I am scared to death. I am about to walk into a courtroom where a citizen’s rights to Due Process to fairness are all subject to the arbitrary and openly biased whims of a would be judge.

Tuesday, December 27, 2005

 “An open letter to whom it may concern” & Phillip E. Jones Sr

Family Court Division 65,

7900 Carondelet

Clayton, MO  63105

Re:  Open letter to whom it may concern

        Jeep v. Jeep 03FC-10670(M), 03FC-12243 and

Dear P. E Jones,

I am scared to death.  I am about to walk into a courtroom where a citizen’s rights to Due Process to fairness are all subject to the arbitrary and openly biased whims of a would be judge.  I have experience.  I have been here before.  At the origination of this issue I walked into this courtroom represented by council and accused of a traffic violation and was stripped of everything, I stress EVERYTHING was stripped from me.  I was forced out of my $250,000 home and into the street virtually naked.  I was not AFFORDED due process.

This included my rights to paternity, to property, to privacy and to liberty.  He, the would be judge, Commissioner Jones took it all without regard to my right to due process or the legal opinion he is legally required to produce as an explanation for his illegal action.  He acted arbitrarily and without accountability.  I asked his immediate superior, Associate Judge Goeke.  I asked the courts presiding Judges Wallace and DePriest to step in, assert their authority over this renegade judge, and reestablish due process.  They ignore me.  I have on numerous occasions since asked for an explanation of this illegal and biased ruling.  He and his cronies, his bosses, his supposed superiors have continually covered up and denied my request for this opinion and thus denied my rights to paternity, property, privacy and liberty.

Since that time Commissioner Jones has continually, without regard to his illegal denial of my rights to fair Due Process, heaped fines, support payments, court cost, and ultimately the cost for the Petitioner’s legal fees on me even though I had no ability to pay.  I am virtually bankrupt.  I cannot afford an attorney myself the petitioner has illegally via a biased judge has stolen my paternity, my financial resources, my assets, and my privacy.  The petitioner has illegally, for the last 26 months, taken soul paternity rights of my son and possession of all the marital physical assets and cash on hand.  I say illegally because the petitioner knows there was no abuse, she has perpetrated a fraud on the court and me, this in conjunction with the denial of my rights to expose her fraud via due process.

Even now I am forced due to a biased settlement to pay her legal fees because I had attempted to assert my legal rights to property, paternity, privacy and liberty because of the illegal biased denial of my constitutional rights to due process by the would be Judge. 

Now I am about to step into the would be judge’s lair again.  I am asking that I be allowed access to my property because the petitioner has made no efforts to date to make the biased settlement of my assets to me.  She has because of the illegal denial of my rights had unfettered control of all the marital assets for 26 months, kept me virtually in jail.  She has attempted with the support of an incompetent GAL and without regard to my legal rights to paternity attempted to turn my son into a drug addict. 

The current charge has no specifics attached to it.  The charge should be dismissed outright because it’s of the lack of specifics.  I am afraid of a renegade judge.  I am afraid of being accused of something I will be literally be blindsided by as I was before.  I ask you to bear witness to this continued denial of my rights.  If they get away with it here, they will someday come for you also.  We all need to be vigilant and aware of our rights and yes fight even though we bare no weapons to maintain them in the face of the evil powers that would deny them.

The current charges will be heard on 1/3/05 (this date should have been 1/3/06) at 7:30am in division 65 of the St. Louis County Court house.  Please attend if you can.

Time is of the essence; if there is anything further I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.

Thank you in advance.

David G. Jeep

David G. Jeep

cc: Presiding Judge Barbara W. Wallace via fax 314-615-8280

      The State of Missouri Court of Appeals, ED85754, (fax 314-539-4324)

      Supreme Court of Missouri, (fax 573-751-7514)

      Joseph A. Goeke, Associate Circuit Judge, (fax (314) 615-2689)

      James Robinson, Attorney for the Petitioner (fax (636) 530-6805)

      David Shaller, GAL (fax (314) 725-2807)

      Philip E. Jones, Division 65 (fax (314) 615-7868)

      Cynthia Kluzak, St. Louis Family Court (fax (314) 615-7264)

      Tom W. DePriest, Jr., Circuit Judge, Adm. Judge (fax (314) 615-4519)

