President Barack Hussein Obama
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W.
Washington, DC 20500-0001
Chief Justice John G. Roberts
Supreme Court of the United States
One First Street N.E.
Washington, DC 20543-0001
Re: Jeep v. Obama, et al –
CONSIDER YOURSELF SERVED by Registered mail 2/23/11
A formal petition in the Supreme Court of the United States of America
Dear Barrack and John,
You apparently did not take me seriously in my prior communications addressed as above, dated Thursday, January 13, 2011, Re: Jeep v. Obama, et al. I am DEAD serious the EVIDENCE of your corruption is on line and has been downloaded to remote and unimpeachable sources.
There are several cases on the current Supreme Court Docket that deal with the
First Amendment's right for a redress of grievances i.e., Ashcroft v. al-Kidd (No. 10-98) "
USA Patriot Act", Kentucky v. King (No. 09-1272) "Searches" and Connick v. Thompson (
09-571) "Brady v. Maryland DUE PROCESS"
This is CORRUPTION on a massive scale at the VERY HIGHEST level of ministerial power in this government of "We the People." You have forgotten your reason for being is in support of "government of the people, by the people, for the people" not in support of yours and others unconstitutional corrupt ministerial power.
The
First Amendment prohibits
Congress from making any law abridging the right of the people to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. The Constitution denies a constitutionally or congressionally authorized "
public Ministers"
from creating a rule or law "
abridging the right of the people to petition the Government for a redress of grievances".
Immunity ministerially granted by "
public Ministers" for "
public Ministers"is repugnant to the Constitution, the rule of law and the essence of civilized society,
the protection of the laws. There are TWO constitutional prohibitions for the grant of Nobility i.e., "
Absolute Immunity,"
Article 1, Section 9, 7th paragraph "No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States" and
Article 1, Section 10, 1st paragraph "No State shall… grant any Title of Nobility."
The Magna Carta in 1215
(§ 61), the first modern attempt at limiting government, originally established the right of redress:
"If we, our chief justice (judges), our officials, or any of our servants offend in any respect against any man, or transgress any of the articles of the peace or of this security… they shall come to us - or in our absence from the kingdom to the chief justice - to declare it and claim immediate redress… by seizing our castles, lands, possessions, or anything else saving only our own person and those of the queen and our children, until they have secured such redress as they have determined upon."
Do I have to light myself on fire like the
Tunisia suicide protester Mohammed Bouazizi to get your attention in
the land of the free and home of the brave? It would be Free Speech
and I have the paperwork to prove I am competent.
"We the People" have inviolable and inalienable rights in this country. People who reject or deny those natural rights as sovereign are the insane ones. Just ask former despot Muhammad Hosni Sayyid Mubarak of Egypt.
You say you do not want to open up another can of worms for litigation abuse e.g., "medical malpractice litigation." Yes malpractice litigation has a cost, but the expense is no more than 2%-3%
of the current health care cost estimates. Our medical malpractice litigation has done its job in creating and maintaining the BEST medical care available and at 2%-3% it does not add to the cost appreciably! Malpractice is not driving the 10% +/- yearly increases that create the current healthcare issues today.
I remember having to pay upwards of $20,000 per year per Ironworker, working on the ground,
making less than $70,000 per year. As a percentage that is 29%. I do not think Doctors are claiming they have to pay 29% of their income as INSURANCE. Insurance and or risk is an unavoidable cost of being alive. And I know for a FACT Doctors and Ironworkers are not only surviving but THRIVING!
Ministerially created Immunity is repugnant to the rule of law, the Constitution as the supreme law of the land and the essence of civilized society!!!!!!
I have literally nothing left to lose.
If there is anything further I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.
Thank you in advance.
"Time is of the essence"
David G. Jeep
cc: a select group of e-mail favorites
file
enclosure
A petition In the Supreme Court of the United States of America
In the Supreme Court of the
United States of America
David G. Jeep, Plaintiff, vs. President Barack Hussein Obama, et al
United States of America,
Mike Christian (FBI), Lyonel Mrythill (FBI), Chris Boyce (USMS), Dan Bracco (FBI), Robert O'Connor (USMS) and Raymond Meyer (AUSA),
8th District US Court of Appeals (07-2614 & 08-1823),
Carol E. Jackson, US District Court Judge, 4:07-CV-1116 CEJ Jeep v. Jones et al (07-2614), Scott O. Wright, Senior US District Judge, 4:07-cv-00506-SOW Jeep v. Bennett et al (08-1823),
Commissioner Philip E. Jones, Sr., Sharon G. Jeep (ex), Joseph A. Goeke , Robert S. Cohen , Michael T. Jamison , Emmett M. O'Brien , Steven H. Goldman , Barbara W. Wallace , James R. Hartenbach , John A. Ross , Michael D. Burton , Larry L. Kendrick , Richard C. Bresnahan , Melvyn W. Wiesman , Maura B. McShane , Colleen Dolan , Mark D. Seigel , Barbara Ann Crancer , Mary Bruntrager Schroeder , Brenda Stith Loftin , Dale W. Hood , Thea A. Sherry , Gloria Clark Reno , John R. Essner , Ellen Levy Siwak , Patrick Clifford , Bernhardt C. Drumm , Dennis N. Smith , Judy Preddy Draper , Sandra Farragut-Hemphill , Douglas R. Beach , John F. Kintz , Gary M. Gaertner , Phillip E. Jones , Carolyn C. Whittington , Tom W. DePriest , David Lee Vincent, St. Louis County and State of Missouri (4:07-CV-1116 CEJ),
Jack A. Bennett, Associate Circuit Judge, Devin M. Ledom, Asst. Prosecuting Attorney, Alex Little, Officer Badge #920, Tim Taylor Officer Badge #913, W. Steven Rives, Prosecuting Attorney, W. James Icenogle, Prosecuting Attorney, Bruce Colyer, Associate Circuit Judge, Jay Nixon Attorney General, State of Missouri, Camden County, and City of Osage Beach (4:07-cv-00506-SOW),
Defendants | ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
Case No _
Appeal: _ |
|
|
|
A Cause of Action, Jurisdictional Statement and Pleading for the "Protection of the Laws"
1.
I am filing this as a cause of action for original Jurisdiction in the Supreme Court of The United States of America against The United States of America Government in the person of its "
public Ministers" at the highest ministerial levels of the Executive
and Justice
Departments. This is a massive, at the highest levels, ministerial unconstitutional "
unlawful Conspiracy" "
out of Court"
to obfuscate "
false and malicious Persecutions." The Justice Department, The Court, The President have NO POWER to ministerially grant themselves or others
This involves the President of the United States of America, Barack Hussein Obama, as an individual and as a public Minister of the United States of America Government, yourselves,
Elena Kagan,
Sonia Sotomayor,
Ruth Bader Ginsburg,
Stephen Breyer,
Antonin Scalia,
Clarence Thomas,
Samuel Alito,
Anthony Kennedy, and Chief Justice
John G. Roberts, the Supreme Court of the United States of America, as individuals and as public Ministers of the United States of America Government,"
and others listed defendants.
The pleading, the jurisdictional statement, the issue is in opposition to the ministerial policy, "Absolute Immunity," adopted, supported and executed at the highest ministerial levels of the Executive and Justice Departments; "Absolute Immunity" is REPUGNANT to the Constitution and Statute Law as the supreme law of the land.
2.
I assert that
Immunity is DIAMETRICALLY opposed to Rule of Law. "We the People" i.e., government of the people, by the people, for the people have established the Rule of Law, the Constitution, as the supreme Law of the land. Immunity for "
the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws"
denies "We the People" "
the protection of the laws,"
"
the essence of civilization."
"
Absolute Immunity" a ministerial policy adopted, supported and enforced at the highest ministerial levels of the Executive and Justice Departments is repugnant to Rule of Law, the Constitution and statute law, Civil
and Criminal.
I petition the President of the United States of America as the executive in charge and yourselves
, The Supreme Court as the highest judicial ministerial levels of the FEDERAL, STATE and Local Government of the United State of America... "
The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America."
and "
The judicial Power of the United States shall be vested in one supreme Court" of the United States of America, as government "
public Ministers" for a redress of grievances as assured by the First Amendment, criminal and civil statute law.
3. Immunity, as ministerially created and applied without constitutional or statute law authorization, is repugnant to both the constitution and statute law.
4. I am petitioning for the protection of the laws.
5.
I have been to the Missouri State Court, The Missouri State Court of Appeals, United States Eastern Missouri 8
th District Court, 8
th United States Court of Appeals, Supreme Court, Attorney General and the President of the United States of America and been denied.
6. I am now petitioning the President of the United States of America as the Executive in charge of the Justice Department's enforcement and or protection of the laws as the responsible party for the enforcement and yourselves as the Supreme Court Judiciary as the responsible party for the judicial enforcement and or protection of the laws. Both the Executive and the Supreme Court share responsibility to "We the People" for the protection of the laws.
8.
