Wednesday, March 11, 2009

I was Arrested in violation of my First Amendment Right to Free Speech... for asking for my rights


I had requested “the Protection of the Law” per my Civil Rights via a quote from the FBI Mission Statement (Charged as Case #4:09-cr-00659-CDP):
“The FBI is the lead agency for investigating violations of federal civil rights laws…and we take that responsibility seriously.” The FBI speaks specifically to these issues as they define their mission as it relates to civil rights “under color of law”. I again quote “U.S. law enforcement officers and other officials like judges, prosecutors, and security guards have been given tremendous power by local, state, and federal government agencies—authority they must have to enforce the law and ensure justice in our country. These powers include the authority to detain and arrest suspects, to search and seize property, to bring criminal charges, to make rulings in court, and to use deadly force in certain situations.
Preventing abuse of this authority, however, is equally necessary to the health of our nation’s democracy. That’s why it’s a federal crime for anyone acting under “color of law” willfully to deprive or conspire to deprive a person of a right protected by the Constitution or U.S. law. (bolding added) “Color of law” simply means that the person is using authority given to him or her by a local, state, or federal government agency.”



I was charged under:
18 U.S.C. § 2 provides:
(a) Whoever commits an offense against the United States or aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures its commission, is punishable as a principal.
(b) Whoever willfully causes an act to be done which if directly performed by him or another would be an offense against the United States, is punishable as a principal.
Whoever transmits in interstate commerce any communication containing any threat to kidnap any person or any threat to injure the person of another, shall be fined not more than $1,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

This was a violation of my Civil Rights per the US Supreme Court, United States of America, Appellee, v. Russell Kelner, Appellant, United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. - 534 F.2d 1020 Argued Oct. 29, 1975.Decided April 9, 1976, “The purpose and effect of the Watts constitutionally-limited definition of the term "threat" is to insure that only unequivocal, unconditional and specific expressions of intention immediately to inflict injury may be punished only such threats, in short, as are of the same nature as those threats which are, as Judge Wright recognizes, "properly punished every day under statutes prohibiting extortion, blackmail and assault without consideration of First Amendment issues." Watts v. United States, 394 U.S. 705 (1969), supra. The Watts requirement of proof of a "true threat," it may be seen, works ultimately to much the same purpose and effect as would a requirement of proof of specific intent to execute the threat because both requirements focus on threats which are so unambiguous and have such immediacy that they convincingly express an intention of being carried out.

I spent 411 day in federal custody denied my liberty and basic human rights, subject to the humiliation and intimidation of County Jail incarceration. 
I was released in the dark of night 24 miles from the site wear I had been arrested in homeless shelter on to the streets of down town St. Charles Missouri in the rain, penniless and wearing prison clothing 

What I wrote, A SAMPLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



A Card-Carrying Pacifist

A Card-Carrying Pacifist
First published February 10, 2009
http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2009/02/card-carrying-pacifist.html


Why did Cookie snap? What did Cookie do, he had struggled and worked to own his own home. He had struggled and worked the American Dream to own his own business.

http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2009/03/you-do-not-want-this-to-become-crazy.html

Civil Rights and Judicial Terrorism

http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2009/02/civil-rights-and-judicial-terrorism.html

To the FBI, A Demand for an affirmative response on or before March 16, 2009

http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2009/03/to-fbi-demand-for-affirmative-response.html




Sunday, March 8, 2009

Why did Cookie snap? What did Cookie do, he had struggled and worked to own his own home. He had struggled and worked the American Dream to own his own business.

Sunday, March 08, 2009

Mike Christian at 314-280-5222 FBI Report
FBI St. Louis
2222 Market Street
St. Louis, Missouri 63103-2516

Phone: (314) 231-4324

Phone: (314) 589-2500, Fax: (314) 589-2636

E-mail: stlouis@ic.fbi.gov

Re: You do not want this to become a Crazy Macho Thing
Your deadline is still Monday March 16, 2009

Dear Mr. Christian,

This is not a spur of the moment DEMAND. I have been at this since Day One, some five plus years ago. This is not about my power v. your power. This is not even about the Rule of Law v. Tyranny and Terrorism. The issue is all about a remedy for a wrong. The rest is just rhetoric to make the right and the wrong more distinguishable.

“Every wrong shall have a remedy”, is a principle of common law that dates back King Henry II of England in the 12th Century. I am demanding my constitutional rights and a remedy for a wrong.
THE WRONG, the undisputed, undisputable RECORD of

THE WRONG

1. The police in Osage Beach, Missouri were incompetent to make the original arrest. They actually testified to their incompetence, of course at the time nobody believed them incompetent, they were believed to be law enforcement professionals, under color of law. On the stand under oath, they knowingly gave false incompetent information as factual evidence to establish police procedure, under color of law. They were wearing uniforms and badges, carrying guns; anybody and everybody could see they were the LAW. And as Professional Law Officers, they had sworn on the stand in front of the judge and the jury to tell “the whole truth and nothing but the truth so help me God”. Incompetence or perjury , it does not make any difference in a civil rights case. But you tell me, did Bill Clinton have sexual relations with that woman? (08-1823)

2. Judge Bennett had no credible legal or constitutional reason to put me in jail at the preliminary hearing in Camden County; it was illegal and unconstitutional Judicial Terrorism . (08-1823)

3. Judge Goeke issued a blatantly deficient, illegal and unconstitutional Court Order in effect taking my Son, my home, all my worldly possessions putting me on the street, HOMELESS; it was illegal and unconstitutional Judicial Terrorism . (07-11115)

4. Commissioner Jones, the would be Judge, forced me illegally and unconstitutionally into a Court Room and “held (me) to answer” his yet to be “adduced” surprise specifics, charges and Judgment; it was illegal and unconstitutional Judicial Terrorism . (07-11115)

5. Judge Colyer denied my valid pretrial motions for dismissal based on the gross incompetents of the arresting officers: it was illegal and unconstitutional Judicial Terrorism . (08-1823)

