"The Earth and everything that's in it"

Saturday, May 12, 2007

The unarmed truth, I am beggingm Jeep v Jeep 03FC-10670M & 03FC-12243

-->

Saturday, May 12, 2007

Gary Krautmann

St. Louis County Circuit Court, Clerk's Office

Court Clerk's Office

7900 Carondelet

Clayton MO 63105

Re: Jeep v Jeep 03FC-10670M & 03FC-12243

The unarmed truth, I am begging

Dear Mr. Krautmann,

I am begging for your help. Commissioner’s discretion got me into this, he acted without an evidentiary imperative, and judicial discretion can get US out.

I do not want to have to sue you and impugn your personal reputations and integrity. I am just asking you for a father and son’s right. But be assured, I will fight to the death for my son and my life.

DO THE RIGHT THING. If you allow this kind of creative thinking in regard to judicial rulings, next time it could be you, your son, your brother, your neighbor, your best friend. Judges have to be restrained by the evidence. They cannot be allowed to create evidence out of a figment of their imagination. All of us have to be diligent to impeach those judges that would act in a judicial capacity whimsically without an evidentiary imperative.

. Next time this could easily be you or your son. Please, I say again please, let my son go and enforce the law. Criminal law takes precedence over a civil ruling; this is a slam-dunk. My ex-wife and the would be judge, commissioner jones, both made fraudulent assertions under oath and as a delusional decree.

My wife and commissioner jones inserted their foundationless allegations to steal from my son and I, our god given rights to be “Father and Son. Would be judges who rule on an active imagination are antithetical to the rule of law. My ex-wife although fraudulently asking for an order of protection, never testified to any abuse or any threat of abuse. And point in fact since that time she has refuted her original assertion several times in open court under oath in front of the tyrannical usurper. The would be , judge commissioner jones. But the commissioner would not let go of the figment of his imagination and rewarded my ex-wife with everything.

Do not even think about WAINWRIGHT v. SYKES, 433 U.S. 72 (1977). I never hid or tried to obscure my innocents. I have from the inception openly, some would say too openly, asserted my innocents. There has never been any guile or hidden agenda in my defense. I want what is mine. This is judicial misconduct and fraud. WAINWRIGHT was never intended to be used for a cover-up of judicial misconduct and fraud. Judicial activism should be used to abate judicial misconduct and fraud at every opportunity possible. That is where Judicial Activism is universally respected.

Fraud unravels it all (fraus omnia corrumpit). There is a strong legal principle adopted internationally that a party who obtained an award through fraud should not be entitled to keep that award. Fraud cannot be allowed to pay.

If you think, I am a little crazy a little too…. I beg your indulgence. Please just picture yourself watching Monday Night Football happily with your son. The police come in and forcibly escort you from your home. You have never threatened, hit or even called anyone, a name, in anger. You are adjudicated an abuser and you are never allowed in your home again. You do not get to even see your son for 90 days. You have no realistic option. Yes I could have appealed, that would have cost at least $10,000, I had $0.00. I tried to appeal on my own, anyone that has ever tried to perfect an appeal knows that it is a nearly impossible task unless the appeals courts wants the issue.

I had been working out of the house for 2 years, it cost me $4,000 to defend myself through the abuse hearing and to get-my car. I had no furnishings; I literally did not even have a pot to piss in. I had some casual winter clothes. I lost my livelihood with my home. I was and am a man of modest means. I had a home and a retirement plan both were ripped from my control by an unfounded, unwarranted, corrupt judicial decree. My ex-wife had always controlled our savings. And even though I was my own lawyer for much of the time because I had no money, I have to date spent in excess of $30,000 on lawyers. To add indignity on top of indignity I was forced to pay my wife’s attorney’s fees, because I was deemed the abuser and I was “at fault.”

Psychologically I am sure there is a clinic name for it. I never had a psychology course. Call it clinical depression, delayed stress, overwhelming stress. I do not have a clue. I know have had thoughts of suicide and genocide. I have empathy for the disenfranchised crazies out there. But I am not a violent man, and I would never seriously consider either option.

Again I am not threatening violence, I just want to plug the dike so this never happens again.

I did nothing wrong. I am asking for my rights as a father, my rights as a person, I want my son, my home and what little property will be left after the courts get finished stealing form us with the bureaucratic nightmare of legal fees.

Time is of the essence. If there is anything further, I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.

Thank you in advance.

David G. Jeep

cc: Philip E. Jones, Sr.

Gary Krautmann, Legal Counsel to the Circuit Clerk

The St. Louis Post Dispatch

a list of selected favorites.

file

All 21st Circuit Judges Jeep v Jeep 03FC-10670M & 03FC-12243, The unarmed truth, I am begging

Saturday, May 12, 2007

Gary Krautmann

St. Louis County Circuit Court, Clerk's Office

Court Clerk's Office

7900 Carondelet

Clayton MO 63105

Re: Jeep v Jeep 03FC-10670M & 03FC-12243

The unarmed truth, I am begging

Dear Judge Krautmann,

I am begging for your help. Commissioner’s discretion got me into this, he acted without an evidentiary imperative, and judicial discretion can get US out.

