Label Number:
7011 2000 0001 2263 2447
Expected
Delivery By: November
9, 201, First-Class
Mail® Certified
Mail™
| Delivered | WASHINGTON, DC 20500 | November 13, 2013 4:25 am |
President Barack Hussein Obama
The White House
Washington, DC 20500-0001
Re: Are you a sophisticated[1] "Uncle Tom" or a venerable leader of "We the People"?[2] - defeat precedent with precedent
Dear Barack,
I feel like we know each other, I have written to you so often, although admittedly, you have never taken the time to write back. I am here to ask, "Are you a sophisticated[3] "Uncle Tom" or a venerable leader of "We the People?" I recently asserted something similar to your Attorney General.
As I am sure you are aware the Black Robed Royalist Article III Judiciary UNCONSTITUTIONALLY and sophisticatedly[4] has, in the very WORST sense, self-servingly, self-constructed[5] "absolute power" [6] from their sophistry[7] of "absolute immunity" to render "absolute corruption"[8] of We the People's unalienable rights. "As long as rulers are above the law, citizens have the same type of freedom that slaves had on days when their masters chose not to beat them."[9] We the People are slaves to the Black Robed Royalist Article III judiciary's UNCONSTITUTIONAL "absolute power" [10] as rendered from their sophistry[11] of "absolute immunity."
That is INSANITY!!!!
In 2009-2010, I did 411 days in Federal Custody before they chose to NOTICED that I had a right to a speedy trial!!!!! We live in a Lawless Society via Eastern District Court of Missouri Case #4:09-cr-00659-CDP Document #78, Attachments #(1) Exhibit, time stamped 3/25/2010, 5:30 PM CDT.
That is INSANITY!!!!
I would hope, as an educated African American Constitutional Expert (J.D.) you know "absolute power's," most noteworthy "absolute corruption."[12] It was with the efforts of "We the People" post-Civil War, as MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissenting in the Civil Rights Cases, 109 U.S. 26 (1883) eloquently put it, "Constitutional provisions, adopted in the interest of liberty and for the purpose of securing, through national legislation, if need be, rights inhering in a state of freedom and belonging to American citizenship have been so construed as to defeat the ends the people desired to accomplish, which they attempted to accomplish, and which they supposed they had accomplished by changes in their fundamental law."
That is INSANITY!!!!
Just imagine where "We the People" would be today if the Black Robed Royalist Article III UNCONSTITUTIONAL independence of the judges via "absolute power" [13] had been brought to heel by "We the People's" fit "sense and reason of the law?"[14] "We the People" would have, always, had the "property in rights"[15] so many of us fought and died for with the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution for the United states of America, the civil War Amendments (13th, 14th and 15th), the Civil Rights Acts of 1866[16] (Formally titled "An Act to protect all Persons in the United States in their Civil Rights, and furnish the Means of their vindication") and The Enforcement Act of 1871 (17 Stat. 13)[17] to secure the "property" [18] in our "rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws" as was the intent of the We the People, the Founders and post-Civil War Citizens.
Are you a sophisticated[19] "Uncle Tom" that refuses to see the Black Robed Royalist, Article III, and unconstitutional Judiciary's "absolute corruption?"[20]
Or are you a venerable leader of "We the People"[21] that can see the necessity for Justice in the face of the Black Robed Royalist, Article III and unconstitutional Judiciary's malicious, corrupt, dishonest, sincerely ignorant and conscientiously stupid[22] assertion of "absolute immunity?"
The source of the Black Robed Royalist Article III Judiciary's Supreme Court precedent reaches back 406 years to a dissolved, discredited corrupt, for CAUSE,[23] court for a thus corrupted ruling i.e., Floyd & Barker (Star Chamber[24] 1607),[25] to evade their legal, designated under law, responsibility for We the People's inalienable justifiable "property in rights."[26] The Star Chamber had its authority "repealed and absolutely revoked and made void" in 1641 with the Act of Parliament "Abolition of the Star Chamber" July 5, 1641. Now just because the Black Robed Royalist, Article III and unconstitutional Judiciary apparently, to this day, has NEVER GOTTEN the memo, that does not change the FACTS. Floyd & Barker a ruling from the Star Chamber 1607 was "repealed and absolutely revoked and made void," for SPECIFIC cause - abusing said "absolutely immune" power, by the Act of Parliament "Abolition of the Star Chamber" July 5, 1641. Thus Floyd & Barker is void, and it use amounts to fraud, fraus omnia corrumpit. Floyd & Barker's thus fraudulent[27] progeny[28] are made VOID AS WELL!!!!!