6. The Prosecuting Attorneys with acquiescence of Judge Colyer denied me exculpable material that would have proved the gross incompetents of the arresting officers; it was illegal and unconstitutional Judicial Terrorism . (08-1823)

7. The arresting officer Mr. Alex Little, Officer Badge #920 lied on the stand perjuring himself by contradicting verifiable police procedure. Officer Little had clearly been made aware of the issue by his intimate knowledge of the pretrial motions for the trial, he was in the courtroom to testify when I made the motion months before the testimony. Additionally he had testified that he had been to the certified training. Incompetence or perjury , it does not make any difference in a civil rights case. But you tell me, did Bill Clinton have sexual relations with that woman? (08-1823)

8. The second arresting officer Mr. Tim Taylor Officer Badge #913,not only testified to his incompetence, but further perjured himself on the stand under oath contradicting his prior sworn police report. Incompetence or perjury , it does not make any difference in a civil rights case. But you tell me, did Bill Clinton have sexual relations with that woman? (08-1823)

9. Judge Colyer and others acting in a conspiracy after the false and illegal conviction and with the full knowledge of all the above issues in a POST TRIAL MOTION, i.e. false arrest, malicious prosecution, false testimony, denial of exculpable material denied my POST TRIAL MOTION for a miss trial and forced me into an appeal that I was unable to mount for reasons other than the evidence above. I had a life outside of the courtroom; I was going through a contested divorce and had been illegally and unconstitutionally forced from my home and my SON, in a related issues, i.e. Writ of Certiorari 07-11115; it was illegal and unconstitutional Judicial Terrorism. (08-1823)

10. Because of the combined issues of the Writ of Certiorari 07-11115 and the appeal 08-1823 and because I am a human and not a superhuman I was unable to mount a perfected appeal in state Court on any of these issues, while working 60 hours a week, managing 145 men, on two shifts, 6 days a week on a construction project building at the rate of $5,000,000/month, this, thus became a Civil Rights Issue in FEDERAL COURT, a violation of Title 18 § 242. Deprivation of rights under color of law and Title 42 § 1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights,


THE WRONG.

What did I do wrong?

I was driving down the road and a self professed incompetent rookie police officer wanted to make, what he thought to be a BIG arrest, I was unfortunately the closest first victim that innocently came within striking distance. Even the probable cause is specious, having to use the right hand blinker in the midst of a left turn? Is that even possible?

I was sitting at home watching Monday Night Football my now ex-wife knowingly filed a bogus, legally deficient ex-parte order of protection ordered without legal or constitutional basis by a Judicial Terrorist; she knew she could get away with it because everybody does it.

I have been at this over five years, I know it would be easier for you easier for the FBI, easier for the Supreme court if I just went away. That AIN’T GONNA HAPPEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Am I going to break, I am going to snap like Cookie?
IT IS A POSSIBILITY!!!!!!!!!

Why did Cookie snap? What did Cookie do, he had struggled and worked to own his own home. He had struggled and worked the American Dream to own his own business. Cookie owned what for him was a glorious piece of property, it was his home, his pride and joy, in a town he had grown up in, a place he had prospered in, a place where he had always felt safe, a place he had hoped to raise a family in, a place where he new the RULES.

Somebody came into his hometown, his home, with guns, traffic tickets, and New RULES . The New RULES told him, you can not live here, as you have ALWAYS LIVED here… for YOUR ENTIRE LIFE, this is no longer your home. You have to now be like US or move!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Now Cookie did not have the education, the patience, or the will that I have. He had the intelligence, he was a smart guy. He had the work ethic, he was a small business owner, a hard worker. He fought as best he could; I am sure he put up a good fight. I am sure he did all that he could to defend his home, defend his business, defend his hopes for the future, defend his rights for the benefit of his son. I knew Cookie, he had a good heart, a good soul, I feel confident that he had grown into a good man, I knew his mother.

I am sure that if there was someone with the truth and the courage to tell it, his Son could be and should be proud of him. Proud of the life he had built, Proud of the fight he put up. Proud of the courage he showed as a peaceful businessman, struggling fighting all those traffic tickets just to keep his home, his business, his life for his son. It is too bad the way it ended, a Crazy Macho thing.

I am sure Cookie has affected to some extent, if only subconsciously, the current RE-THINKING of eminent domain / zoning and it’s uses for commercial, non-imperative, NON-governmental uses. The use of “eminent domain” for non-imperative commercial purposes is currently being reconsidered with commercial interests going belly up before completing the projects. Should we have listen closer to Cookie?

You do not want to run the risk of this becoming a Crazy Macho thing. That would not be politically or legally SMART. I do not have to tell ANY of you LAW ENFORCEMENT officers, you push a man to extremes illegally, you have responsibility for his actions . I am legally demanding my rights. That is the difference between a privilege and a right. You can DEMAND your rights. A privilege you have to ask nice for, may I please. You need to teach Dan Bracco (FBI) that.

We have a Bill of Rights in this country. It is a part of our Constitution and enforceable throughout the land as THE rule of law. I am demanding my civil RIGHTS as declared in the Bill of Rights, specifically the 4th, 5th and 6th amendments. The FBI is responsible for enforcing our CIVIL RIGHTS as defined by the Bill of Rights, U.S. Constitution and Laws. You need to teach Dan Bracco (FBI) that.

