"The Earth and everything that's in it": December 3, 2017

Wednesday, December 6, 2017

Re: Case No. 4:17-cv-02690-AGF - Jeep v Government of the United States of America eta!, NOTICE OF APPEAL

United States Post Office Certified First Class Mail Delivery

Audrey G. Fleissig, District Judge

c/o Gregory J. Linhares - Clerk of Court

St. Louis - Eastern Division

111 South 10th Street, Suite 3.300

St. Louis, MO 63102-1123

Re: Case No. 4:17-cv-02690-AGF - Jeep v Government of the United States of America eta!, NOTICE OF APPEAL

Dear People,

This has been a criminal conspiracy for the deprivation of rights[1] since the instant of its creation as "an infamously-scandalous, non-exigent, EXTRA-JUDICIAL gravamen, - a "beyond debate"^{^[2]} NOT "facially valid court order" [3] and an unconstitutional FRAUD[4] on the COURT by an officer of the Court.

In the, now 14 year, struggle it has become an all-consuming RICO[5] action to cover up the criminal conspiracy against rights.

Noting my pro se prior submission of a "Motion for reconsideration" dated Monday, November 20, 2017, the court's order dated s 9th day of November (Document Number: 6), 2017., and NOT being professionally aware of bureaucratic limits on appeal. In good faith, I advance an appeal, here and now, Wednesday, December 06, 2017, 10:05:29 AM.

If there is anything further, I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.

Thank you in advance.

"Time is of the essence"

David G. Jeep

enclosure

a. "NOTICE OF APPEAL"

cc: The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals Clerk's Office

My Blog - Wednesday, December 06, 2017, 10:05:29 AM

[1] 18 U.S. Code § 241 - Conspiracy against rights and 18 U.S. Code § 242 - Deprivation of rights under color of law

[2] Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, 563 U. S. 731, 741 (2011), Mullenix v. Luna 577 U. S. ____ (2015)

[3] (Stump v. Sparkman,435 U.S. 356-57 (1978) PENN v. U.S. 335 F.3d 790 (2003)) - The assertion of a misdemeanor traffic violation does not provide REASONABLE probable cause for an ex parte order of protection. Clearly based on the original SERVED handwritten petition dated 11-03-03, there was a complete absence of jurisdiction for the stated charge.

[4] Fraus omnia corrumpit "Fraud corrupts all." A principle according to which the discovery of fraud invalidates all aspects of a judicial decision

[5] 18 U.S. Code Chapter 96 - Racketeer Influenced And Corrupt Organizations

UNITED STATES EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI

FEDERAL COURT - St. Louis DIVISION

JURY DEMAND

_____________________________________________________________________

Jeep

Government of the United States of America, et al

Case No. 4:17-cv-02690-AGF

_____________________________________________________________________

I. NOTIFICATION of APPEAL

_____________________________________________________________________

Please make note of my notice of appeal for all actions currently bearing upon the above referenced issue Case No. 4:17-cv-02690-AGF.

The Court's order dated 9th day of November (Document Number: 6) is ludicrous on its face. The citation listed District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 486 (1983) is outside the 8th Circuit's jurisdiction and unrelated to specifics of the gravamen as reasoned and described – "an infamously-scandalous, non-exigent, extra-judicial gravamen, - a NOT "facially valid court order"^{^[1]} (Stump v. Sparkman,435 U.S. 356-57 (1978) PENN v. U.S. 335 F.3d 790 (2003)) - that was reckonably^{^[2]} issued "in the "clear absence of all jurisdiction,""^{^[3]} (Mireles v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9, 11-12, 112 S. Ct. 286, 116 L.Ed.2d 9 (1991) (per curiam) PENN v. U.S. 335 F.3d 790 (2003)) - "beyond debate"^{^[4]} (Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, 563 U. S. 731, 741 (2011), Mullenix v. Luna 577 U. S. _(2015)) "sufficiently clear that every reasonable official would have understood that what he is doing violates that right"^{^[5]} (Anderson v. Creighton, 483 U. S. 635, 640 (1987), Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, 563 U. S. 731, 741 (2011)).^{^[6]}"

_____________________________________________________________________

II. CERTIFICATION AND CLOSING

_____________________________________________________________________

Respectfully submitted, Wednesday, December 06, 2017

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

David G. Jeep

GENERAL DELIVERY

Saint Louis, MO 63155-9999

E-Mail Dave@DGJeep.com (preferred)

(314) 514-5228

The plaintiff is homeless and without the will to go on because of this issue AND SEEKS EMERGENCY RELIEF!!!!