      Barbara W. Wallace, Circuit Judge, Presiding Judge (fax (314) 615-8280)

      The St. Louis Post Dispatch, Editorial Department (fax 314-340-3103)

      The Riverfront Times, Editorial Department (fax 314-754-5955)

      The Kansas City Star, Editorial Department ( letters@kcstar.com )

       file

       

Motion for removal and Notice of Intent to fiel appeal

Pro Se
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE COUNTY OF ST. LOUIS
STATE OF MISSOURI

Sharon Gayle Jeep, (SSN#)Petitioner,
and
David Gerard Jeep, (SSN#)Respondent

Case No.: 03FC-10670M & 03FC-12243 Presiding Judge of Division 65

Respondent's Motion for Removal of Commissioner Jones in regard to this issue And a Motion to preserve Respondent’s rights of appeal due to a judgment asserted by a Corrupt Judiciary and a Fraudulent Petition Support by the aforementioned Corrupted Judiciary

COMES NOW Respondent, David G. Jeep, and moves this Court to remove Commissioner Jones in the above referenced issues and to preserve his right of appeal based on the initial denial and the subsequent denial of this courts continued ILLEGAL rulings.

1. On 11/19/03 the Respondent was illegally denied Access to due process

2. Numerous motions were put forward both by certified members of the Bar and by the respondent on his own behalf. A citizen should not have to ask for his rights. Right are not awarded, RIGHTS by definition can not be taken away, they cannot be denied. If rights are denied it is ILLEGAL. If I held someone against there will and denied them access to there property it would be theft, kidnapping and or slavery. I will be filing formal charges of theft, kidnapping and white slavery against the Commissioner Jones and his cronies.

3. If a Commissioner, a would be judge and or a Judge Rule without affording all parties their right to due process they are breaking the law.

4. Commissioner Jones admitted in my presence and in the presents of others that he had made mistake, that there was nothing to warrant an Order of Protection. Nonetheless in spite of his illegal denial of my rights and in spite of his admitted mistake he continued to enforce his corrupt, illegal ruling. I for one think that that makes Criminally libel for his actions.

5. I will be filing charges of fraud and theft against the petitioner and her would be attorney. That is once I again get access to my fraudulently denied right to my liberty and my property

6. If the courts act illegally, the courts need to be exposed as criminals they are. All the petitions for my right to due process were summarily and illegally denied by Commissioner Jones in attempt to cover up his misconduct and his incompetence and his illegal abuse of his judicial authority. Commissioner Jones has continuously denied the Respondent his right to his property, to his paternity, to his liberty, to his everything.

7. The Respondent has been illegally denied access to all of his possessions
for nearly 2 years because of this CORRUPT ruling by Commissioner Jones.

8. The Respondent’s Child has been forced to into drug dependency without regard to the Respondents rights nor the rights of the child.

9. There has never been a threat of violence nor and act of violence by the respondent. Yet the basis for the entire issue is an illegally enforced order of protection.

10. Yes the Respondent has peacefully attempted on 2 occasions to recover his fraudulently stolen belongings.

11. There was one attempt to get custody of the child for the Respondent and yes I did knock on the door because petitioner would not answer the door and because my wife had taken the child outside of her rights under then in place custody order.

12. On 12/19/04 the respondent was denied his right to due process because the aforementioned BIASED Commissioner sat in judgment and his subsequent ruling based on unsupported suspect perjurious testimony presented by the Petitioner.

13. Now nearly 12 months after the Commissioner’s Biased decree the Petitioner has made no effort to settle the Fraudulent, Biased Judgment for fear of my APPEAL. The Petitioner was award everything I owned and has had unencumbered use of EVERYTHING I owned without regard to my rights of ownership, all without the Respondent being afford access to due process.

14. The Respondent has made motions that the custody order afford the Petitioner gave too much in terms of monetary support and that the support was inhibiting the respondents right to his property.



