Tuesday, April 25, 2023

The FACTS of MY Case Are Without Question!

The FACTS of MY Case Are Without Question!

The FACTS of MY case are without question - my liberty rights, my paternity rights, my property rights, were unconstitutionally deprived on November 3. 2003, 7:55pm CT. On the ex parte order of abuse in question, there was NO claim of physical abuse and there has never been any claim or substantiation of physical abuse before or since. THERE IS NO STATUTE OF LIMITATION on fraud or the deprivation of constitutional rights. I have been fighting to regain "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" relentlessly since.[1] The UNDISPUTED issue is and has always been – a flagrantly, infamous, fraudulent, non-exigent, extra-judicial (coram non judice) court order:

1. a fraud (fraus omnia corrumpit ^[2]) on the court by an officer of the court (FRCP 60(d)(3))^[3]

2. a NOT "facially valid court order"^[4] (Stump v. Sparkman,435 U.S. 356-57 (1978) PENN v. U.S. 335 F.3d 790 (2003)) -

3. that was reckonably^[5] issued "in the "clear absence of all jurisdiction," (Mireles v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9, 11-12, 112 S.Ct. 286, 116 L.Ed.2d 9 (1991) (per curiam) PENN v. U.S. 335 F.3d 790 (2003)

4. "beyond debate" (Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, 563 U. S. 731, 741 (2011), Mullenix v. Luna 577 U. S. _(2015))

5. "sufficiently clear that every reasonable official would have understood that what he is doing violates that right" (Anderson v. Creighton, 483 U. S. 635, 640 (1987), Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, 563 U. S. 731, 741 (2011)^[6]

Congress and the Supreme Court are very much historically aware of judicial culpability in the deprivation of rights, "The congressional purpose[7] seems to me to be clear- NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW. A condition of lawlessness existed in certain of the States under which people were being denied their civil rights. Congress intended to provide a remedy for the wrongs being perpetrated. And its (US Congress 1871) members were not unaware that certain members of the judiciary were implicated in the state of affairs which the statute(s) (now codified as Criminal 18 U.S.C. § 241 &; 242 and Civil 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 1985) was intended to rectify…. Mr. Rainey of South Carolina noted that "[T]he courts are in many instances under the control of those who are wholly inimical to the impartial administration of law and equity. Congressman Beatty of Ohio claimed that it was the duty of Congress to listen to the appeals of those who, by reason of popular sentiment or secret organizations or prejudiced juries or bribed judges, [cannot] obtain the rights and privileges due an United States citizen. . . ." MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, dissenting. Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 559 (1967)

THE GRAVITAS OF THE PERSONAL^{^[8]} ISSUE IS BEYOND QUESTION, IT TOOK AWAY PETITIONER'S SON, HOME, CAR AND EVERYTHING HE ONCE HELD DEAR IN THE WORLD. Thus, the issue could never be construed as vexatious^[9] nor is the ongoing fight against flagrant injustice "continual Calumniations"^[10] nor could a near 20 year struggle against injustice be construed as an inconsequential "short ride."^[11]

At issue – a flagrantly, infamous, fraudulent, non-exigent, extra-judicial (coram non judice) COURT ORDER - a fraud (fraus omnia corrumpit ^{^[12]}) on the court by an officer of the court (FRCP 60(d)(3))^{^[13]} - a NOT "facially valid court order"^[14] - that was reckonably^[15] issued "in the "clear absence of all jurisdiction,"[16] "beyond debate"[17] - "sufficiently clear that every reasonable official would have understood that what he is doing violates"^{^[18]} a right that right.^{^[19]}^{^[20] ^[21] ^[22] [23]}

There is no statute of limitations on “war crimes” or “murder”…

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/12/it-is-murder.html

Jane Crow Discrimination = Fathers are disfavored by domestic relations law in the United States!

“Jane Crow” discrimination is REAL. In 1960 5% (one in twenty) children had no Father in the home. In 2014 40% (eight in twenty) children have no father at home. In my LIFETIME a 700% increase, that my Son and I HAD NO SAY IN. (The Fracking Boom, a Baby Boom, and the Retreat From Marriage" - Freakonomics – NPR - July 5, 2017, "Women just aren’t that into the ‘marriageable male’ anymore, economists say" Washington Post - By Danielle Paquette - May 16, 2017, “Male Earnings, Marriageable Men, and Nonmarital Fertility: Evidence from the Fracking Boom” Melissa S. Kearney & Riley Wilson - May 2017).