We the People in essence, if you can believe the Black Robed Royalist, Article III and unconstitutional Judiciary, "intended sub silentio to"[29] trade the "absolute immunity" of the nobility[30] for the "absolute immunity" of the "malicious or corrupt" judges,[31] the "malicious or dishonest" prosecutor, [32] the "knowingly false testimony by police officers,"[33] the malicious, corrupt, sincerely ignorant and conscientiously stupid[34] actions[35] of federal, state, local, and regional legislators[36] and the malicious, corrupt, dishonest, sincerely ignorant and conscientiously stupid[37] actions of "all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process" [38] acting under color of law to wit, ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION.[39]
That is INSANITY!!!!
"Absolute corruption" of our "unalienable rights" is worse than living under Stalin, "Six million people are under correctional supervision in the U.S.—more than were in Stalin's gulags."[40] "With 5% of the world's population, our country now houses nearly 25% of the world's reported prisoners."[41] In the United States of America, the home of the free and the brave, you are FIVE times more likely to be in JAIL!!!!
That is INSANITY!!!!
Now the FEAR MONGER MIS-INFORMATIONISTS want you to believe that is because of misguided drug policies. And that IS WRONG. Everybody in the free world has been forced into the same misguided criminalization of DRUGS, at our insistence, to be able to trade with us. It is not Drugs, although in a country such as ours, with judicial sophistry[42] unrestrained that supposedly promotes and holds individual liberty dearer than life itself, victimless crimes should never have been sanctioned by an independent judiciary looking out EXCLUSIVELY to protect and defend our personal liberties.
That is INSANITY!!!!
The REASON we have FIVE times as many people in jail than any other country in the free world is we do not invest in JUSTICE. Justice is not worth the effort in the view of the Black Robed Royalist, Article III and unconstitutional Judiciary. We have the Jane Crow Era, the Plea Bargain Era and the Exclusionary Rule Era, where JUSTICE is proclaimed too overgenerous, and nobody is thus answerable to it. A Judge can make up probable cause out of knowingly fraudulent information for an unrelated charge that results in a NOT "facially valid court order"[43] and the signed warrant becomes unquestionable as regards the "property in rights" [44] of the innocent victim being deprived!!!! Prosecutors can hide behind the sincerely ignorant and conscientiously stupid[45] denial of due process by way of the deprivation of exculpable evidence.[46] The police can give "knowingly false testimony"[47] and withhold evidence. There is nothing in the plea bargain era that the innocent victim can do to redress the JUSTIFIABLE grievance.
Just imagine negotiating for your LIFE in a plea bargain where the adversary can withhold exculpable evidence, assert "knowingly false testimony by police officers."[48] The lone innocent accused victim has no hope for defense against "knowingly false testimony by police officers"[49] and the denial of exculpable evidence they have no knowledge of. If you are luckily or unluckily in a capital murder trial where the death penalty has been an issue after 18 years, an investigator might just happen to find the evidence that clears your name as in Connick v Thompson, but do not expect an apology or any redress of grievances, there is no "property in rights"[50] that our government of the People, by the People, for the People is bound to respect. We the People have asserted "property in rights"[51] from the beginning with 1st and 7th amendment Justice, but our Black Robed Royalist, Article III Judiciary has with the sophistry unrestrained unconstitutionally DENIED "We the People" any "property in rights"[52] via their judge made law of "absolute immunity"
The Judicial sophistry [53] of "absolute immunity" creates "absolute power" to the ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION[54] of We the People's unalienable rights.
That is INSANITY!!!!