______________________________________
This Tuesday December 13, 2005
Pro SeDavid G. Jeep, Respondent16359D Lakefield Place DriveGrover, MO 63040 314-277-5904

Respondent's Motion for Removal of Commissioner Jones in regard to this issue And a Motion to preserve Respondent’s rights of appeal due to a judgment asserted by a Corrupt Judiciary and a Fraudulent Petition Support by the aforementioned Corrupted Judiciary

Pro Se

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE COUNTY OF ST. LOUIS

STATE OF MISSOURI

Sharon Gayle Jeep, (SSN)                         Petitioner,                         and David Gerard Jeep, (SSN)                         Respondent

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case No.: 03FC-10670M & 03FC-12243 Presiding Judge of Division 65

Respondent's Motion for Removal of Commissioner Jones in regard to this issue And a Motion to preserve Respondent’s rights of appeal due to a judgment asserted by a Corrupt Judiciary and a Fraudulent Petition Support by the aforementioned Corrupted Judiciary

COMES NOW Respondent, David G. Jeep, and moves this Court to remove Commissioner Jones in the above referenced issues and to preserve his right of appeal based on the initial denial and the subsequent denial of this courts continued ILLEGAL rulings.

1. On 11/19/03 the Respondent was illegally denied Access to due process
2. Numerous motions were put forward both by certified members of the Bar and by the respondent on his own behalf.  A citizen should not have to ask for his rights.  Right are not awarded, RIGHTS by definition can not be taken away, they cannot be denied.  If rights are denied it is ILLEGAL.  If I held someone against there will and denied them access to there property it would be theft, kidnapping and or slavery.  I will be filing formal charges of theft, kidnapping and white slavery against the Commissioner Jones and his cronies. 
3. If a Commissioner, a would be judge and or a Judge Rule without affording all parties their right to due process they are breaking the law.
4. Commissioner Jones admitted in my presence and in the presents of others that he had made mistake, that there was nothing to warrant an Order of Protection.  Nonetheless in spite of his illegal denial of my rights and in spite of his admitted mistake he continued to enforce his corrupt, illegal ruling.  I for one think that that makes Criminally libel for his actions.
5. I will be filing charges of fraud and theft against the petitioner and her would be attorney.  That is once I again get access to my fraudulently denied right to my liberty and my property
6. If the courts act illegally, the courts need to be exposed as criminals they are.  All the petitions for my right to due process were summarily and illegally denied by Commissioner Jones in attempt to cover up his misconduct and his incompetence and his illegal abuse of his judicial authority.  Commissioner Jones has continuously denied the Respondent his right to his property, to his paternity, to his liberty, to his everything.
7. The Respondent has been illegally denied access to all of his possessions for nearly 2 years because of this CORRUPT ruling by Commissioner Jones.
8. The Respondent’s Child has been forced to into drug dependency without regard to the Respondents rights nor the rights of the child.
9. There has never been a threat of violence nor and act of violence by the respondent.  Yet the basis for the entire issue is an illegally enforced order of protection.
10. Yes the Respondent has peacefully attempted on 2 occasions to recover his fraudulently stolen belongings.
11. There was one attempt to get custody of the child for the Respondent and yes I did knock on the door because petitioner would not answer the door and because my wife had taken the child outside of her rights under then in place custody order.
12.  On 12/19/04 the respondent was denied his right to due process because the aforementioned BIASED Commissioner sat in judgment and his subsequent ruling based on unsupported suspect perjurious testimony presented by the Petitioner.
13. Now nearly 12 months after the Commissioner’s Biased decree the Petitioner has made no effort to settle the Fraudulent, Biased Judgment for fear of my APPEAL.  The Petitioner was award everything I owned and has had unencumbered use of EVERYTHING I owned without regard to my rights of ownership, all without the Respondent being afford access to due process.  
14. The Respondent has made motions that the custody order afford the Petitioner gave too much in terms of monetary support and that the support was inhibiting the respondents right to his property.

                                                                                    ______________________________________

This Tuesday December 13, 2005

Pro Se David G. Jeep, Respondent 16359D Lakefield Place Drive Grover, MO 63040                                       314-277-5904

Missouri State Highway Patrol, Re: Report of a crime and a request for an investigation

January 20, 2005

Missouri State Highway Patrol
General Headquarters
1510 E. Elm Street
Jefferson City, MO 65102

(573) 751-3313

Re: Case # CR203-1336M, SD26269
Report of a crime and a request for an investigation

Dear Sirs,

I have been referred to you by the supreme court of Missouri. I have to date spent nearly $5,000 on my defense regarding a charge of DWI as referenced above. I am sure that you question anyone’s assertion of innocence to the charge. But all men are considered innocent until given right to due process and proven guilty in a court of law. When the police lie, the prosecutors suborn perjury and the judge looks the other way is there any justice?