There is no statute of limitations on “war crimes” or “murder”…

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/12/it-is-murder.html

Jane Crow Discrimination = Fathers are disfavored by domestic relations law in the United States!

^{^[1]} Petitions 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856

[2] fraus omnia corrumpit - "Fraud corrupts all." - A principle according to which the discovery of fraud invalidates all aspects of a judicial decision or arbitral award. THERE IS NO STATUTE OF LIMITATION on fraud or the deprivation of constitutional rights.

[3] Rule 60(d)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure - "set aside a judgment for fraud on the court"

[4] The assertion of a misdemeanor traffic violation does not provide REASONABLE probable cause for an ex parte order of protection. Clearly based on the original SERVED handwritten petition dated 11-03-03, THERE WAS A COMPLETE ABSENCE OF JURISDICTION for the stated charge.

[5] If reason (reckonabilty) does not limit jurisdiction with probable cause, nothing can."reckonability" is a needful characteristic of any law worthy of the name." Antonin Scalia: The Rule of Law as a Law of Rules, 56 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1175, 1175-81 (1989)

[6] "To this day, I am haunted by the vivid memory of the confirming shrug from the Police Officer when I questioned it as served on November 3, 2003. I am further haunted by the memory of the same confirming shrug when Commissioner Jones first saw the absurdity of the court order on the bench November 20, 2003 as my attorney then highlighted as he repeated his prior objections."

[7] Jim Crow and/or Jane Crow

[8] While the petitioner asserts this is not necessarily an isolated Jane Crow issue, it is a uniquely flagrant "first impression" and PERSONAL for the petitioner. Per McCabe v. Atchison, T. & S.F. Ry. Co., 235 U.S. 151 (1914) " The essence of the constitutional right to equal protection of the law is that it is a personal one, and does not depend upon the number of persons affected"

[9] Bradley v. Fisher, 80 U.S. 335 (1871), Page 80 U. S. 348 and 349

[10] Floyd and Barker. (1607) Easter Term, 5 James I - In the Court of Star Chamber. - First Published in the Reports, volume 12, page 23.

[11] Ida B. Well v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railroad - Tennessee Supreme Court, which reversed the lower court's ruling in 1887. It concluded, "We think it is evident that the purpose of the defendant in error was to harass with a view to this suit, and that her persistence was not in good faith to obtain a comfortable seat for the short ride."[Southwestern Reporter, Volume 4, May 16–August 1, 1887.

[12] fraus omnia corrumpit - "Fraud corrupts all." - A principle according to which the discovery of fraud invalidates all aspects of a judicial decision or arbitral award.

[13] Rule 60(d)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure - "set aside a judgment for fraud on the court"

[14] The assertion of a misdemeanor traffic violation does not provide REASONABLE probable cause for an ex parte order of protection. Clearly based on the original SERVED handwritten petition dated 11-03-03, THERE WAS A COMPLETE ABSENCE OF JURISDICTION for the stated charge. (Stump v. Sparkman,435 U.S. 356-57 (1978) PENN v. U.S. 335 F.3d 790 (2003))

[15] If reason (reckonabilty) does not limit jurisdiction with probable cause, nothing can."reckonability" is a needful characteristic of any law worthy of the name." Antonin Scalia: The Rule of Law as a Law of Rules, 56 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1175, 1175-81 (1989)

[16] (Mireles v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9, 11-12, 112 S.Ct. 286, 116 L.Ed.2d 9 (1991) (per curiam) PENN v. U.S. 335 F.3d 790 (2003)

[17] (Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, 563 U. S. 731, 741 (2011), Mullenix v. Luna 577 U. S. _(2015))

[18] Anderson v. Creighton, 483 U. S. 635, 640 (1987), Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, 563 U. S. 731, 741 (2011) - "To this day, I am haunted by the vivid memory of the confirming shrug from the Police Officer when I questioned it as served on November 3, 2003. I am further haunted by the memory of the same confirming shrug when Commissioner Jones first saw the absurdity of the court order on the bench November 20, 2003 as my attorney then highlighted as he repeated his prior objections."