My wife and commissioner jones inserted their foundationless allegations to steal from my son and I, our god given rights to be “Father and Son. Would be judges who rule on an active imagination are antithetical to the rule of law. My ex-wife although fraudulently asking for an order of protection, never testified to any abuse or any threat of abuse. And point in fact since that time she has refuted her original assertion several times in open court under oath in front of the tyrannical usurper. The would be , judge commissioner jones. But the commissioner would not let go of the figment of his imagination and rewarded my ex-wife with everything.

Again I am not threatening violence, I just want to plug the dike so this never happens again.

Time is of the essence. If there is anything further, I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.

Thank you in advance.

Reply to: Dave@DGJeep.com

David G. Jeep

cc: Philip E. Jones, Sr.

Gary Krautmann, Legal Counsel to the Circuit Clerk

The St. Louis Post Dispatch

a list of selected favorites.

file

Saturday, May 5, 2007

St. Louis County Circuit Court Division Re: The Unarmed Truth

Saturday, May 05, 2007

Joseph A. Goeke
St. Louis County Circuit Court Division
Courts Building, 2nd Floor
7900 Carondelet
Clayton MO 63105

Re: Jeep v Jeep 03FC-10670M & 03FC-12243
The unarmed truth

Dear Judge Goeke,

I am asking for your help. Commissioner’s discretion got me into this and judicial discretion can get US out.

As I am sure you know the St. Louis County Family/Civil Courts are full of biased bigoted bastards. I do not want this to be about name-calling. I am merely being guileless and factual in my descriptions. You know this, I know this, and everybody knows this, “The St. Louis County Family/Civil Courts are full of biased bigoted bastards.” Biased, because arbitrarily woman get the first right of refusal on all custody matters and marital assets. Bigoted, because they deny the rights of fathers. I want to repeat that, THEY DENY THE RIGHTS OF FATHERS arbitrarily as much or more than any racial groups were discriminated against in the past. And I say openly the Family/Civil courts must be full of bastards because it is as if the people in the courts never had, never valued or never knew their fathers.

Fathers are second, third or even fourth-class citizens in the family per the biased, bigoted bastards in the courts. A woman can be a drunk, a sex addict, or an emotional cripple and yet they have first right of refusal, by default with the biased, bigoted bastards in the courts, to be made the primary custodian and caregiver to minor children. Fathers are forced to right checks and given only limited access to their children. They are Siegenthaler-ed (every other weekend and Wednesdays nights).

I will not be swept under the rug of your apathy and bigotry. You are not over ruling a judge you are removing a rubber stamp from the cover up of the extreme bigotry and bias of a would be judge. A would be judge, a commissioner, who by job description is incapable of rendering the decision without oversight. Please read the enclosed letter I sent to commissioner jones. If you do not intervene, I will see you criminally charged for dereliction of duty. I will see you serve time for your crimes of theft, conspiracy, apathy and incompetence and I will sue you for one hundred twenty three million three hundred forty five thousand seven hundred eighty nine dollars and thirty-two cents …………………………………………………….……… $123,345,789.32.

You are about to run into the most powerful and respected force in a Free Society, an innocent man. Before this issue was taken up by the courts, I had been the primary care giver for my son. I fixed him breakfast, lunch and dinner, I took him to school every day. I went to all his school events. I was there for him when he got home from school. We went to the pool virtually every day we did not go to Six Flags during the summer. Yet he was ripped from my arms because by default the biased bigoted bastards of the St. Louis County Family/Civil Courts gave custody to my ex-wife. Of course, I could not even put a roof over my head or his. I had been thrown out into the street by the fraudulently asserted and incompetently adjudicated order of protection. I had everything I owned stolen from me by a fraudulent claim and the biased bigoted bastards of the St. Louis County Family/Civil Courts. I no longer had a home. I no longer owned anything. I was on the whim of a would be judge penniless and without any realistic options.

If I had only had due process and a fair minded judge to start with. The original ex-parte order of protection should never have been signed nor ordered. Nothing in it made a case for abuse. My ex-stepdaughter supported her claim of abuse, because she had nearly flunked out of high school and had failed four consecutive semesters in college and was partying every night till 3:00am, she was warned, after 3 semesters of failure, and then asked to move out on her own after the fourth, by her Grandmother, her Uncles, her Aunts, her Mother and her Stepfather. But her mother instead enlisted her in a criminal conspiracy to feign fear to defraud me of my rights to our son, our house and our life’s savings. That is not good parenting. That was child abuse, if anything, to engage your children in your criminal conspiracy to defraud.

My ex-wife testified on the stand during the divorce proceedings and the abuse hearing that I had never abused her verbally, she testified that I never hit or threatened to hit her. She testified that I never demanded sex or deviant sex. But the thief in black robes, the biased, bigoted bastard, Commissioner Jones could not have his perception his protection order proven unwarranted. I was declared a wife abuser, a child abuser and sexual deviant in the final divorce decree.

