​“19 Harvard Law Professors Defend Law Student Brandon Winston, Denouncing His Portrayal in “The Hunting Ground”” and “Shutting Down Conversations About Rape at Harvard Law,” BY JEANNIE SUK

​From: David G. Jeep

To: Elizabeth Bartholet (ebarthol@law.harvard.edu), Scott Brewer (sbrewer@law.harvard.edu), Charles Donahue, Jr. (jreader@law.harvard.edu), Nancy Gertner (ngertner@law.harvard.edu), Janet Halley (jhalley@law.harvard.edu), Bruce L. Hay (hay@law.harvard.edu), Philip B. Heymann (heymann@law.harvard.edu), David W. Kennedy (dkennedy@law.harvard.edu), Duncan M. Kennedy (kennedy@law.harvard.edu), Randall L. Kennedy (rkennedy@law.harvard.edu), Charles J. Ogletree (dnorthington@law.harvard.edu), Jr., Richard D. Parker (parker@law.harvard.edu), J. Mark Ramseyer (ramseyer@law.harvard.edu), David Rosenberg (mdr@law.harvard.edu), Lewis D. Sargentich (lsargent@law.harvard.edu), David L. Shapiro (dshapiro@law.harvard.edu), Henry J. Steiner (hsteiner@law.harvard.edu), Jeannie C. Suk (jsuk@law.harvard.edu), Laurence H. Tribe (tribe@law.harvard.edu)

Re: "19 Harvard Law Professors Defend Law Student Brandon Winston, Denouncing His Portrayal in "The Hunting Ground"" and "Shutting Down Conversations About Rape at Harvard Law," BY JEANNIE SUK

            I realize you all live in ivory towers and no longer have to deal with the HARD FACTS of We the People's Justice System.  But in the "Jane Crow"[1] era, the issue in "The Hunting Ground," happens EVERY DAY on a much, MUCH LARGER SCALE and DEVASTATING EXTREME.

I have, in the "Jane Crow" era, been fighting this for 12+ years, I spent 411 days in jail (Federal Inmate #36072-044[2]), I have been homeless for 8+ years, I have been through the Article III Judicial System 7 times and I have presented 6 DOCKETED AND DENIED Petitions for Writ of Certiorari[3] to the Supreme Court of the United states i.e., 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-5193, 13-7030, 14-5551 and 14-10088!!!!

I quote from my recent appeal (Eighth Circuit Appeal Case #: 15-3403, District Case #: 4:15CV1533HEA)

"If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary."[4]  Both the District and Circuit courts have refused to acknowledge two mandatory FACTS:

1.    ANY assertion of personal ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY, without proof of divinity, is a fraud by any standard of Justice in a government/civilization of free and equal persons on THIS PLANET!!!!![5]

2.    ANY assertion of governmental ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY, acknowledging human fallibility, is repugnant to a government/civilization of the people, by the people and for the people on THIS PLANET!!!!! [6]

BUT YET TODAY in the US of A, to paraphrase Ms. Suk's argument... "The extent of the damage comes out of the fact that "always believe" unwittingly renders the stakes of each individual case impossibly high, by linking the veracity of any one claim to the veracity of all claims. When the core belief is that the JUSTICE SYSTEM NEVER MAKES MISTAKES, if any one JUDGE / PROSECUTOR / POLICEMAN has errored, it brings into question the stability of the entire thought system, rendering uncertain all allegations of LIABILITY FOR INALIENABLE RIGHTS. But this is entire thought system, rendering uncertain all allegations of LIABILITY FOR INALIENABLE RIGHTS. But this is neither sensible nor necessary: that a few claims turn out to be false does not mean that all, most, or even many claims are wrongful. The imperative to act as though every accusation must be true—when we all know some number will not be—harms the overall credibility of LIABILITY FOR INALIENABLE RIGHTS."

I remind you of We the People's "raison d'être"[7] for incorporating with our constitution was to ESTABLISH JUSTICE…, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this constitution for the United States of America" via "rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws"

 If there is anything further I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.

Thank you in advance.

 cc:  My Blog - Thursday, December 31, 2015, 4:13:13 PM

---

[1] "unequal protection" of the Laws based on gender discrimination via "fraud on the court" e.g., blatantly false accusation of abuse for tactical reasons in divorce and child custody proceedings.

[2] http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2010/04/charges-are-dismissed-without-prejudice.html

http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2011/08/st-louis-post-dispatch-arrest-march-12.html

[3] http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2015/12/list-of-docketed-and-denied-petitions.html

[4] FEDERALIST No. 51 – "The Structure of the Government Must Furnish the Proper Checks and Balances Between the Different Departments "For the Independent Journal.  Wednesday, February 6, 1788. by James Madison

[5] DGJeep Wednesday, June 15, 2011 http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2011/06/any-assertion-of-absolute-immunity.html

[6] DGJeep Wednesday, June 15, 2011 http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2011/06/any-assertion-of-absolute-immunity.html

[7] MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN delivered the opinion of the Court. "To criticize section 1983 liability because it leads decisionmakers to avoid the infringement of constitutional rights is to criticize one of the statute's raisons d'etre."  Owen v. City of Independence, 445 U.S. 656 (1980)​

Thanks in advance,

To Kill a Mocking Bird, The Denial of Due Process

"Agere sequitur esse"

"Time is  of the essence"

David G. Jeep, Federal Inmate #36072-044

http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/

My E-mail addresses are David.G.Jeep@GMail.com orDGJeep01@yahoo.com

(314) 514-5228

David G. Jeep

GENERAL DELIVERY

Saint Louis , MO 63155-9999

Why impute Missing BAC in FARS? The REAL Problem, FRAUD in the "Legality of Drunken-Driving"

Could it be that none were reported becuase none were in EVIDENCE!!!  

