Monday, April 11, 2011

Rights are at once Vested with the Individual -- The Prosecution Rests, but I Can’t By JOHN THOMPSON, New York Times: April 9, 2011


Rights are at once Vested with the Individual
The Massive Ongoing Conspiracy AGAINST RIGHTS
Monday, April 11, 2011, 4:02:35 PM
The Prosecution Rests, but I Can't By JOHN THOMPSON, New York Times: April 9, 2011
I, like Mr. Thompson, cannot rest.  The Court took EVERYTHING from me without my constitutionally GUARANTEED right to Due Process of Law.  It is not so much the abstract idea of a Right that has been taken away, it is what can be done if you do not have the protection of "rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws."[1]  Mr. Thompson was 18 years in prison for robbery and murder, 14 of them on death row awaiting the happenstance find by his defense team of exculpable evidence he should have been given, 18 years prior, before the trial. 
I have been fighting every SECOND for 7 ½ years (2,717 days) just to get the Court to acknowledge the culpability of the criminals that denied me my "rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws."[2]  The evidence of the corruption in my cases was presented to the Judges before any actions were taken.  Yet, my son was taken away, my home was taken away… EVERYTHING I had ever held dear was taken AWAY.  I was forced into a battle for my VERY life against an enemy that was empowered by my loss, the loss my son, the loss of my home and the loss of EVERYTHING I owned.  It was a criminal conspiracy against rights, my rights.  I consider it to have been kidnapping.[3]  I am still fighting for redress.
"Combinations, darker than the night that hides them, conspiracies, wicked as the worst of felons could devise, have gone unwhipped of justice. Immunity is given to crime, and the records of the public tribunals are searched in vain for any evidence of effective redress."[4]
A citizen's Constitutional Rights are at once vested with the individual not the race, not the religion, not the sexual orientation, not the political party, not via any affiliation and/or lack of any affiliation.  Rights are at once fully vested at birth to a Citizen of the United States of America.  Nowhere in the Constitution does it say you have to have a group of people with the same interest to acquire your Definitive Constitutional Rights of equal access to your life, liberty, or property.  Rights are, AGAIN, at once vested with the individual!!!!
The basis of any non-familial civilization is an agreement between otherwise unrelated individuals to look out for and defend each other's rights.  The mutual responsibility for the enforcement of that agreement is what forms civilization.  The most basic agreement starts with "I will not step on your toes, if you agree to NOT step on mine."  The first cave persons had basic nonverbal physical security agreements so they could safely co-habit the first cave.   That tenet of civilization is so basic now it seems puerile almost to have to even mention it.  We have evolved.
We have evolved from those basic nonverbal physical security agreements, via the Divine Right of Kings and into a democratically limited constitutional governmental civilization of free and equal persons.  Our agreements are no longer exclusively rooted in the most basic nonverbal physical security of the individual.  We have with our democratically derived union established at once vested "rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws."[5]  "We the People in order to form a more perfect Union" have taken responsibility for Justice… the establishment, enforcement and confirmation of "any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws."[6] 
Rights are a tangible asset in our democratic union of free and equal persons.  How much are they worth?  Just ask any illegal Asian or Mexican immigrant, literally risking their lives, how much they paid beyond the potential loss of life as a percentage of their tangible on hand assets to be smuggled across the border or the ocean for the potential opportunity for limited access to America's "rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws"[7] Take away a person's rights, e.g. as confirmed in Connick, District Attorney, et al. v. Thompson No. 09–571 or Jeep v Obama and we have BOTH suffered an incalculable loss.
I would assert that it is a No-Brainer that the overwhelming majority of the voting public would want to see "Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws"[8] prosecuted criminally and civilly for the crime and a redress of the grievances to the party injured.  We have after all an UNDISPUTABLE First Amendment "right of the people… to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
When a citizen of the United States of America is deprived of his or her INDIVIDUAL Constitutional Rights it is a crime against the Constitution.  If we truly want to be a civilization of free and equal persons, we have to establish Justice to ENFORCE Constitutional Rights with civil and criminal prosecution of the Rule of Law.
The Supreme Court FIVE,[9] with a self-serving, self-made unconstitutional ministerial rule,[10] has again said NO Person and or Authority acting under color of law has any civil or criminal liability for "any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws"[11] unless and until it can be shown that the rights of SEVERAL similarly associated individuals have been denied their constitutional rights also.  The Supreme Court FIVE[12]  acknowledges the denial of rights with their apathy and do nothing to establish Justice… the establishment, enforcement and confirmation of "any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws."[13]  Supreme Court FIVE's[14] self-serving, self-made unconstitutional ministerial rule asserts that if someone robs you, you have to prove, at your own expense, that they robbed several other people in similarly associated acts before they can be criminally or civilly prosecuted for your individual loss.
The XIV Amendment says, "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."  The constitution in its most recent and related reference, the XIV Amendment, assured the individual PERSON's at once vested rights.  There is no reference to having to show that several other people have had their "rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws" similarly criminally deprived.  Furthermore, the First Amendment assures "the right of the people… to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
"The very essence of civil liberty certainly consists in the right of every individual to claim the protection of the laws whenever he receives an injury. One of the first duties of government is to afford that protection. In Great Britain, the King[15] himself is sued in the respectful form of a petition, and he never fails to comply with the judgment of his court." Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 Page 5 U. S. 163 (1803)

This is INSANITY!!!!  We are just suppose to take it on the chin for the greater good.  And somehow IGNORE the deprivation of our “rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws[1]




We do not have any individually enforceable rights in this country, "Everybody, BUT the innocent victim, has "ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY"" for the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America e.g.,  To Kill a Mocking Bird, The Denial of Due ProcessThe Exclusionary Rule, Grounds for Impeachment  (Jeep v Obama, Jeep v United States of America (10-1947), Jeep v Jones (07-11115))

DGJeep"The Earth and everything that's in it" (http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/)
Monday, April 11, 2011, 4:02:35 PM 0000 Blank Issue Paper REV 02 .doc



[3] TITLE 18—CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, PART I—CRIMES, CHAPTER 13—CIVIL RIGHTS § 241. A Conspiracy against rights -- They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
[4] David Perley Lowe (born near Utica, NY, August 22, 1823 - died April 10, 1882) was a Representative from Kansas. Quoted from Congressional debate of the 1871 Civil Rights Act (currently codified as Title Civil 42 U.S.C. § 1983) Cong. Globe, 42nd Cong., 1st Sess., App. 166-167. Monroe v. Pape, 365 U. S. 167 (1961) Page 365 U. S. 175
[10] I would assert it is Grounds for Impeachment
[15] It should be noted that as early as 1215 in the Magna Carta (§ 61) The King acknowledge that he had responsibility for the actions of his Judges and assumed the liability of the right of Redress for their actions. ""If we, our chief justice (judges), our officials, or any of our servants offend in any respect against any man, or transgress any of the articles of the peace or of this security… they shall come to us - or in our absence from the kingdom to the chief justice - to declare it and claim immediate redress… by seizing our castles, lands, possessions, or anything else saving only our own person and those of the queen and our children, until they have secured such redress as they have determined upon." "




--
Thanks in advance


To Kill a Mocking Bird, The Denial of Due Process

"Agere sequitur esse"
"Time is of the essence"
David G. Jeep
http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/
E-mail is preferred Dave@DGJeep.com, DGJeep@DGJeep.com
(314) 514-5228

David G. Jeep
c/o The Bridge
1610 Olive Street,
Saint Louis, MO 63103-2316