Monday, May 9, 2011

Why don’t we just cut out the middleman and submit ourselves directly to the criminals? Monday, May 09, 2011, 4:25:00 PM The Prosecution Rests, but I Can't CONNICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ET AL. v. THOMPSON (3/29/11)


Why don't we just cut out the middleman and submit ourselves directly to the criminals?
Monday, May 09, 2011, 4:25:00 PM

Why is there such a big issue in holding our Civil Servants liable for "the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America?"[1]  What is their function if not to enforce the law within the confines of "any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America?"
Why do we have Judge, Prosecutors, Police, point in fact "all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process,"[2] if they can criminally use the Color of Law to randomly, maliciously, corruptly or incompetently Steal, Kidnap, and Murder by depriving the innocent victim's "rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America."  Why don't we just cut out the middleman and submit ourselves directly to the criminals?

This Constitution -  is suppose to secures us:

"We the People of the United States, in Order to … establish Justice… to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

Article 4., Section 2
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

Article 6., 2nd Paragraph
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

Amendment 1
Congress shall make no law… abridging… the right of the people… to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Amendment 14, Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State herein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

The Laws - Statute law secures us:

TITLE 42--THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE CHAPTER 21--CIVIL RIGHTS SUBCHAPTER I—GENERALLY  Sec. 1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights: Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress

and

TITLE 18—CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, PART I—CRIMES, CHAPTER 13—CIVIL RIGHTS § 241. A Conspiracy against rights -- If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same.
They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping (they stole everything and then kidnapped my son) or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill (they attempted to kill Mr. Thompson), they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

All Treaties made secures us:
"The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights[3]" as adopted by the United Nations[4] on 12/16/66, and signed by the United States on October 5, 1977 secures for third world countries and the United States of America:

PART II, Article 2, Section 3.
Each State Party to the present Covenant undertakes:
(a)  To ensure that any person whose rights or freedoms as herein recognized are violated shall have an effective remedy, notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity;
(b)  To ensure that any person claiming such a remedy shall have his right thereto determined by competent judicial, administrative or legislative authorities, or by any other competent authority provided for by the legal system of the State, and to develop the possibilities of judicial remedy;
To ensure that the competent authorities shall enforce such remedies when granted
We will HAVE NONE of that!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 
We will HAVE Supreme Court Precedent, CONNICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ET AL. v. THOMPSON (3/29/11), that requires the innocent victim, while possibly being impoverished, destitute, homeless and alone on the street, like myself, or convicted in jail on death row like Mr. Thompson, to prove that the criminals that stole from the innocent victim, the criminals that kidnapped[5] the innocent victim's children, the criminals that attempted to MURDER[6] the innocent victim did the EXACT same thing to several other innocent victims in a timely and consistent pattern.  If the innocent victim does not prove all that, the innocent victim has NO HOPE for substantive justice from the government of the people, by the people and for the people for the criminal government actions.  Even if the innocent victim repeatedly "petition the Government for a redress of grievances.Judicial precedent deprives the innocent victim of the right to substantive justice between the government and the people[7]!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Why don't we just cut out the middleman and submit ourselves directly to the criminals?

The Right of Petition is the right to substantive justice between the government and the people.  We do not have any individually enforceable rights in this country, "Everybody, BUT the innocent victim, has "ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY"" for the deprivation of "any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America"[8] e.g., To Kill a Mocking Bird, The Denial of Due Process, The Exclusionary Rule, Grounds for Impeachment, Jeep v Obama, Jeep v United States of America 10-1947, Jeep v Jones "The most humble Petition for a Wirt of Certiorari to the Supreme Court 07-11115."

DGJeep"The Earth and everything that's in it" (http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/)
Monday, May 09, 2011, 4:25:00 PM 2011 05-09-11 Constitutional ISSUES  REV 02.doc



[3] "The Covenant is presented for both its binding force as "Supreme Law of the Land", and also for its persuasive force in reason, to help understand the nature of our own Petition Clause, that it is a law of reason freely chosen by our founders: If we now choose it freely as a basis for the organization of free nations, why should we presume that it was less compelling when our Founding Fathers brought the Thirteen Colonies together under one Constitution?" 31 U. WEST L.A. L. REV. ( Summer 2000 ) JOHN E. WOLFGRAM
[4] "And if you think that is a national problem, consider that the United States is by far the World's greatest power; it is not accountable to its own people for its abuses of power, and that abuse of power flows freely into international circles. Given that reality, there is not a nation in the world that should not fear us in the same way that a reasonable person fears a child with a gun." 31 U. WEST L.A. L. REV. ( Summer 2000 ) JOHN E. WOLFGRAM
[5] TITLE 18—CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, PART I—CRIMES, CHAPTER 13—CIVIL RIGHTS § 241. A Conspiracy against rights -- They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping (they kidnapped my son) or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill (they attempted to kill Mr. Thompson), they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
[6] TITLE 18—CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, PART I—CRIMES, CHAPTER 13—CIVIL RIGHTS § 241. A Conspiracy against rights -- They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping (they kidnapped my son) or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill (they attempted to kill Mr. Thompson), they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
[7] Anybody that actually even wants to NOT believe this ought to read the Declaration of Independence.  And if you think all our forefathers wanted when they "In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury" was to be free to endlessly petition without any force of law to establish the right to substantive justice between government and governed.  You are INSANE!!!!!!!!!!!!!



--
Thanks in advance


To Kill a Mocking Bird, The Denial of Due Process

"Agere sequitur esse"
"Time is of the essence"
David G. Jeep
http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/
E-mail is preferred Dave@DGJeep.com, DGJeep@DGJeep.com
(314) 514-5228

David G. Jeep
c/o The Bridge
1610 Olive Street,
Saint Louis, MO 63103-2316