[1] The assertion of a misdemeanor traffic violation does not provide REASONABLE probable cause for an ex parte order of protection. Clearly based on the original SERVED handwritten petition dated 11-03-03, there was a complete absence of jurisdiction for the stated charge.

[2] If reason (reckonabilty) does not limit jurisdiction with probable cause, nothing can."reckonability" is a needful characteristic of any law worthy of the name." Antonin Scalia: The Rule of Law as a Law of Rules, 56 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1175, 1175-81 (1989)

[3] Mireles v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9, 11-12, 112 S.Ct. 286, 116 L.Ed.2d 9 (1991) (per curiam) PENN v. U.S. 335 F.3d 790 (2003)

[4] Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, 563 U. S. 731, 741 (2011), Mullenix v. Luna 577 U. S. ____ (2015)

[5] Ashcroft V. Al-Kidd 563 U. S. _(9)_ (2011), Anderson v. Creighton, 483 U. S. 635, 640 (1987).

[6] "To this day, I am haunted by the vivid memory of the confirming shrug from the Police Officer when I questioned it as served on November 3, 2003. I am further haunted by the memory of the same confirming shrug when Commissioner Jones first saw the absurdity of the court order on the bench November 20, 2003 as my attorney then highlighted as he repeated his prior objections." Lisa Nesbit c/o OFFICE OF THE CLERK Thursday, June 15, 2017, 10:23:36 AM

"Agere sequitur esse" ('action follows being')

David G. Jeep,

Federal Inmate #36072-044 (formerly)
www.DGJeep.com
Dave@DGJeep.com

Mobile (314) 514-5228

David G. Jeep

GENERAL DELIVERY

Saint Louis, MO 63155-9999

Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court

U. S. Court of Appeals for the 8^th Circuit

111 South 10th Street

Room 24.329

St. Louis, MO. 63102-1123

Re: Case No. 4:17-cv-02690-AGF - Jeep v Government of the United States of America eta!, NOTICE OF APPEAL

Dear People,

I realize that the appeal as noted above and in the accompanying documentation has go through Eastern District of Missouri | United States District Court.

But because you are CRIMINALLY[1] implicated in this 14 year RICO[2] action as a conspiracy for the deprivation of rights, I out of sequence provide you this copy for INFORMATION ONLY.

If there is anything further, I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.

Thank you in advance.

“Time is of the essence”

David G. Jeep

enclosure

a. FYI - “NOTICE OF APPEAL as mailed to MOED”

cc: My Blog - Thursday, December 07, 2017, 9:41:50 AM

[1] 18 USC §241 - §242 and 42 USC §1983 - §1985

[2] 18 U.S. Code Chapter 96 - Racketeer Influenced And Corrupt Organizations

Tuesday, December 5, 2017

Morning Joe - MSNBC Network Address - “Jane Crow” "FATHERS ARE DISFAVORED BY AMERICAN DOMESTIC RELATION LAW."

I realize "Jane Crow" may not be the current highbrow gender issue of the moment, but it is life threatening and destroying the elemental American family structure!

As regards recent revelations of HIGH PROFILE sexual harassment issue - NO one REALLY knows the facts!! Use to be you could hang a Black man in the street on the basis of an accusation ALONE!! Are we now going back there?

We have been fighting for 150 years, since the passage of the 14th amendment, to establish equal protection of "Due Process of Law." At this point this is all just Trump/Russian active measures (propaganda machine). We need the 14th amendment to establish the FACTS, with equal protection of "Due Process of Law."

Now you assume WOMEN would never lie, that is foolish and you know it. Just investigate the YEARS of the NUMEROUS false accusations as regards ex parte orders of protection.