​http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2015/12/the-real-problem-fraud-in-legality-of.html

​

Thanks in advance,

To Kill a Mocking Bird, The Denial of Due Process

"Agere sequitur esse"

"Time is  of the essence"

David G. Jeep, Federal Inmate #36072-044
http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/
My E-mail addresses are David.G.Jeep@GMail.com orDGJeep01@yahoo.com

(314) 514-5228

David G. Jeep

GENERAL DELIVERY

Saint Louis , MO 63155-9999

The REAL Problem, FRAUD in the "Legality of Drunken-Driving"

The REAL Problem, FRAUD in the "Legality of Drunken-Driving"

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration COOKs the Books on 60% of the Blood Alcohol Content statistics and has been doing it since 1986!!!!!!!!!!!!!

FRAUS OMNIA CORRUMPIT "FRAUD CORRUPTS ALL."

DOT HS 809 450 ESTIMATES of Alcohol Involvement in Fatal Crashes

http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2013/01/the-real-problem-fraud-in-legality-of.html

http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/809-450.pdf

It is a religious teaching among many people today that alcohol is bad, and you must always believe statistics (Multiple Imputation (MI)). Questioning in a particular instance whether alcohol was the cause violates that religious teaching.

Examining evidence and concluding that a particular case is not indeed alcohol related, is a sin that reveals that one is an alcohol abuser and biased in favor of perpetrators.

Why impute Missing BAC in FARS?

A. If estimates of alcohol involvement are based only on BAC values that are reported for some persons, invalid inferences will result because the characteristics of the persons with unknown BACs can be significantly different from those with reported BACs.

Could it be that none were reported becuase none were in EVIDENCE!!!  

That is just a punch of BS that says there were not enough incidences to support our premise so we CREATED SOME TO SUIT OUR PREMISE!!!! 

It is a religious teaching among many people today that alcohol is bad, and you must always believe statistics (Multiple Imputation (MI)). Questioning in a particular instance whether alcohol was the cause violates that religious teaching.

Examining evidence and concluding that a particular case is not indeed alcohol related, is a sin that reveals that one is an alcohol abuser and biased in favor of perpetrators.

Thanks in advance,

To Kill a Mocking Bird, The Denial of Due Process

"Agere sequitur esse"

"Time is  of the essence"

David G. Jeep, Federal Inmate #36072-044
http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/
My E-mail addresses are David.G.Jeep@GMail.com orDGJeep01@yahoo.com

(314) 514-5228

David G. Jeep

GENERAL DELIVERY

Saint Louis , MO 63155-9999

Hillary Clinton’s asserted E-MAIL issues are another[1] attempt by GOP to play on their constituents’ stupidity. Their subliminal assumption is anybody that uses e-mail is showing-off, lazy, or trying to hide something; otherwise they would have sent a letter.

Hillary Clinton's asserted E-MAIL issues are another[1] attempt by GOP to play on their constituents' stupidity.  Their subliminal assumption is anybody that uses e-mail is showing-off, lazy, or trying to hide something; otherwise they would have sent a letter.

And that is just not the case!!!!!!!!!

There is no smoking gun.  The FBI is investigating not because there is any credibility to the claims, but because congress would put up a stink if they did not.     

GROW UP!!!!  Since GWBush was too stupid to use e-mail a similar investigation would be to search every trash can he ever walked by while president for any incriminating top-secret information he may have on PURPOSE or inadvertently thrown away!!!  Not because we have any smoking gun that tells us to, but MEREMLY BECAUSE we are trying to use the mere existence of an investigation to incriminate GWBUsh

GROW UP!!!!!!!!!

Will our justice system ever acknowledge their "raison d'être" "to establish Justice" and put aside the greater glory of the Black Robed Royalist Guild of Judges assertion of nobility? Will there ever be an end?????

The FEAR MONGERS want to sell their self-serving ABSOLUTE POWER. They assert that We the People's Justice System, the prosecutors, the police and "the judges should be at liberty to exercise their functions with independence, and without fear of consequences."[81]  The sophistry of the Guild of Judges interprets this as a power to "do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid"[82] i.e., the "deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America."[83]  And if We the People ever deny them their "absolute immunity" we will live in the constant FEAR of ANARCHY… the overwhelming and unavoidability of "vexatious"[84] or "calumnious"[85] actions.  "Vexatious" or "calumnious" actions are normal and avoidable; they could easily be confirmed or denied on appeal. 

http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2013/12/will-our-justice-system-ever.html

Do not give into the FEAR!!!  Neither shoe bombers or underwear bombers nor would be stadium bombers can defeat us!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2015/11/do-not-give-into-fear-neither-shoe.html

---

[1] After Fighting a war to eliminate slavery we were sold Jim Crow as an unavoidable force of nature>>>> McCarthyism speaks for itself>>> The Southern Strategy was an racist appeal to Dixiecrats that were opposed to the Civil Rights laws passed by their Democratic party and president in 1960's >>>>>>  Free Healthcare for all is inconsistent with Capitalism, Supply will never satiate supply, we are all going to die and we will all spend whatever we have or do not have to live one minute longer  

Thanks in advance,

To Kill a Mocking Bird, The Denial of Due Process

"Agere sequitur esse"

"Time is  of the essence"

David G. Jeep, Federal Inmate #36072-044
http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/
My E-mail addresses are David.G.Jeep@GMail.com orDGJeep01@yahoo.com

(314) 514-5228

David G. Jeep

GENERAL DELIVERY

Saint Louis , MO 63155-9999