[19] While the petitioner asserts this is not necessarily an isolated Jane Crow issue, it is a uniquely flagrant "first impression" and PERSONAL for the petitioner. Per McCabe v. Atchison, T. & S.F. Ry. Co., 235 U.S. 151 (1914) " The essence of the constitutional right to equal protection of the law is that it is a personal one, and does not depend upon the number of persons affected"

[20] Ida B. Well v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railroad - Tennessee Supreme Court, which reversed the lower court's ruling in 1887. It concluded, "We think it is evident that the purpose of the defendant in error was to harass with a view to this suit, and that her persistence was not in good faith to obtain a comfortable seat for the short ride."[Southwestern Reporter, Volume 4, May 16–August 1, 1887.

[21] Bradley v. Fisher, 80 U.S. 335 (1871), Page 80 U. S. 348 and 349

[22] Floyd and Barker. (1607) Easter Term, 5 James I - In the Court of Star Chamber. - First Published in the Reports, volume 12, page 23.

[23] "The congressional purpose (now codified as Criminal 18 U.S.C. § 241 &; 242 and Civil 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 1985) seems to me to be clear- NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW. A condition of lawlessness existed in certain of the States under which people were being denied their civil rights. Congress intended to provide a remedy for the wrongs being perpetrated. And its (US Congress 1871) members were not unaware that certain members of the judiciary were implicated in the state of affairs which the statute(s) (now codified as Criminal 18 U.S.C. § 241 &; 242 and Civil 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 1985) was intended to rectify…. Mr. Rainey of South Carolina noted that "[T]he courts are in many instances under the control of those who are wholly inimical to the impartial administration of law and equity. Congressman Beatty of Ohio claimed that it was the duty of Congress to listen to the appeals of those who, by reason of popular sentiment or secret organizations or prejudiced juries or bribed judges, [cannot] obtain the rights and privileges due an United States citizen. . . ." MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, dissenting. Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 559 (1967) THE GRAVITAS OF THE PERSONAL ISSUE IS BEYOND QUESTION, IT TOOK AWAY PETITIONER'S SON, HOME, CAR AND EVERYTHING HE ONCE HELD DEAR IN THE WORLD. Thus the issue could never be construed as vexatious nor is the ongoing fight against flagrant injustice "continual Calumniations" nor could a near 20 year struggle against injustice be construed as an inconsequential "short ride."

"Fake News Donny"

Sunday, October 12, 2025 - 2:19:02 PM

Article I, II, and “School-Yard-Rock” clearly define how to make law. Show me where in the amended Constitution for the United States “judge-made-law” is called for or authorized?

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/06/sc.html

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FVfm-ushzCCTS5BtH1R7MeOvnDvh_kqv/view

The Issue with Trump, HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH TRUMP!

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/03/the-issue-with-trump.html

American Exceptionalism – NOT SO MUCH

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2023/10/american-exceptionalism-not-so-much.html

Equal Rights in a Free Market Economy

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2013/04/equal-rights-in-free-market-economy.html

A Balanced Budget for America

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2012/07/balanced-budget-for-america.html

BE AWARE, but do not be afraid, Trump is, at best and at worst, pathetically incompetent and INEFFECTIVE manager / leader!

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/be-aware.html

Trump does not know the name of the country he was or is to be president of...

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/istgtdnk.html

The constitutional small "d" undemocratic corrupt “dark money” Senate and Electoral College

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html

Trump is a convicted and diagnosed psychotic criminal, chronic degenerate, maniacal liar and a "fucking moron!"

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/be-aware.html

The constitutional small "d" unrepresentative corrupt “dark money” Senate and Electoral College

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html

The Judicial sophistry of "absolute immunity" creates "absolute power" to the ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION of We the People's unalienable rights under color of law... the AUDACITY of the INSANITY, ignorance and stupidity in support of a "fantastic or delusional" scenario.

The Emperor Has No Clothes.

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/if-that-is-not-absolute-corruption-of.html

The FACTS of MY case are without question

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2022/09/the-facts-of-my-case-are-without.html

DGJeep v. Supreme Court of the United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856)

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?Search=David+Jeep&type=Supreme-Court=Dockets

Sunday, October 12, 2025 - 2:19:02 PM

"Fake News Donny"

Thanks in advance...

