Wednesday, May 31, 2006

Jeep v Jeep 03FC-10670M & 03FC-12243 When a woman cries out, everyone rushes into to save her.




Wednesday, May 31, 2006

Philip Jones
Division 65,
St. Louis County Court
7900 Carondolet Blvd.
Clayton, MO 63105

Re:      Jeep v Jeep 03FC-10670M & 03FC-12243

Dear jones

When a woman cries out, everyone rushes into to save her.  If you are the accused, armed men will come into your house with out warning to force you on to the street with little more than the clothes on your back.  I know I have been there, I had thirty minutes to pack two suitcases and now nearly three years later I am still struggling to survive.  Albeit it a contrivance by the woman for attention, for illegal gain and the incompetent, unlawful denial of Due Process.
But when a man after fighting for his rights, screaming at the top of his lungs for nearly three years, finally proves the criminality and incompetence of those that have accused and convicted him wrongly, without benefit of Due Process, after he has shown how the criminals and incompetents have inflicted massive damage and insult on a father and a son…. no one rushes in or cares.  Everyone reaches for cover and the father and son’s suffering continues.
Be aware that your snap decision-making, based on the illegal denial of Due Process, and your incompetence created and perpetuated this illegal atrocity and your lack of forthright acknowledgment and acceptance of your mistake, even now with delay, on top of delay, on top of delay further proves your incompetence as a Judge. 
Time is of the essence and if there is anything further I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.
Thank you in advance.

Reply to Dave@DGJeep.com

David G. Jeep
 

Enclosure

cc:    a list of select favorites
         file*


> From: "David G. Jeep" <Dave@DGJeep.com>
> Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 11:18:09 -0500
> To: Sharon Jeep <constant_survivor@hotmail.com>
> Conversation: This summer
> Subject: Re: This summer
>
> Sharon,
>
> As regards summer plans in general, if I were you I would not be making any.
> I will be swearing out a warrant on charges of theft through fraud.  You have
> stolen everything from me.  Your lies in November of 2003 were just that lies
> and if we had a real judge that actually followed the law and or established
> judicial guidelines none of this would have happened.  But you, he (the Judge) and your
> attorney are all complicit in the theft of my paternity, my property, my
> rights, and everything I hold dear. That is the first and foremost reason why,
> you should not make any long range plans, by that I mean summer plans with our
> son.  I will have you in jail, I will have full and encumbered custody of my
> son and you will be in jail.
>
> Secondly, as regards my making plans, you have at present bankrupted me, I can
> barely make the rent.  I am worried about having enough for food on the table.
> Because as stated early you have stolen everything form me with your fraud.
> For the present that is the case.  But do not worry about me long term, I will
> have my house, I will have it paid for in full, my financial future is secure.
> I will sue all those complicit in the illegal theft of my paternity, my
> property, my rights, and everything I hold dear.  I will win because as I have
> stated before I am the only one involved in this issue that has not broken the
> law, my cannon of ethics or my judicial oath to administer the law fairly.
>
> Now you can show this to who ever you want to, please publish this on the
> front page of the paper, I am just putting forward my issues regarding our son
> and our son's ability to have a normal life with an accused and a soon to be
> convicted felon for a mother
>
> Best whishes always
> Dave
>