Wednesday, August 19, 2026 - 4:45:34 PM
Pat, I am OK. You are OK.
Comey and the Ivy League
HAVE NO RIGHTS
Former FBI Director Comey, the Ivy League schools (with government funding) and numerous others are just now finding out they have no rights in today’s want-to-be Supreme[1] unconstitutional judge-made-law EVERYBODY is immune self-inculpating Article III black-robed-royalist world.
Any assertion, request or grant of immunity from the RULE of LAW[2], 23-939 Trump v. United States (07/01/2024), is antithetical and diametrically opposed (i.e., unconstitutional) to responsible democratic-republican[3] Constitutional government![4]
The founding fathers saw this coming, like the Barrons with the Magna Carta’s (1215) Chapter 61, and more contemporaneously in 1763, with British Member of Parliament John Wilkes’s The North Briton, No. 45 that culminated with the "Wilkes and Liberty" (Wilkes v. Wood 98 Eng. Rep. 489, 498--99 C.P. 1763 a verdict, with a thousand pounds damages ($240,000 in today’s dollar)) movement in Parliament and the Colonies at the Revolution in 1776.
That is why they gave us the too often overlooked last clause of the first amendment i.e., “Congress shall make no law… abridging… the right of the people… to petition the Government for a redress of grievances[5].”
Congress has made no law.
The issue arose just post the Article III[6] Civil War with two cases. The last clause of the First Amendment held fast, for almost 100 years, through the Article III Civil War (1861-1865). And then TWO unforeseen UNCONSTITUTIONAL “Jim Crow”[7] judge-made-laws within 7 years:
Ø Randall v. Brigham, 74 U. S. 536 (decided April 15, 1869) sophistry in response to the criminal liability in The Civil Rights Act of 1866 passed in to law April 9, 1866 and then..
Ø Bradley v. Fisher, 80 U.S. 335 (decided April 8, 1872) sophistry in response to civil liability in the Civil Rights Act of 1871 passed into law April 20, 1871 are the origins of unconstitutional "immunity" in the American Justice system.
i.e., thus a judge’s discretion became immune to any attempt to get FIRST AMENDMENT “redress of grievances.[8]”
What is, again, way too often overlooked - the founding fathers had 574[9] years of judicial precedent i.e., judge-made-law experience since the Magna Carta. The King only got involved on issues of royal prerogative, the day-to-day issues of justice were under the sole authority of the “common law” i.e., pure and unadulterated judge-made-law.
The Article III judiciary in the United States has been handing out their unconstitutional judge-made-law of inculpating “immunity.” like pedophiles on Halloween with trick or treat candy to any and all seemingly willing seducible co-conspirators.
Since 1866, a year after the end of the Article III’s Civil War ended, the corrupt despotic conspirative unconstitutional want-to-be Supreme[10] oligarchy’s self-incriminating “judge-made-law” a.k.a. “Jim Crow,”[11] “Jane Crow”, “Mass Incarceration[12],” “unitary theory of the presidency” sophistry[13] tells us STILL today, “We the People” sub silentio[14] traded the “King can do no WRONG” for the unconstitutional Nobility of the ABSOLUTELY IMMUNE actions of the “malicious or corrupt” judges,[15] the “malicious or dishonest” prosecutor[16], the “knowingly false testimony by police officers"[17], the malicious, corrupt, dishonest, sincerely ignorant, conscientiously stupid actions of “all persons (spouses) -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process,”[18] the actions of federal, state, local, and regional legislators[19] and now PRESIDENTS[20] acting under color of law to render absolute corruption of inalienable constitutional rights. And We the People have no enforceable constitutional civil rights and despotically imprison ourselves at 4-5 times the rate of the greater civilized world.
I have been fighting this for 23 years. I spent 411 days in jail without access to a trial. Everybody effectively has immunity for the deprivation of rights, everybody but the victim of said deprivation.
Comey, the Ivy League and others are going to find out the sophistry of self-incriminating judge-made-law i.e., the unitary theory of the presidency defeats the rights of “We the People.”