That aside, I have been asking, nicely, for my rights for FIVE YEARS!!!!!!!! When does an illegal refusal become illegal extremes, I am through asking. I am demanding my “rights…secured by the Constitution and laws ”. Do not even begin to think about immunity, there is no such thing as immunity from the rule of LAW. Specifically I want the protection of the civil right’s laws as passed in 1871 and as now codified into the United States Code of law as Title 18 § 242. Deprivation of rights under color of law and Title 42 § 1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights. Title 18 § 242. Deprivation of rights under color of law and Title 42 § 1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights were written and made into law to enforce “We the People’s” rights on those acting “under color of law”. That is what Civil rights enforcement is all about, I quote from FBI Mission Statement “The FBI is the lead agency for investigating violations of federal civil rights laws…and we take that responsibility seriously. ” The FBI speaks specifically to these issues as they define their mission as it relates to civil rights “under color of law”. I again quote “U.S. law enforcement officers and other officials like judges, prosecutors, and security guards have been given tremendous power by local, state, and federal government agencies—authority they must have to enforce the law and ensure justice in our country. These powers include the authority to detain and arrest suspects, to search and seize property, to bring criminal charges, to make rulings in court, and to use deadly force in certain situations.

Preventing abuse of this authority, however, is equally necessary to the health of our nation’s democracy. That’s why it’s a federal crime for anyone acting under “color of law” willfully to deprive or conspire to deprive a person of a right protected by the Constitution or U.S. law. (bolding added) “Color of law” simply means that the person is using authority given to him or her by a local, state, or federal government agency. ” You need to teach Dan Bracco (FBI) that.

This is about FEDERAL Constitutional Civil Rights yes.

But more importantly it is about the rights of a Father and SON. I refuse to be the sperm donor and the source of Child Support DOLLARS.

I have a SON; I will be his FATHER!!!!!!

I will never give up, I will NEVER GIVE IN!!!!!!!!!!

No REAL FATHER EVER WOULD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You do not want this to become a Crazy Macho Thing. Let’s all be civilized. Lets all work for the Rule of Law, the rights of “We the People”. I am not asking for a lot, Judges that are constrained by the Bill of Rights, competent police officers, the truth AND the “rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws ”.

My world / Cookies’ world, I am a card carrying pacifist. I was raised in a different world from most. My world was nothing like Cookies. I was white upper middle class. I had the BEST, schools, opportunity and Rights. Cookie did not have the same schools, opportunity and Rights as I did, it was a long time ago, he was African American.

We didn’t have to fight for our supper; we did it for FUN. We would go at each other with a level of proficiency, ability and intensity that would literally terrify most people. We did it for FUN. We are not talking about just the physical sports, we are talking mental games of lust and avarice. I was the youngest of three boys in a privileged neighborhood and privileged school.

But we were civilized, I could break your leg on the field, win the girl and get paid for doing it. Then slap you on the back with a smile and say jokingly “wasn’t that fun”. And you would very civilly take it and BE BETTER next time. That was my world. It was as cut throat as any ghetto I assure you.

I use to be afraid of myself. I use to have a hair trigger, but time and experience gave me discipline and control. I learned to walk away from violence and a lot other things. I learned to live a lot more civil life. I know people that live that way still, always ON, always read to go for the jugular. I am NO longer like that, I am normally a very happy go lucky kind of guy, ask anybody.

You do not want to break me away from my civility and my civil rights. There are no holds barred in that kind of fight. I would go dark and you would never see me, but there would be CONSEQUENCES. And the consequences would be beyond the imagination of anybody constrained by civility and the civil rights of others. I am not threatening anything; I do not even want to think about that. Nobody in their right mind wants to think about that. You can back any person into a corner where his or her only option is fight or flight.

You do not want this to become a Crazy Macho Thing

I do not even want to think about an old friend walking into City Hall and shooting people indiscriminately until he was shot and killed himself. He knew exactly what he was doing; in modern parlance, it was “suicide by cop”.


Time is of the essence. If there is anything further, I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.


Thank you in advance

Time is always of the essence,

Dave@DGJeep.com

David G. Jeep

David G. Jeep

cc: a select group of favorites
file

Friday, March 6, 2009

You do not want this to become a Crazy Macho Thing, Your deadline is still Monday March 16, 2009

Friday, March 06, 2009

Mike Christian at 314-280-5222 FBI Report
FBI St. Louis
2222 Market Street
St. Louis, Missouri 63103-2516

Phone: (314) 231-4324
Phone: (314) 589-2500, Fax: (314) 589-2636
E-mail: stlouis@ic.fbi.gov

Re: You do not want this to become a Crazy Macho Thing
Your deadline is still Monday March 16, 2009

Dear Mr. Christian,

This is not a spur of the moment DEMAND. I have been at this since Day One, some five plus years ago. This is not about my power v. your power. This is not even about the Rule of Law v. Tyranny and Terrorism. The issue is all about a remedy for a wrong. The rest is just rhetoric to make the right and the wrong more distinguishable.

“Every wrong shall have a remedy”, is a principle of common law that dates back King Henry II of England in the 12th Century. I am demanding my constitutional rights and a remedy for a wrong.


THE WRONG, the undisputed, undisputable RECORD of

THE WRONG


1. The police in Osage Beach, Missouri were incompetent to make the original arrest. They actually testified to their incompetence, of course at the time nobody believed them incompetent, they were believed to be law enforcement professionals, under color of law. On the stand under oath, they knowingly gave false incompetent information as factual evidence to establish police procedure, under color of law. They were wearing uniforms and badges, carrying guns; anybody and everybody could see they were the LAW. And as Professional Law Officers, they had sworn on the stand in front of the judge and the jury to tell “the whole truth and nothing but the truth so help me God”. Incompetence[1] or perjury[2], it does not make any difference in a civil rights case. But you tell me, did Bill Clinton have sexual relations with that woman? (08-1823)

2. Judge Bennett had no credible legal or constitutional reason to put me in jail at the preliminary hearing in Camden County; it was illegal and unconstitutional Judicial Terrorism[3]. (08-1823)

3. Judge Goeke issued a blatantly deficient, illegal and unconstitutional Court Order in effect taking my Son, my home, all my worldly possessions putting me on the street, HOMELESS; it was illegal and unconstitutional Judicial Terrorism[4]. (07-11115)

