Re: The PHONY Benghazi scandal[1] ONE LAST TIME
While I feel extremely sorry for the deaths in Benghazi, they were at BEST accidental in the new unfamiliar location. They, the people that had their lives at risk, had no, in place, evacuation plan!!! If there had been a set evacuation plan, U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens most likely would not have perished. The facility was new and temporary at best!!! Although an official cause of death has never been determined, Stevens apparently became separated from his staff while trying to escape to the roof and was allegedly overcome by smoke inhalation (CNN and ABC News).
In that the CIA was the ONLY American presence with "boots on the ground" in Benghazi at the time of the attack their input in the talking points memos at 2:27 p.m. on Sept. 14, 2012 and the final version, after their numerous revisions, produced at 12:13 p.m. on Sept. 15, 2014" was the BEST INFORMATION available.
Even if ALL the allegations Fox News is asserting were true.
THEY ARE NOT TRUE!!!
But even if they were, they would never even come close to the lies George W. Bush and friends presented in their "Weapons of Mass Destruction" deception in Iraq. That criminal conspiracy and misrepresentation cost 5,000 American lives, $1.9 trillion (or $6,300 per U.S. citizen) in an unfunded mandate and those inconsequential things "American Exceptionalism" rarely if ever counts, the indigenous civilians killed 123,153 – 137,027.
If there is anything further I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.
Thank you in advance.
"Time is of the essence"
David G. Jeep
[1] The real scandal is that this has consumed so much of the countries interest on SO LITTLE of an issue.
THINK!!!!!!!!!!! PLEASE!!!!!! THINK!!!!!!!!!
It is not about a police state. It is not about Citizens United, Rove v. Wade
or Hobby Lobby v. Obamacare. It is not
about corporate greed.
It
is not about Police gear. It is not about Michael Brown or Eric Garner. It is not necessarily about race, the
self-serving-supreme-court is much more subtle.
IT IS NECESSARILY ABOUT JUSTICE.
TODAY, “We the People” are ruled
by the unwritten absolutely immune self-serving MARTIAL LAW of JUDICIAL RULE in
the Jane Crow Era and the World War on Drugs that NEGATES all our supposedly
inalienable constitutional rights.
I realize it sounds almost
ridiculous but "We the People" “to establish Justice” need a
Constitutional Amendment:
“Malice, corruption, dishonesty,
sincere ignorance, conscientious stupidity and Incompetence ARE NOT and never
have been covered by ANY grant of immunity, under color of CONSTITUTIONAL law.”
You don’t believe me READ their
precedent.
To hear the supreme court sophistry[1]
tell us, via their unrestricted absolutely immune power, We the People, all
evidence to the contrary, traded the “King can do no WRONG” for the of the
ABSOLUTELY IMMUNE actions of the “malicious or corrupt” judges (Bradley v.
Fisher, supra, 80 U. S. 335, 80 U. S. 349, note, at 80 U. S. 350, Pierson v.
Ray, 386 U. S. 57 (1967) Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349 (1978)), the “malicious or dishonest” prosecutor
(Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U. S. 428 (1976)), the “knowingly false testimony by
police officers" (Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 345 (1983)), corrupt, malicious, dishonest, sincerely
ignorant and conscientiously stupid
actions of federal, state, local, and regional legislators (Bogan v.
Scott-Harris - 523 U.S. 44 (1997) Tenney v. Brandhove, 341 U. S. 367, 372,
372-376; Amy v. Supervisors, 11 Wall. 136, 138)
and the malicious, corrupt, dishonest, sincerely ignorant and
conscientiously stupid actions of “all
persons (spouses) -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of
the judicial process” (Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 345 (1983)) acting under color of law to render ABSOLUTE
CORRUPTION of INALIENABLE RIGHTS under
color of law.
We need a constitutional amendment to END the judicial sanction of
Malice, corruption, dishonesty, sincere ignorance, conscientious stupidity and
Incompetence
THINK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! PLEASE
THINK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
[1]
“We have long enough suffered under the base prostitution of law to party
passions in one judge, and the imbecility of another. In the hands of one the
law is nothing more than an ambiguous text, to be explained by his sophistry
into any meaning which may subserve his personal malice.” (The Letters of
Thomas Jefferson: 1743-1826 SCHOOLS AND "LITTLE REPUBLICS" To John
Tyler Monticello, May 26, 1810)
Thanks in advance,
To Kill a Mocking Bird, The Denial of Due Process
"Agere sequitur esse"
"Time is of the essence"
David G. Jeep
http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/
My E-mail addresses are David.G.Jeep@GMail.com orDGJeep01@yahoo.com
(314) 514-5228
David G. Jeep
http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/
My E-mail addresses are David.G.Jeep@GMail.com orDGJeep01@yahoo.com
David G. Jeep
GENERAL DELIVERY
Saint Louis , MO 63155-9999
