New York Times Misses the Issue
Tuesday, April 05, 2011, 9:07:20 AM
Connick, District Attorney, et al. v. Thompson No. 09–571
The very essence of Civilization REQUIRES "rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws."[1] Without an agreement, constitution and laws, preceding any dispute we are forced to survival of the fittest. Civilization breaks down without "rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws."[2] Established RIGHTS are and have been the essence of Civilization since the first cave persons agreed to share the first cave.
The flaw in the Supreme Court FIVE's[3] recent ruling in Connick, District Attorney, et al. v. Thompson No. 09–571 was not a lack Empathy. It was a lack of LAW! Our "rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws."[4] I say again "rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws."[5] When District Attorney Connick denied Mr. Thompson his Due Process right to exculpable material, District Attorney Connick BROKE the LAW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
At the hearing for Mr. Thompson in 1985 he was denied exculpable material, just as a matter of common sense and fair play an accused person ought to have been provided all the evidence for his defense. More specifically in this case there was LEGAL PRECEDENT, the RESULT of a Supreme Court ruling, Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), that had been GENERALLY excepted and on the books for 23 years!!!!!!!!
"We now hold that the suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to an accused upon request violates due process where the evidence is material either to guilt or to punishment, irrespective of the good faith or bad faith of the prosecution." Page 373 U. S. 87
Now if the state passes a law tomorrow, for example, lowering the speed limit on the street in front of your house you are immediacy held responsible. If they put up the sign during the day while you are at work and you violate the speed on your way home, you have broken the LAW and can be held liable.
Ignorantia juris non excusat (Latin for "ignorance of the law does not excuse"). Not so for the Judges, the Prosecution or the Police.
I was falsely arrested by two incompetent police officers. How did I know they were incompetent, I have proof of their incompetents in the court record of their testimony. Their false, I assert perjurious, testimony at the trial for my false persecution. This VERIFIABLLY FALSE testimony was and has been allowed to stand as fact over my pretrial protestation, my at trial objection and my post trial appeals to the original court, the Missouri State Appeals Court, the Eastern Missouri 8th District Federal Court, the 8th District Federal Appeals Court and the Supreme Court of the United State of America.
You think you have enforceable rights. You have nothing!!!!!!! The Supreme Court FIVE[6] has again affirmed "absolute immunity… for all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process"[7] for "the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws"[8]
I, admittedly, have a different perspective than most. I have been victimized by the SAME criminally, corrupt, malicious, incompetent and random denial of my "rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws"[9] as Mr. Thompson. I was held to answer two infamous charges. The first one was, as referenced above, by two incompetent Police Officers. The second one, I was held without any probable cause. The pleadings did not support the infamous charge. The infamy of the charge alone was enough for TWO Judges to sign off on an unconstitutional warrant. But no matter, during hearing I quote "The Court finds--First of all, the Court amends the pleadings to conform with the evidence adduced. The Court does find the allegations of the amended petition to be true."[10] I was never given a copy of the "amended petition" nor was I ever given the opportunity to be heard on the "amended petition." My attorney of record made pretrial protestation as to the lack of evidence to support the charge. My attorney of record then filed TWO formal written motions after the ruling for both a copy of "amended petition" and a new hearing on the "amended petition" an infamous charge, the were ignored!!! My requests for my constitutionally secured rights have since been ignored by the original court, by the Missouri State Appeals Court, by the Eastern Missouri 8th District Federal Court, by the 8th District Federal Appeals Court and by the Supreme Court of the United State of America.
I have been fighting every SECOND for 7 ½ years. My son was taken away, my home was taken away… EVERYTHING I had ever held dear was taken AWAY. I was forced into a battle for my VERY life against an enemy that was empowered by my loss of my son, the loss of my home and the loss of EVERYTHING I owned. It was a criminal conspiracy against rights, my rights. I consider it to have been kidnapping.[11]
If Judge pulls out a gun in a courtroom and points at someone and says give me your son, give me your home, give me everything you own, that would be a crime. But if a Judge merely strikes his gavel and orders you to do the same, even though you have not been afford Due Process of Law, he can take you son, take your home and take EVERYTHING you ever held dear in the world and there is not a DAM-THING you can do it about. He has absolute immunity for the deprivation of "any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws."[12]
Why do we keep those faded pieces of parchment in a place of honor in Washington, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights? The "rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws"[13] are of ABSOLUTELY no use. The Supreme Court FIVE[14] has again affirmed "absolute immunity… for all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process"[15] for "the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws"[16]
We do not have any individually enforceable rights in this country, "Everybody, BUT the innocent victim, has "ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY"" for the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America e.g., "To Kill a Mocking Bird, The Denial of Due Process" or The Exclusionary Rule. (Jeep v Obama, Jeep v United States of America (10-1947), Jeep v Jones (07-11115))
DGJeep"The Earth and everything that's in it" (http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/)
Tuesday, April 05, 2011, 9:07:20 AM 2011 04-04-11 New York Times Misses the Issue REV 02 .doc
[3] Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Anthony Kennedy, and Chief Justice John G. Roberts
[6] Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Anthony Kennedy, and Chief Justice John G. Roberts
[10] Page 95 of the Official Trial Transcript of the appeal ED84021, Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court 07-11115, Jeep v. Commissioner Jones, et al.
[11] TITLE 18—CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, PART I—CRIMES, CHAPTER 13—CIVIL RIGHTS § 241. A Conspiracy against rights -- They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
[14] Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Anthony Kennedy, and Chief Justice John G. Roberts
--
Thanks in advance
To Kill a Mocking Bird, The Denial of Due Process
"Agere sequitur esse"
"Time is of the essence"
David G. Jeep
http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/
E-mail is preferred Dave@DGJeep.com, DGJeep@DGJeep.com
(314) 514-5228
David G. Jeep
c/o The Bridge
1610 Olive Street,
Saint Louis, MO 63103-2316
No comments:
Post a Comment