"Agere sequitur esse" ('action follows being')

David G. Jeep, Federal Inmate #36072-044 (formerly)

www.DGJeep.com - Dave@DGJeep.com

Mobile (314) 514-5228 leave message

David G. Jeep

1531 Pine St Apt #403

St. Louis, MO 63103-2547

Wednesday, March 15, 2023

As regards the Trump / Stormy Daniels

"Trump will be REVEALED as an inveterate FRAUD from his habitual tax evasion, his constant lying^[1], his collusion with the Russians to get elected and his current capitulation to Russia with his Ukraine Policy"

"1. The defendant DONALD J. TRUMP repeatedly and fraudulently falsified New York business records to conceal criminal conduct that hid damaging information from the voting public during the 2016 presidential election." https://thehill.com/homenews/3933605-read-trump-indictment-and-statement-of-facts/

As regards the Trump / Stormy Daniels they are trying to YES convict him, but second and just as importantly set up a standard for future prosecutions. They need to FIRST establish that the "statute of limitations" was tolled[2] during the presidency because of "A Sitting President's Amenability to Indictment and Criminal Prosecution" – OLC opinion October 16, 2000. Additionally, Trump could not be prosecuted because of his subserviently corrupt DOJ. Nor impeached because of a politically dependent corrupt minority in the Senate.

But secondly, they need to establish Trump's propensity for FRAUD. Once they establish the fraud and the propensity for generating FRAUD, the assertion of fraus omnia corrumpit - fraud unravels all - once a contract is affected by fraud, all bets are off. It is the oldest of legal dictums, the perpetrator of a fraud cannot be allowed to profit from said fraud once the fraud is established.

They can then unseat the three Supreme Court Justices, and that is a good thing.

The three Supreme Court Justices were appointed via FRAUD. Fraud with Stormy Daniels, National Enquirer, David Pecker and Karen McDougal.[3]

But more importantly the fraud regarding his collusion with the Russians during the campaign, and during his time in office. Trump got away with fraud while in office, with his obstruction of justice,[4] the OLC Memo "A Sitting President's Amenability to Indictment and Criminal Prosecution." The concurrence of subservient Attorney General and the obsequious but controlling self-serving minority in the Senate.

Remember Don Jr, confirmed the collusion in his Trump Tower Meeting email.[5] The FBI, CIA and DNI confirmed the Russian's[6] delivered the dirt later in the summer as requested. Everybody saw Donald Trump confirm that he continues to pay Putin off with his conciliatory policies to Russia in his Helsinki Press conference[7].

[1] "Trump's false or misleading claims total 30573 over 4 years" Washington Post - Jan 24, 2021

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/how-fact-checker-tracked-trump-claims/2021/01/23/ad04b69a-5c1d-11eb-a976-bad6431e03e2_story.html

[2] "a court's possible authority to recognize an equitable tolling." page 259, "A Sitting President's Amenability to Indictment and Criminal Prosecution"

[3] "National Enquirer owner admits to 'catch and kill' payment to ex-Playmate" The Guardian Wed 12 Dec 2018 16.41 EST https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/dec/12/national-enquirer-trump-payments-david-pecker-catch-and-kill

[4] "10 times Trump may have obstructed justice, according to Mueller" BY WILL RAHN, JULY 23, 2019 / 6:56 PM / CBS NEWS

[5] "Trump Tower meeting emails 'really bad,' aide told Trump" By ERIC TUCKER APNews April 25, 2019 https://apnews.com/article/politics-ap-top-news-donald-trump-paul-manafort-north-america-215ffd4a7c25473abd5a0b1781bb947b

[6] "FBI, DNI back CIA judgment that Russia meddled in election and favored Trump DECEMBER 16, 2016 / 2:56 PM / CBS NEWS https://www.cbsnews.com/news/fbi-dni-back-cia-judgment-that-russia-meddled-in-election-and-favored-trump/ "

[7] "Trump sides with Russia against FBI (CIA, DNI and NSA) at Helsinki summit Published" BBC 16 July 2018 https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-44852812 AND his current assertion that Russia's WAR of AGGRESSION in Ukraine has justification, while a unified FREE WORLD assert otherwise. "'Putin never ever would have gone into Ukraine if I were president,' Trump claims Independent, Gustaf Kilander, Washington, DC, Tuesday 21 February 2023 14:39 https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/donald-trump-putin-war-russia-b2286504.html

Thanks in advance...

"Agere sequitur esse" ('action follows being')

David G. Jeep, Federal Inmate #36072-044 (formerly)

www.DGJeep.com - Dave@DGJeep.com

Mobile (314) 514-5228 leave message

David G. Jeep

1531 Pine St Apt #403

St. Louis, MO 63103-2547

The FACTS of MY case are without question

The FACTS of MY case are without question - my liberty rights, my paternity rights, my property rights, were unconstitutionally deprived on November 3. 2003, 7:55pm CT. THERE IS NO STATUTE OF LIMITATION on fraud or the deprivation of constitutional rights. I have been fighting to regain them relentlessly since.

Tuesday, March 14, 2023

Metro(R) by T-Mobile - Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP) SCAM

Federal Communications Commission

45 L Street NE

Washington, DC 20554

Phone: 1-888-225-5322

Videophone: 1-844-432-2275

54Fax: 1-866-418-0232

T‑Mobile (Metro) Customer Relations

P.O. Box 37380

Albuquerque, NM 87176-7380

Call: 888-8-METRO-8

Call: *611 from your Metro® by T‑Mobile phone

Re: Metro® by T-Mobile - Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP) SCAM

"TRUE 5G" Cell Phone Account # 314-665-8485 – unlimited plan

"TRUE 5G" Home Internet Account # 314-448-1837– unlimited plan

Dear People,

Metro® by T-Mobile is running a SCAM. I signed up for Cell Phone Account # 314-665-8485 – unlimited plan. December 2021 - $25/month. I have been "auto paying" for the last 15 months no problem. I liked the service I paid automatically.

No Problem.

I signed up for a T-Mobile "TRUE 5G" home internet service in May of 2022 - $50/month. I have been "auto paying" for the last 10 months no problem. I liked the service I paid automatically. I investigated the Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP) for my T-Mobile home internet service told it was not available.

No Problem.

I signed up with AT&T via the Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP) but the AT&T service could not come up to "TRUE 5G" standard. I canceled with AT&T, to preserve my ACP benefit.

Metro® by T-Mobile then sent me a text message offering me "TRUE 5G" with the potential for an ACP benefit. I signed up for the additional "TRUE 5G" Home Internet service with Account # 314-448-1837– unlimited plan, as referenced above.[1]

I established the cost of my NEW service with the Metro® by T-Mobile as follows:

"TRUE 5G" Cell Phone Account # 314-665-8485 – unlimited plan $25.00

"TRUE 5G" Home Internet Account # 314-448-1837– unlimited plan $50.00

- Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP) ($30.00)

- TOTAL DUE monthly $45.00

I checked my account due on the Metro® by T-Mobile app. They say that I will owe $55.00/month. That is $10/month more than I had discussed with the Metro® by T-Mobile salesperson. The store personnel tell me they can do nothing, *611 information tells me they can do nothing.

The Metro® by T-Mobile SCAM asserts three factors to improve their TAKE (i.e., profit). The first SCAM is that every Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP) program participant must use the ACP on their cell phone service. The second SCAM, the ACP is only applicable to the FULL non-promotional list price for cell service price of $30/month, no matter any current, prior, or ongoing price the participant is otherwise entitled to. This should be my prior and ongoing price of only $25/month, as stated in the above accounting. The third SCAM is apparently the result of this being a new account payment to establish auto pay of $5/month, this despite the prior two accounts being established originally and ongoing autopay without any objection or added cost.

Now the current agreed contract amount for the two services ought to be $45 not the $55 currently asked. I am making a record of the current agreed contract amount of $45 and asking that the billing about be adjusted accordingly.

Acknowledging that the Metro® by T-Mobile SCAM could benefit from any BUREAUCRATIC delay in establishing facts - I am asking for a credit on the current amount due of $10/month. And an ongoing contract amount of $45/month with the Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP) ($30.00) paid by others.

My complaint is an over payment to the Metro® by T-Mobile SCAM of $10 per month. Being a retired fixed income recipient of the ACP benefit - every penny counts. I want my rate adjusted to $45/month on going for the "TRUE 5G" Cell Phone Account # 314-665-8485 and "TRUE 5G" Home Internet Account # 314-448-1837 with an ACP benefit.

Now I have spent hours on the phone and hours at the store trying to effect FAIRNESS I describe. I now escalate to formerly requesting Federal Communications Commission assistance to resolve this issue per the website ( https://consumercomplaints.fcc.gov/hc/en-us/articles/4412582232980-Need-Help-with-an-Affordable-Connectivity-Program-ACP-or-Emergency-Broadband-Benefit-EBB-complaint- ) .

If there is anything further, please let me know.

Thank you in advance.