As examples of the Judicial sophistry[55] that has corrupted We the People's unalienable rights I submit, Randall v. Brigham, 74 U.S. 7 (1868) the origin of judicial criminal sophisticated[56] "absolute immunity," Bradley v. Fisher, 13 Wall. 335 (1872) origin of sophisticated[57] Judicial civil "absolute immunity," Blyew v. United States, 80 U.S. 581 (1871) sophisticated[58] "absolute immunity" for racially motivate mass murder, United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875) sophisticated[59] "absolute immunity" for racially motivated massacre (Colfax Riot/pogrom),
United States v. Harris, 106 U.S. 629 (1883) sophisticated[60] "absolute immunity" for the states allowance of kidnapping, assault and murder without regard to the 14th Amendments security, Civil Rights Cases, 109 U.S. 3 (1883) creating sophisticated[61] racial segregation and the ongoing Jim Crow discrimination over the "necessary and proper" "Act to protect all citizens in their civil and legal rights." 18 Stat. 335, enacted March 1, 1875, Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896) separate and UNEQUAL, clarifying sophisticated[62] segregation over the necessary and proper "Act to protect all citizens in their civil and legal rights." 18 Stat. 335, enacted March 1, 1875, Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547 (1967) reaffirmed Judicial sophisticated[63] "absolute immunity," Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U. S. 409 (1976) prosecutorial sophisticated[64] "absolute immunity," Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349 (1978) sophisticated[65] "absolute immunity" for forced sterilization, and Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983) sophisticated[66] "absolute immunity" for "knowingly false testimony by police officers," and "all persons that were integral in the Judicial Process." If that is not ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION of We the People's intent to establish justice, I can not imagine what is.
That is INSANITY!!!!
Not to mention the current malicious corruption of what We the People deemed "necessary and proper" with District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), that sophisticatedly[67] abolished gun control and put us all at risk of more Zimmerman/Martin like random violence, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), that sophisticatedly[68] abolished credibility in election campaign financing and put us all at risk of more Koch Brothers / FOX News misinformation that pollutes if not corrupts our political system and Connick v. Thompson, 563 U.S. ___ (2011) that sophisticatedly[69] created impossibly "difficult problems of proof" for the redress of grievances for the deprivation of the "property in rights."[70]
The FEAR MONGERS want us ARMED and READY, via District of Columbia v. Heller, for the inevitable conflict they are FOMENTING with the promulgation of FEARFUL MISINFORMATION being funded by Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. They want to destabilize the economy by crippling the American Economy with a crash of the currency based on a refusal to honor the Fourteenth Amendment "The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, "The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), commonly called the Affordable Care Act (ACA) or "Obamacare", is a United States federal statute LAW," shall not be questioned.
You want to fall for the sophistry[71] that the Fourteenth Amendment's assertions[72] were put there to reassure veterans of the Civil War. WRONG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You and OTHERS want to believe that the Civil War Era citizen was economically ignorant? That is so FAR WRONG it is almost laughable. Those that had lived through the Civil War had REAL LIFE experience with the economic failure of a Government to support its legal tender. The "Greyback" (Confederate States of America dollar) had JUST COLLAPSED!!!! "The term greenback refers to legal tender, printed in green on one side and issued by the United States during the American Civil War which was backed not by the conventional gold or silver standard but by the credibility of the U.S. Government."[73]
"The Confederate States of America dollar (or "Greyback") was first issued just before the outbreak of the American Civil War by the newly formed Confederacy. It was not backed by hard assets, but simply by a promise to pay the bearer after the war, on the prospect of Southern victory and independence.
As the war began to tilt against the Confederates, confidence in the currency diminished, and inflation followed. By the end of 1864, the currency was practically worthless."[74]
The FEAR MONGERS don't care who wins as long as the War or UPHEAVAL or depression creates a DEMAND for a HARD CURRENCY again!!!!!! So we can go back to building their pyramids!!!!!!!!!![75] Neither The Egyptian Pyramids, The Palace of Versailles, The Taj Mahal or The Biltmore Estate did a DAM thing for the SLAVES that built them!!!!![76]
That is INSANITY!!!!
