Monday, November 9, 2026

Help us heal, PLEASE!!!!



Monday, November 9, 2026 - 9:39:41 PM

 Quick Take -----------------------------------------------------image.png

Pat, I am OK.  You are OK.



Presumptive Senate Majority Leader

Re: November 3, 2026 - Repudiation of Trump

      DGJeep v. Supreme Court of the United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari (07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856)[1]

 

Dear People,

 

Steven Miller gets a “dead fish”

Trump’s presidency “sleeps with the fishes.”

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2026/11/dead-fish.html

All the “talking heads” are so, so, soooooooooo missing it!!!  They are avoiding the abomination of judge-made-law that created Trump!  I been at this for 20+ years, 10+ years homeless, 411 days in JAIL[2]. 

You think we elect our leaders.  We make a big deal about elections.  You think we have a governing Constitution.  None of that means a damn thing to judge-made-law!!!!![3]

Any assertion, request or grant of immunity from the RULE of LAW[4], 23-939 Trump v. United States (07/01/2024), is judge-made-law - antithetical and diametrically opposed (i.e., unconstitutional) to responsible democratic-republican[5] Constitutional government![6]

"As long as rulers are above the law[7], citizens have the same type of freedom that slaves had on days when their masters chose not to beat them.[8]"

You think we elect our leaders.  We make a big deal about elections.  You think we have a governing Constitution.  None of that means a damn thing to judge-made-law!!!!![9]

Trump was a known liar, a known criminal tax evader, a known criminal bankrupt, a known criminal fraudster, a known Russian conspirator, a proponent of tabloid/internet “fake news” in 2016 when he first got elected.

Everybody looked the other way.  Trump got elected in 2016 with Mitch McConnell’s proverbial “golden key” of a “pick” for would be Supreme[10] oligarchy[11] in his pocket.  We the People are today ruled by 5 of 9 on a want to be Supreme[12] CORRUPT DESPOTIC CONSPIRATIVE UNCONSTITUTIONAL Oligarchy.

Today in the United States we imprison ourselves at 5 times the rate of the greater civilized world.  Today the fascist United States NOW imprisons its citizens at 541/100K[13] that is 220th out of 224 developed Countries.  Within that number the fascist United States imprisons Whites @ 181/100K, Blacks @ 901/100K,[14] and Females @ 39/100K[15] - provably unjustly and discriminatingly!  Trump, M.A.G.A. and the "unconstitutional would be Supreme[16] oligarchy" would tell you that Blacks, especially Black males, are just more lawless, voting rights, economic inequality, and D.E.I. be damned.[17]

We think we elect our leaders.  We make a big deal about elections.  We think we have a governing Constitution.  None of that means a damn thing to judge-made-law!!!!![18]

I spent 411 days in jail, without even an attempted trial, much less a conviction.  I was innocent, indigent, without the ability to even ask for a bond with a court appointed attorney, much less pay it.   I had freely walked into the FBI office, “the primary federal agency responsible for investigating possible violations of federal civil rights statutes,”[19] to assist me with a Constitutional Civil Rights issue; the abomination arrested me and put in jail for 411 days without trial[20].

The exact opposite of Trump.  Trump has multitudes of lawyers to speak for him.  Trump always had the money to pay a bond, to pay lawyers for his freedom and create endless delays[21] to keep him out of court and away from trial or conviction for his easily identifiable guilt.

I bring this up not to incriminate Trump.  I bring this up to expose the thriving abomination that has been propelling Trump and others, since at least the start of Chief Justice Roger B. Taney’s Article III[22] judge-made-law Civil War on March 6, 1857.  NOTE: 4 years before Abraham Lincoln’s G.O.P. campaign and inauguration March 4, 1861.

We make a big deal about elections.  We think we have a governing Constitution.  None of that means a damn thing to judge-made-law!!!!![23]

This is going to blow Trump’s ego; Trump is maybe a “runny nose” as compared the “gangrenous-cancerous” abomination of judge-made-law that, to this day; the abomination of judge-made-law is festering in the wounds of our overflowing jails, civil courts and in the heart of our once Great United States. 

“MAKE THE UNITED STATES GREAT AGAIN”

Help us heal, PLEASE!!!! 

Take your time.  No hurry unless Trump escalate the Iran War without a congressional authorization.  Make the United States great again, eliminate the abomination of judge-made-law, impeach, remove, prosecute and JAIL Trump for his known numerous crimes against the United States and humanity.

If there is anything further, please let me know.

“Time is of the essence”

Thank you in advance.

  

David G. Jeep

 

enclosure My “Manifesto”

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ClKXVhK7dvXpUScomcHuspjZSDsGBr28/view

 

cc: Chief Justice John Glover Roberts Jr.

      Congressman Wesley Bell,

      U.S. Senator John Thune, Presumptive Senate Minority Leader

      www.DGJeep.com

      file



[2] Not to even mention the 8 Petitions for Writ of Certiorari through the Federal District, Circuit and to the Supreme Court (07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856[2])
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?Search=David+Jeep&type=Supreme-Court=Dockets

[3] Justice John Marshall Harlan dissenting in the Civil Rights Cases, 109 U.S. 26 (1883) confirmed, Jefferson’s expectation, post-Article III Civil War at the inception of Jim Crow:

“Constitutional provisions, adopted in the interest of liberty and for the purpose of securing, through national legislation, if need be, rights inhering in a state of freedom and belonging to American citizenship have been so construed as to defeat the ends the people desired to accomplish, which they attempted to accomplish, and which they supposed they had accomplished by changes in their fundamental law. By this I do not mean that the determination of these cases should have been materially controlled by considerations of mere expediency or policy. I mean only, in this form, to express an earnest conviction that the court has departed from the familiar rule requiring, in the interpretation of constitutional provisions, that full effect be given to the intent with which they were adopted.”

