Friday, January 7, 2011

Your Maginot Line will not hold, because I carry no weapons


Friday, January 07, 2011
Chief United States District Judge
Catherine D. Perry
111 South 10th Street, Suite 14.182
St. Louis, MO 63102-1125

Phone (314)244-7520
Fax (314)244-7529

Re: I think it only fair to warn you, AGAIN!!!!!!!!!!!!
       Be aware of who and what you are dealing with!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
       Your Maginot Line will not hold, because I carry no weapons

Dear Ms. Perry,
You CAN NOT euphemistically excuse this by saying you are doing “honorable work.”  This is NOT HONORABLE WORK, the denial of your solemn oath of office, to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.” 
You cannot say, “the violations were not deliberate,” “not malicious evil wrongdoing” or “in the heat of battle,” [1] I have the undisputed evidence that they were NOT!!!!!!!!!  This is ALL-PUBLIC now, exposed, an enormous, criminal, deliberate, depraved and indifferent conspiracy against rights.  It has been ON-GOING excruciatingly for 2,795 days, 7.657534247 years WITHOUT REGARD to the constitutionally declared and assured RIGHTS!!!!!!!!!!!  I have been yelling at the top of my lungs virtually every minute, SUFFERING every second of every day from the criminal denial of rights.  This is about the loss of my own flesh and blood, MY SON, the loss of liberty, the loss of property and the loss of the essence of life… TIME..
I am not some crazy
conspiracy fanatic.
I am not some crazy conspiracy fanatic; I do not see conspiracies everywhere.  I have first hand knowledge of this one.  I have endured over 7 years of criminal denial, 411 days of illegal incarceration[2], two psychological examinations, and over three years of abject poverty, homelessness and life on the street in my struggle, Jeep v. United States of America. [3]
My issues revolve around unconcealed corrupt actions of the police, the prosecutors and the judges.  The COURT RECORD CONFIRMS IT.  This corruption was enumerated at or near the time of its occurrence.  Yours and other’s subsequent cover up of these negligent, malicious and corrupt actions is a criminal, deliberate, depraved and indifferent conspiracy against rights (Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241 - Conspiracy Against Rights ). 
I do not see a conspiracy against rights in “Texan declared innocent after 30 years in prison.”  Eyewitnesses make mistakes there is no avoiding it.  It could be likened to a fact of life almost, “Eyewitness: How Accurate Is Visual Memory?”(60 Minutes).  Given that eyewitness testimony is humanly fallible mistakes will happen, we need to improve the way we utilize eyewitness testimony to establish guilt e.g., double blind photo arrays, unbiased computer photo lineups.  As suggested by the 60 Minutes story in North Carolina: 
“Showing victims lineup photos one at a time and emphasizing that the right answer may be none of the above, having lineups conducted by a person who doesn't know who the suspect is, or not by a person at all.
One system now used in a handful of cities is computer software Mike Gauldin helped develop to have a laptop conduct photo lineups.
But law professor Rich Rosen says that in the vast majority of places, there's been no reform, and that needs to change. "This is something that police officers can and should be in favor of," he told Stahl.” and other auditing measures.”[4] 
The issue comes down to culpability in Texas and North Carolina as referenced in the two cases above, the Police and Prosecutors may have been over zealous but they did not violate established procedures.  In Connick v. Thompson (09-571), a case currently before the Supreme Court, the prosecutors are claiming ignorance of the law.  Ignorance of the law cannot be allowed or that becomes EVERYONE’s excuse.  “Ignorantia juris non excusat” is a well-established axiom of both Civil and Criminal Law.  Especially so with the Brady Rule, a result of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), it has been on the books for nearly 50 years.
In my cases, I told the police officers, the prosecuting attorneys, the State Judges, the State Appeals Court Judges, the Federal Judges, the Federal Appeals Court Judges and the Supreme Court they had made CONSTITUTIONAL mistakes before we went to trial and then repeated it before adjudication in the form of formal pretrial[5] and post trial motions,[6] objections and appeals.  Nonetheless the Police Officers, the Prosecuting attorneys and the Judges confirmed their criminality by purporting and/or allowing negligent, malicious, and corrupt testimony and adjudications to stand, thus the criminal, deliberate, depraved and indifferent conspiracy against rights is UNDENIABLE.  These issues are the direct result of the denial of my 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th and 14th Amendment RIGHTS.  The 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th and 14th Amendment RIGHTS as interpreted in my case have been on the books since the ratification of the Constitution in 1791.  The only issue is the corrupt, malicious and unconstitutional Judge Made Law of ASOLUTE IMMUNITY for all.[7] 
Clearly the 1st Amendment right to government redress and the Statute Civil[8] Law[9] were written for this purpose.  It is the self serving CRIMINAL, deliberate, depraved and indifferent conspiracy against RIGHTS that see it differently.  There is no excuse for the undeniable CRIMINAL, deliberate, depraved and indifferent conspiracy against RIGHTS[10]!!!!!!!!!!!!!
If there is anything further I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.
“Time is of the essence”
Thank you in advance.
David G.Jeep  
http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/
E-mail is preferred Dave@DGJeep.com, DGJeep@DGJeep.com
Voice mail (314) 514-5228

David G. Jeep
c/o The Bridge
1610 Olive Street,
Saint Louis, MO 63103-2316

David G. Jeep

cc:  e-mailed to a select group of favorites
       file

[1]“Bill Weigel, president of the National Organization of Bar Counsel, an association of state disciplinary officials.” As quoted “States can discipline federal prosecutors, rarely do.” USA Today
[3] Petition for a Writ of Certiorari, Jeep v United States of America “Opposed to Immunity” currently on file in the Supreme Court clerk’s office, 8th District Court of appeals Appeal: 10-1947, U.S. Federal Court Eastern District of Missouri Case No. Case 4:10-CV-101-TCM -- State Court Case No.: 03FC-10670M, Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District ED84021, U.S. District Court Eastern District of Missouri Jeep v. Jones et al, 4:07-cv-01116-CEJ, 8th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals 07-2614, Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court 07-11115 & State Court Case # CR203-1336M, Missouri Court of Appeals Southern District SD26269, U.S. District Court Western District of Missouri 07-0506-CV-W-SOW Jeep v Bennett, et al, 8th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals 08-1823 (http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/).
[4] Eyewitness: How Accurate Is Visual Memory? Lesley Stahl Reports On Flaws In Eyewitness Testimony That Lead To Wrong Convictions, March 8, 2009. It was updated on July 11, 2009
[5] Pretrial Motions in 26th District - September 16 and 30, 2003 Case No.:CR203-1336M, Tim Schlesinger Motion 12-5-03 (Jeep, Sharon vs. Jeep, David Cause No. 03FC-10670(M) Division No. 65)declares his pretrial motion of November 13, 2003.
[7] “absolute immunity from subsequent damages liability for all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process.” Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983) @ Page 460 U. S. 335
[9] "Whatever other concerns should shape a particular official's actions, certainly one of them should be the constitutional rights of individuals who will be affected by his actions. To criticize section 1983 liability because it leads decision makers to avoid the infringement of constitutional rights is to criticize one of the statute's raisons d'etre." Owen v. City of Independence, 445 U.S. 622 (1980) Page 445 U. S. 657
Posted by at
Labels: ,