I was charged on 5/16/03 somewhere just after midnight. I was not drunk, I had not put anyone at risk. The arresting officer pulled me over for failing to use my blinker as I crossed the center lane of a virtually empty road as I entered the highway via a left turn. I was not belligerent, I was not disorderly. I submitted for the breathalyzer test. I blew steadily for 15 seconds, the result was in valid.

I submitted for the field sobriety test battery, I supposedly failed. I did not fall down I was just a little unsteady. I failed while I was wearing cowboy boots. See the enclosed prisoners receipt for a pair of boots and other miscellaneous. The standard procedures for the test as set by NHSTA, state that anyone wearing a 2” heal or higher should be offered the chance to remove the shoes prior to the test being administered. I was not afforded that opportunity.

I could not afford an attorney. I had quotes that started at $10,000 for a defense against this charge. Needless to say, again, I could not afford a lawyer.

While attending to pretrial issues in Camden County the Judge at the time one Jack A. Bennett had me thrown in jail. There was never even so much as an explanation offered as to why I was put in jail in the courtroom. Later I was told by the Bailiff that I was being held because I had driven myself to court and that was an illegal act in that because of my asserted refusal my license had been revoked.

My wife had driven me to court that day. She had taken off work and taken my son out of school to do so. She had driven me down to Camden County. No one would listen to me. When I contacted a bail bondsman he put up my bail and spoke on my behalf. The Judge released me the following evening after posting another bail.

Needles to say I was very upset. I explored my options. I was told I could appeal the judges ruling. Again to appeal a judges ruling is an extremely expensive alternative. I could not afford a lawyer. I filed a grievance with the Commission on Retirement, Removal and Discipline of Judges, as is any citizen’s right. See the enclosed copies of the letters dated 10/08/03, and addressed in that regard. When you read the letter you will see that I have stated my case and I enclosed copies of receipts from my wife substantiating her presences in Camden County on the morning in question.

That formed the motive for what became a conspiracy involving Judge Bennett, Judge Colyer, The Prosecuting Attorneys, Mr. W. Steven Rives & Mr. W. James Icenogle, and the two arresting police officers, Alex Little & Tim Taylor to convict me at whatever cost.

At my trail before a jury, the two arresting police officers lied under oath. Alex Little lied in that he asserted that it was a 4” heal that required prior offer of removal. This is in direct contradiction to the standard. And if you have any knowledge of shoes, a 4” heel is just so unusual as to be unworthy of reference. Nonetheless, the jury seeing the officer offer it as fact took it as fact. A police officer that should have known is business, a police officer that would never lie, lied. The jury was swayed.

I had made several motions prior to the trail trying to get the Standard utilized by the State of Missouri. The prosecuting attorney had stated that the NHTSA standard was what was used, but they would not provide me a copy. The prosecuting attorneys new what my defense revolved around. Thus it is my assertion that the Prosecuting Attorneys either prepped the officer regarding the issue and told them how to lie or they condoned what they new to be an officer of the court committing perjury on the stand and they supported and thus suborned perjury.

The second officer Tim Taylor lied in direct contradiction to his prior sworn statement on the police report. Tim Taylor stated repeatedly that I had not blown for the 15 seconds he had referenced on his sworn police report. A police officer that should have known is business, a police officer that would never lie, lied. The jury was swayed.

Because the prosecuting attorneys had the police report and because I had made motions prior to the trial that the Breathalyzer test should be thrown out as a refusal because it was an invalid. At trial I had the State of Missouri’s Health Department authority on the Breathalyzer give sworn testimony that a breathalyzer blow should take between 5 and 17 seconds, see the court record enclosed. Again the prosecuting attorney knew of the police report. Thus it is my assertion that the Prosecuting Attorneys either prepped the officer regarding the issue and told them how to lie or they condoned what they new to be an officer of the court committing perjury on the stand and they supported and thus suborned perjury. And for whatever reason the police report was not entered into evidence, and in my naive defense I thought that it had been.

