"The Earth and everything that's in it"

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2022/09/the-facts-of-my-case-are-without.html

DGJeep v. Supreme Court of the United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856)

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?Search=David+Jeep&type=Supreme-Court=Dockets

Thanks in advance...

"Agere sequitur esse" ('action follows being')

David G. Jeep, Federal Inmate #36072-044 (formerly)

Mobile (314) 514-5228 leave message

This statement, this "Hat" predated any attempt on Trump's life and will ENDURE past any and all political discussions going forward, FOREVER AND EVER!!!

Friday, July 12, 2024

We ALL want a young, vigorous, healthy candidate like JFK

Friday, July 12, 2024 - 9:39:51 AM

We ALL want a young, vigorous, healthy candidate like JFK?

We ALL want a young, vigorous, healthy candidate like JFK? Tragically JFK died too young for us to discover his chronic back issues… His pills… His women... His many flaws.

Biden has admitted flaws. Yes, Biden can mix up names, lose his train of thought. But Biden will also admit his mistakes, RECOVER his true train of thought, AND "never shoots from the hip" before he does something WRONG. I have CONFIDENCE in the Biden thoughtful 40+ year RECORD!!!

Trump NOT so much!!!!

I am remembering the good old days in the 2000 Senatorial election in deep, DEEPER RED Missouri. The FORMER Democratic Governor Mel Carnahan passed away in a tragic plane crash weeks before the election.

Deep, DEEPER, NOW too deep RED Missouri elected a dead Democrat rather than the "ARCH" conservative Republican John Ashcroft.

Thank the lord Joe Biden is nowhere near dead. But if he were to die tragically in the next weeks, month. I would happily vote for the memory of Joe Biden, his Vice President and his administration, over the proven fascist, shoot from the hip, never admit a MISTAKE Trump - EVERDAY of the week, and TWICE on SUNDAY!!!

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html

This is the ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION of We the People's intent to establish justice!!!

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/if-that-is-not-absolute-corruption-of.html

DGJeep v. Supreme Court of the United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856)

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?Search=David+Jeep&type=Supreme-Court=Dockets

Thanks in advance...

"Agere sequitur esse" ('action follows being')

David G. Jeep, Federal Inmate #36072-044 (formerly)

Mobile (314) 514-5228 leave message

Monday, July 1, 2024

Trump v. United States CONFLICTS WITH Loper Bright

Download as a PDF

Monday, July 1, 2024

Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice,

Supreme Court of the United States

One First Street N.E.

Washington, DC 20543-0001

Re: Trump v. United States CONFLICTS WITH Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo

22 CFR § 93.2 - Notice of suit, any and all assertions of enduring non-exigent immunity are an abdication and / or a dereliction of due process of law under Article III – as it relates to any person, a former president[1] or DGJeep[2] v. Supreme Court of the United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856)[3]

Dear People,

I do not think you can reconcile Trump v. United States with the deference prohibited by Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo. Don't you now have to assume deference to the Executive's enforcement action?

The enforcement of the laws is a CORE authority of the Executive. I do not think there is any room in Trump v. United States to question his (their) core executive authority.

If there is anything further, please let me know.

"Time is of the essence"

Thank you in advance.

David G. Jeep

cc: www.DGJeep.com

file

[1] 23-939 Trump, Donald J. v. United States

[2] a.k.a., David Gerard Jeep. It should be noted that my middle-class family had the Jeep name centuries in advance of the Willys Motor Co creation of their General Purpose (GP) vehicle for the U.S. Army. The Jeep family has been traced back to the 1500's, My paternal grandfather was born 21 NOV 1888 • my father fought in WWII and drove / rode a GP. There was NO proverbial "Henry Jeep!!!!"

[3] My argument NOW includes 23-719 Trump v. Anderson!!!

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html

This is the ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION of We the People's intent to establish justice!!!

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/if-that-is-not-absolute-corruption-of.html

DGJeep v. Supreme Court of the United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856)

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?Search=David+Jeep&type=Supreme-Court=Dockets

Thanks in advance...

"Agere sequitur esse" ('action follows being')

David G. Jeep, Federal Inmate #36072-044 (formerly)

Mobile (314) 514-5228 leave message

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html

This is the ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION of We the People's intent to establish justice!!!

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/if-that-is-not-absolute-corruption-of.html

DGJeep v. Supreme Court of the United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856)

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?Search=David+Jeep&type=Supreme-Court=Dockets

Friday, June 28, 2024

Chevron deference

The administration of law in the United States has been an executive function for DECADES, if not forever. To remove the Chevron deference, to the executive, forces everything to be subject to the ANARCHY of 11% of the population's deference required to maintain a filibuster in the UNREPRESENTATIVE Senate!!!

In the UNREPRESENTATIVE "dark money" senate without regard to party, a majority of 52 of the senators, from the 26 least populous states amount to a minimum 18% (58,200,744) of the population. To hold a filibuster and BLOCK EVERYTHING takes 42 senators from the 21 smallest states with a minimum 11% (37,216,620) of the population. 60 Senators from the 30 least populous states can override any filibuster with a population of 79,847,432, amounting to only 24% of the total population.

Now granted, the least populous states have never come together perfectly since the Civil War, but anything less than 51% of the population telling 49% of the population is not the representative government our constitution guarantees.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aX7ewxt5t_60MB_t04SOq8xuNWVuJv1b/edit?gid=359160521#gid=359160521

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html

Un-Representative "dark money" Senate

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html

This is the ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION of We the People's intent to establish justice!!!

