"My
definition of a free society is a society where it is safe to be unpopular."
Adlai
E. Stevenson Jr.
"A
country in which nobody is ever really responsible is
a country in which nobody is ever truly safe."[1]
Thursday, September 29, 2011, 6:10:50 PM
No One is safe in America today,
not the popular people, not the unpopular people. The establishment of Justice[3] is NO longer possible. We the People are forced to accept
corruption in our Judicial process in the form of corrupt Judges, Prosecutors,
Police and "all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were
integral parts of the judicial process." [4]
"It is a general and indisputable
rule that where there is a legal right, there is also a legal remedy by suit or
action at law whenever that right is invaded."[5] "It is a settled and invariable
principle in the laws of England that every right, when withheld, must have a
remedy, and every injury its proper redress." [6] WRONG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
HOW CAN We the People BE
SAFE??
Our Supreme Court has abolished
any accountability for rights with their impunity of ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY…
"This immunity applies even when the judge is accused of acting
maliciously and corruptly."[7] "To be sure, this immunity does
leave the genuinely wronged defendant without civil redress against a
prosecutor whose malicious or dishonest action deprives him of liberty."[8] "There is, of course, the
possibility that, despite the truthfinding safeguards of the judicial process,
some defendants might indeed be unjustly convicted on the basis of knowingly
false testimony by police officers."[9] In short the Supreme Court precedent
asserts "absolute immunity… for all persons -- governmental or
otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process." [10]Where do We the People go for the protection of the law when "all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process" have ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY for the "deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America"[11]?????
The ministerial grant of "Absolute Immunity,"[12] by and for ministers, is a massive, at the highest levels, ministerial, unconstitutional and "unlawful Conspiracy"[13] "before out of Court"[14] to obfuscate "false and malicious Persecutions."[15]
"Immunity is given to crime, and the records of the public tribunals are searched in vain for any evidence of effective redress." "The courts are in many instances under the control of those who are wholly inimical to the impartial administration of law and equity." I say it NOW, 2011!!! Justice William O. Douglas said it in 1961 and 1967. [16] Mr. Lowe of Kansas and Mr. Rainey of South Carolina respectively said it originally in 1871[17].
for condoning the denial of a Constitutionally secured and
congressionally un-abridge-able right to justice and
"fraud upon the court."
Impeach the Supreme Court FIVE
for verifiable NOT "good Behaviour,[19]" denying the establishment of
justice and abridging a Constitutionally secured and congressionally un-abridge-able
right, with their deprivation of substantive 7th Amendment[20] justice between the government and the
people, Connick, District Attorney, et al.
v. Thompson No. 09–571 Decided March 29, 2011 and "fraud
upon the court" with Ashcroft v. al-Kidd No. 10–98 Decided May 31, 2011!!!
The Right of Petition is the
right to substantive justice between the government and the people. We do not
have any individually enforceable rights in this country, "Everybody, BUT
the innocent victim, has "ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY"" for the "deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities
secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America"[21] e.g., To Kill
a Mocking Bird, The Denial of Due Process, The Exclusionary Rule, Grounds for
Impeachment, Jeep v Obama, Jeep v United States of America 10-1947, Jeep v
Jones "The most humble Petition for a Wirt of Certiorari to the Supreme
Court 07-11115."
DGJeep "The Earth and
everything that's in it" (www.dgjeep.blogspot.com)
Thursday, September 29, 2011,
6:10:50 PM,
[2] Op-Ed Contributor, The Prosecution Rests, but I Can't, By JOHN THOMPSON, Published: April 9, 2011 New York Times regarding Connick, District Attorney, et al. v. Thompson No. 09–571 Decided March 29, 2011
[3] "We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America." The Constitution for the United States of America June 21, 1788
[4] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 339 (1983) ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY for all persons
[5] Chief Justice John Marshal in Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 163 (1803) establishing Supreme Court precedent and quoting English common law per the Commentaries on the Laws of England, the 18th-century treatise on the common law of England by Sir William Blackstone
[6] Ibid. Chief Justice John Marshal in Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 163 (1803) quoting English common law
[7] Bradley v. Fisher, supra, 80 U. S. 335, 80 U. S. 349, note, at 80 U. S. 350, Pierson v. Ray, 386 U. S. 57 (1967) Judicial ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY
[8] Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U. S. 428 (1976) Prosecutorial ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY
[9] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 345 (1983) Police ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY
[10] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 339 (1983) ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY for all persons
[11] Title Criminal 18, U.S.C, § 241 & 242, and Title Civil 42 U.S.C. § 1983 & 1985
[12] "absolute immunity… for all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process" for the "deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws." Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983) @ Page 460 U. S. 335
[13] Lord Coke Floyd and Barker (1607) "Judge or Justice of Peace: and the Law will not admit any proof against this vehement and violent presumption of Law, that a Justice sworn to do Justice will do injustice; but if he hath conspired before out of Court, this is extrajudicial; but due examination of Causes out of Court, and inquiring by Testimonies, Et similia, is not any Conspiracy, for this he ought to do; but subornation of Witnesses, and false and malicious Persecutions, out of Court, to such whom he knowes will be Indictors, to find any guilty, &c. amounts to an unlawful Conspiracy."
[14] Lord Coke Floyd and Barker (1607)
[15] Lord Coke Floyd and Barker (1607)
[16] Monroe v. Pape, 365 U. S. 167 (1961) and Pierson v. Ray, 386 U. S. 559 (1967)
[17] Cong.Globe, 42d Cong., 1st Sess., 374 & 394
[18] Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Anthony Kennedy, and Chief Justice John G. Roberts
[19] Article III Section 1 the Constitution for the United States of America "The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour"
[20] Amendment VII In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
[21] Title Criminal 18, U.S.C, § 241 & 242, and Title Civil 42 U.S.C. § 1983 & 1985
--
Thanks in advance
To Kill a Mocking Bird, The Denial of Due Process
"agere sequitor esse"
"Time is of the essence"
David G. Jeep
http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/
E-mail is preferred Dave@DGJeep.com, DGJeep@DGJeep.com
(314) 514-5228
David G. Jeep
c/o The Bridge
1610 Olive Street,
Saint Louis, MO 63103-2316
--
Posted By Blogger to "The Earth and everything that's in it" at 9/29/2011 06:24:00 PM