Finally after the jury struggled with the verdict for nearly 6 hours, well into the night and rendered their verdict of guilty. After the trial and prior to sentencing I brought all theses issue of supporting and suborning perjury by officers of the court, Judge Colyer, refused to use his judicial discretion to right this wrong. And thus is complicit in the conspiracy.

Thus Judge Bennett is guilty for having first made the illegal judgment against me during the pretrial and then instigating my conviction by calling on friendship and cronyism to convict me. The prosecuting attorneys are guilty for prepping for, supporting and suborning perjury. The police officers are guilty of perjury, and finally Judge Coyler is guilty of looking the other way while this conspiracy is going on and doing nothing to stop it.

If you questions on any of these issue, you can contact the jury foreperson for cooperation. There is a list of the jury’s names in the court file, I have a list of the jury’s names.

For your reference I am including here copies of the letters referenced above and electronic copy of the trial’s transcript (filename SD26269) and copies of all the pretrial motions and letters I generated in this regard on CD. If there is anything more I can do for you in this regard, please let me know. Please if you would investigate and keep me informed as to the status.

Time is of the essence.

Regards,



David G. Jeep
enclosure
cc: file

Commission on Retirement, Removal and Discipline of Judges

January 20, 2005

Commission on Retirement, Removal and Discipline of Judges
2190 South Mason Road
St. Louis, Missouri 63131

(314) 966-1007 (phone)
(314) 966-0076 (fax)

Re: Case # CR203-1336M, SD26269
Report of a crime and a request for an investigation

Dear Sirs,
I have been referred to you by the supreme court of Missouri. I have to date spent nearly $5,000 on my defense regarding a charge of DWI as referenced above. I am sure that you question anyone’s assertion of innocence to the charge. But all men are considered innocent until given right to due process and proven guilty in a court of law. When the police lie, the prosecutors suborn perjury and the judge looks the other way is there any justice?

I was charged on 5/16/03 somewhere just after midnight. I was not drunk, I had not put anyone at risk. The arresting officer pulled me over for failing to use my blinker as I crossed the center lane of a virtually empty road as I entered the highway via a left turn. I was not belligerent, I was not disorderly. I submitted for the breathalyzer test. I blew steadily for 15 seconds, the result was in valid.

I submitted for the field sobriety test battery, I supposedly failed. I did not fall down I was just a little unsteady. I failed while I was wearing cowboy boots. See the enclosed prisoners receipt for a pair of boots and other miscellaneous. The standard procedures for the test as set by NHSTA, state that anyone wearing a 2” heal or higher should be offered the chance to remove the shoes prior to the test being administered. I was not afforded that opportunity.

I could not afford an attorney. I had quotes that started at $10,000 for a defense against this charge. Needless to say, again, I could not afford a lawyer.

While attending to pretrial issues in Camden County the Judge at the time one Jack A. Bennett had me thrown in jail. There was never even so much as an explanation offered as to why I was put in jail in the courtroom. Later I was told by the Bailiff that I was being held because I had driven myself to court and that was an illegal act in that because of my asserted refusal my license had been revoked.

My wife had driven me to court that day. She had taken off work and taken my son out of school to do so. She had driven me down to Camden County. No one would listen to me. When I contacted a bail bondsman he put up my bail and spoke on my behalf. The Judge released me the following evening after posting another bail.

Needles to say I was very upset. I explored my options. I was told I could appeal the judges ruling. Again to appeal a judges ruling is an extremely expensive alternative. I could not afford a lawyer. I filed a grievance with the Commission on Retirement, Removal and Discipline of Judges, as is any citizen’s right.

See the enclosed copies of the letters dated 10/08/03, and addressed in that regard. When you read the letter you will see that I have stated my case and I enclosed copies of receipts from my wife substantiating her presences in Camden County on the morning in question.

That formed the motive for what became a conspiracy involving Judge Bennett, Judge Colyer, The Prosecuting Attorneys, Mr. W. Steven Rives & Mr. W. James Icenogle, and the two arresting police officers, Alex Little & Tim Taylor to convict me at whatever cost.

At my trail before a jury, the two arresting police officers lied under oath. Alex Little lied in that he asserted that it was a 4” heal that required prior offer of removal. This is in direct contradiction to the standard. And if you have any knowledge of shoes, a 4” heel is just so unusual as to be unworthy of reference.

Nonetheless, the jury seeing the officer offer it as fact took it as fact. A police officer that should have known is business, a police officer that would never lie, lied. The jury was swayed.