Wednesday, August 19, 2026 - 7:32:25 PM
The last clause of the First Amendment makes any assertion of IMMUNITY unconstitutional.
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2026/02/last-clause-1a.html
The Constitution for the United States - Article I, II, and Schoolhouse Rock’s[21] “I’m Just a Bill[22]” clearly define how to make law. Show me where in the amended Constitution for the United States “judge-made-law” is called for or authorized[23]?
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/06/sc.html
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FVfm-ushzCCTS5BtH1R7MeOvnDvh_kqv/view
The Issue with Trump, HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH TRUMP!
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/03/the-issue-with-trump.html
American Exceptionalism – NOT SO MUCH
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2023/10/american-exceptionalism-not-so-much.html
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2013/04/equal-rights-in-free-market-economy.html
A Balanced Budget for America
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2012/07/balanced-budget-for-america.html
BE AWARE, but do not be afraid, Trump is, at best and at worst, pathetically incompetent and INEFFECTIVE manager / leader!
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/be-aware.html
Trump does not know the name of the country he was or is to be president of...
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/istgtdnk.html
The constitutional small "d" undemocratic corrupt “dark money” Senate and Electoral College
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html
Trump is a convicted and diagnosed psychotic criminal, chronic degenerate, maniacal liar and a "fucking moron!"
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/be-aware.html
The constitutional small "d" unrepresentative corrupt “dark money” Senate and Electoral College
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html
The Judicial sophistry of "absolute immunity" creates "absolute power" to the ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION of We the People's unalienable rights under color of law... the AUDACITY of the INSANITY, ignorance and stupidity in support of a "fantastic or delusional" scenario.
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/if-that-is-not-absolute-corruption-of.html
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UmmaZmRkIUZ3EdC_9iI0Bpojr6LZ_lU0/view?usp=sharing
Petition Supreme Court website https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/18/18-5856/62608/20180904161503131_00000007.pdf
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2022/09/the-facts-of-my-case-are-without.html
DGJeep v. Supreme Court of the United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856)
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?Search=David+Jeep&type=Supreme-Court=Dockets
Wednesday, August 19, 2026 - 7:32:25 PM
[1] Article III of the Constitution for the United States posits "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish (bolding/underling added)." The Constitution for the United States posits one supreme Court among the many inferior Courts, NOT a Supreme Court outside the many Courts. The grammar of the capitalization is important for an accurate interpretation. As is the "judicial Power" in the Constitution for the United States is ABSOLUTELY constrained by the use of a trial-specific-local-jury as originally REQUIRED 1215 - Magna Carta's Clause 39 - "No free man is to be arrested, or imprisoned, or disseised, or outlawed, or exiled, or in any other way ruined, nor will we go against him or send against him, except by the lawful judgment of his peers or by the law of the land" and as incorporated in the in our Constitution for the United states Article II Section 2.3 criminal issues and the VII Amendment for civil Issues.
[2] Thomas Paine “Common Sense 1776” said it first and BEST, in the United STATES, “the law is king. For as in absolute governments the King is law, so in free countries the law ought to be king; and there ought to be no other. But lest any ill use should afterwards arise, let the Crown at the conclusion of the ceremony be demolished, and scattered among the people whose right it is.”’
[3] Thomas Jefferson belonged to the Democratic-Republican Party, which he co-founded with James Madison in the early 1790s… democratically representative government was and should be the goal.
[4] I am a nearly 70-year-old, graduate of an “old boy’s school” white guy, presumably privileged(?), that has been denied my Due Process Rights; my son, my home, my car, my life has been taken and DESTROYED. I have been impoverished screaming about it for 20+ years. I went to the FBI, “the primary federal agency responsible for investigating possible violations of federal civil rights statutes,” to assist me with the Constitutional Civil Rights issue; they arrested me and put in jail for 411 days without trial.
[5] Equally prohibits immunity and harassment
[6] The want-to-be Supreme despotic oligarch started their Civil War with the decision with obiter dictum of Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1856).