If you truly want to fix the "sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity,"[77] all you have to do is utilize your "executive privilege" direct your Attorney General to prosecute over the Black Robed Royalist Article III UNCONSTITUTIONAL assertions of "absolute immunity" and have your Solicitor General refuse to defend "absolute immunity" by accepting responsibility in a court of law for the sincerely ignorant and conscientiously stupid assertion of "absolute immunity," and defeat precedent with precedent.
If there is anything further I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.
Thank you in advance.
"Time is of the essence"
David G. Jeep
cc: Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Supreme Court of the United States
Donald B. Verrilli Jr. Solicitor General, United States Department Of Justice
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General, United States Department Of Justice
[1] Judicial sophistry is the "ABSOLUTE" WORST kind of sophistication, "We have long enough suffered under the base prostitution of law to party passions in one judge, and the imbecility of another. In the hands of one the law is nothing more than an ambiguous text, to be explained by his sophistry into any meaning which may subserve his personal malice" (Thomas Jefferson, To John Tyler Monticello, May 26, 1810)
[2] See one of the people's Petition for a writ of certiorari No. 13-7030 Title: David G. Jeep, Petitioner v. United States
[3] Judicial sophistry is the "ABSOLUTE" WORST kind of sophistication, ibid.
[4] Judicial sophistry is the "ABSOLUTE" WORST kind of sophistication, ibid.
[5] Alexander Hamilton's assertions of danger of "constructive power" to rights with in Federalist number 84
[6] "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men, even when they exercise influence and not authority, still more when you superadd the tendency or the certainty of corruption by authority. There is no worse heresy than that the office sanctifies the holder of it." Lord Acton in a letter he wrote to scholar and ecclesiastic Mandell Creighton, dated April 1887.
[7] "We have long enough suffered under the base prostitution of law to party passions in one judge, and the imbecility of another. In the hands of one the law is nothing more than an ambiguous text, to be explained by his sophistry into any meaning which may subserve his personal malice" (Thomas Jefferson, To John Tyler Monticello, May 26, 1810)
[8] "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Lord Acton 1887.
[9] James Bovard (born 1956) "Attention Deficit Democracy" (Palgrave, 2006)
[10] "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely." Lord Acton 1887
[11] "We have long enough suffered under the base prostitution of law to party passions in one judge, and the imbecility of another. In the hands of one the law is nothing more than an ambiguous text, to be explained by his sophistry into any meaning which may subserve his personal malice" (Thomas Jefferson, To John Tyler Monticello, May 26, 1810)
[12] "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Lord Acton 1887.
[13] "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men, even when they exercise influence and not authority, still more when you superadd the tendency or the certainty of corruption by authority. There is no worse heresy than that the office sanctifies the holder of it." Lord Acton in a letter he wrote to scholar and ecclesiastic Mandell Creighton, dated April 1887.
[15] "Property" James Madison Essays for the National Gazette 1791- 1792
[16] Now codified as Title Criminal 18, U.S.C, § 241 & 242 into the United States Code of Law to hold UNQUALIFED "Whoever" criminally liable for the deprivation of rights under color of law.
[17] Now codified as Title Civil 42 U.S.C. § 1983 & 1985 into the United States Code of Law to hold UNQUALIFED "Every person" civilly liable for the deprivation of rights under color of law.
[18] "Property" James Madison Essays for the National Gazette 1791- 1792
[19] Judicial sophistry is the "ABSOLUTE" WORST kind of sophistication, "We have long enough suffered under the base prostitution of law to party passions in one judge, and the imbecility of another. In the hands of one the law is nothing more than an ambiguous text, to be explained by his sophistry into any meaning which may subserve his personal malice" (Thomas Jefferson, To John Tyler Monticello, May 26, 1810)
[20] "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Lord Acton 1887.
[21] See one of the people's Petition for a writ of certiorari No. 13-7030 Title: David G. Jeep, Petitioner v. United States
[22] "Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." Martin Luther King, Jr.