I site
Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 Page 5 U. S. 163 "
The very essence of civil liberty certainly consists in the right of every individual to claim the protection of the laws whenever he receives an injury. One of the first duties of government is to afford that protection. In Great Britain, the King himself is sued in the respectful form of a petition, and he never fails to comply with the judgment of his court."
9.
I have been denied
the protection of the laws because of "
Absolute Immunity"
as currently held as a ministerial policy adopted at the highest levels of the Executive and Justice Departments. I have been denied
the protection of the laws via agents (local Police, State Police, FBI, and USMS) and the courts (Local, State, Federal and Supreme) in numerous prior petitions, complaints, pleadings, appeals and motions on file with this court and others. (Petition for a Writ of Certiorari, Jeep v United States of America "Opposed to Immunity" currently on file in the Supreme Court clerk's office,
8th District Court of appeals Appeal: 10-1947, U.S. Federal Court Eastern District of Missouri Case No. Case 4:10-CV-101-TCM -- State Court Case No.: 03FC-10670M, Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District ED84021, U.S. District Court Eastern District of Missouri Jeep v. Jones et al, 4:07-cv-01116-CEJ,
8th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals 07-2614,
Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court 07-11115 & State Court Case # CR203-1336M, Missouri Court of Appeals Southern District SD26269, U.S. District Court Western District of Missouri 07-0506-CV-W-SOW Jeep v Bennett, et al,
8th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals 08-1823 (
http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/).
10.
"
Absolute Immunity" ministerially granted for "
public Ministers" is repugnant to the Constitution. There are TWO constitutional prohibitions for the grant of Nobility, "
Absolute Immunity,"
Article 1, Section 9, 7th paragraph "No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States" and
Article 1, Section 10, 1st paragraph "No State shall… grant any Title of Nobility."
11.
These issues arise from a series of 2003 incidents where the Plaintiff, David G. Jeep was held to answer on two infamous charges, "
false and malicious Persecutions,"
without any probable cause, much less proof of any wrong doing. The facts
of the issues are a matter of court record and are not in dispute.
12.
the protection of the laws.I have endured over 7 ½ years (2,667 days +/-) of criminal denial, 411 days of illegal incarceration
(where I was humiliated with the denial of the most basic of liberties - regularly and repeatedly subjected to strip searches), two psychological examinations, and 3 ½ years of abject poverty, homelessness and life on the street in my struggle, Jeep v. United States of America.
15. I seek damages and injunctive relief, noting that offending Judicial Officers were involved, as follows:
I.
Injunctive relief to overturn and expunge the DWI Conviction (Case # , CR203-1336M) and remove all reference of it from my Driving Record and the 33 year old 1978 DWI conviction.
II. Injunctive relief to overturn all orders of protection between Sharon G. Jeep and David G. Jeep and remove all record of them (Case No.: 03FC-10670M).
III. Injunctive relief to overturn the subsequent and coupled Property and Custody Order (Case No.: 03FC-12243) currently in effect between David G. Jeep and Sharon G. Jeep as regards the joint marital property as of November 3, 2003 and the custody of the Minor Child Patrick Brandon Jeep (DOB 12/22/94) and remand it to a new judge for resettlement based on this ruling.
IV. Actual Damages in the amount of:
Fifty Million Dollars and No Cents----------------------- $50,000,000.00
V. Punitive damages. In the amount of:
One Hundred Million Dollars and No Cents-------------- $100,000,000.00
16. I am homeless, destitute and unable to pay any filing fee for this complaint.
17.
I have nothing but postage to mail this petition. I have holes in the seat of my one pair of pants, holes in the soles of my one pair of shoes and nothing but food stamps to eat. Do I have to light myself on fire in the street to get your attention, like the
Tunisia suicide protester Mohammed Bouazizi?
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Signed this Wednesday, February 23, 2011
Signature of Plaintiff(s)
_________________________________________
David G. Jeep
David G. Jeep
c/o The Bridge
1610 Olive Street
Saint Louis, MO 63103-2316
E-Mail Dave@DGJeep.com (preferred)
(314) 514-5228
Alcohol-related driving offenses, expunged from records, when--procedures, effect--limitations 577.054. 1. After a period of not less than ten years, an individual who has pleaded guilty or has been convicted for a first alcohol-related driving offense which is a misdemeanor or a county or city ordinance violation and which is not a conviction for driving a commercial motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol and who since such date has not been convicted of any other alcohol-related driving offense may apply to the court in which he or she pled guilty or was sentenced for an order to expunge from all official records all recordations of his or her arrest, plea, trial or conviction.