My ex-wife was awarded what she wanted our house, unfettered custody of our son, the bulk of our family savings and a monthly support check of nearly $800/month to do with as she pleases. And she proved the easiest way to get that is to point your finger and say, “abuser,” and the biased bigoted bastards will come to your aid that is if you are female. There is no need for proof or corroboration in the St. Louis County Family/Civil Courts with the biased bigoted bastards. The whole system is designed to protect woman at the expense of the rights of fathers.

Now I am asking for your help here. As an officer of the court you are obligated to report criminal activity. I want you to ask a few questions. You will easily discover that I am the victim here. And then, I want you to request a warrant for the arrest of James J. Robinson the attorney, my ex-wife Sharon Jeep and my ex-stepdaughter Kristen Capps for fraud. And then based on that, I would ask that you grant me custody of my son. Further I would ask that you issue a stay for all previous orders issued in the divorce, orders of protection, property settlements and custody orders.

I did nothing wrong. Yet I had everything stolen from me by an ex-spouse who presented a fraudulent petition upheld and enforced by an incompetent Commissioner who was clearly a biased bigoted bastard. You have the legal obligation and the authority to issue and or request an indictment for fraud based on the clear issue of fraud and sexual bias and bigotry. This will minimize but it will not correct the criminal acts of fraud by the petitioner and of your subordinate, commissioner jones. I request a speedy trail and a hearing on the issues with a new judge. I have already suffered under this fraud for more 3 years and 6 months.

If you do not help, I am going to pursue criminal charges for negligence and sue you in court for damages. And yes per the 1983 Civil Rights Act it is criminal and you have civil liabilities for the denial of my constitutional rights. You are the overseers of commissioner jones’s. He used your authority to corrupt the system, you as a group of negligent biased bigoted bastards rubber-stamped his orders, and under your authority, he enforced them. You as elected officials, you work for the electorate. Commissioner Jones as your subordinate, your appointee, and your employee he works for you. So I am going to ask for criminal charges of negligence for you and sue you the circuit court judges and the associate circuit court judges in St. Louis County, because he is acting with your rubber stamp and under the authority of your good name (lol). I am the most powerful and respected force in a Free Society, an innocent man. And I have the will, the voice and the ability to expose you for the corrupt incompetent you are. You have stolen from me, my rights to paternity, liberty, property, and due process. You have willfully and without regard to the evidence or proof stolen from me my son, my property and my liberty.

Time is of the essence. If there is anything further, I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.

Thank you in advance.

Dave@DGJeep.com

David G. Jeep

enclosure, letter dated 4/30/07 to Jones

cc: Philip E. Jones, Sr.
The St. Louis Post Dispatch
a list of selected favorites.
file

The unarmed truth, Jeep v Jeep 03FC-10670M & 03FC-12243

Saturday, May 05, 2007

Joseph A. Goeke

St. Louis County Circuit Court Division

Courts Building, 2nd Floor

7900 Carondelet

Clayton MO 63105

Re: Jeep v Jeep 03FC-10670M & 03FC-12243

The unarmed truth

Dear Judge Goeke,

I am asking for your help. Commissioner’s discretion got me into this and judicial discretion can get US out.

As I am sure you know the St. Louis County Family/Civil Courts are full of biased bigoted bastards. I do not want this to be about name-calling. I am merely being guileless and factual in my descriptions. You know this, I know this, and everybody knows this, “The St. Louis County Family/Civil Courts are full of biased bigoted bastards.” Biased, because arbitrarily woman get the first right of refusal on all custody matters and marital assets. Bigoted, because they deny the rights of fathers. I want to repeat that, THEY DENY THE RIGHTS OF FATHERS arbitrarily as much or more than any racial groups were discriminated against in the past. And I say openly the Family/Civil courts must be full of bastards because it is as if the people in the courts never had, never valued or never knew their fathers.

Fathers are second, third or even fourth-class citizens in the family per the biased, bigoted bastards in the courts. A woman can be a drunk, a sex addict, or an emotional cripple and yet they have first right of refusal, by default with the biased, bigoted bastards in the courts, to be made the primary custodian and caregiver to minor children. Fathers are forced to right checks and given only limited access to their children. They are Siegenthaler-ed (every other weekend and Wednesdays nights).

I will not be swept under the rug of your apathy and bigotry. You are not over ruling a judge you are removing a rubber stamp from the cover up of the extreme bigotry and bias of a would be judge. A would be judge, a commissioner, who by job description is incapable of rendering the decision without oversight. Please read the enclosed letter I sent to commissioner jones. If you do not intervene, I will see you criminally charged for dereliction of duty. I will see you serve time for your crimes of theft, conspiracy, apathy and incompetence and I will sue you for one hundred twenty three million three hundred forty five thousand seven hundred eighty nine dollars and thirty-two cents …………………………………………………….……… $123,345,789.32.

You are about to run into the most powerful and respected force in a Free Society, an innocent man. Before this issue was taken up by the courts, I had been the primary care giver for my son. I fixed him breakfast, lunch and dinner, I took him to school every day. I went to all his school events. I was there for him when he got home from school. We went to the pool virtually every day we did not go to Six Flags during the summer. Yet he was ripped from my arms because by default the biased bigoted bastards of the St. Louis County Family/Civil Courts gave custody to my ex-wife. Of course, I could not even put a roof over my head or his. I had been thrown out into the street by the fraudulently asserted and incompetently adjudicated order of protection. I had everything I owned stolen from me by a fraudulent claim and the biased bigoted bastards of the St. Louis County Family/Civil Courts. I no longer had a home. I no longer owned anything. I was on the whim of a would be judge penniless and without any realistic options.

If I had only had due process and a fair minded judge to start with. The original ex-parte order of protection should never have been signed nor ordered. Nothing in it made a case for abuse. My ex-stepdaughter supported her claim of abuse, because she had nearly flunked out of high school and had failed four consecutive semesters in college and was partying every night till 3:00am, she was warned, after 3 semesters of failure, and then asked to move out on her own after the fourth, by her Grandmother, her Uncles, her Aunts, her Mother and her Stepfather. But her mother instead enlisted her in a criminal conspiracy to feign fear to defraud me of my rights to our son, our house and our life’s savings. That is not good parenting. That was child abuse, if anything, to engage your children in your criminal conspiracy to defraud.

My ex-wife testified on the stand during the divorce proceedings and the abuse hearing that I had never abused her verbally, she testified that I never hit or threatened to hit her. She testified that I never demanded sex or deviant sex. But the thief in black robes, the biased, bigoted bastard, Commissioner Jones could not have his perception his protection order proven unwarranted. I was declared a wife abuser, a child abuser and sexual deviant in the final divorce decree.

My ex-wife was awarded what she wanted our house, unfettered custody of our son, the bulk of our family savings and a monthly support check of nearly $800/month to do with as she pleases. And she proved the easiest way to get that is to point your finger and say, “abuser,” and the biased bigoted bastards will come to your aid that is if you are female. There is no need for proof or corroboration in the St. Louis County Family/Civil Courts with the biased bigoted bastards. The whole system is designed to protect woman at the expense of the rights of fathers.

Now I am asking for your help here. As an officer of the court you are obligated to report criminal activity. I want you to ask a few questions. You will easily discover that I am the victim here. And then, I want you to request a warrant for the arrest of James J. Robinson the attorney, my ex-wife Sharon Jeep and my ex-stepdaughter Kristen Capps for fraud. And then based on that, I would ask that you grant me custody of my son. Further I would ask that you issue a stay for all previous orders issued in the divorce, orders of protection, property settlements and custody orders.

I did nothing wrong. Yet I had everything stolen from me by an ex-spouse who presented a fraudulent petition upheld and enforced by an incompetent Commissioner who was clearly a biased bigoted bastard. You have the legal obligation and the authority to issue and or request an indictment for fraud based on the clear issue of fraud and sexual bias and bigotry. This will minimize but it will not correct the criminal acts of fraud by the petitioner and of your subordinate, commissioner jones. I request a speedy trail and a hearing on the issues with a new judge. I have already suffered under this fraud for more 3 years and 6 months.

If you do not help, I am going to pursue criminal charges for negligence and sue you in court for damages. And yes per the 1983 Civil Rights Act it is criminal and you have civil liabilities for the denial of my constitutional rights. You are the overseers of commissioner jones’s. He used your authority to corrupt the system, you as a group of negligent biased bigoted bastards rubber-stamped his orders, and under your authority, he enforced them. You as elected officials, you work for the electorate. Commissioner Jones as your subordinate, your appointee, and your employee he works for you. So I am going to ask for criminal charges of negligence for you and sue you the circuit court judges and the associate circuit court judges in St. Louis County, because he is acting with your rubber stamp and under the authority of your good name (lol). I am the most powerful and respected force in a Free Society, an innocent man. And I have the will, the voice and the ability to expose you for the corrupt incompetent you are. You have stolen from me, my rights to paternity, liberty, property, and due process. You have willfully and without regard to the evidence or proof stolen from me my son, my property and my liberty.

Time is of the essence. If there is anything further, I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.

Thank you in advance.

Dave@DGJeep.com

David G. Jeep

enclosure, letter dated 4/30/07 to Jones

cc: Philip E. Jones, Sr.

The St. Louis Post Dispatch

a list of selected favorites.

file

Tuesday, May 1, 2007

Differences in Frequency of Violence and Reported Injury Between Relationships With Reciprocal and Nonreciprocal Intimate Partner Violence

Differences in Frequency of Violence and Reported Injury Between Relationships With Reciprocal and Nonreciprocal Intimate Partner Violence

Results. Almost 24% of all relationships had some violence, and half (49.7%)
of those were reciprocally violent. In nonreciprocally violent relationships, women
were the perpetrators in more than 70% of the cases. Reciprocity was associated
with more frequent violence among women (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=2.3; 95%
confidence interval [CI]=1.9, 2.8), but not men (AOR=1.26; 95% CI=0.9, 1.7). Regarding
injury, men were more likely to inflict injury than were women (AOR=1.3;
95% CI=1.1, 1.5), and reciprocal intimate partner violence was associated with
greater injury than was nonreciprocal intimate partner violence regardless of the
gender of the perpetrator (AOR=4.4; 95% CI=3.6, 5.5).

Published May 2007, Vol 97, No. 5 | American Journal of Public Health

Women are Just as Likely as Men to Commit Domestic Violence...

U.S. CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION
Differences in Frequency of Violence and Reported Injury Between Relationships With Reciprocal and Nonreciprocal Intimate Partner Violence

MELANIE PHILLIPS
Man Beaters Behind Closed Doors

RICHARD GELLES
The Hidden Side of Domestic Violence: Male Victims

MARTIN FIEBERT
References Examining Assaults by Women on Their Spouses or Male Partners: An Annotated Bibliography

RICHARD B. FELSON and MAUREEN C. OUTLAW
The Control Motive and Marital Violence

RENEE McDONALD
Estimating the Number of American Children Living in Partner-Violent Families

MURRAY STRAUS
Processes Explaining the Concealment and Distortion of Evidence on Gender Symmetry in Partner Violence

NICOLA GRAHAM-KEVAN
Distorting Intimate Violence Findings: Playing With Numbers

MURRAY STRAUS
32 Nation Study of Dating Violence Finds Female-Only Violence More Common than Male-Only

MURRAY STRAUS
Why the Overwhehning Evidence on Partner Physical Violence Has Not Been Perceived and Is Often Denied

Men Sustain Over One-Third of all DV-Related Injuries...

ABC 20/20
Men Battered by Their Wives

JOHN ARCHER, Ph.D.
Sex Differences in Aggression Between Heterosexual Partners: A Meta-Analytic Review

LEONARD PAULOZZI
Surveillance for Homicide among Intimate Partners – United States, 1981 – 1998

...But Men are Less Likely to Report the Incdent...

DAVID FONTES, PSY.D.
Violent Touch: Breaking Through the Stereotype

GEORGE ROLPH
Domestic Violence and the Male Victim

...So Media Coverage is Often Biased...

CATHY YOUNG
The Other Aggressor in Domestic Violence

GLENN SACKS
Baseball Player's Domestic Violence Arrest Demonstrates how Men are Presumed Guilty in Domestic Disputes

...Which Allows the Myths to Continue.

DONALD G. DUTTON
The Gender Paradigm In Domestic Violence Research And Theory: Part I: The Conflict Of Theory And Data

DONALD G. DUTTON
The Gender Paradigm In Domestic Violence Research And Practice Part II: The Information Website Of The American Bar Association

DONALD G. DUTTON
A Call to Revive Psychology and Science in Domestic Violence Research and Practice

RICHARD GELLES
Domestic Violence Factoids

WENDY MCELROY
Domestic Violence: Behind the Stereotypes

GLENN SACKS
'Fatal Fathers' Myth Promoted in Wake of Peterson, Hacking Cases

SUSAN SARNOFF
The Institutionalization of Misinformation: VAWA II

Tuesday, April 24, 2007

Missouri Attorney General's Office - Report of a Crime - Cause No. CR203-1336M - SD26269

Tuesday, April 24, 2007

Missouri Attorney General's Office

Supreme Court Building

207 W. High St.

P.O. Box 899

Jefferson City, MO 65102

Phone: 573-751-3321

Fax: 573-751-0774

Re: Report of a Crime

Cause No. CR203-1336M - SD26269

Dear People,

My attorney and now the Missouri State Highway Patrol tell me you are the ones that have the responsibility to investigate this type of crime. There is very little investigation required. You need only verify the documentation, I am enclosing. Please consider this a sworn complaint based on the following.

I want to report a crime. For law enforcement professionals such as yourself this is an unsavory one. The perpetrators involved in the crime are law enforcement “professionals” and Officer’s of the court. The crimes False Arrest, Malicious Prosecution, Perjury, Suborning Perjury, Criminal Conspiracy and Professional Malfeasants. The state’s prosecutors and their witnesses have fabricated evidence out of false testimony and disgraced their office and their uniforms by breaking the law.

False Arrest, the arresting officer, Mr. Little, did not give me the opportunity as prescribed by the NHSTA standard[1] to remove my 2 ½” heeled cowboy boots[2]. That the made the results of the test unreliable and the resulting arrest, false. Now if the police department had caught and admitted their error right off, this would not have been an issue.

Mr. Taylor the officer that administered the breathalyzer test and contrived the refusal perjured himself by denying his prior sworn testimony that I had blown for 15 seconds on the certified arrest report[3]. This after I had a witness from the Missouri State Health Department, the authority over the breathalyzer test confirm under oath[4], that a 20 second continuous blow should not have been necessary.