[4] Thomas Paine “Common Sense 1776” said it first and BEST, in the United STATES, “the law is king. For as in absolute governments the King is law, so in free countries the law ought to be king; and there ought to be no other. But lest any ill use should afterwards arise, let the Crown at the conclusion of the ceremony be demolished, and scattered among the people whose right it is.”’

[5] Thomas Jefferson belonged to the Democratic-Republican Party, which he co-founded with James Madison in the early 1790s… democratically representative government was and should be the goal.

[6] I am a 70-year-old, graduate of an “old boy’s school” white guy, presumably privileged(?), that has been denied my Due Process Rights; my son, my home, my car, my life has been taken and DESTROYED.  I have been impoverished screaming about it for 20+ years.  I went to the FBI, “the primary federal agency responsible for investigating possible violations of federal civil rights statutes,” to assist me with the Constitutional Civil Rights issue; they arrested me and put in jail for 411 days without trial.[6]

[7] The last clause of the First Amendment held fast, for almost 100 years, through the Article III[7] Civil War (1861-1865).  And then TWO unforeseen UNCONSTITUTIONAL “Jim Crow”[7] judge-made-laws within 7 years:

Ø  Randall v. Brigham, 74 U. S. 536 (decided April 15, 1869) sophistry in response to the criminal liability in The Civil Rights Act of 1866 passed in to law April 9, 1866 and then..

Ø  Bradley v. Fisher, 80 U.S. 335 (decided April 8, 1872)  sophistry in response to civil liability in the Civil Rights Act of 1871 passed into law April 20, 1871 are the origins of unconstitutional "immunity" in the American Justice system.

i.e., thus a judge’s discretion became immune to any attempt to get “redress of grievances.[7]” 

[8] James Bovard (born 1956) is a bestselling libertarian author and lecturer, whose political commentary targets examples of waste, failures, corruption, cronyism and abuses of power in government.  “Attention Deficit Democracy” (Palgrave, 2006)

[10] Article III of the Constitution for the United States posits "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish (bolding/underling added)."  The Constitution for the United States posits one supreme Court among the many inferior Courts, NOT a Supreme Court outside the many Courts.  The grammar of the capitalization is important for an accurate interpretation. 

[11] (Thomas Jefferson  9/28/1820:

"(Y)you seem to consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions; a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. Our judges are as honest as other men, and not more so. They have, with others, the same passions for party, for power, and the privilege of their corps.... Their power [is] the more dangerous as they are in office for life, and not responsible, as the other functionaries are, to the elective control. The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with the corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots…."  

[12] Article III of the Constitution for the United States posits "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish (bolding/underling added)."  The Constitution for the United States posits one supreme Court among the many inferior Courts, NOT a Supreme Court outside the many Courts.  The grammar of the capitalization is important for an accurate interpretation. 

[14] Prisoners in 2021 – Statistical Tables U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics Table 5 Imprisonment rates of U.S. residents of all ages, based on sentenced prisoners under the jurisdiction of state or federal correctional authorities, by jurisdiction, sex, and race or Hispanic origin, 2011–2021  https://bjs.ojp.gov/media/68246/download

[15] TABLE 2 Prisoners under the jurisdiction of state or federal correctional authorities, by sex and jurisdiction, 2022 and 2023 https://bjs.ojp.gov/document/p23st.pdf

[16] Article III of the Constitution for the United States posits "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish (bolding/underling added)."  The Constitution for the United States posits one supreme Court among the many inferior Courts, NOT a Supreme Court outside the many Courts.  The grammar of the capitalization is important for an accurate interpretation.  As is the "judicial Power" in the Constitution for the United States is ABSOLUTELY constrained by the use of a trial-specific-local-jury as originally REQUIRED 1215 - Magna Carta's Clause 39 - "No free man is to be arrested, or imprisoned, or disseised, or outlawed, or exiled, or in any other way ruined, nor will we go against him or send against him, except by the lawful judgment of his peers or by the law of the land" and as incorporated in the in our Constitution for the United states Article II Section 2.3 criminal issues and the VII Amendment for civil Issues.

[17] Only would be Gods believe they know it all.  The rest of us have to rely on Diversity Equity and Inclusion to stay fully aware, informed and have any hope of winning long term. https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2026/03/owbgods.html

[19] “The FBI is the primary federal agency responsible for investigating possible violations of federal civil rights statutes.”  https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/civil-rights

[20] Charges are Dismissed without Prejudice for failure to comply with the Speedy Trial Act  (Case #4:09-cr-00659-CDP).

[21] In overt contradiction to our Constitutional requirement for a speedy trial

[22] The want-to-be Supreme despotic oligarch started their Article III[22] Civil War with the decision with obiter dictum of Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1856).  The Free States in the Union had assumed the common law of Lord Henley’s , obiter dictum; the Lord Chancellor of England, in Shanley v Harvey (1763) 2 Eden 126.  In his judgment he held that as soon as a person set foot on English soil, he or she became free and that a "negro" might maintain an action against his or her master for ill usage, together with an application for habeas corpus if detained. However, such comments were not necessary for the decision in the case, and in law were only obiter dictum.



--

Thanks in advance...


“Agere sequitur esse” (‘action follows being’)

David G. Jeep, Federal Inmate #36072-044 (formerly)

www.DGJeep.com - From: Dave@DGJeep.com  - David.G.Jeep@Gmail.com

Mobile (314) 514-5228 leave message


Manifesto 


David G. Jeep

1531 Pine St Apt #512

St. Louis, MO 63103-2548


No comments: