Wednesday, April 8, 2026 - 4:00:26 PM
Pat, I am OK. You are OK.
“The ONLY ANSWER to Fixing the Supreme Court”
Representative Sean Casten
2440 Rayburn House
Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515
Phone: (202) 225-4561
Re: “The ONLY ANSWER to Fixing the Supreme Court”
Court Accountability Action.(Alex Arson)
Dear People,
Articles I & II are very precise and fixed about how laws are to be made.
Show me where in the 4,000 +/- words of the original, the 1789 version or the current to date amended version, for the Constitution for the United States judge-made-law is called for or authorized. It ain’t there!
Yes, Chief Justice John Marshall, A Federalist, made a power-grab in Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803) while handing an inconsequential realistically already decided case, possession is 9/10ths of the law, to his opposition, the Democratic-Republican Party,[1] James Madison, Thomas Jefferson’s Secretary of State. Jefferson could not appeal or complain - he won it!
But nowhere in the Constitution does a judge have any power at all without the consent of a criminal or civil “case-specific” jury. What is too often overlooked from 1789, at the writing of the Constitution for the United States, our forefathers had been living under the auspices of legal precedent for 654 years since the Magna Carta 1215. They knew better than to incorporate the judge-made-law i.e., legal precedent of James Madison (Federalist Paper #47), Alexander Hamilton (Federalist Papers #78, #79 and #81), or even the future 5th Chief Justice John Marshall (Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803)).
Your take on Article III Section 2.2 is valid. With an act of Congress the “supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.”
But what you are already missing in section 2, is Article III., Section. 1. that posits “one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.” There is nothing about a Supreme Court above all. All Article III judges are structurally contained by the concurrence of a criminal and/or civil case-specific jury.
Yes, I have to agree that it would be seductively appealing to have Philosopher Kings to rules us. But it has been a problem ever since Plato first proposed it with his Republic in 389BC. It is/was not a problem with Plato, or a James Madsion, Alexander Hamilton or even the 5th Chief Justice John Marshall. The problem always arises down the unseen road with a successor e.g. the 6th Chief Justice Roger B. Taney that started the Civil War with Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 407 (1856).
Chief Justice Roger B. Taney started the Civil War with his judge-made-law that said the black man "had no rights which the white man was bound to respect, and that the negro might justly and lawfully be reduced to slavery for his benefit" (Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 407 (1856)). Judge-made-law FORCED the Dredd Scott decision on the free states and new territories, reasonable men could not tolerate it.
Trump got elected in 2016 with a Supreme Court majority pick in his pocket, a proverbial “golden ticket” for judge-made-law. Trump got re-elected in 2024 with the FICTIONALLY asserted judge-made-law of presidential immunity in his pocket.
Now if there is any question in your mind about a presidential need for immunity? I can give you my manifesto on immunity[2].
But just ask yourself, why would the Founding Fathers EVEN have invested in the parchment if they ever thought it possible to give immunity from the Constitution and the laws derived from it to anyone?
If there is anything further, please let me know.
“Time is of the essence”
Thank you in advance.
David G. Jeep
cc: www.DGJeep.com
file
LEFT Potential POSTS REV working.docx
Wednesday, April 8, 2026 - 4:00:26 PM
The last clause of the First Amendment makes any assertion of IMMUNITY unconstitutional.
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2026/02/last-clause-1a.html
The Constitution for the United States - Article I, II, and Schoolhouse Rock’s[3] “I’m Just a Bill[4]” clearly define how to make law. Show me where in the amended Constitution for the United States “judge-made-law” is called for or authorized[5]?
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/06/sc.html
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FVfm-ushzCCTS5BtH1R7MeOvnDvh_kqv/view
The Issue with Trump, HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH TRUMP!
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/03/the-issue-with-trump.html
American Exceptionalism – NOT SO MUCH
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2023/10/american-exceptionalism-not-so-much.html
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2013/04/equal-rights-in-free-market-economy.html
A Balanced Budget for America
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2012/07/balanced-budget-for-america.html
BE AWARE, but do not be afraid, Trump is, at best and at worst, pathetically incompetent and INEFFECTIVE manager / leader!
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/be-aware.html
Trump does not know the name of the country he was or is to be president of...
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/istgtdnk.html
The constitutional small "d" undemocratic corrupt “dark money” Senate and Electoral College
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html
Trump is a convicted and diagnosed psychotic criminal, chronic degenerate, maniacal liar and a "fucking moron!"
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/be-aware.html
The constitutional small "d" unrepresentative corrupt “dark money” Senate and Electoral College
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html
The Judicial sophistry of "absolute immunity" creates "absolute power" to the ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION of We the People's unalienable rights under color of law... the AUDACITY of the INSANITY, ignorance and stupidity in support of a "fantastic or delusional" scenario.
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/if-that-is-not-absolute-corruption-of.html
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UmmaZmRkIUZ3EdC_9iI0Bpojr6LZ_lU0/view?usp=sharing
Petition Supreme Court website https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/18/18-5856/62608/20180904161503131_00000007.pdf
The FACTS of MY case are without question
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2022/09/the-facts-of-my-case-are-without.html
DGJeep v. Supreme Court of the United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856)
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?Search=David+Jeep&type=Supreme-Court=Dockets
Wednesday, April 8, 2026 - 4:00:26 PM
[1] I sooooooooooooo want to take the name Democratic-Republican Party back for Jefferson’s party!!!! The modern Federalist/Republicans say we do not live in a democracy; we live in a republic. The founding fathers conceived a democrat representative government. Jefferson named it CORRECTLY.
[2] My Manifesto – a PDF document….
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ClKXVhK7dvXpUScomcHuspjZSDsGBr28/view
Thanks in advance...
“Agere sequitur esse” (‘action follows being’)
David G. Jeep, Federal Inmate #36072-044 (formerly)
www.DGJeep.com - From: Dave@DGJeep.com - David.G.Jeep@Gmail.com
Mobile (314) 514-5228 leave message
My “Manifesto”
David G. Jeep
1531 Pine St Apt #512
St. Louis, MO 63103-2548
No comments:
Post a Comment