They never admitted their mistakes, this in spite of being at pretrial motions[5] that highlighted this as an issue. They chose instead to cover up and deny the issue with perjured testimony on the day of the trial. You cannot give people badges and let them make arrests if they do not know how to make arrests and or not willing to admit when they have made a False Arrest.

Malicious Prosecution, if the prosecutor had done his due diligence and confirmed the evidence and the testimony prior to trial, even a cursory review of the facts and the pretrial motions would have brought the credibility of the issue to light. They either did not due any credible investigation to determine the validity of the issue or they were just lazy, either way, I see it as Malicious Prosecution.

Perjury, given that the police officers had prior knowledge of the issues via their unusual attendance at the pretrial motions and their continued denial of the facts through their false testimony ignorance is no excuse. But even if they do want to claim ignorance at the time of the arrest, ok somebody made a mistake. Informed ignorance 8 months later on the stand is no excuse. They committed Perjury.

Suborning Perjury is the presentation of evidence known to be false through another party. The Prosecuting attorney should have known that the issue of the 2 ½” heel was credible and he should not have allowed the police officers to commit perjury. He let them commit perjury on the stand under oath in support of their otherwise unsupportable case. They Suborned Perjury.

Criminal Conspiracy, in that both the police and the prosecutors had knowledge or should have had knowledge of the criminal actions of the other, they conspired to cover it up. They committed a Criminal Conspiracy.

Professional Malfeasants, no one received any bribes and I am not claiming that they did. But monetary benefit is not the only benefit to be had in this situation. In that neither the police nor the prosecutor did their respective duties, they were just lazy at best. They benefited from being lazy and disregarding their professional duties and there was Professional Malfeasants.

Time is of the essence, if there is anything further, I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.

Thank you in advance.

Replay to Dave@DGJeep.com

David G. Jeep

enclosure

Copy of letter dated 4/24/07 to James F. Keathley, MSHP

Copy of letter dated 4/9/07 to MSHP

Copy of letter dated 3/7/07 t o the MSHP

cc: Richard Edwards, Edwards Schramm Young and Beilenson L.L.P.

Michael Young, Edwards Schramm Young and Beilenson L.L.P.

St. Louis Post Dispatch, Editorial Department

file

[1] See copies of the NHTSA Standard as attached to the copy of the 3/7/07 letter to the MSHP

[2] See copies of the of the arrest report dated 5/17/03 and as attached to the copy of the 3/7/07 letter to the MSHP

[3] See copies of the of the certified arrest report dated 5/18/03 and as attached to the copy of the 3/7/07 letter to the MSHP

[4] See a certified copy of the trial transcript

[5] See copies of the of the pretrial motions dated 9/30/03 as attached to the as attached to the copy of the 3/7/07 letter to the MSHP

Friday, April 13, 2007

Bill McClellan St Louis Post-Dispatch

Friday, April 13, 2007

Bill McClellan
St Louis Post-Dispatch
900 N Tucker Blvd.
Saint Louis, MO, 63101

Re: Jeep v State of Missouri
The indisputable facts.

Dear Bill,

I have attempted to contact you before in this regard. I am not sure if you are interested or would even be able to help, but thank you for listening anyway.

We have a mutual acquaintance, XXXXXX. He had put us together 10 years ago over the corruption inherent with the issue of minority participation in the $60,000,000 St. Louis Public Schools asbestos abatement and rebuilding program in the early 90s. We met at the TGIF Fridays on Olive just west of I-270 to discuss it over a cup of coffee. I was able to relate stories although nothing truly note worthy.

That all being said I wanted to discuss an unrelated personal issue with you. There are four basic unwritten laws we have to agree on up front, before I can proceed. These as subliminally asserted by every alcohol related public service announcement broadcast these days. They are:

1) Everybody that drinks is a drunk or a potential drunk
2) All drunks drink and then drive.
3) Everybody that drinks and drives is a baby killer
4) All drunks lie to cover up 1, 2 and 3.

Those are the “Politically Correct Rules” and there is no disputing them and no opposing them· If you oppose them you are in support of baby killers. You can consider them as iron clad as all “Duke University Lacrosse Players are drunken rowdy out of control sexual abusers.” Those are both indisputable axioms. Political Correctness rules the world today!!!!!!!

We have a constitutional right to drink alcohol in this country. We suffered through prohibition and the repeal of prohibition to get the right to drink into the constitution. We are still suffering under the prohibition of other intoxicants, but that issue is for another day.

We have a right to drive automobiles safely in this country. This would be covered by the basic right to liberty and the 9th amendment regarding enumerated rights. We have the right to liberty and the pursuit of happiness as a reference in the Declaration of Independence as a part of the countries founding covenant.

