Wednesday, September 14, 2022

Congresswoman Cori Bush - Re: Civil Rights 1776-2022 and a Constitutional Judiciary



 

Congresswoman Cori Bush

563 Cannon House Office Building

Washington, DC 20515

 

Re: Civil Rights 1776-2022 and a Constitutional Judiciary

 

Dear Ms. Bush,

 

I live in your district.  I am a 66-year-old white guy.  I was born a white, I will always be a white guy -- I am going to die a white guy.  I stress that because “Civil Rights” are not just a racial issue.  Additionally, as a lifelong St. Louisan, I had the solidly middle-class advantage of going to THE proverbial old boy’s school.  I graduated CBC in 1974.  I WAS living in the best neighborhood in far west St. Louis County.  I stress that because “Civil Rights” are not an economic issue, this side of Donald Trump.  Nonetheless my CIVIL RIGHTS are ignored!

I have been engaged in a CIVIL RIGHTS issue for the last nearly 20 years.[1]  The FACTS of MY case are without question.  My issues are EXACTLY the same as every revolutionary colonist, every slave, and/or every MAN in the 21st century.  My civilized rights issue is exemplified by the rights Ida B. Wells sought in 1884-1887.  Ida B. wells was no shrinking-violet like Rosa Parks.  It took TWO men and boy to drag Ida off the train.  And then Ida B. Wells, on her own dollar, won a CIVILIZED award of $500 in 1884 US dollars.   Ida B. Wells did all this amidst “Southern Horrors: Lynch Law in All Its Phases,” she literally wrote the book.

Ida B. Wells’s 7th Amendment constitutional rights were DENIED by the Tennessee Supreme Court, which reversed the lower court's ruling in 1887.  It concluded: "We think it is evident that the purpose of the defendant in error was to harass with a view to this suit, and that her persistence was not in good faith to obtain a comfortable seat for the short ride."  The American absolutely immune “star chamber” has for too long been able to deny the rule the United States without regard to Constitution they proport to “defend against all enemies foreign or domestic”.

The 7th Amendment is CLEAR: “the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States.”

You want to fix the “star chamber” i.e., the judiciary, you want to fix the 2nd Amendment, you want to GUARANTEE civilized human rights enforce the founding father’s 7th Amendment.

The unrecognized civil rights Civil Rights 1776-2022 issue that has plagued the United States is the denial of 7th Amendment rights!  I personally have the EVIDENCE of 2003-2022 of unconstitutional immunity from the 7th Amendment:

·       a fraud (fraus omnia corrumpit[2]) on the court by an officer of the court (FRCP 60(d)(3))[3]

·       a NOT “facially valid court order”[4]

·       that was reckonably[5] issued “in the "clear absence of all jurisdictions,” [6]

·       “beyond debate” [7]

·       “sufficiently clear that every reasonable official would have understood that what he is doing violates that right”[8]

The Article III Federal Courts have been unregulated and allowed to self-servingly hold themselves immune from the very Constitution the are held to defend.  Article III section 2 states “the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.”

Judges will NOT be making anymore judge made law if they are held like the rest of the citizenry, to answer to a 7th Amendment CIVILIZED jury.

If there is anything further, please let me know.

Thank you in advance.

David G. Jeep

enclosure “The Green New Deal

 cc: www.DGJeep.com

      file



[1] www.DGJeep.com - https://drive.google.com/file/d/17Z_nJTJ7tatl57njkzWxyFopN-b5JI5M/view Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts

[2] fraus omnia corrumpit - “Fraud corrupts all.” - A principle according to which the discovery of fraud invalidates all aspects of a judicial decision or arbitral award.

[3] Rule 60(d)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure - “set aside a judgment for fraud on the court”

[4] The assertion of a misdemeanor traffic violation does not provide REASONABLE probable cause for an ex parte order of protection.  Clearly based on the original SERVED handwritten petition dated 11-03-03, there was a complete absence of jurisdiction for the stated charge.  

[5] If reason (reckonabilty) does not limit jurisdiction with probable cause, nothing can."reckonability" is a needful characteristic of any law worthy of the name."  Antonin Scalia: The Rule of Law as a Law of Rules,  56 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1175, 1175-81 (1989)

[6] (Mireles v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9, 11-12, 112 S.Ct. 286, 116 L.Ed.2d 9 (1991) (per curiam) PENN v. U.S. 335 F.3d 790 (2003)

[7] (Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, 563 U. S. 731, 741 (2011), Mullenix v. Luna 577 U. S. _(2015))

[8] "To this day, I am haunted by the vivid memory of the confirming shrug from the Police Officer when I questioned it as served on November 3, 2003.  I am further haunted by the memory of the same confirming shrug when Commissioner Jones first saw the absurdity of the court order on the bench November 20, 2003 as my attorney then highlighted as he repeated his prior objections."


The GREEN New Deal

 

Stabilize the economy

·       Oil INFLATION has been at the root of EVERY surge in inflation since 1973

Defeat Putin

·       Putin and Russia are no longer a world power.  Putin and Russia are merely petroleum producers throwing their weight around

Defeat OPEC i.e., Saudi Arabi, Al Qaeda, Radical Islam, Venezuela

·       Radical Islam, Iran, Iraq and Saudi Arabia have been USING OPEC and their Petro Dollars to dictate to the free world for toooo long

Stimulate the economy

·       FDR’s original “New Deal” deficit financed WWII, the Baby Boom and the greatest economic recovery in history.  Do not believe the assertion of the nebulous assertion of Adam Smith’s “invisible hand.”  Government deficit spending has created the United States economy not stifled it!!

Save the PLANET

·       Saving the plane is an existential threat and this should stand alone as a reason to create, defend and deficit finance if need be to DEFEAT global warming.  Yes you can pay off a former Cincinnati weatherman and one or two PhD Meteorologist to say Global Warming is farce.  But any reasonable person concurs with the overwhelming majority of scientific authorities that are screaming the DEATH knell of global warming left unabated by the Green New Deal.

 

The GREEN New Deal

 

No comments: