Thursday, October 15, 2026

The Rise In Threats To Protectees?

 


Thursday, October 15, 2026 - 3:25:06 PM

 

Quick Take -----------------------------------------------------image.png


Pat, I am OK.  You are OK.

The Rise In Threats To Protectees?

60 Minutes (10/11/26)

The rise in threats to protectees,[1] I had a discussion about this issue with three FBI agents and two Federal Marshalls[2] 17 years ago on or about March 1, 2009.  They, with the help of others, put me in jail for 411 days without trial, conviction or ability to appeal[3]. 


The rise in threats to protectees is directly dependent on two things, the unconstitutional corruption of the 1st and the 2nd Amendments to the Constitution for the United States. 


15 years ago I presented my dilemma.  I had been rationally pursuing[4] my due process right to redress[5] to establish justice for 5 years then, 23 years now.  But I had run into an unconstitutional assertion of “absolute immunity.”  As we all know absolute immunity sustains absolute power which creates the inevitability of absolute corruption.  Lord Acton, the 19th-century English Catholic historian and politician wrote the famous phrase: “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.”  The only reasonable rational option I had left was violence or the threat of 2nd Amendment violence.[6]


When unconstitutional judge-made-law prohibits redress, the only option you have left is a M.A.G.A. assertion of the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed[7] i.e., the right of the people to use Arms to redress grievances and remove the government. 


You want to know why the rise In threats to protectees, the impatient and ignorant M.A.G.A. forces, whipped up by Trump and others, are utilizing what they believe is their constitutional rights of the people to use Arms to redress grievances and remove the government.


Thus, when judge-made-law unconstitutional and irrationally denies redress and the right to regulate arms, the door is open, and you force the victim to violence for their only rational redress.


It is common knowledge in the United States today you have no right of redress if you are an unfashionable indigent minority.[8] 


Of course, if you are rich like Trump you can CRIMINALLY cheat on your taxes from cradle to grave, rape and abuse your wife, rape random women, defraud your partners/subcontractors with bankruptcy, defraud bankers, cheat in elections, defraud your name-sake charity foundation, defraud your name-sake university students, kidnap people, murder people, commit war crimes, destroy historical sites, ignore due-process-of-law and proudly stand as the elected president of the United States.  “Impeachment is but a scare crow,” Thomas Jefferson 1820.”


Article III’s judge-made-law and its assertion of stare decisis is unconstitutional and irrational under Article I and II’s Constitutional statute law.  


Article III’s power is strictly Constitutionally limited by adversarial due process of law and the consent of a unique trial specific local jury.  


Any assertion, request or grant of immunity from the RULE of LAW[9], 23-939 Trump v. United States (07/01/2024), is antithetical and diametrically opposed (i.e., unconstitutional) to responsible democratic-republican[10] Constitutional government![11]


To assert otherwise would create “the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions; a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. Our judges are as honest as other men, and not more so. They have, with others, the same passions for party, for power, and the privilege of their corps.... Their power [is] the more dangerous as they are in office for life, and not responsible, as the other functionaries are, to the elective control. The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with the corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots." — Thomas Jefferson 28th September 1820, letter to Mr. JARVIS, from Monticello

 

DGJeep

www.DGJeep.com

2026 10-13-26 The rise in threats to protectees QUI CK TAKE



[1] 60 Minutes Transcript: Secret Service confronts rise in threats to protectees

By Norah O'Donnell, Pat Milton, Michael Rey, Julie Morse Goff

October 11, 2026 / 7:00 PM EDT / CBS News

[2] Mike Christian (FBI),  Lyonel Mrythill (FBI), Chris Boyce (USMS), Dan Bracco (FBI), Robert O’Connor (USMS)

[3] Charges are Dismissed without Prejudice for failure to comply with the Speedy Trial Act  (Case #4:09-cr-00659-CDP).

[4] See EIGHT Petitions through the Federal District and Circuit Courts for Writ Certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856)

[5] “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

[6] "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

[7] "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

[8] M.A.G.A., Jim Crow and Jane Crow Discrimination = Fathers are disfavored by domestic relations law in the United States of America!

[9] Thomas Paine “Common Sense 1776” said it first and BEST, in the United STATES, “the law is king. For as in absolute governments the King is law, so in free countries the law ought to be king; and there ought to be no other. But lest any ill use should afterwards arise, let the Crown at the conclusion of the ceremony be demolished, and scattered among the people whose right it is.”’

[10] Thomas Jefferson belonged to the Democratic-Republican Party, which he co-founded with James Madison in the early 1790s… democratically representative government was and should be the goal.

[11] I am a 70-year-old, graduate of an “old boy’s school” white guy, presumably privileged(?), that has been denied my Due Process Rights; my son, my home, my car, my life has been taken and DESTROYED.  I have been impoverished screaming about it for 20+ years.  I went to the FBI, “the primary federal agency responsible for investigating possible violations of federal civil rights statutes,” to assist me with the Constitutional Civil Rights issue; they arrested me and put in jail for 411 days without trial.



--

Thanks in advance...


“Agere sequitur esse” (‘action follows being’)

David G. Jeep, Federal Inmate #36072-044 (formerly)

www.DGJeep.com - From: Dave@DGJeep.com  - David.G.Jeep@Gmail.com

Mobile (314) 514-5228 leave message


Manifesto 


David G. Jeep

1531 Pine St Apt #512

St. Louis, MO 63103-2548