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/if-that-is-not-absolute-corruption-of.html

DGJeep v. Supreme Court of the United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856)

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?Search=David+Jeep&type=Supreme-Court=Dockets

Mika, United States v. Rahimi, You are missing the issues

Wednesday, June 26, 2024

Mika Brzezinski

30 Rockefeller Plaza Suite 408

New York New York 10112-0002

Re: Mika, United States v. Rahimi, You are missing the issues

Make the United States great again[1]

Dear People,

The Supreme Court on Friday, June 21, 2024, upheld a federal law that bars anyone subject to a domestic violence restraining order from possessing a gun. Your take on the issue, this is good for women's rights and gun control.

You could not be more WRONG.

Now I state openly and without reservation, I believe in a "well-regulated militia." A "well-regulated militia" is the only way to fix the United States' gun problem. Picking out individual bad actors will not fix the United States' gun problem,

A well-regulate militia in my view requires licensing, the regular renewal of license with liability[2] insurance for the legal possession of any gun. Furthermore a well-regulated militia prohibits UNREGULATED open or concealed carrying of a loaded weapon in a public place. Carrying a loaded weapon in your rear pickup truck window, your pocket or your glove box should be prohibited. It is a RISK civilized society should not have to endure.

Furthermore, I state, in 2003 I was served with an extra-judicial[3] ex parte order of protection that never listed any abuse and abuse was never claimed or presented in the divorce proceedings. My son, my home, my car everything I ever cared for in the world was taken from me and handed over to my newly revealed once intimate enemy.

Ex parte orders of protection

Ex parte orders of protection are granted, way too conservatively, holding the accused to an impossibly pacific standard and liberally without specific probable cause in the United States today. To add an extraordinary gun control facet to the abuse of ex parte orders of protection is punitive not helpful. I mean if you are into guns and cannot find a libertarian-gun-loving-profiteer to sell you an unlicensed firearm, you are just not trying in the United States today.

In 1960 1 in 20 (5%) kids lived in a home without a father, in 2014 it is 8 in 20 (40%).[4] That is a 700% increase in the failure rate. The problem with the family in the United States today is not about the rarity of domestic abuse and individual failings. Society "at large" is failing. The issue with the Family today is Jane Crow Discrimination = Fathers are disfavored by domestic relations law in the United States!

You are not going to stop the REAL committed abuser with an unenforceable gun prohibition and you are going to potentially disturb ethical gun lovers. It is not worth the exchange..

We do not need to add to the abuse potential of the already ubiquitously abused ex parte orders of protection. We need to give credibility anew to the legitimate use of ex parte orders of protection before expanding its potential abuse.

We need to provide EVERY person with our constitutionally assured "due process of law" and eliminate the abuse of extra-judicial[5] ex parte orders of protection before we add to the problem.

Gun Control

I was talking to a friend of mine the other day. I have known the guy for 10 plus years. He has a good job, pays his bills, been married and divorced, has kids, and supports his current girlfriend. He lives in the city and has all his life, never lived on farm and probably never even been on one. And except for being a dirty, rotten, stinking Cubs fan I could not fault him.

We were just chatting last week. I do not know what brought it up? But he revealed to me he had a Glock. I remarked, "A piece of tactical tupperware.'" And I asked why? He said that he just liked having it. He then related that he also has an AK47.

I am telling you this is a good dirty, rotten, stinking Cubs fan if there ever was one.

But this guy is more about the gun problem in the United States today than the very, very RARE gun wielding domestic abuser today. His guns are at best an accident looking for a place to happen.

Anybody that says they would never go off the deep end and use guns recklessly or violently just does not know the potential depths of humanity. Any person can be pushed over the edge of sanity by the proverbial "slings and arrows of outrageous fortune."

And ACCIDENTLY his son? His grandson might stumble upon them? Thinking they were toys and shoot themselves or shoot his father, the neighbor, his sibling?

To put it more precisely, unregulated irresponsible gun ownership in a civilized country is at best an accident waiting to happen or at worst pointlessly destructive.

Gun deaths in a civilized world are near ZERO. I mean just look around for civilized societies with near zero gun deaths. The United States is not CIVILIZED.

If there is anything further, please let me know.

"Time is of the essence"

Thank you in advance.

David G. Jeep

cc: www.DGJeep.com

file

[1] https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/06/make-united-states-great-again.html

[2] Liability for not only the immediate owners misuse, but also a contribution to a victim fund for any stolen firearm.

[3] not legally authorized - VII Amendment, Criminal 18 U.S.C. § 241 &; 242 and Civil 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 1985

[4] The Fracking Boom, a Baby Boom, and the Retreat From Marriage" - Freakonomics – NPR - July 5, 2017, "Women just aren't that into the 'marriageable male' anymore, economists say" Washington Post - By Danielle Paquette - May 16, 2017, "Male Earnings, Marriageable Men, and Nonmarital Fertility: Evidence from the Fracking Boom" Melissa S. Kearney & Riley Wilson - May 2017

[5] not legally authorized - VII Amendment, Criminal 18 U.S.C. § 241 &; 242 and Civil 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 1985

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html

This is the ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION of We the People's intent to establish justice!!!

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/if-that-is-not-absolute-corruption-of.html

DGJeep v. Supreme Court of the United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856)

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?Search=David+Jeep&type=Supreme-Court=Dockets

Thanks in advance...

"Agere sequitur esse" ('action follows being')

David G. Jeep, Federal Inmate #36072-044 (formerly)