I had made several motions prior to the trail trying to get the Standard utilized by the State of Missouri. The prosecuting attorney had stated that the NHTSA standard was what was used, but they would not provide me a copy. The prosecuting attorneys new what my defense revolved around. Thus it is my assertion that the Prosecuting Attorneys either prepped the officer regarding the issue and told them how to lie or they condoned what they new to be an officer of the court committing perjury on the stand and they supported and thus suborned perjury.

The second officer Tim Taylor lied in direct contradiction to his prior sworn statement on the police report. Tim Taylor stated repeatedly that I had not blown for the 15 seconds he had referenced on his sworn police report. A police officer that should have known is business, a police officer that would never lie, lied. The jury was swayed.

Because the prosecuting attorneys had the police report and because I had made motions prior to the trial that the Breathalyzer test should be thrown out as a refusal because it was an invalid. At trial I had the State of Missouri’s Health Department authority on the Breathalyzer give sworn testimony that a breathalyzer blow should take between 5 and 17 seconds, see the court record enclosed. Again the prosecuting attorney knew of the police report. Thus it is my assertion that the Prosecuting Attorneys either prepped the officer regarding the issue and told them how to lie or they condoned what they new to be an officer of the court committing perjury on the stand and they supported and thus suborned perjury. And for whatever reason the police report was not entered into evidence, and in my naive defense I thought that it had been.

Finally after the jury struggled with the verdict for nearly 6 hours, well into the night and rendered their verdict of guilty. After the trial and prior to sentencing I brought all theses issue of supporting and suborning perjury by officers of the court, Judge Colyer, refused to use his judicial discretion to right this wrong. And thus is complicit in the conspiracy.
Thus Judge Bennett is guilty for having first made the illegal judgment against me during the pretrial and then instigating my conviction by calling on friendship and cronyism to convict me. The prosecuting attorneys are guilty for prepping for, supporting and suborning perjury. The police officers are guilty of perjury, and finally Judge Coyler is guilty of looking the other way while this conspiracy is going on and doing nothing to stop it.

If you questions on any of these issue, you can contact the jury foreperson for cooperation. There is a list of the jury’s names in the court file, I have a list of the jury’s names.

For your reference I am including here copies of the letters referenced above and electronic copy of the trial’s transcript (filename SD26269) and copies of all the pretrial motions and letters I generated in this regard on CD. If there is anything more I can do for you in this regard, please let me know. Please if you would investigate and keep me informed as to the status. Time is of the essence.
Regards,



David G. Jeep
enclosure
cc: file

Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel, Case # CR203-1336M, SD26269, Report of a crime and a request for an investigation

January 20, 2005

                       

Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel

3335 American Avenue

Jefferson City, MO   65109-1079

                       

Re:   Case # CR203-1336M, SD26269

         Report of a crime and a request for an investigation

                       

Dear Sirs,

I have been referred to you by the supreme court of Missouri.  I have to date spent nearly $5,000 on my defense regarding a charge of DWI as referenced above.   I am sure that you question anyone’s assertion of innocence to the charge.  But all men are considered innocent until given right to due process and proven guilty in a court of law.  When the police lie, the prosecutors suborn perjury and the judge looks the other way is there any justice?

I was charged on 5/16/03 somewhere just after midnight.  I was not drunk, I had not put anyone at risk.  The arresting officer pulled me over for failing to use my blinker as I crossed the center lane of a virtually empty road as I entered the highway via a left turn.  I was not belligerent, I was not disorderly.  I submitted for the breathalyzer test. I blew steadily for 15 seconds, the result was in valid. 

I submitted for the field sobriety test battery, I supposedly failed.  I did not fall down I was just a little unsteady.  I failed while I was wearing cowboy boots.  See the enclosed prisoners receipt for a pair of boots and other miscellaneous.  The standard procedures for the test as set by NHSTA, state that anyone wearing a 2” heal or higher should be offered the chance to remove the shoes prior to the test being administered.  I was not afforded that opportunity. 

I could not afford an attorney. I had quotes that started at $10,000 for a defense against this charge.  Needless to say, again, I could not afford a lawyer.