4. Commissioner Jones, the would be Judge, forced me illegally and unconstitutionally into a Court Room and “held (me) to answer” his yet to be “adduced” surprise specifics, charges and Judgment; it was illegal and unconstitutional Judicial Terrorism[5]. (07-11115)

5. Judge Colyer denied my valid pretrial motions for dismissal based on the gross incompetents of the arresting officers: it was illegal and unconstitutional Judicial Terrorism[6]. (08-1823)

6. The Prosecuting Attorneys with acquiescence of Judge Colyer denied me exculpable material[7] that would have proved the gross incompetents of the arresting officers; it was illegal and unconstitutional Judicial Terrorism[8]. (08-1823)

7. The arresting officer Mr. Alex Little, Officer Badge #920 lied on the stand perjuring himself by contradicting verifiable police procedure. Officer Little had clearly been made aware of the issue by his intimate knowledge of the pretrial motions for the trial, he was in the courtroom to testify when I made the motion months before the testimony. Additionally he had testified that he had been to the certified training. Incompetence[9] or perjury[10], it does not make any difference in a civil rights case. But you tell me, did Bill Clinton have sexual relations with that woman? (08-1823)

8. The second arresting officer Mr. Tim Taylor Officer Badge #913,not only testified to his incompetence, but further perjured himself on the stand under oath contradicting his prior sworn police report. Incompetence[11] or perjury[12], it does not make any difference in a civil rights case. But you tell me, did Bill Clinton have sexual relations with that woman? (08-1823)

9. Judge Colyer and others acting in a conspiracy after the false and illegal conviction and with the full knowledge of all the above issues in a POST TRIAL MOTION, i.e. false arrest, malicious prosecution, false testimony, denial of exculpable material denied my POST TRIAL MOTION for a miss trial and forced me into an appeal that I was unable to mount for reasons other than the evidence above. I had a life outside of the courtroom; I was going through a contested divorce and had been illegally and unconstitutionally forced from my home and my SON, in a related issues, i.e. Writ of Certiorari 07-11115; it was illegal and unconstitutional Judicial Terrorism. (08-1823)

10. Because of the combined issues of the Writ of Certiorari 07-11115 and the appeal 08-1823 and because I am a human and not a superhuman I was unable to mount a perfected appeal in state Court on any of these issues, while working 60 hours a week, managing 145 men, on two shifts, 6 days a week on a construction project building at the rate of $5,000,000/month, this, thus became a Civil Rights Issue in FEDERAL COURT, a violation of Title 18 § 242. Deprivation of rights under color of law and Title 42 § 1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights, the wrong.

What did I do wrong?

I was driving down the road and a self professed incompetent rookie police officer wanted to make, what he thought to be a BIG arrest, I was unfortunately the closest first victim that innocently came within striking distance. Even the probable cause is specious, having to use the right hand blinker in the midst of a left turn? Is that even possible?

I was sitting at home watching Monday Night Football my now ex-wife[13] knowingly filed a bogus, legally deficient ex-parte order of protection ordered without legal or constitutional basis by a Judicial Terrorist; she knew she could get away with it because everybody does it.

I have been at this over five years, I know it would be easier for you easier for the FBI, easier for the Supreme court if I just went away. That AIN’T GONNA HAPPEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Am I going to break, I am going to snap like Cookie?

IT IS A POSSIBILITY!!!!!!!!!

Why did Cookie snap? What did Cookie do, he had struggled and worked to own his own home. He had struggled and worked the American Dream to own his own business. Cookie owned what for him was a glorious piece of property, it was his home, his pride and joy, in a town he had grown up in, a place he had prospered in, a place where he had always felt safe, a place he had hoped to raise a family in, a place where he new the RULES.

Somebody came into his hometown, his home, with guns, traffic tickets, and New RULES[14]. The New RULES told him, you can not live here, as you have ALWAYS LIVED here… for YOUR ENTIRE LIFE, this is no longer your home. You have to now be like US or move!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Now Cookie did not have the education, the patience, or the will that I have. He had the intelligence, he was a smart guy. He had the work ethic, he was a small business owner, a hard worker. He fought as best he could; I am sure he put up a good fight. I am sure he did all that he could to defend his home, defend his business, defend his hopes for the future, defend his rights for the benefit of his son. I knew Cookie, he had a good heart, a good soul, I feel confident that he had grown into a good man, I knew his mother.

I am sure that if there was someone with the truth and the courage to tell it, his Son could be and should be proud of him. Proud of the life he had built, Proud of the fight he put up. Proud of the courage he showed as a peaceful businessman, struggling fighting all those traffic tickets just to keep his home, his business, his life for his son. It is too bad the way it ended, a Crazy Macho thing.

I am sure Cookie has affected to some extent, if only subconsciously, the current RE-THINKING of eminent domain / zoning and it’s uses for commercial, non-imperative, NON-governmental uses. The use of “eminent domain” for non-imperative commercial purposes is currently being reconsidered with commercial interests going belly up before completing the projects. Should we have listen closer to Cookie?

You do not want to run the risk of this becoming a Crazy Macho thing. That would not be politically or legally SMART. I do not have to tell ANY of you LAW ENFORCEMENT officers, you push a man to extremes illegally, you have responsibility for his actions[15]. I am legally demanding my rights. That is the difference between a privilege and a right. You can DEMAND your rights. A privilege you have to ask nice for, may I please. You need to teach Dan Bracco (FBI) that.

We have a Bill of Rights in this country. It is a part of our Constitution and enforceable throughout the land as THE rule of law. I am demanding my civil RIGHTS as declared in the Bill of Rights, specifically the 4th, 5th and 6th amendments. The FBI is responsible for enforcing our CIVIL RIGHTS as defined by the Bill of Rights, U.S. Constitution and Laws. You need to teach Dan Bracco (FBI) that.

