Wednesday, May 31, 2006
Philip Jones
Division 65,
St. Louis County Court
7900 Carondolet Blvd.
Clayton, MO 63105
Re: Jeep v Jeep 03FC-10670M & 03FC-12243
Dear jones
You have no right to be sitting in judgment, you have no right to claim title to that bench that society has currently honored you with. You have disgraced yourself and the office to which you claim title. You have consistently and without regard to the laws you were sworn to uphold, defiled and disgraced that trust. On November 19, 2003, you handed down a ruling corrupted and biased by the denial of my and my son’s right to due process. You had thus denied my and my sons right to a fair unbiased hearing. My and my son’s constitutional right to Due Process was denied by your incompetent and corrupted ruling. I made you aware of this in chambers and you acknowledge as much saying and I quote, “these two do no need an order of protection.” If you had been honorable and fair minded you should have at that point step aside and disavowed your prior corrupted rulings. You have no honor, you have no professional integrity. You are a criminal. You then started the cover up. Your cover up cronies assisted you in the criminal activity. You and they became criminals in a cover up of your corruption. There were several public and timely motions made, you and your cover up cronies denied them all.
You had first and foremost broken the trust and the responsibilities aforded your office. But then it became personal for me and criminal for you because I stood up to you. As I stand up to you then, as I stand up to now and as I will be standing up to tomorrow and the next day and on in to forever. I am unafraid as a free man innocent in a free society I have done nothing wrong. You are the criminal that has has stolen from me my right to paternity, my right to due process, my right to liberty and my right to due process.
You and your cover up cronies then furthered your criminal activity by enforcing what you knew to be a corrupt ruling and by covering up and attempting to ignore your illegal denial of my rights to a fair and impartial hearing. Your incompetence and your corruption will be brought to light and it will be the legally enforce the end to you and your kind.
As stated before I will then reopen the custody and property settlement, simultaneously suing my ex-wife for fraud. I will prove an equitable settlement based on 20o3 fair market value
Time is of the essence and if there is anything further I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.
Thank you in advance.
David G. Jeep
David G. Jeep
Enclosure
cc: a list of select favorites
file
> From: "David G. Jeep"
> Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 11:18:09 -0500
> To: Sharon Jeep
> Conversation: This summer
> Subject: Re: This summer
>
> Sharon,
>
> As regards summer plans in general, if I were you I would not be making any.
> I will be swearing out a warrant on charges of theft through fraud. You have
> stolen everything from me. Your lies in November of 2003 were just that lies
> and if we had a real judge that actually followed the law and or established
> judicial guidelines none of this would have happened. But you, he (the Judge) and your
> attorney are all complicit in the theft of my paternity, my property, my
> rights, and everything I hold dear. That is the first and foremost reason why,
> you should not make any long range plans, by that I mean summer plans with our
> son. I will have you in jail, I will have full and encumbered custody of my
> son and you will be in jail.
>
> Secondly, as regards my making plans, you have at present bankrupted me, I can
> barely make the rent. I am worried about having enough for food on the table.
> Because as stated early you have stolen everything form me with your fraud.
> For the present that is the case. But do not worry about me long term, I will
> have my house, I will have it paid for in full, my financial future is secure.
> I will sue all those complicit in the illegal theft of my paternity, my
> property, my rights, and everything I hold dear. I will win because as I have
> stated before I am the only one involved in this issue that has not broken the
> law, my cannon of ethics or my judicial oath to administer the law fairly.
>
> Now you can show this to who ever you want to, please publish this on the
> front page of the paper, I am just putting forward my issues regarding our son
> and our son's ability to have a normal life with an accused and a soon to be
> convicted felon for a mother
>
> Best whishes always
> Dave
>