"It doesn't take a cynic to point out that when a woman is getting a divorce, what she may truly fear is not violence, but losing the house or kids. Under an exparte order of protection, if she's willing to fib to the judge and say she is "in fear" of her children's father, she will get custody and money and probably the house."

A fete de complete, "A man against whom a frivolous exparte order of protection has been brought starts to lose any power in his divorce proceeding. They do start decompensating, and they do start to have emotional issues, and they do start developing post-traumatic stress disorders. They keep replaying in their minds the tape of what happened to them in court. It starts this whole vicious downward cycle. They've been embarrassed and shamed in front of their family and friends, unjustly, and they totally lose any sense of self-control and self-respect. They may indeed become verbally abusive. It's difficult for the court to see where that person was prior to the restraining order." "The Booming Domestic Violence Industry" - Massachusetts News, 08/02/99, By John Maguire, Hitting below the belt Monday, 10/25/99 12:00 ET, By Cathy Young, Salon - Divorced men claim discrimination by state courts, 09/07/99, By Erica Noonan, Associated Press, Dads to Sue for Discrimination, 08/24/99, By Amy Sinatra, ABCNEWS.com, The Federal Scheme to Destroy Father-Child Relationships, by Jake Morphonios, 02/13/08.

Everyone is saying this is a watershed moment. You are waiting with bated breath for the inevitable trickle-down flood. You are IDIOTS – "The effect" is now a FLOOD of FRAUDULENT actions and the "Jane Crow" era has been growing every year since 1974!

Again, use to be you could hang a Black man in the street on the basis of an accusation ALONE!! We have been fighting for 150 years, since the passage of the 14th amendment, to establish equal protection of "Due Process of Law." You are being played, at this point - this is all just the Trump/Russian active measures (propaganda machine). We need the 14th amendment to establish equal protection of "Due Process of Law"

"No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

I am the "greater fool" who foolishly believes he can succeed where others have failed. After 14 years - with 10 years homeless, 411 days in jail and 7 trips to the Supreme Court of the United States - I STILL BELIEVE - I can convince the courts that the Judiciary's asserted "absolute immunity" DEFEATS the Constitution's raison raison d'être - security for "the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

That being said Due Process of Law has been abandoned in American domestic relation law.

The accumulated effect of the "Jane Crow" era has now been documented by research - with the birth rate down by 48% since 1960 and teen pregnancy down by 65% just since 1990 -- single motherhood is UP by 700% since 1960. [1] 40% of all births in the United States of America were to single mothers in 2015. Why? In the "Jane Crow" era "FATHERS ARE DISFAVORED BY AMERICAN DOMESTIC RELATION LAW."

GRAVITAS of the RICO action against my rights as a man and the war against the elemental American family structure.

Judicial Independence was originally postulated to altruistically support and defend the establishment of justice in the face of malice, corruption, sincere ignorance and conscientious stupid. But no more it defends without question the self-serving perpetuation of injustice of judicial absolute immunity.

If there is anything further I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.

Thank you in advance.

David G. Jeep

[1] "Male Earnings, Marriageable Men, and Nonmarital Fertility: Evidence from the Fracking Boom" Melissa S. Kearney, Riley Wilson - NBER Working Paper No. 23408 - Issued in May 2017"Agere sequitur esse" ('action follows being')

David G. Jeep,

Federal Inmate #36072-044 (formerly)
www.DGJeep.com
Dave@DGJeep.com

Mobile (314) 514-5228

David G. Jeep

GENERAL DELIVERY

Saint Louis, MO 63155-9999

Monday, December 4, 2017

To the Unknown (Caller) - 56 min ago (Monday, December 4, 2017, 3:03:50 PM CST)

If you want to rob a bank or run a red light there's something you should do first to make it alright. You can break any laws without any oversight if you change your last name to Clinton.

ANSWER - Where were the Clinton’s accused of any of this???

You can light up as you can act like a jerk you can make a crap ton of money without doing any work plus.

ANSWER – You think Trump has sweat equity in his money?

You can sleep with your staff as an added perk if you change your last name to Clinton the SPC the FBI the house of representatives.

ANSWER – Clinton was impeached, he was revealed and admitted to the bad acts.

We just don't apply you can have all your enemies mysteriously died if you change your last name to Clinton.