That aside, I have been asking, nicely, for my rights for FIVE YEARS!!!!!!!! When does an illegal refusal become illegal extremes, I am through asking. I am demanding my “rights…secured by the Constitution and laws[16]”. Do not even begin to think about immunity, there is no such thing as immunity from the rule of LAW. Specifically I want the protection of the civil right’s laws as passed in 1871 and as now codified into the United States Code of law as Title 18 § 242. Deprivation of rights under color of law and Title 42 § 1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights. Title 18 § 242. Deprivation of rights under color of law and Title 42 § 1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights were written and made into law to enforce “We the People’s” rights on those acting “under color of law”. That is what Civil rights enforcement is all about, I quote from FBI Mission Statement “The FBI is the lead agency for investigating violations of federal civil rights laws…and we take that responsibility seriously.[17]” The FBI speaks specifically to these issues as they define their mission as it relates to civil rights “under color of law”. I again quote “U.S. law enforcement officers and other officials like judges, prosecutors, and security guards have been given tremendous power by local, state, and federal government agencies—authority they must have to enforce the law and ensure justice in our country. These powers include the authority to detain and arrest suspects, to search and seize property, to bring criminal charges, to make rulings in court, and to use deadly force in certain situations.

Preventing abuse of this authority, however, is equally necessary to the health of our nation’s democracy. That’s why it’s a federal crime for anyone acting under “color of law” willfully to deprive or conspire to deprive a person of a right protected by the Constitution or U.S.. law. (bolding added) “Color of law” simply means that the person is using authority given to him or her by a local, state, or federal government agency.[18]” You need to teach Dan Bracco (FBI) that.

This is about FEDERAL Constitutional Civil Rights yes.

But more importantly it is about the rights of a Father and SON. I refuse to be the sperm donor and the source of Child Support DOLLARS.

I have a SON; I will be his FATHER!!!!!!

I will never give up, I will NEVER GIVE IN!!!!!!!!!!

No REAL FATHER EVER WOULD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You do not want this to become a Crazy Macho Thing. Let’s all be civilized. Lets all work for the Rule of Law, the rights of “We the People”. I am not asking for a lot, Judges that are constrained by the Bill of Rights, competent police officers, the truth AND the “rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws[19]”.

My world / Cookies’ world, I am a card carrying pacifist. I was raised in a different world from most. My world was nothing like Cookies. I was white upper middle class. I had the BEST, schools, opportunity and Rights. Cookie did not have the same schools, opportunity and Rights as I did, it was a long time ago, he was African American.

We didn’t have to fight for our supper; we did it for FUN. We would go at each other with a level of proficiency, ability and intensity that would literally terrify most people. We did it for FUN. We are not talking about just the physical sports, we are talking mental games of lust and avarice. I was the youngest of three boys in a privileged neighborhood and privileged school.

But we were civilized, I could break your leg on the field, win the girl and get paid for doing it. Then slap you on the back with a smile and say jokingly “wasn’t that fun”. And you would very civilly take it and BE BETTER next time. That was my world. It was as cut throat as any ghetto I assure you.

I use to be afraid of myself. I use to have a hair trigger, but time and experience gave me discipline and control. I learned to walk away from violence and a lot other things. I learned to live a lot more civil life. I know people that live that way still, always ON, always read to go for the jugular. I am NO longer like that, I am normally a very happy go lucky kind of guy, ask anybody.

You do not want to break me away from my civility and my civil rights. There are no holds barred in that kind of fight. I would go dark and you would never see me, but there would be CONSEQUENCES. And the consequences would be beyond the imagination of anybody constrained by civility and the civil rights of others. I am not threatening anything; I do not even want to think about that. Nobody in their right mind wants to think about that. You can back any person into a corner where his or her only option is fight or flight.
You do not want this to become a Crazy Macho Thing

I do not even want to think about an old friend walking into City Hall and shooting people indiscriminately until he was shot and killed himself. He knew exactly what he was doing; in modern parlance, it was “suicide by cop”.

Time is of the essence. If there is anything further, I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.



Thank you in advance
Time is always of the essence,

David G. Jeep
cc: a select group of favorites

file



[1] Owen v City of Independence (455 U.S. 622 (1980) "A Good Faith effort is not Enough"(FN 20 & Pages 21)

[2] Amendment V and VI United States Constitution compulsory testifying requires compulsory “truth telling”

[3] The Fourth Amendment provides that "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated. . . ."

[4] The Fourth Amendment provides that "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated. . . ."

[5] The Fourth Amendment provides that "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated. . . ."

[6] The Fourteenth Amendment asserts Due Process of Law as a requisite for any and all deprivations. This motion was without a valid reason for denial

[7]Jean v. Collins 221 F.3d 656, 659 (4th Cir. 200) cert. denied 531 U.S. 1076 121 S.Ct. 771, 148 L.ed.2d 671 (2001), "Due Process, Right to Exculpatory, Brady Material" (FN 17, 25, 26 & Pages 19, 26, 27)

[8] The Fourteenth Amendment asserts Due Process of Law as a requisite for any and all deprivations. This motion was without a valid reason for denial

[9] Owen v City of Independence (455 U.S. 622 (1980) "A Good Faith effort is not Enough"(FN 20 & Pages 21)

[10] Amendment V and VI United States Constitution compulsory testifying requires compulsory “truth telling”

[11] Owen v City of Independence (455 U.S. 622 (1980) "A Good Faith effort is not Enough"(FN 20 & Pages 21)

[12] Amendment V and VI United States Constitution compulsory testifying requires compulsory “truth telling”

[13] Ex-wife is a civilized description, I do not want to be any where near her and or even be forced to touch her with a ten foot pole.

[14] If memory serves the use of “eminent domain” for a commercial purposes was first used in Meacham Park. The use of “eminent domain” for commercial purposes is currently being reconsidered with commercial interests going belly up before completing the projects. Should we have listen closer to Cookie?

[15] Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971)

[16]Title 18 § 242. Deprivation of rights under color of law and Title 42 § 1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights.