While attending to pretrial issues in Camden County the Judge at the time one Jack A. Bennett had me thrown in jail.  There was never even so much as an explanation offered as to why I was put in jail in the courtroom.  Later I was told by the Bailiff that I was being held because I had driven myself to court and that was an illegal act in that because of my asserted refusal my license had been revoked. 

My wife had driven me to court that day.  She had taken off work and taken my son out of school to do so.  She had driven me down to Camden County.  No one would listen to me.  When I contacted a bail bondsman he put up my bail and spoke on my behalf.  The Judge released me the following evening after posting another bail. 

Needles to say I was very upset.  I explored my options.  I was told I could appeal the judges ruling.  Again to appeal a judges ruling is an extremely expensive alternative.  I could not afford a lawyer.  I filed a grievance with the Commission on Retirement, Removal and Discipline of Judges, as is any citizen’s right.  See the enclosed copies of the letters dated 10/08/03, and addressed in that regard.  When you read the letter you will see that I have stated my case and I enclosed copies of receipts from my wife substantiating her presences in Camden County on the morning in question.

That formed the motive for what became a conspiracy involving Judge Bennett, Judge Colyer, The Prosecuting Attorneys, Mr. W. Steven Rives & Mr. W. James Icenogle, and the two arresting police officers, Alex Little & Tim Taylor to convict me at whatever cost.

At my trail before a jury, the two arresting police officers lied under oath.  Alex Little lied in that he asserted that it was a 4” heal that required prior offer of removal.  This is in direct contradiction to the standard.  And if you have any knowledge of shoes, a 4” heel is just so unusual as to be unworthy of reference.  Nonetheless, the jury seeing the officer offer it as fact took it as fact.  A police officer that should have known is business, a police officer that would never lie, lied.  The jury was swayed.

I had made several motions prior to the trail trying to get the Standard utilized by the State of Missouri.  The prosecuting attorney had stated that the NHTSA standard was what was used, but they would not provide me a copy.  The prosecuting attorneys new what my defense revolved around.  Thus it is my assertion that the Prosecuting Attorneys either prepped the officer regarding the issue and told them how to lie or they condoned what they new to be an officer of the court committing perjury on the stand and they supported and thus suborned perjury.  

The second officer Tim Taylor lied in direct contradiction to his prior sworn statement on the police report.  Tim Taylor stated repeatedly that I had not blown for the 15 seconds he had referenced on his sworn police report.  A police officer that should have known is business, a police officer that would never lie, lied.  The jury was swayed.

Because the prosecuting attorneys had the police report and because I had made motions prior to the trial that the Breathalyzer test should be thrown out as a refusal because it was an invalid.  At trial I had the State of Missouri’s Health Department authority on the Breathalyzer give sworn testimony that a breathalyzer blow should take between 5 and 17 seconds, see the court record enclosed.  Again the prosecuting attorney knew of the police report.  Thus it is my assertion that the Prosecuting Attorneys either prepped the officer regarding the issue and told them how to lie or they condoned what they new to be an officer of the court committing perjury on the stand and they supported and thus suborned perjury.  And for whatever reason the police report was not entered into evidence, and in my naive defense I thought that it had been.   

Finally after the jury struggled with the verdict for nearly 6 hours, well into the night and rendered their verdict of guilty.  After the trial and prior to sentencing I brought all theses issue of supporting and suborning perjury by officers of the court, Judge Colyer, refused to use his judicial discretion to right this wrong.  And thus is complicit in the conspiracy.

Thus Judge Bennett is guilty for having first made the illegal judgment against me during the pretrial and then instigating my conviction by calling on friendship and cronyism to convict me.  The prosecuting attorneys are guilty for prepping for, supporting and suborning perjury.  The police officers are guilty of perjury, and finally Judge Coyler is guilty of looking the other way while this conspiracy is going on and doing nothing to stop it.

If you questions on any of these issue, you can contact the jury foreperson for cooperation.  There is a list of the jury’s names in the court file, I have a list of the jury’s names.

For your reference I am including here copies of the letters referenced above and electronic copy of the trial’s transcript (filename SD26269) and copies of all the pretrial motions and letters I generated in this regard on CD.  If there is anything more I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.  Please if you would investigate and keep me informed as to the status.  Time is of the essence.

Regards,

Replay to Dave@DGJeep.com

David G. Jeep

enclosure

cc: file