David G. Jeep

cc: www.DGJeep.com

file

[1] I was forced to go through what has been a very laborious process, to re-establish "TRUE 5G" T-Mobile home internet via the same T-Mobile hardware, software and network.

Thanks in advance...

"Agere sequitur esse" ('action follows being')

David G. Jeep, Federal Inmate #36072-044 (formerly)

www.DGJeep.com - Dave@DGJeep.com

Mobile (314) 514-5228 leave message

David G. Jeep

1531 Pine St Apt #403

St. Louis, MO 63103-2547

Your interviewing SKILLS - “fake news” without becoming “fake news”.

Chuck Todd

30 Rockefeller Plaza, Building 620

New York, NY 10112

Re: Your interviewing SKILLS - "fake news" without becoming "fake news".

Dear People,

I just finished watching your interview with Gov. Chris Sununu (R-N.H.), (https://www.nbcnews.com/meet-the-press/video/sununu-says-desantis-would-win-in-new-hampshire-if-election-were-today-164506181563). You allow him to set the "fake news" premise "Hunter Biden's laptop and the source of the COVID" as valid without confrontation.

I am sorry, but anybody mentions "fake news" you have to confront it. You can not be USED as an obsequious conveyor / proponent of the "fake news" without becoming "fake news".

If there is anything further, please let me know.

Thank you in advance.

David G. Jeep

enclosure

cc: www.DGJeep.com

file

Thanks in advance...

"Agere sequitur esse" ('action follows being')

David G. Jeep, Federal Inmate #36072-044 (formerly)

www.DGJeep.com - Dave@DGJeep.com

Mobile (314) 514-5228 leave message

David G. Jeep

1531 Pine St Apt #403

St. Louis, MO 63103-2547

Monday, February 20, 2023

Trump Colluded With the Russians

Trump Colluded With the Russians

You clearly have no clue. Assertions alone do not create FACTS.

FACT - The meeting between three senior members of the 2016 Trump campaign – Donald Trump Jr., Jared Kushner, and Paul Manafort – four other U.S. citizens, and Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya happened at Trump Tower in New York City on June 9, 2016. Don Jr. acknowledged his email premising the meeting on the Russians proposal to provide DIRT on Hillary Clinton. [1]

FACT - The Mueller Report[2] via the FBI, CIA and DNI documented that Russians provided DIRT on Hillary Clinton via the release of Guccifer 2.0's [3] stolen emails (Campaign and Podesta emails emails[4]) later in the summer (June and July 2016, October 7, 2016).

FACT - The Mueller Report proved Manafort provided confidential Trump polling information, August 2, 2016, to the Russians via Konstantin Kilimnik, who the FBI assesses to have ties to Russian intelligence. [5]

Those are FACTS supported by Mueller, CIA, FBI and DNI and the parties to the conspiracy.

FACT - Trump got elected in a close election via FRAUD. Fraud corrupts all it touches!!! The Three Supreme Court Justices Trump nominated are all CORRUPTED by the FRAUD in Trump's campaign assisted by the Russian FRAUD.

Senate panel finds Russia interfered in the 2016 U.S. election -Aug 18, 2020 4:49 AM EDT

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump campaign’s interactions with Russian intelligence services during the 2016 presidential election posed a “grave” counterintelligence threat, a Senate panel concluded Tuesday as it detailed how associates of Donald Trump had regular contact with Russians and expected to benefit from the Kremlin’s help.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/senate-panel-finds-russia-interfered-in-the-2016-us-election

A non-political impeachment was to be the remedy.

A political impeachment is not even a "scarecrow" (Thomas Jefferson).

FACT - There is NO statute of imitations on FRAUD!

#GROW UP !!!!!

[1] Page 116 & 185 The Mueller Report “Report On The Investigation Into Russian Interference In The 2016 Presidential Election”

[2] https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5955118-The-Mueller-Report

[3] According to indictments in February 2018, the "Guccifer 2.0" persona is operated by Russian military intelligence agency GRU.[12] On July 13, 2018, Special Counsel Robert Mueller indicted 12 GRU agents for allegedly perpetrating the cyberattacks.

[4] Page 20 & 176 The Mueller Report “Report On The Investigation Into Russian Interference In The 2016 Presidential Election”

[5] Page 7 The Mueller Report “Report On The Investigation Into Russian Interference In The 2016 Presidential Election”

Jane Crow Discrimination = Fathers are disfavored by domestic relations law in the United States of America!