[23] The cause as confirmed in the Act of Parliament "Abolition of the Star Chamber" July 5, 1641, was abuse of "absolutely immune" discretion, Article I, § 9 "but the said judges have not kept themselves to the points limited by the said statute, but have undertaken to punish where no law doth warrant, and to make decrees for things having no such authority, and to inflict heavier punishments than by any law is warranted"
[24]Act of Parliament "Abolition of the Star Chamber" July 5, 1641, statute law in the realm of England, or dominion of Wales, that "repealed and absolutely revoked and made void" for CAUSE, the abuse of absolutely immune discretion, the originating controlling precedent for "absolute immunity" in (Star Chamber 1607,)Bradley v. Fisher, 80 U.S. 347 (1871)
[25] "Floyd and Barker, reported by Coke, in 1608" Bradley v. Fisher - 80 U.S. 347 (1871), Pierson v. Ray - 386 U.S. 554 (1967)
[26] "Property" James Madison Essays for the National Gazette 1791- 1792
[27] "Fraus omnia corrumpit," fraud corrupts all. A principle according to which the discovery of fraud invalidates all aspects of a judicial decision. United States v. Throckmorton, 98 U.S. 65 (1878) is applicable here "But there is an admitted exception to this general rule in cases where, by reason of something done by the successful party to a suit, there was in fact no adversary trial or decision of the issue in the case. Where the unsuccessful party has been prevented from exhibiting fully his case by fraud or deception practiced on him by his opponent, as by keeping him away from court." This describes ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY'S effect PERFECTLY.
[28] Randall v. Brigham, 74 U.S. 7 (1868), Bradley v. Fisher, 13 Wall. 335 (1872), Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547 (1967), Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U. S. 409 (1976), Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349 (1978), Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983) AND Connick, District Attorney, et al. v. Thompson No. 09–571 Decided March 29, 2011, TO NAME BUT A FEW!!!!!!
[30] There are TWO constitutional prohibitions for the grant of Nobility i.e., "Absolute Immunity," Article 1, Section 9, 7th paragraph "No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States" and Article 1, Section 10, 1st paragraph "No State shall… grant any Title of Nobility."
You some how want to argue that "the grant of Nobility" was about something other than the ROYAL Status of IMMUNITY. You want to argue that hereditary property rights were linked to a Colonial interpretation of Nobility? That would undermine Free-Enterprise.
There is not now and there was not then any titular value other than Royal status as immunity - being above the law? Did Nat "King" Cole violate the constitution? No one is that petty. Nobility conferred ONE-THING of interest now and then, IMMUNITY from the RULE OF LAW!!!!!!!!!!!!!
[31] Bradley v. Fisher, supra, 80 U. S. 335, 80 U. S. 349, note, at 80 U. S. 350, Pierson v. Ray, 386 U. S. 57 (1967) Judicial ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY is based on a skewed reading, overlooking the noted exception that absolute ANYTHING creates, of Lord Coke, Floyd and Barker (1607) ruling from an acknowledged CORRUPT court, the Star Chamber.
[32] Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U. S. 428 (1976) Prosecutorial ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY
[33] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 345 (1983) Police ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY
[34] Incompetence is the most insidious and it is covered up by the gratuitous grants of dishonesty, malice and corruption. Martin Luther King said it better, "Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity" (MLK Jr., Strength to Love, 1963).
As regards state Prosecutors, "States can discipline federal prosecutors, rarely do" 12/08/2010 USAToday by Brad Heath & Kevin McCoy ("Federal prosecutors series"). The "OPR is a black hole. Stuff goes in, nothing comes out," said Jim Lavine, the president of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. "The public, the defense attorneys and the judiciary have lost respect for the government's ability to police themselves."
As regards law enforcement "Convicted defendants left uninformed of forensic flaws found by Justice Dept." By Spencer S. Hsu, The Washington Post published: April 16, 2012, The Washington Post reported on cases that demonstrate problems of COMPETENCY in forensic analysis that have been known for nearly 40 years by the Justice Department.
[35] The denial of the "The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, "the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), commonly called the Affordable Care Act (ACA) or Obamacare," shall not be questioned."
