Civilization is under THREAT!!!!
#METOO
White and now minority women are always to be held in the VERY HIGHEST of esteem. Habeas Corpus, Due Process of Law are to be immediately suspended. Call out the National Guard we need them to shoot the tallywackers off of Harvey Weinstein, Kevin Spacey, Charlie Rose, and most especially Roy Moore.
Civilization is under THREAT!
To protect the female gender's indisputable biblical-sublime-virginal status every accused - abuser, harasser or rapist needs to be exposed and humiliated by substantiated or unsubstantiated - reasonable or UNREASONABLE accusation. The proverbial Tar and Feathering is to be ORDINARY and common place. The idea of DUE PROCESS of law needs to be suspended in the irresistible interests of biblical WOMANHOOD and sustaining the active measure of our #fakenews PRESIDENT!
We can not afford to let the other 99.9999% of men - who are not and never will be acused of anything - our everyday companions, lovers, co-workers, sons and fathers get any ideas. These men have been holding up their end for centuries. We can not now afford to let them think they have any control over their natural sexual urges. I mean it is not like LIFE since the beginning of recorded history has had a positive outcome for virtually 99.9999% of all persons?
I know for a fact that my parents, who raised 7 well-adjusted kids in a happy home and were married HAPPILY for 200 years (maybe a slight exaggeration, I just do not know the exact number), were constantly haunted by sexual HANG-UPS.
My mother by the memory of the big time SOB that use to sit on the corner of her desk when with a college degree she worked for MODOT as a secretary. I mean that emotionally scarred he for life, she only raised 7 happy, healthy well adjusted kids with that on shoulders.
My father like too many of today's and yesterday's FATHERS was a behind the scenes sexual predator. Even though my 4 sisters who still SWEAR unending love and adoration to their father who died nearly 30 years ago, they KNOW he was a PERVERT just like their 3 brother, myself included.
In the holier-than-I "Jane Crow" era all memory of my father, just like myself, must NOW be thrown out with the refuse of humanity and left with nothing on the street - with out ANY REASONABLE PROBABLE CAUSE, without any due process, and without any hope of REDEMPTION!!!
I mean this worked so well with just White women and "Niggers" in the Jim Crow era!!
The Senate Intelligence Committee heard Thursday (March 30, 2017) from Clint Watts, a counter-terrorism expert, who described a sophisticated Trump/Russian active measures (propaganda machine) that specifically sought to bolster President Donald Trump and influence ELECTIONS
#FAKENEWS = Trump's "active measures" = propaganda
#FAKENEWS = Trump's "active measures" = propaganda
_____________________________________________________________________
Audrey G. Fleissig, District Judge
c/o Gregory J. Linhares - Clerk of Court
St. Louis - Eastern Division
111 South 10th Street, Suite 3.300
St. Louis, MO 63102-1123
Re: Case No. 4:17-cv-02690-AGF - Jeep v Government of the United States of America eta!,
Dear People,
Maybe if the gravamen had NOT been a blatantly-unconstitutional, high-handed, personally destructive to ME, example of extra-judicial action from the instant of it being signed, I would be able to humbly accept the court's self-serving assertion of malice, corruption and incompetence.
BUT, THAT AIN'T GONNA HAPPEN!
You know it, I know it, and EVERYBODY aware of the issue knows it. "Jane Crow" discrimination is common practice and common knowledge as it was for the so-called "niggers" in the "Jim Crow" discrimination of the south
If there is anything further, I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.
Thank you in advance.
"Time is of the essence"
David G. Jeep
enclosure
a. Motion for Reconsideration dated Monday, November 20, 2017 "
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
UNITED STATES EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
FEDERAL COURT - St. Louis DIVISION
JURY DEMAND
_____________________________________________________________________
Jeep
v.
Government of the United States of America, et al
Case No. 4:17-cv-02690-AGF
_____________________________________________________________________
I. Motion for reconsideration
____________________________________________________________________
1) Kahn v. Kahn, 21 F.3d 859, 861 (8th Cir. 1994) "The domestic relations exception divests the federal courts of jurisdiction over any action for which the subject is a divorce, allowance of alimony, or child custody."
a) I have to first and foremost make note of the 14th Amendment's undisputed, "No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." That unqualified constitutional security should need no further assertion and/or justification. The "the letter of the law is the body; the sense and reason of the law is the soul" and thus the 14th Amendment makes ANY exception to it unconstitutional.
A.) We have been down the road of assuming and/or asserting exceptions before. I can do no better than quote, the NOW fully vindicated, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissenting (Civil Rights Cases, 109 U.S. 26&62 (1883))
"The opinion in these cases proceeds, it seems to me, upon grounds entirely too narrow and artificial. I cannot resist the conclusion that the substance and spirit of the recent (13th, 14th, and 15th) amendments of the Constitution have been sacrificed by a subtle and ingenious verbal criticism.