Thus we have a right to safely drive automobiles while we drink. Now I am not at issue with the specifics of actually drinking while I drive. Although constitutionally we could make a case for it. What I am at issue on is the prosecution and enforcement of our laws in this regard safety…. As discussed earlier the current politically corrected law is as follows:

1. Everybody that drinks is a drunk or a potential drunk
2. All drunks drink and then drive.
3. Everybody that drinks and drives is a baby killer
4. All drunks lie to cover up 1, 2 and 3.

The current sediment is we need to get baby killers / drunk drivers off the road at any cost. What people do not see is that at any cost is then interpreted as perjury, fabrication of evidence, false arrest and malicious prosecution. If a man even smells of alcohol while driving he needs to be punished to the limit of any and all laws humanly possible.

In the State of Missouri although the law states you have to prove blood alcohol content, that is not what or how it is enforced. The public majority is willing to assert and support that If a man even smells of alcohol while driving he needs to be punished to the limit of any and all laws pertaining.

There is the Neo-Prohibition afoot today. And we heap any and all punishment on any person found to be drinking and driving. Anybody that drinks and drives cannot be trusted in a job, with children or with a driver’s license. Again everybody that drinks and then drive is a baby killer.

All the above is a factual representation of the facts as they exist in today’s society. I say that generally as they relate to everyone and specifically as they relate to the perjury that has been supported and backed up by the very legal system that should be absolutely opposed to perjury and injustice.

I have three issues with the above. The first should be obvious, generalities although seductive for their ease of use are never as absolute as they portend to be. The “all” and “everybody” cannot be applied to any group of individuals. Every group is comprised of individuals and individuals by definition cannot be “all” and “everybody”, they are individuals.

The second issues was recently put forward by Al Gore as quoted from Mark Twain, “It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.” And if you think that Mark Twain was wrong, I ask you to consider my case and the case of the Duke University LaCross team as examples of what we think we know, but just ain’t true.

The third are the statistics that supposedly support the puritanical campaign against drinking and driving.

I am not going to burden you with the reams of documentation in support of my case against the police. I am enclosing a letter for reference only I sent to the Missouri State Highway Patrol earlier this week. I will provide additional documentation if asked.

Suffice it to say, that I can prove that the police either rhad no knowledge of the their own legal procedures at the time of my arrest or openly disregarded them so the arrest was either fallacious or malicious. I can prove that I made the prosecutors and the police aware of the legal issues in their case in advance of the trial and that their prosecution was therefore an illegal persecution. I can prove that police officers involved in the case were both aware of their mistakes at the arrest in advance of their testimony and changed their stories under oath on the stand to their arrest. I have been making the power that be aware the issues of their incompetents, perjury and cover up of the same for three years now. None has taken the action that they were suppose to Prosecute the Criminal and Defend the rights of the innocent. Again suffice it to say:

1. Everybody that drinks is a drunk or a potential drunk
2. All drunks drink and then drive.
3. Everybody that drinks and drives is a baby killer
4. All drunks lie to cover up 1, 2 and 3.
And DO NOT forget that all “Duke University Lacrosse Players are drunken rowdy out of control sexual abusers.”

I would like to sit down and talk to you. If you would like to sit down for a cup of coffee and talk about the specifics and allow me to hand deliver the documentation, I am more than happy to, I will buy the coffee this time.

If you would be interested still in that FAILED social experiment known as Minority Participation in Construction Contracting / Affirmative Action, you might look into a company once known as Interface General Contracting / Ready Mix. The owner was Sam Hutchinson as I remember. He, as a black man, was put in business probably 30 years ago for Minority Participation and utilized by everybody. He was put out of business after the Teamster’s strike against the ready mix companies in 1999-2000. He signed up retroactively to the then disputed Teamster’s Contractor and was then completely legally able to sell Ready Mix non-stop during the strike. But again, for my money he got forced all toooo quietly, out of business after 2 + decades of loyal pass through billing as an affirmative action and minority participation pawn for defying the big boys. He actually had some credibility and might have been able to someday stand on his own. To date I can state without reservation, as a 30 year veteran of the construction industry, I have yet to find a successful free standing affirmative action example of a minority contractor in St. Louis.

Time is of the essence, if there is anything further I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.

Thank you in advance.

David G. Jeep

David G. Jeep

enclosure
Letter Dated 4/9/07 MSHP

cc: file

Wednesday, March 7, 2007

Missouri Attorney General's Office - Report of a Crime - Cause No. CR203-1336M - SD26269 3/7/07

Wednesday, March 07, 2007

Missouri Attorney General's Office

Supreme Court Building

207 W. High St.

P.O. Box 899

Jefferson City, MO 65102

Phone: 573-751-3321

Fax: 573-751-0774

Re: Report of a Crime

Cause No. CR203-1336M - SD26269

Dear People,

My attorney and now the Missouri State Highway Patrol tells me you are the ones that have the responsibility to investigate this type of crime. There is very little investigation required. You will need only verify the documentation, I am enclosing. Please consider this to be a sworn complaint based on the following.

If Law Enforcement officers are allowed to fabricate false evidence and present it as fact on the stand under oath in uniform on the stand with imunity from prosecution, none of us is safe n our beds

I was arrested on 5/17/03 for an alleged DWI.

