Tuesday, January 27, 2026 - 6:48:26 PM
Pat, I am OK. You are OK.
"Qualified Immunity"
You are going to hear a lot about the judge-made-law[1] of "Qualified Immunity" in the coming days as we come to terms on Trump's[2], I.C.E.'s[3] and M.A.G.A.'s[4] culpability for the MURDERS and MASSIVE CIVIL RIGHTS abuses.
Qualified Immunity is a judge-made-law[5]. Qualified Immunity currently empowers an incarceration rate in the United States that is FOUR times[6] the rate of the greater civilized world. The murder rate and the CRIME RATE are much lower in the civilized world outside the United States, sans U.S. judge-made-law.
Judge-made-law "a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. (TJ)"
"Qualified Immunity" presumes, with judicial authority, the government actor has the law-enforcement-right that they utilized. It is on the VICTIM to prove malice as a motivator; mere incompetence will not due.
A "Qualified Immunity" defense provides the government actor with the presumption of innocence and puts the onus on the victim to prove that a government official violated a constitutional or statutory right, and that this right was "clearly established" at the time of the conduct.
Stand back, right there is where the REALITY of judge-made-law[7] has gone off the RAILS!!!
Before the Constitution, before the supreme[8] Court, before Trump, before M.A.G.A.:
"We (held) hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
Again "rights" are "endowed by the Creator" and thus have precedence over constitutional or mere statute law, and much, much, MUCH less judge-made-law.
The government should have to prove a right "endowed by the Creator" with "clearly established" credible fear of loss of life that they were protecting that justified taking a life much less just disrespecting Constitutional rights in I.C.E. enforcement generally.
We do not have rights in this so-called, would be, leading, developed, civilized and most affluent MODEL society ours!
The supreme[9] Court's judge-made-law i.e., sophistry[10] tells us, "We the People" sub silentio[11] traded the much abhorred "King can do no WRONG" for the ABSOLUTELY (or laughably qualified) IMMUNE actions of the "malicious or corrupt" judges,[12] the "malicious or dishonest" prosecutor[13], the "knowingly false testimony by police officers"[14], the malicious, corrupt, dishonest, sincerely ignorant, conscientiously stupid actions of "all persons (spouses) -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process,"[15] the actions of federal, state, local, and regional legislators[16] and now PRESIDENTS[17] acting under color of judge-made-law to render absolute corruption of inalienable constitutional rights.
The "supreme[18] Court" handed Trump his 2024 victory. And in this same term took for themselves the keys to kingdom with the little known, 22-451 Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo (06/28/2024). With Loper Article I (congress) and Article II (president) have no power without the itemized approval of the Supreme[19] Court; i.e., an old man's unrepresentative, undemocratic appointed for life political oligarchy.
This is ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION of "We the People's" [20] intent to "establish justice." [21]
The whole idea of the judge-made-law of immunity from a constitution and the laws it creates is antithetical to the raison d'être for the very idea of a constitution and the rule of law. Article III has usurped power never conceived of by the Founding Fathers.
The Constitution for the United States - Article I, II, and Schoolhouse Rock's[22] "I'm Just a Bill[23]" clearly define how to make law. Show me where in the amended Constitution for the United States "judge-made-law" is called for or authorized[24]?
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/06/sc.html
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FVfm-ushzCCTS5BtH1R7MeOvnDvh_kqv/view
The Issue with Trump, HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH TRUMP!
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/03/the-issue-with-trump.html
American Exceptionalism – NOT SO MUCH
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2023/10/american-exceptionalism-not-so-much.html
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2013/04/equal-rights-in-free-market-economy.html
A Balanced Budget for America
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2012/07/balanced-budget-for-america.html
BE AWARE, but do not be afraid, Trump is, at best and at worst, pathetically incompetent and INEFFECTIVE manager / leader!
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/be-aware.html
Trump does not know the name of the country he was or is to be president of...
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/istgtdnk.html
The constitutional small "d" undemocratic corrupt "dark money" Senate and Electoral College
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html
Trump is a convicted and diagnosed psychotic criminal, chronic degenerate, maniacal liar and a "fucking moron!"