Thursday, February 16, 2023

DGJeep[1] v. United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856) FOLLOW UP

USPS.co Certified Mail Tracking : 7022 1670 0001 1516 2328

USPS 70221670000115162328, USPS in possession of item 02/15/2023 11:49am SAINT LOUIS MO 63155
USPS 70221670000115162328, Delivered, PO Box 02/22/2023 7:17am WASHINGTON DC 20543.

Download as 3 page PDF

Download as 48 page PDF as mailed

Wednesday, February 15, 2023

Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr.

Supreme Court of the United States

One First Street N.E.

Washington, DC 20543-0001

Re: DGJeep[1] v. United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856) FOLLOW UP

Dear People,

I am sane. I realize that may seem a strange assertion, but when you have repeatedly been dealing with clearly insane people, it is REQUIRED. I have TWO psychological examines in the bag, to prove it. Both at your expense and insistence.[2] Please remember you held me in jail for 411 days without a bond, trial, or conviction. My case for my sanity has not changed, psychiatrist[3] listen to and analyze based on reason not prior irrational precedent.

The Article III judges that assert "absolute immunity from subsequent damages liability for all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process"[4] are CLEARLY the crazy ones. How can anyone reasonably expect their constitutional civil rights to be protected while "absolute immunity from subsequent damages liability for all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process"[5] exists for the deprivation of said constitutional rights?

Just so you know I am keeping records. I sent you a certified letter with a $300 postal money order, which you received on "11:47 am on August 2, 2022." You returned the letter and the postal money order to me via First Class US mail. I sent you another certified letter with another $300 postal money order, which you received on "11:31 am on November 29, 2022.[6]" I have heard NOTHING since.

Now I hold out hope that you are actually considering it. Although I feel it more likely that you are ignoring your "due process" constitutional responsibility as you and others have done in the past e.g., Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1856), Ableman v. Booth, 62 U.S. (21 How.) 506 (1859), Blyew v. United States, 80 U.S. 581 (1871), United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1876), Chesapeake, O. & S. R. Co. v. Wells, 1887, p. 5, Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896), Lochner v. New York, 198 U.S. 45 (1905), Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 559 (1967), Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983). Penn v. U.S. 335 F.3d 790 (2003), Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, 563 U. S. 731, 741 (2011), and last but certainly not THE LAST - Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, 597 U.S. ___ (2022).

I mean recently you use your non de minimis zealous-religious (i.e., non-scientific) opinion to create a person with rights that has NO VIABILITY to eat, breath, think, move on its own. You could as easily make a zealous-religious case to say god made cancer and for ANYONE to remove their cancer violates my religion. There was a time when surgery was considered illegal and sacrilegious. We grew out of it. We the People had grown out of zealous-religious abortion fear too, until you created judge-made-law with a false assertion of "judicial absolute immunity" attached.

Now your six-person majority on the Supreme Court of the United States was clearly created by Mitch McConnell's unprecedented 2016 senate corruption and the corruption of the Trumpian/Russian fraud of the 2016 United States presidential election. For We the People to even consider the Supreme Court as viable begs all common sense.

But the corrupted precedent of judicial absolute immunity's judge-made-law motivated all the 2016 corruption. Before we can even think about the 2016 elections and senate corruption, we need to first overcome the naïve political operative's belief in judge-made-law. Judge-made-law is a Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803) fiction. John Marshall the first and longest serving Chief Justice, the author of Marbury v Madison, aspired to it, but never had the hubris to act upon. Marshall's successor, the second longest serving Chief Justice, Roger Brooke Taney certainly had no lack of hubris in his use of Judge-made-law.

The Founders were very much aware of the historically corrupt power of a judiciary e.g., THE[1] Star Chamber 1641[7] and the Bloody Assizes 1685.

Over the last TWENTY years I have made EIGHT petitions through the Article III courts i.e., district, circuit and supreme, Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856.

I have the court transcripts, the court records, and the documentation that PROVES your corruption in defense of the open uncontested fraud of the beat cops, family commissioner, state court judges, my ex-spouse and YOURSELVES. You explain your corruption with the self-serving assertion of an unconstitutional NEED FOR personal absolute immunity.

Theoretically, I have no issue with beat-cops, judges or even a spouse's potential need for a justifiable ex-parte order of protection.

