jackson CAN not be allowed to STAND!!!  Congress needs to restrict Article III judicial authority, as ORIGINALLY constitutionally restricted, to the trial specific judgment of petite juries and ELIMINATE any stare decisis[2] of Judge made law.  Congress/states then need to be asked to codify abortion rights e.g., Kansas.  States rights were defeated with Lincoln's preservation of the union.  "We the people of the United States" are not the united individual free states.  We are UNITED!


If there is anything further, please let me know.


Thank you in advance.

 

David G. Jeep

 

cc: Joe Scarborough, Mika Brzezinski, Donny Deutsch, and Willie Geist

      www.DGJeep.com

      file



[1] The PRICE OF OIL has been at the heart of every inflationary surge for the last 50+ years!!!!

[2] The horrific history of unfettered stare decisis is without question.   "How can rights, privileges and immunities secured by the constitution and immunity for the deprivation of rights, privileges and immunities secured by the constitution, both be constitutional?" Despite the 1st and 7th Amendment and then the civil war statutes Criminal 18 U.S.C. § 241 &; 242 and Civil 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 1985 rights, privileges and immunities secured by the constitution are worthless if you are poor or worse yet middle class.  Of course, if you have the million dollar litigation budget of Trump - you can rape your wife, defraud thousands of people (Trump University), profit from a corrupt tax exempt FRAUDULENT foundation, etc, etc, and then run for president - NOBODY DOES A THING!!! 












Jane Crow Discrimination = Fathers are disfavored by domestic relations law in the United States of America!






Thanks in advance...

"Agere sequitur esse" ('action follows being')

David G. Jeep, Federal Inmate #36072-044 (formerly)

www.DGJeep.com - Dave@DGJeep.com

Mobile (314) 514-5228 leave message

 

David G. Jeep

1531 Pine St Apt #403

St. Louis, MO 63103-2547