"The Earth and everything that's in it": June 30, 2024

Monday, July 1, 2024

Trump v. United States CONFLICTS WITH Loper Bright

Download as a PDF

Monday, July 1, 2024

Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice,

Supreme Court of the United States

One First Street N.E.

Washington, DC 20543-0001

Re: Trump v. United States CONFLICTS WITH Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo

22 CFR § 93.2 - Notice of suit, any and all assertions of enduring non-exigent immunity are an abdication and / or a dereliction of due process of law under Article III – as it relates to any person, a former president[1] or DGJeep[2] v. Supreme Court of the United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856)[3]

Dear People,

I do not think you can reconcile Trump v. United States with the deference prohibited by Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo. Don't you now have to assume deference to the Executive's enforcement action?

The enforcement of the laws is a CORE authority of the Executive. I do not think there is any room in Trump v. United States to question his (their) core executive authority.

If there is anything further, please let me know.

"Time is of the essence"

Thank you in advance.

David G. Jeep

cc: www.DGJeep.com

file

[1] 23-939 Trump, Donald J. v. United States

[2] a.k.a., David Gerard Jeep. It should be noted that my middle-class family had the Jeep name centuries in advance of the Willys Motor Co creation of their General Purpose (GP) vehicle for the U.S. Army. The Jeep family has been traced back to the 1500's, My paternal grandfather was born 21 NOV 1888 • my father fought in WWII and drove / rode a GP. There was NO proverbial "Henry Jeep!!!!"

[3] My argument NOW includes 23-719 Trump v. Anderson!!!