I do have is an ISSUE with, the corruption of a beat cop who is either completely incompetent of police procedure or one who lies for a conviction and / or a judge who issues an order without ANY probable cause and / or a spouse who uses a clearly fraudulent ex-parte order of protection to get the upper hand in a custody / divorce dispute and / or a Supreme Court that wants to assert "absolute immunity from subsequent damages liability for all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process"[8] exists for the deprivation of constitutional civil rights.

You SOMEHOW assert you have immunity from the very document you have SWORN to "defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic." I doubt the founders ever thought that a new "Star Chamber" could arise over their clearly unequivocal constitutional limitation of a trial by jury i.e., Article III, Section 2.3, the V, VI, VII and ultimately the XIV Amendments.

"Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts."

― Winston S. Churchill

If there is anything further, please let me know.

Thank you in advance.

David G. Jeep

cc: Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice, Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Associate Justice, Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice, Elena Kagan, Associate Justice, Neil M. Gorsuch, Associate Justice, Brett M. Kavanaugh, Associate Justice, Amy Coney Barrett, Associate Justice, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Associate Justice, Sandra Day O'Connor (Retired), Associate Justice , Anthony M. Kennedy, (Retired) Associate Justice , David H. Souter (Retired), Associate Justice, Stephen G. Breyer, (Retired), Associate Justice, Lisa Nesbit c/o Scott S. Harris Supreme Court Clerk, Joe Scarborough, Mika Brzezinski and Willie Geist - Morning Joe - MSNBC Network, Attorney General Merrick Garland, DOJ Civil Rights Division

www.DGJeep.com, file

[1] THE Star Chamber has nothing to do with the Michael Douglas 1983 movie "The Star Chamber"

[1] It should be noted that my middle class family roots had the Jeep name centuries in advance of the Willys Motor Co creation of their General Purpose (GP) for the U.S. Army. My paternal grandfather was born 21 NOV 1888 • my father fought in WWII and drove / rode a GP.

[2] Charges are Dismissed without Prejudice for failure to comply with the Speedy Trial Act (Case #4:09-cr-00659-CDP).

[3] One of the psychiatrist mentioned how they thought my assertion of "Jane Crow" discrimination for a man in divorce was at least SANE, if not a worthy cause.

[4] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983)

[5] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983)

[6] If there are any questions, see my blog @ www.dgjeep.com)

[7] Abolition of the Star Chamber July 5, 1641:

_"An act for the regulating of the privy council, and for taking away the court commonly called the star-chamber.

"WHEREAS by the great charter many times confirmed in parliament, it is enacted, That no freeman shall be taken or imprisoned, or disseised of his freehold or liberties, or free customs, or be outlawed or exiled or otherwise destroyed, and that the King will not pass upon him, or condemn him; but by lawful judgment of his peers, or by the law of the land…"

[8] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983)

Thanks in advance...

"Agere sequitur esse" ('action follows being')

David G. Jeep, Federal Inmate #36072-044 (formerly)

www.DGJeep.com - Dave@DGJeep.com

Mobile (314) 514-5228 leave message

David G. Jeep

1531 Pine St Apt #403

St. Louis, MO 63103-2547

Thursday, January 26, 2023

Modern drone and or shoulder fired rocket warfare has made tanks obsolete.

Modern drone and or shoulder fired rocket warfare has made tanks obsolete

Tanks are slow, predictable, hard to maintain and costly to transport. Modern drone and or shoulder fired rocket warfare has made tanks obsolete. A tank costs conservatively $500K. While a shoulder fired anti-tank rocket costs maybe $10K. $10K takes out $500K and the $10K is so much easier to maintain and transport it is just ridiculous. Yes the Soviet Union invested in TOO many tanks at the end of the "cold war.". Tanks look threatening on the MAP. But in reality, tanks defend only against small arms fire. In drone warfare an operator at Whiteman Air force base in Missouri can defeat a column of tanks, @ $500K a copy, in the Ukraine with a $10K for each drone fired missile or a shoulder fired missile as tactically required.

Tank warfare is an outdated and showy at best, MACHO extremely costly weapon on the modern battlefield today!!!

Thanks in advance...

"Agere sequitur esse" ('action follows being')

David G. Jeep, Federal Inmate #36072-044 (formerly)

www.DGJeep.com - Dave@DGJeep.com

Mobile (314) 514-5228 leave message

David G. Jeep

1531 Pine St Apt #403

St. Louis, MO 63103-2547