[17] http://www.fbi.gov/hq/cid/civilrights/civilrts.htm

[18] http://www.fbi.gov/hq/cid/civilrights/color.htm

[19] Title 18 § 242. Deprivation of rights under color of law and Title 42 § 1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights.


Thanks in advance,


"Time is of the essence".


David G. Jeep
Dave@DGJeep.com
DGJeep@DGJeep.com

Wednesday, March 4, 2009

US Marshal, Re: Your worst Fears, am I your worst fear? revised and extended 3/4/09

Wednesday March 4, 2009

Robert O'Connor
Criminal Investigator US Marshal
U. S. Department of Justice
111 South 10th Street, Suite 2-319
St. Louis, MO 63102

Phone 314-539-2023, E-Mail Robert.OConnor@USDOJ.gov

Re: Your worst Fears, am I your worst fear? revised and extended 3/4/09

Dear Mr. O’Connor,

I just wanted to thank you and your associates Lyonel Mrythill (FBI), Chris Boyce (U.S. Marshal) and Dan Bracco (FBI) for the enlightening 3 hour sessions this morning March 3, 2009 at the St. Louis FBI office. I found it very illuminating to say the least, that in a room along with four federal law enforcement officers, I am the only one that sees perjury[1] as to the established police procedures in a court of law under oath by a law enforcement official and the order and enforcement of a unashamedly deficient warrant as violations of the “rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws[2]”. That I guess is the state of our Justice system.

Again thank you for that!

As I was leaving Chris mentioned something that I thought very telling also. He referenced Charles “Cookie” Thornton (sp?). As you know Mr. Thornton (sp) was the mass murder involved in the Kirkwood City Hall shooting spree last year. As I stated I had known “Cookie.” He asked “I am that guy?” I said “No.” I did mention that I knew him. We had worked together 30 years ago. It amazed me when I heard the news, he just did not seem the type.

As further explanation, I submit that Cookie and I had worked together for probably nearly a year as dishwashers in the restaurant at the old Holiday Inn at Watson and Lindbergh just south of Meacham Park, I am going to guess late 70s, 78-79. I worked with both Cookie and his brother that went by the nickname “Saphire”. Saphire as I stated was unlike Cookie. Sapphire at the time, 30 years ago, impressed me as the would-be gangster. Cookie was always the hard worker. I worked closely with both of them at separate times. Cookie was always there, Saphire would disappear for hours at time and return yawning as if he had been knapping. Saphire was always regaling me, a middle class white kid, with his nefarious stories of his exploits at Kirkwood high school and in his home turf Meacham Park. As a co-worker he left a lot to be desired. Cookie on the other hand was always there holding up his end, polite, thoughtful, courteous.

It surprised me when I heard that Cookie had been the one that had killed all those people. But as I read, unlike some people, I read for a reason to understand why a friend had done something so bad.

Cookie was born and raised in Meacham Park, the depressed segregated Kirkwood Black Ghetto of the 50s 60s and 70s. It was his home. And he had started a business there and had prospered. That was until he had issues that developed with the City Hall in Kirkwood. Kirkwood within the last 10 years has redeveloped their home turf, Meacham Park. The Meacham Park that I remembered from my youth is not like it is today. In the 70s when both Cookie and I were coming of age Meacham Park was a very different place. There were no through streets, just dead ends, and no white man would go in there for any other reason than necessity. I can assure you there were never any parking tickets issued. But it was home to Cookie and Saphire; they felt safe there.

Now since I had known Cookie there had been a lot of water under the bridge. And we never had any direct dealings after high school. But I read where Cookie had had issues with parking tickets in Meacham Park and I am guessing zoning issues in the recently redeveloped residential and commercial area once his home, his turf, his safe zone. I had to smile when I heard about parking tickets. In the Meacham Park I knew, nobody EVER wrote any parking tickets. The police only went in there when absolutely necessary.

But I now know it was and has been redeveloped into a Wal-Mart, a Sam’s, a Lowells and a gentrified residential neighborhood. An ex girlfriend of mine had moved in there and asked me for the back-story on Meacham Park. I gave the short and sweet version as referenced here.

Now I have had dealings with all too many Zoning commissions myself in my professional career in construction. Zoning has a lot of uses and it is over used, for all the wrong reasons, by too many people. Now I have to admit, that I have been on the helpful receiving end of that miss use as often as on the losing end, I can’t really personally complain.

I can only guess what happened to Cookie. First his ground was either not essential or they worked around it during the redevelopment/buy out. Maybe he was a holdout for a bigger payoff, I could not spite him that chance. For whatever reason, he was still there as what should have been viewed as a Grandfathered-In Minority Owned Business. And the forces that now ruled, ZONING, were trying to force his business out by ticketing his construction vehicles as parked on the street as they had always been for the several years past, grandfathered-in. This got to be extreme, thousands of dollars, my understanding. No business can survive with that kind of impediment. HE did not know how to fight a zoning war, they just did not teach that on the streets of the former Meacham Park when he was growing up. He fought as best he could until he snapped; he went berserk. Did he see it coming? Would anyone in his position see it coming? I bet the best psychiatrist on the planet could have missed it had he been up close and personal on a daily basis. His family missed it, I saw his mother on TV crying; I worked with her also.

I feel guilty as a former acquaintance, that I was not there to help with the zoning issues, I would have helped if I had only known. There is the old adage “never send to know for whom the bell tolls it tolls for thee." I realize, I have no responsibility, I had no direct knowledge, but I feel guilty, I could have helped.

Now if Cookie had had a good Zoning Attorney to work with, if he had better access to true justice, the whole thing could have been avoided. Everybody could have made money on the deal. It definitely should have been handled differently. And I bet there is no one in this world or the next that wishes it had been handled differently, more than Cookie.

“If you want Peace, work for Justice[3]”.

