The Supreme Court works for
"We the People"
Things are not as they were!
"A country in which nobody is ever really responsible is
a country in which nobody is ever truly safe."
Wednesday, October 12, 2011, 12:31:51 PM
The Prosecution Rests, but I Can't
I do not think there should be any mistake. The Supreme Court works for "We the People." "We the People" have via OUR president and legislature enacted health care reform. We are at liberty to do this because we have secured the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity. We did this to promote the general Welfare. Those powers are BOTH enumerated in our PREAMBLE to the Constitution. Because some of you cannot read I quote:
"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty the United States of America."
"We the People" went further to REITERATE and INSTITUTIONALIZE our intentions with:
"The Congress shall have Power To… provide for the… general Welfare of the United States" (Article. I. Section. 8. Paragraph 1).
"To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof" (Article. I. Section. 8. Paragraph 9).
The Conservatives among our Judiciary want to invoke Judicial Review to negate the WILL of "We the People." This will not FLY!!!!! Things are not as they were!
The Royalist Unaccountable Supreme Court VOIDED the Civil Rights Act (1876) with their malicious, corrupt and unconstitutional ruling in Civil Rights Cases, 109 U.S. 3 (1883) and then iced the cake with Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896) creating the concept and sanctioning 100 years of government sponsored "Separate and Unequal." Things are not as they were!
The Royalist Unaccountable Supreme Court of the United States got away with corrupting the will "We the People" post Civil War. The Royalist Unaccountable Judiciary is directly and unequivocally responsible for 100 years (1865-Civil Rights Act 1964) of Jim Crow's racial unrest and criminal malfeasants after the end of the American Civil War (1861–1865).
The majority of the victorious We the People as represented by BOTH houses of congress and the President in 1876 NEVER wanted segregation. The Majority of We the People as represented by BOTH houses of congress and Presidents passed into law AMENDMENT XIII (December 6, 1865), AMENDMENT XIV (July 9, 1868), AMENDMENT XV (February 3, 1870), The Civil Rights Act of 1866 and 1871, Force Acts of 1870-1875, and the ANTI-Segregationist Civil Rights Act (1876). The Royalist Unaccountable Supreme Court of the United States got away with corrupting the will "We the People" post Civil War for 100 years with their fraudulent malicious and unconstitutional ruling in Civil Rights Cases, 109 U.S. 3 (1883) and then iced the cake with Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896). Things are not as they were!
"We the People" have learned from past mistakes!!!!
The ministerial grant of "Absolute Immunity," by and for ministers, is a massive, at the highest levels, ministerial, unconstitutional and "unlawful Conspiracy" "before out of Court" to obfuscate "false and malicious Persecutions."
"Immunity is given to crime, and the records of the public tribunals are searched in vain for any evidence of effective redress." "The courts are in many instances under the control of those who are wholly inimical to the impartial administration of law and equity." I say it NOW, 2011!!! Justice William O. Douglas said it in 1961 and 1967.  Mr. Lowe of Kansas and Mr. Rainey of South Carolina respectively said it originally in 1871.
Impeach the Supreme Court FIVE
for condoning the denial of a Constitutionally secured and congressionally un-abridge-able right to justice and
"fraud upon the court."
Before they have a chance to screw-up Healthcare for
Impeach the Supreme Court FIVE for verifiable NOT "good Behaviour," denying the establishment of justice and abridging a Constitutionally secured and congressionally un-abridge-able right, with their deprivation of substantive 7th Amendment justice between the government and the people, Connick, District Attorney, et al. v. Thompson No. 09–571 Decided March 29, 2011 and "fraud upon the court" with Ashcroft v. al-Kidd No. 10–98 Decided May 31, 2011!!!
The Right of Petition is the right to substantive justice between the government and the people. We do not have any individually enforceable rights in this country, "Everybody, BUT the innocent victim, has "ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY"" for the "deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America" e.g., "To Kill a Mocking Bird, The Denial of Due Process," "The Exclusionary Rule," "Grounds for Impeachment," "Jeep v Obama, Jeep v United States of America 10-1947," "Jeep v Jones, The most humble Petition for a Wirt of Certiorari to the Supreme Court 07-11115."
DGJeep "The Earth and everything that's in it" (www.dgjeep.blogspot.com)
Wednesday, October 12, 2011, 12:31:51 PM, 2011 10-12-11 The Supreme Court works for We the People REV 01
 Op-Ed Contributor, The Prosecution Rests, but I Can't, By JOHN THOMPSON, Published: April 9, 2011 New York Times regarding Connick, District Attorney, et al. v. Thompson No. 09–571 Decided March 29, 2011
 Series of four acts passed by the U.S. Congress (1870–75) to protect the rights guaranteed to blacks by the 14th and 15th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States.
 Lord Coke Floyd and Barker (1607) "Judge or Justice of Peace: and the Law will not admit any proof against this vehement and violent presumption of Law, that a Justice sworn to do Justice will do injustice; but if he hath conspired before out of Court, this is extrajudicial; but due examination of Causes out of Court, and inquiring by Testimonies, Et similia, is not any Conspiracy, for this he ought to do; but subornation of Witnesses, and false and malicious Persecutions, out of Court, to such whom he knowes will be Indictors, to find any guilty, &c. amounts to an unlawful Conspiracy."
 Cong.Globe, 42d Cong., 1st Sess., 374 & 394
 Article III Section 1 the Constitution for the United States of America "The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour" Yes it is spelled wrong in the Constitution
 Amendment VII In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
Thanks in advance
To Kill a Mocking Bird, The Denial of Due Process
"agere sequitor esse"
"Time is of the essence"
David G. Jeep
http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/E-mail is preferred Dave@DGJeep.com, DGJeep@DGJeep.com
David G. Jeep
c/o The Bridge
1610 Olive Street,
Saint Louis, MO 63103-2316