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/be-aware.html
The constitutional small "d" unrepresentative corrupt "dark money" Senate and Electoral College
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html
The Judicial sophistry of "absolute immunity" creates "absolute power" to the ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION of We the People's unalienable rights under color of law... the AUDACITY of the INSANITY, ignorance and stupidity in support of a "fantastic or delusional" scenario.
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/if-that-is-not-absolute-corruption-of.html
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2022/09/the-facts-of-my-case-are-without.html
DGJeep v. Supreme[25] Court of the United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856)
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?Search=David+Jeep&type=Supreme-Court=Dockets
Tuesday, January 27, 2026 - 6:48:26 PM
[1] I know just a little about judge-made-law. I been at this for 23 years… see www.DGJeep.com or DGJeep v. Supreme Court of the United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856) https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?Search=David+Jeep&type=Supreme-Court=Dockets
[2] There is NO statute of limitations on executive Murder or War Crimes.
[3] All of the Government Actors that have attempted to make excuses and cover up MURDER are culpable for the CRIME!!!
[4] You can not hold a political party culpable, but you can figuratively "tar and feather" them to disgrace them!!!
[5] There is ABSOLUTELY no authority for judge-made-law in the 4,000 +/- words of the Constitution for the United States
[6] 8 times the rate for African Americans.
[7] I know just a little about judge-made-law. I been at this for 23 years… see www.DGJeep.com or DGJeep v. Supreme Court of the United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856) https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?Search=David+Jeep&type=Supreme-Court=Dockets
[8] Article III of the US Constitution posits a "supreme Court" among the many inferior courts NOT a Supreme Court outside of the many inferior Courts. ALL Article III Judicial power REQUIRES the assent of an instant local jury.
[9] Article III of the US Constitution posits a "supreme Court" among the many inferior courts NOT a Supreme Court outside of the many inferior Courts. ALL Article III Judicial power REQUIRES the assent of an instant local jury.
[10] Sophistry(?) is a logical fallacy that involves the use of deceptive, superficial arguments.
[11] sub silentio is a Latin phrase that means "under silence" or "in silence". It's often used in legal contexts to describe something that's implied but not explicitly stated. For example, a court might overrule a case's holding sub silentio without explicitly stating that it's doing so. Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U. S. 362
[12] Bradley v. Fisher, supra, 80 U. S. 335, 80 U. S. 349, note, at 80 U. S. 350, Pierson v. Ray, 386 U. S. 57 (1967) Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349 (1978)
[13] Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U. S. 428 (1976)
[14] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 345 (1983)
[15] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 345 (1983)
[16] Bogan v. Scott-Harris - 523 U.S. 44 (1997) Tenney v. Brandhove, 341 U. S. 367, 372, 372-376; Amy v. Supervisors, 11 Wall. 136, 138
[18] Article III of the US Constitution posits a "supreme Court" among the many inferior courts NOT a Supreme Court outside of the many inferior Courts. ALL Article III Judicial power REQUIRES the assent of an instant local jury.
[19] Article III of the US Constitution posits a "supreme Court" among the many inferior courts NOT a Supreme Court outside of the many inferior Courts. ALL Article III Judicial power REQUIRES the assent of an instant local jury.
[20] Preamble to the Constitution for the United States
[21] Preamble to the Constitution for the United States
[24] https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/06/sc.html
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FVfm-ushzCCTS5BtH1R7MeOvnDvh_kqv/view
[25] Article III of the US Constitution posits a "supreme Court" among the many inferior courts NOT a Supreme Court outside of the many inferior Courts. ALL Article III Judicial power REQUIRES the assent of an instant local jury.
Thanks in advance...
"Agere sequitur esse" ('action follows being')
David G. Jeep, Federal Inmate #36072-044 (formerly)
www.DGJeep.com - Dave@DGJeep.com - David.G.Jeep@Gmail.com
Mobile (314) 514-5228 leave message
David G. Jeep
1531 Pine St Apt #512
St. Louis, MO 63103-2548
No comments:
Post a Comment