"It is not the words of the law, but the internal sense of it that makes the law; the letter of the law is the body; the sense and reason of the law is the soul…."
"Today it is the colored race which is denied, by corporations and individuals wielding public authority, rights fundamental in their freedom and citizenship. At some future time, it may be that some other race will fall under the ban of race discrimination. If the constitutional amendments be enforced according to the intent with which, as I conceive, they were adopted, there cannot be, in this republic, any class of human beings in practical subjection to another class with power in the latter to dole out to the former just such privileges as they may choose to grant. The supreme law of the land has decreed that no authority shall be exercised in this country upon the basis of discrimination, in respect of civil rights, against freemen and citizens because of their race, color, or previous condition of servitude. To that decree -- for the due enforcement of which, by appropriate legislation, Congress has been invested with express power -- everyone must bow, whatever may have been, or whatever now are, his individual views as to the wisdom or policy either of the recent changes in the fundamental law or of the legislation which has been enacted to give them effect."
b) Additionally and more specifically the issue "an infamously-scandalous, non-exigent, extra-judicial gravamen, - a NOT "facially valid court order"" is unconstitutional and a FRAUD[1] on the COURT by an officer of the Court.
c) As regards an EXPARTE Order that is by Missouri statute independent of any "proceedings for dissolution of marriage, legal separation, separate maintenance and other actions between the parties and are IN ADDITION TO ANY OTHER AVAILABLE CIVIL (damages) OR CRIMINAL REMEDIES.[2] Via the OTHER AVAILABLE CIVIL OR CRIMINAL REMEDIES I am requesting ORDER(s) OF CORAM NOBIS[3] "and remand it to a new (Missouri) judge for resettlement based on this ruling" via the "domestic relations exception":
A.) Injunctive/declaratory - ORDER OF CORAM NOBIS[4] - relief to overturn and expunge the DWI Conviction (Case No.:CR203-1336M) and remove all reference of it from my Driving Record and, as housekeeping issue, the 33 year old 1978 DWI conviction.
B.) Injunctive/declaratory - ORDER OF CORAM NOBIS[5] - relief to overturn all orders of protection between Sharon G. Jeep and David G. Jeep and remove all record of them (Case No.:03FC-10670M).
C.) Injunctive/declaratory - ORDER OF CORAM NOBIS[6] - relief to overturn the subsequent and coupled Property and Custody Order (Case No.:03FC-12243) currently in effect between David G. Jeep and Sharon G. Jeep as regards the joint marital property as of November 3, 2003 and the custody of then Minor Child Patrick Brandon Jeep (DOB 12/22/94) AND REMAND IT TO A NEW JUDGE FOR RESETTLEMENT BASED ON THIS RULING.
D.) Injunctive/declaratory - ORDER OF CORAM NOBIS[7] -relief to expunge from my record, WITH PREJUDICE, Eastern District Court of Missouri Case #4:09-cr-00659-CDP
2) As regards your assertion of "over challenges to state court decisions. . . in particular cases arising out of judicial proceedings even if those challenges allege that the state court's action was unconstitutional. Review of those decisions may be had only in [the United States Supreme Court]." District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 486 (1983). In light of the afore-mentioned, this action is dismissed with prejudice.
a. The referenced citation from the "District of Columbia Court of Appeals" is referential only and has no controlling authority on the 8th Circuit.
b. I first assert the 1st Amendment: "Congress shall make no law… the right of the people… to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." That implies that courts cannot.
A.) "In Great Britain, the King himself is sued in the respectful form of a petition, and he never fails to comply with the judgment of his court. (Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 163 (1803))
B.) And as I am sure the court is aware, the Supreme Court does not, as a rule, take Petitions for Writ of Certiorari unless on an appeal of a recent District Court Case. So your assertion that only the in "[the United States Supreme Court]" is without merit - fraud invalidates all aspects of a judicial decision.
c. Additionally and equally importantly even though it is not necessarily required,[8] I assert new evidence unconsidered by the prior district court ruling with the undisputed nationwide survey stating:
"With the birth rate down by 48% since 1960 and teen pregnancy down by 65% just since 1990 -- single motherhood is UP by 700% since 1960 (40% of births were to single mothers in 2015 v. 1960's 5%).[9] Per the report's authors,[10] these figures stand without regard to race or income.
Why?
In the "Jane Crow" era - "FATHERS ARE DISFAVORED BY AMERICAN DOMESTIC RELATION LAW." For years I have been screaming about it with news story after news story - from coast-to-coast.[11] Now I have a major study from renowned scholars[12] based on Government Figures that supports my experience and conclusions. Per the report's authors, these figures stand without regard to race or income.