The Free States in the Union had assumed the common law of Lord Henley’s , obiter dictum; the Lord Chancellor of England, in Shanley v Harvey (1763) 2 Eden 126. In his judgment he held that as soon as a person set foot on English soil, he or she became free and that a "negro" might maintain an action against his or her master for ill usage, together with an application for habeas corpus if detained. However, such comments were not necessary for the decision in the case, and in law were only obiter dictum.
[7] In The United States today “Jane Crow Discrimination = Fathers are disfavored by domestic relations law in the United States!” “The FACTS of MY case are without question” https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2022/09/the-facts-of-my-case-are-without.html
DGJeep v. Supreme Court of the United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856) https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?Search=David+Jeep&type=Supreme-Court=Dockets
[8] A right to “petition the Government for a redress of grievances”, does not tolerate harassment or absolute immunity, that does not make it unusable or unenforceable.
[9] The Founding Fathers in 1789 had the historical first-hand knowledge of living under judge-made-law (i.e., legal precedent) authority since the Magna Carta 1215, 574 years.
[10] Article III of the Constitution for the United States posits "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish (bolding/underling added)." The Constitution for the United States posits one supreme Court among the many inferior Courts, NOT a Supreme Court outside the many Courts. The grammar of the capitalization is important for an accurate interpretation. As is the "judicial Power" in the Constitution for the United States is ABSOLUTELY constrained by the use of a trial-specific-local-jury as originally REQUIRED 1215 - Magna Carta's Clause 39 - "No free man is to be arrested, or imprisoned, or disseised, or outlawed, or exiled, or in any other way ruined, nor will we go against him or send against him, except by the lawful judgment of his peers or by the law of the land" and as incorporated in the in our Constitution for the United states Article II Section 2.3 criminal issues and the VII Amendment for civil Issues.
[11] In The United States today “Jane Crow Discrimination = Fathers are disfavored by domestic relations law in the United States!” “The FACTS of MY case are without question” https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2022/09/the-facts-of-my-case-are-without.html
DGJeep v. Supreme Court of the United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856) https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?Search=David+Jeep&type=Supreme-Court=Dockets
[12] The fascist judicial United States TODAY imprisons its people at 5 times (541/100K ) the rate of the greater developed world (111/100K ). The fascist United States’s imprisonment issue started out strictly as a racial issue with Jim Crow. Today 170 years after a Civil War to live up to our Declaration of Independence it is still about racial and sexual injustice. Today the fascist United States NOW imprisons its citizens at 541/100K that is 220th out of 224 developed Countries. Within that number the fascist United States imprisons Whites @ 181/100K, Blacks @ 901/100K, and Females @ 39/100K provably unjustly and discriminatingly! Trump, M.A.G.A. and the "unconsti-tutional Supreme oligarchy" would tell you that Blacks, especially Black males, are just more lawless, voting rights, economic inequality, and D.E.I. be damned.
[13] Sophistry(?) is a logical fallacy that involves the use of deceptive, superficial arguments.
[14] sub silentio is a Latin phrase that means "under silence" or "in silence". It's often used in legal contexts to describe something that's implied but not explicitly stated. For example, a court might overrule a case's holding sub silentio without explicitly stating that it's doing so. Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U. S. 362
[15] Bradley v. Fisher, supra, 80 U. S. 335, 80 U. S. 349, note, at 80 U. S. 350, Pierson v. Ray, 386 U. S. 57 (1967) Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349 (1978)
[16] Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U. S. 428 (1976)
[17] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 345 (1983)
[18] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 345 (1983)
[19] Bogan v. Scott-Harris - 523 U.S. 44 (1997) Tenney v. Brandhove, 341 U. S. 367, 372, 372-376; Amy v. Supervisors, 11 Wall. 136, 138
Thanks in advance...
“Agere sequitur esse” (‘action follows being’)
David G. Jeep, Federal Inmate #36072-044 (formerly)
www.DGJeep.com - From: Dave@DGJeep.com - David.G.Jeep@Gmail.com
Mobile (314) 514-5228 leave message
David G. Jeep
1531 Pine St Apt #512
St. Louis, MO 63103-2548
No comments:
Post a Comment