Exclusionary
Rule Era,[1] to further their cause of
a Royalist Justice system, the Supreme Court has created The Exclusionary Rule to cover up their crimes at the expense of We the
People. The premise of The Exclusionary Rule is the assumption that the Judicial Process[2] can do no wrong. The Royalist Judicial Process
in America would prefer to let known criminals go free rather that accept criminal
and civil responsibility for their criminal actions against our civil rights, under
color of law.[3] They
set up a royalist system of deterrents that allow criminals acting under color of
law to act without personal regard to We the People’s civil rights; We the People
are forced to cover up the Judicial Process’s criminal actions by accepting the
KNOWN criminal back into our midst. It is
INSANITY!!!! The Exclusionary Rule is compensation
to the criminal for “the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured
by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America”[4]
As verified in Bivens, “Finally,
assuming Bivens' innocence of the crime charged, the "exclusionary rule"
is simply irrelevant. For people in Bivens' shoes, it is damages or nothing.”[5]
“We the People” have to take
back the unchecked power to fabricate self-serving Judge made law out of “sophistry.” The Judiciary is and has been criminally[6] using their “sophistry” to maliciously corruptly
and incompetently deny the establishment of Justice,[7] We the People[8] sought for “ourselves and our Posterity.”
“We the People” do
not have the substantive right to Justice between the Government and the People
that instigated the Declaration of Independence’s repeated petitions for redress. “We the People” do not have the lawfully
un-abridge-able right to petition the government for a redress of grievances secured
by the First Amendment.
“We the People” are
at the mercy of ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY for the “malicious or corrupt” judges,[9] the “malicious or dishonest”
prosecutor, [10] the “knowingly false testimony by police officers"[11] and “all (malicious, corrupt, dishonest and incompetent[12]) persons -- governmental or
otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process” [13] acting under color of law to wit, ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION.[14] They can deprive “any rights, privileges, or
immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America”[15] under color of law but outside Due Process of law
and there is nothing “We the People” can do about it short of War.
[2] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983) (“Absolute Immunity” for all persons that were integral
in the Judicial Process)
[3] TITLE 18—CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, PART I—CRIMES, CHAPTER 13—CIVIL RIGHTS § 241. A Conspiracy against rights
-- They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or
both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section
or if such acts include kidnapping (they kidnapped
my son) or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual
abuse, or an attempt to kill (they
attempted to kill Mr. Thompson), they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of
years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
[6] TITLE 18—CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, PART I—CRIMES, CHAPTER 13—CIVIL RIGHTS § 241. A Conspiracy against rights
-- They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or
both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section
or if such acts include kidnapping (they kidnapped
my son) or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual
abuse, or an attempt to kill (they
attempted to kill Mr. Thompson), they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of
years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
[8] “We the People of the
United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common
defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves
and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States
of America.” The Constitution for the United States of America, September 17, 1787 – ratification
final – June 21, 1788
[9] Bradley v. Fisher, supra, 80 U. S. 335, 80 U. S. 349, note, at 80 U. S. 350,
Pierson v. Ray, 386 U. S. 57 (1967) Judicial ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY is based on a skewed reading, overlooking the noted
exception that absolute ANYTHING creates, of Lord Coke, Floyd and Barker (1607) ruling from
an acknowledged CORRUPT court, the Star Chamber.
[12] Incompetence is the most insidious and it is covered
up by the gratuitous grant of malice, corruption and dishonesty!!!!
[13] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 345 (1983) ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY for “all persons -- governmental or otherwise --
who were integral parts of the judicial process”
[14] “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power
corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men, even when they
exercise influence and not authority, still more when you superadd the tendency
or the certainty of corruption by authority. There is no worse heresy than that
the office sanctifies the holder of it.” Lord Acton in a letter he wrote to scholar
and ecclesiastic Mandell Creighton, dated April 1887.