There is no excuse for what Cookie did. There is never any excuse for violence. That being said we are all animals, trying to live within limits of our own undefined animal based flawed humanity. Nobody knows exactly where those limits are. And nobody not even the federal government has the right to go out profiling for presumed at risk people.

What the Zoning Commissions can and SHOULD do is be a little more sensitive to those pre-existing grandfathered-in minority owned businesses falling victim to rezoning or eminent domain issues.

What the Federal Government needs to do is “establish Justice ” enforce the “rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws[4]” and work for the truth by eliminating law enforcement officers such as yourself and others that look the other way to the testilying / Perjury on the Stand Under Oath of their fellow officers. And stand up for every citizen’s right to feel safe in his own home free from the harassment of a deficient warrant without probably cause, i.e. Judicial Tyranny and Terrorism.

Am I your worst fear? Am I like Cookie Thornton, am I going to go off berserk and kill people. I truly hope not, but as I have repeated over and over again no one can tell the future. Just knowing you for the little time that I have known you, as gun totting federal agent, I would have laid money on you going berserk before Cookie, but what do I know?? I would definitely put Dan Bracco (FBI) ahead of all three of us on the list.

To be honest, a killing spree or a terrorist act, those are the least of your worries. Your worst fear is not even illegal in a lot of countries; in fact any law against it is symbolic because it is unenforceable.

I am the victim of SEVERAL crimes. Perjury is a CRIME. I can prove the police had prior knowledge of the issue as an issue. I asked the prosecuting attorney in the presence of the officer to dismiss based on the issue. I further asked but was not provided the exculpable material; I now have in my possession, that proves the credibility of my assertion of the officers incompetence to perform the test. I can prove that they should have known the correct procedures based on their attendance at required certified instruction on the issues.

The Bill of Rights was and is a document limiting police / government action into our private lives of “We the People”. Clearly one of the most important rights is the 4th, where “We the People” assert “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated[5]” we have the right to feel safe in or homes free from unlawful deficient warrants/oders. Clearly “We the People” assert for ourselves the right to require the specifics of an “infamous charge[6]” prior to any required court appearance. Clearly when “We the People” reserved for ourselves the right to “to have (a) compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in (our)his favor[7]” we meant to assure the right to a compulsory process to have witnesses tell the truth.

As a person living under the Constitution and the Bill of Rights I have a right to speak out and protest/fight unreasonable zoning demands, I have the right to REQUIRE probable cause on any warrant that orders me from my home, I have the right to the specifics for any infamous charge I am ask to answer for in advance of any court appearance and I have the right to a compulsory process to have witnesses tell the truth on my behalf.

All I have ever asked for is a reasonable 8th grade interpretation of the “rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws[8]”. I refuse to believe that is beyond my reach.

If there is anything further I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.

Thank you in advance.

Dave@DGJeep.com

David G. Jeep


cc: file



[1]Perjury and incompetence are both crimes I do not care what you call it. Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983), States that a police office is not liable for damages as a result of perjury as to the facts. But specifically in this case, the police were testifying to their professional knowledge of the their procedures for enforcing the law and thus were acting “under color of law”. I would really like to debate this, but if they did not Perjure themselves, they are GROSSLY Negligent having been informed of the issue prior, gross negligence is easier to prove in a Civil Rights Action
[2] Title 18 § 242. Deprivation of rights under color of law and Title 42 § 1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights.
[3] Henry Louis Mencken quotes (American humorous Journalist and Critic of American life who influenced US fiction through the 1920s, 1880-1956)
[4] Title 18 § 242. Deprivation of rights under color of law and Title 42 § 1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights.
[5] The IV Amendment to the US Constitution
[6] The V Amendment to the US Constitution
[7] The V Amendment to the US Constitution
[8] Title 18 § 242. Deprivation of rights under color of law and Title 42 § 1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights.

Sunday, March 1, 2009

To the FBI, A Demand for an affirmative response on or before March 16, 2009

Sunday, March 01, 2009, revised and extended

Mike Christian at 314-280-5222 FBI Report
FBI St. Louis
2222 Market Street
St. Louis, Missouri 63103-2516

Phone: (314) 231-4324

Phone: (314) 589-2500, Fax: (314) 589-2636

E-mail: stlouis@ic.fbi.gov

Re: A Demand for an affirmative response on or before March 16, 2009
A Demand for Civil Rights and a jihad opposed to Judicial Terrorism
Writ of Certiorari (07-11115) and U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals (08-1823)

Dear Mr. Christian,

As you know I have been pursuing my civil rights peacefully for five plus years. This is not a spur of the moment “demand”. We have, face to face, discussed these issues in the past. At that time I believed in the rule of law, I believed we had a credible system of justice. But NO longer, I am and have been the victim of the denial of my “rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws ” via unconstitutional and illegal Judicial Tyranny and Terrorism. The Guild of Judges has in defiance of the Constitution declared themselves “Nobility ” and assumed a would-be sovereign’s immunity from the rule of the “Constitution and laws ”. They thus assert they are not responsible to “establish Justice ” and safeguard “We the People’s” “rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws ”.

I cannot imagine that I am alone, the only victim of their corruption, but even if I were it still is a crime against the Constitution the first time and every time it happens. This is a crime against the Rule of Law. I do not need to prove habitual violation nor my minority status for credibility; again this is a crime against the Constitution. The violations of my civil rights are numerous, manifest and unambiguous. The issues revolve around two cases. Those cases have been recognized and are referenced here as a Writ of Certiorari 07-11115 to the Supreme Court and an Appeal to the U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals 08-1823.

Under the issue in the Writ of Certiorari 07-11115 , the defendants openly and undeniably served a deficient warrant, no probably cause , and then helped the then petitioner, now defendant, to answer for the deficient warrant at the unconstitutional hearing on the infamous charge, creating specifics via surprise self-serving testilying as the basis for an illegal and unconstitutional court order. Thus denying the petitioner’s right to prior specific knowledge of the infamous charge , to defend him against said infamous charge. The defendants in this issue took everything from the petitioner WITHOUT Due Process of Law . Everything was stolen via this illegal and unconstitutional action, EVERYTHING, from his life’s blood, HIS SON and his home to his little league baseball glove and his dark socks. As a result from that day to this nearly five plus years later he literally has not had his unalienable Rights to life, liberty, and personal property.