"Jane Crow" discrimination against the constitutional equal protection/due process, unassailable and natural-rights of Fathers affects 100% of the population! EVERYONE HAS A FATHER
_____________________________________________________________________
II. CERTIFICATION AND CLOSING
_____________________________________________________________________
Respectfully submitted, Wednesday, November 22, 2017
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
David G. Jeep
GENERAL DELIVERY
Saint Louis, MO 63155-9999
E-Mail Dave@DGJeep.com (preferred)
(314) 514-5228
The plaintiff is homeless and without the will to go on because of this issue AND SEEKS EMERGENCY RELIEF!!!!
________________________________
[1] Fraus omnia corrumpit "Fraud corrupts all." A principle according to which the discovery of fraud invalidates all aspects of a judicial decision
[2] The issue of an EXPARTE Order is and I quote Missouri Revised Statutes Chapter 455, Proceedings independent of others - Section 455.070 item 38 form the original petition:
Missouri Revised Statutes Chapter 455, Proceedings independent of others - Section 455.070 All proceedings under sections 455.010 to (This includes Protective Orders Section 455.035) 455.085 are independent of any proceedings for dissolution of marriage, legal separation, separate maintenance and other actions between the parties and are in addition to any other available civil or criminal remedies, unless otherwise specifically provided herein. (L. 1980 S.B. 524 § 13)
[3] A coram nobis petition to a public stigma, and so forth, in order to restore, so far as possible, the erroneously convicted party to a pre-conviction state.
[4] A coram nobis petition to a public stigma, and so forth, in order to restore, so far as possible, the erroneously convicted party to a pre-conviction state.
[5] A coram nobis petition to a public stigma, and so forth, in order to restore, so far as possible, the erroneously convicted party to a pre-conviction state.
[6] A coram nobis petition to a public stigma, and so forth, in order to restore, so far as possible, the erroneously convicted party to a pre-conviction state.
[7] A coram nobis petition to a public stigma, and so forth, in order to restore, so far as possible, the erroneously convicted party to a pre-conviction state.
[8] "The essence of the constitutional right to equal protection of the law is that it is a personal one, and does not depend upon the number of persons affected, and any individual who is denied by a common carrier, under authority of the state, a facility or convenience which is furnished to another under substantially the same circumstances may properly complain that his constitutional privilege has been invaded." McCabe v. Atchison, T. & S.F. Ry. Co., 235 U.S. 151 (1914)
[9] "Male Earnings, Marriageable Men, and Nonmarital Fertility: Evidence from the Fracking Boom" by Melissa S. Kearney, Riley Wilson - NBER Working Paper No. 23408 - Issued in May 2017 - NBER Program(s): CH EEE LS PE - Per a new paper by Andrew Cherlin, professor of sociology at Johns Hopkins University and Melissa Kearney, professor of economics at University of Maryland this 700% increase is across economic and racial lines. See also - "Women just aren't that into the 'marriageable male' anymore, economists say" Washington Post - By Danielle Paquette - May 16, 2016 - "The Fracking Boom, a Baby Boom, and the Retreat From Marriage" Freakonomics – NPR - July 5, 2017
[10] Andrew Cherlin, professor of sociology at Johns Hopkins University and Melissa Kearney, professor of economics at University of Maryland
[11] A fait accompli, "A man against whom a frivolous ex parte order of protection has been brought starts to lose any power in his divorce proceeding. They do start decompensating, and they do start to have emotional issues, and they do start developing post-traumatic stress disorders. They keep replaying in their minds the tape of what happened to them in court. It starts this whole vicious downward cycle. They've been embarrassed and shamed in front of their family and friends, unjustly, and they totally lose any sense of self-control and self-respect. They may indeed become verbally abusive. It's difficult for the court to see where that person was prior to the restraining order." "The Booming Domestic Violence Industry" - Massachusetts News, 08/02/99, By John Maguire, Hitting below the belt Monday, 10/25/99 12:00 ET, By Cathy Young, Salon - Divorced men claim discrimination by state courts, 09/07/99, By Erica Noonan, Associated Press, Dads to Sue for Discrimination, 08/24/99, By Amy Sinatra, ABCNEWS.com, The Federal Scheme to Destroy Father-Child Relationships, by Jake Morphonios, 02/13/08.
[12] Andrew Cherlin, professor of sociology at Johns Hopkins University and Melissa Kearney, professor of economics at University of Maryland
"Agere sequitur esse" ('action follows being')
David G. Jeep,
Federal Inmate #36072-044 (formerly)
Mobile (314) 514-5228
David G. Jeep
GENERAL DELIVERY
Saint Louis, MO 63155-9999