[36] "are entitled to absolute immunity" Bogan v. Scott-Harris - 523 U.S. 44 (1997) Tenney v. Brandhove, 341 U. S. 367, 372, 372-376; Amy v. Supervisors, 11 Wall. 136, 138
[37] Incompetence is the most insidious and it is covered up by the gratuitous grants of dishonesty, malice and corruption. Martin Luther King said it better, "Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity" (MLK Jr., Strength to Love, 1963).
As regards state Prosecutors, "States can discipline federal prosecutors, rarely do" 12/08/2010 USAToday by Brad Heath & Kevin McCoy ("Federal prosecutors series"). The "OPR is a black hole. Stuff goes in, nothing comes out," said Jim Lavine, the president of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. "The public, the defense attorneys and the judiciary have lost respect for the government's ability to police themselves."
As regards law enforcement "Convicted defendants left uninformed of forensic flaws found by Justice Dept." By Spencer S. Hsu, The Washington Post published: April 16, 2012, The Washington Post reported on cases that demonstrate problems of COMPETENCY in forensic analysis that have been known for nearly 40 years by the Justice Department.
[38] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 345 (1983) ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY for "all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process"
[39] "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men, even when they exercise influence and not authority, still more when you superadd the tendency or the certainty of corruption by authority. There is no worse heresy than that the office sanctifies the holder of it." Lord Acton in a letter he wrote to scholar and ecclesiastic Mandell Creighton, dated April 1887.
[40] The Caging of America, Why do we lock up so many people? by Adam Gopnik, The New Yorker, January 30, 2012
[41] "With 5% of the world's population, our country now houses nearly 25% of the world's reported prisoners" and you have the moronic audacity to ask why???? "Why We Must Fix Our Prisons", By Senator Jim Webb, Parade Magazine published: 03/29/2009, U.S. Imprisons One in 100 Adults, Report Finds New York Times, By ADAM LIPTAK, published: February 29, 2008, Our Real Prison Problem. Why are we so worried about Gitmo? Newsweek by Dahlia Lithwick published June 5, 2009
[42] "We have long enough suffered under the base prostitution of law to party passions in one judge, and the imbecility of another. In the hands of one the law is nothing more than an ambiguous text, to be explained by his sophistry into any meaning which may subserve his personal malice" (Thomas Jefferson, To John Tyler Monticello, May 26, 1810)
[43] PENN v. U.S. 335 F.3d 786 (2003)
[44] "Property" James Madison Essays for the National Gazette 1791- 1792
[45] Incompetence is the most insidious and it is covered up by the gratuitous grants of dishonesty, malice and corruption. Martin Luther King said it better, "Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity" (MLK Jr., Strength to Love, 1963).
As regards state Prosecutors, "States can discipline federal prosecutors, rarely do" 12/08/2010 USAToday by Brad Heath & Kevin McCoy ("Federal prosecutors series"). The "OPR is a black hole. Stuff goes in, nothing comes out," said Jim Lavine, the president of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. "The public, the defense attorneys and the judiciary have lost respect for the government's ability to police themselves."
As regards law enforcement "Convicted defendants left uninformed of forensic flaws found by Justice Dept." By Spencer S. Hsu, The Washington Post published: April 16, 2012, The Washington Post reported on cases that demonstrate problems of COMPETENCY in forensic analysis that have been known for nearly 40 years by the Justice Department.
[46] "The rule of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U. S. 83, arguably applies in three quite different situations. Each involves the discovery, after trial, of information which had been known to the prosecution but unknown to the defense.
In the first situation, typified by Mooney v. Holohan, 294 U. S. 103, the undisclosed evidence demonstrates that the prosecution's case includes perjured testimony and that the prosecution knew, or should have known, of the perjury." United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 103 (1976)
[47] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 345 (1983) Police ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY
[48] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 345 (1983) Police ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY
[49] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 345 (1983) Police ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY
[50] "Property" James Madison Essays for the National Gazette 1791- 1792
[51] "Property" James Madison Essays for the National Gazette 1791- 1792
[52] "Property" James Madison Essays for the National Gazette 1791- 1792
[53] "We have long enough suffered under the base prostitution of law to party passions in one judge, and the imbecility of another. In the hands of one the law is nothing more than an ambiguous text, to be explained by his sophistry into any meaning which may subserve his personal malice" (Thomas Jefferson, To John Tyler Monticello, May 26, 1810)
[54] "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men, even when they exercise influence and not authority, still more when you superadd the tendency or the certainty of corruption by authority. There is no worse heresy than that the office sanctifies the holder of it." Lord Acton in a letter he wrote to scholar and ecclesiastic Mandell Creighton, dated April 1887.