The criminal issues at the center of the appeal (08-1823) are too numerous to detail here. They are described in the legal brief filed with the appeal, which can be provided via e-mail. Briefly, after the false imprisonment that linked the two cases and before the false unjustifiable corrupted conviction in 08-1823, the defendants withheld exculpable information , presented false evidence , perjured themselves, and suborned perjury. After the illegal, corrupt and false conviction, the defendants refused me “protection of the law ” and then acted in a conspiracy to cover up there misconduct and continue the denial of my “rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws ”. The defendants perjured and suborned perjury themselves / testilied about the specifics of their own, subsequently independently verified, police procedures and prior sworn police reports on the witness stand under oath. The defendants in this issue took the petitioner’s livelihood and gave unconstitutionally what little illegal credibility the defendants in the issue of the Writ of Certiorari (07-11115) even claimed.

I do not know nor at this point do I care if you work for the US Attorney General or you are an independent agency. I have contacted Mr. Eric Holder, the US Attorney General, in this regard. I have not heard anything from his office. I am drowning beneath the vile sophistry of the illegal and unconstitutional theft of my life, liberty, and property. If a demand sounds like a threat, it is a demand from a drowning man to a life guard that is suppose to be there to save and protect him, take it as you will.

At this point after a concerted effort for 5 years, I can say without qualification, first hand experience; there is no enforcement of the “rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws ” in the United States of America. There is no “Rule of Law”. The Supreme Court has chosen to abandon its responsibilities to “establish Justice ” based on our “rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws ” in favor of the self-serving immunity it has declared for the Guild of Judges. Thus the Constitution has been dumped, there is no government, there is no order, there is no rule of law, we live as animals in the jungle and it is survival of the fittest.

That being said, I still aspire to being a civilized man. I therefore ask you and the others referenced here to act in a unified effort to enforce our “rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws ” as described in the Writ of Certiorari (07-11115) and U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals (08-1823) and save what little dignity this country has left.

I am impoverished as a result of my five-year effort. I am homeless. I do not have postage or paper to print or mail this letter. I hope to get it printed and hand deliver a hard copy to your office on or before Monday March 02, 2009. As you should know, I have the documentation that indisputably establishes my assertions of the denial of my “rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws ” and can transmit copies electronically as requested electronically (via Dave@DGJeep.com ).

As I have stated before, I am at my wits end, this has been a five-year peaceful struggle for me. I have nothing left but the irresistible instinctual innocent need to violently fight the terrorism. In one last hope for a peaceful settlement, I am DEMANDING, yes DEMANDING a response, in the affirmative, that the FBI and others are prosecuting the criminals, referenced here as defendants, with a timetable for said prosecution on or before March 16, 2009. If a demand sounds like a threat, it is a demand from a drowning man to a life guard that is suppose to be there to save and protect him, take it as you will.

I realize no one has any accountability. Everyone, but the victim, has immunity. For that reason this is an unseen issue for most of America; they sleep ignorant and unaware of the issue of the Guild of Judge’s unconstitutional and illegal assertion of Nobility, Sovereign and Absolute immunity. That by no means makes it justifiable anymore than a thief unseen working under the cloak of darkness. I have tried for 5 years to peacefully bring this to the attention of those responsible for this issue. I feel obligated to initiate a jihad to bring it to their attention and to fight the unconstitutional judicial terrorism that threatens us all. They want us to believe we are not “persons” as defined by “We the People ” in our constitution. They want us to believe they do not have an obligation to maintain and/or “establish Justice ” as required by “We the People ” in our constitution.

Death and destruction are the only things that are of any consequence in our all too insulated world. There will be consequences; we live in a jungle. “People are going die .” There is no rule of law; we do not have the protection of the “rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws ”. If all of us do not have equal and unfettered “rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws ” none of us have the “rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws ”. If a demand sounds like a threat, it is a demand from a drowning man to a life guard that is suppose to be there to save and protect him, take it as you will.

And for what it is worth you (The FBI), The United States Supreme Court, The Attorney General, Mr. Eric Holder, and the local United States Attorney’s Office Eastern District of Missouri, Catherine L. Hanaway all work for me as a Citizen of the United States. Your function in case you are unfamiliar is to work for “We the People” and enforce the “rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws ”. And if you refuse to act in accordance with the constitution and the established law of “We the People”, you are all additionally culpable as co-conspirators for any consequences as a result of your deliberate indifference to your professional and public obligations as government employees to enforce and protect our “rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws ” “under color of law” along with the listed defendants in the original complaints.

I am not the criminal; I am the victim of the criminal denial of our “rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws ”. You allow me a courtroom and take away your rights to Due Process and I will pronounce you to be a father rapper, a child molester, a wife beater and take all your money with court order and two strokes of my gavel. I have suffered through this for five long years. When corned, EVERY animal will eventually instinctively, innocently and violently fight against terrorism as the only available means of self-preservation.

You do realize, you have no power other than to comply. The right will prevail over the tyranny and terrorism if not now in the future. I have faith and hope that will endure even if I am forced to give up the precious gift of life in defense of our liberty, “Give me Liberty, or give me Death!” If a demand sounds like a threat, it is a demand from a drowning man to a life guard that is suppose to be there to protect him, take it as you will.

If there is anything further I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.
Thank you in advance.

Dave@DGJeep.com

David G. Jeep

Enclosure
“I am a Card Carrying Pacifist REV03


cc: The United States Supreme Court
Eric H. Holder Jr.
President Barack Hussein Obama
e-mailed to a list of select group of favorites
file