During the criminal trial for this issue, the state’s prosecuting attorney and arresting officers, conspired to commit perjury, the subornation of perjury, false arrest, malicious prosecution and the cover up of those via criminal conspiracy and professional malfeasants on the stand under oath. Officers of the court are professionally responsible for performing their duties within ethical and professional standard. The ethical issues will be shown to be obvious. The professional standards in this issue are defined by the Missouri State Highway Patrol and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

For basic police procedures, the State of Missouri has adopted via the Highway Patrol, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s testing procedures for establishing blood alcohol levels in regard to the state’s DWI laws. Theses standards are adopted by all the states. They are administered and taught by the Missouri State Highway Patrol and the Missouri State Department of Health.

What makes this all a crime; I revealed my case in advance of the trial attempting to settle the issue. I made a motion in open court via a PA system, to dismiss the case because the Field Sobriety Test had been administered incorrectly, see copy dated 9/30/03. It was heard and denied by the Judge on 11/12/503, no issue. The Judge thought it an issue for the jury. The issues arises because the prosecuting attorneys Mr. Devin M. Ledom, Asst. Prosecuting Attorney and Mr. W. James Icenogle, Prosecuting Attorney had had it in writing for 2 months and they had invited the arresting officers, Mr. Alex Little, Officer Badge #920 and Mr. Tim Taylor Officer Badge #913, to attend during this pretrial hearing regarding my motions. Their attendance can be verified by numerous court officers but I am sure they got paid for it also, probably in the form of overtime. At a minimum there should be time ticket references on their payroll, but in addition they should have a police log via there dispatcher they would have had to put themselves out of service, 10-7 or 10-17. Regardless, they had knowledge of the issues; they could have and should have researched the issues, to avoid wasting everybody’s time in a trial. That would have been a valid result.

But that is not what they did. They conspired to put forth false testimony. When I was arrested, I was wearing “cowboy” boots, see the Arrest report dated 5/17/03 and signed by myself and the arresting officer Mr. Alex Little, Officer Badge #920. See also the enclosed copy of the NHSTA standards for the “Walk-and- Turn Test” and the “One-Leg Stand Test” pages VII-9 through VII-14. In the HHTSA standards, it specifically states that the “Individuals wearing heels more than 2 inches high should be given the opportunity to remove their shoes.”

As a case for conspiracy, perjury and the subornation of perjury see the enclosed copy of Mr. Alex Little, Officer Badge #920 sworn testimony. His sworn testimony specifically contradicts the NHTSA standard. He asserts that the trigger for shoe removal is a four-inch heel. He new of the issue prior, he was prepared to provide false testimony under oath at TRIAL contradicting the applicable NHSTA Standard. That was perjury. He was not acting alone or without oversight, he thus had co-conspirators.

Secondly the refusal / non-refusal of the breathalyzer test per the certified copy of the arrest report by Mr. Tim Taylor Officer Badge #913, see enclosed copy certified by Officer Matt Schwin badge #915 dated 5/18/03, I blew for approximately 15 seconds. At trial after Mr. Tim Taylor Officer Badge #913 contradicted, his prior certified statement of the facts and perjured himself by denying that I had blown for 15 seconds continuously. That was perjury. He was not acting alone or without oversight, he thus had co-conspirators.

Furthermore I had Christine Lynn Silva of the Missouri Department of Health testify that the 15 20 second requirement for a credible blow on a standard breathalyzer test was outside of her experience.

This conspiracy in my opinion was motivated by zealous vanity and my legal assertion to the Commission on Retirement, Removal and Discipline of Judges that Mr. Jack A. Bennett, Associate Circuit Judge was incompetent. The co-conspirator and their actions resulted in a “False Arrest, Malicious Prosecution, Subornation of Perjury and Perjury. I have included copies of all the documents referenced.

I am a man of limited means; I was just subsequent to this arrest forced into a very crippling divorce. I did not have at the time money and or access to equity to pay for either professional defense nor acquire a perfected appeal. This is a criminal issue. The co-conspirators, as officers of the court with their criminal actions are much more abhorrent and I want them prosecuted to the full extent of the law.

Time is of the essence, if there is anything further, I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.

Thank you in advance.

David G. Jeep

enclosure

Copy of Arrest Report dated 5/17/03

Copy of the Legal Motions dated 9/30/03

Copy of the court setting the date of 11/25/03 as the date for the hearing regarding pending motions.

Copy of Pages VII9 – VII14 of the NHSTA Standard

Copy of Pages 84-85 of Mr. Little’s testimony from the certified Trial Transcript

Copy of the Certified Arrest report dated 5-18-03

Copy of Pages 118-121 of Mr. Taylor’s testimony from the certified Trial Transcript

cc: Richard Edwards, Edwards Schramm Young and Beilenson L.L.P.

Michael Young, Edwards Schramm Young and Beilenson L.L.P.

St. Louis Post Dispatch, Editorial Department

file