[55] "We have long enough suffered under the base prostitution of law to party passions in one judge, and the imbecility of another. In the hands of one the law is nothing more than an ambiguous text, to be explained by his sophistry into any meaning which may subserve his personal malice" (Thomas Jefferson, To John Tyler Monticello, May 26, 1810)
[56] Judicial sophistry is the "ABSOLUTE" WORST kind of sophistication, ibid.
[57] Judicial sophistry is the "ABSOLUTE" WORST kind of sophistication, ibid.
[58] Judicial sophistry is the "ABSOLUTE" WORST kind of sophistication, ibid.
[59] Judicial sophistry is the "ABSOLUTE" WORST kind of sophistication, ibid.
[60] Judicial sophistry is the "ABSOLUTE" WORST kind of sophistication, ibid.
[61] Judicial sophistry is the "ABSOLUTE" WORST kind of sophistication, ibid.
[62] Judicial sophistry is the "ABSOLUTE" WORST kind of sophistication, ibid.
[63] Judicial sophistry is the "ABSOLUTE" WORST kind of sophistication, ibid.
[64] Judicial sophistry is the "ABSOLUTE" WORST kind of sophistication, ibid.
[65] Judicial sophistry is the "ABSOLUTE" WORST kind of sophistication, ibid.
[66] Judicial sophistry is the "ABSOLUTE" WORST kind of sophistication, ibid.
[67] Judicial sophistry is the "ABSOLUTE" WORST kind of sophistication, ibid.
[68] Judicial sophistry is the "ABSOLUTE" WORST kind of sophistication, ibid.
[69] Judicial sophistry is the "ABSOLUTE" WORST kind of sophistication, ibid.
[70] "Property" James Madison Essays for the National Gazette 1791- 1792
[71] Judicial sophistry is the "ABSOLUTE" WORST kind of sophistication, ibid.
[72] Passed by Congress June 13, 1866. Ratified July 9, 1868
[75] "The Gold Standard is what built the Pyramids" http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2011/10/gold-standard-is-what-built-pyramids.html
[76] "A Balanced Budget for America?" http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2012/07/balanced-budget-for-america.html
[77] "Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." Martin Luther King, Jr.
--
Thanks in advance
To Kill a Mocking Bird, The Denial of Due Process
"agere sequitor esse"
"Time is of the essence"
David G. Jeep
http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/
E-mail is preferred Dave@DGJeep.com, DGJeep@DGJeep.com
(314) 514-5228
David G. Jeep
GENERAL DELIVERY
Saint Louis, MO 63155-9999
Label Number: 7011 2000 0001 2263 2447
Label Number: 7011 2000 0001 2263 2447
Shipment
Activity-------------------------- Location--------------------- Date & Time
-- ----------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------- ------------------------
Depart USPS Sort Facility--- SAINT
LOUIS, MO 63155--------- Nov. 7,
2013
Processed at USPS Origin Sort Facility--
----------------------------------- SAINT LOUIS, MO 63155-- Nov. 7, 2013 12:04 am
Processed at USPS Origin Sort Facility--
----------------------------------- SAINT LOUIS, MO 63155-- Nov. 6, 2013 11:32 pm
Dispatched to Sort Facility--- SAINT
LOUIS, MO 63101--- Nov. 6, 2013
5:22 pm
Acceptance----------------------- SAINT
LOUIS, MO 63101--- Nov. 6, 2013
4:39 pm
---- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------------------
Expected
Delivery By:
November
9, 2013
First-Class
Mail®
Certified
Mail™
