The Blessings of Liberty
and
The Supreme Court
I sometimes feel like the waif in “The Emperor’s New Cloths”
AM I THE ONLY ONE
THAT CAN SEE IT??
“A country
in which nobody is ever really responsible is
Wednesday,
April 18, 2012, 6:16:31 AM
“We hold these truths to be
self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator
with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty
and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted
among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.”[4]
“We the People
of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic
Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure
the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain
and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”[5]
The concentration of power in
a single person or in an oligarchy e.g., the United States Supreme Court has over
time proved itself to be antithetical to the Blessings of Liberty
“Power tends to corrupt,
and absolute power corrupts
absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men, even when they exercise
influence and not authority, still more when you superadd the tendency or the certainty
of corruption by authority. There is no
worse heresy than that the office sanctifies the holder of it.”[11]
For this reason “We the People”
attempted to disperse power with the Constitution of the United States of America by establishing
three separate branches of Government, with an inherent system of checks and balances
among them, the legislature (Article. I. , Section.
1., All legislative Powers. e.g., impeachment), the executive (Article. II., Section.
1., The executive Power), and the judicial[12]
(Article III., Section. 1., The judicial Power).
The checks and balances, within
the constitutional government of the United States of America, as in civilization
at large, was suppose to limit Liberty as an absolute right for any of the branches
of government. The legislature makes law,
has impeachment[13]
authority for the other two branches and has limited tenure based on electability,
the executive then administers the law and has limited tenure based on
electability and, supposedly, the judiciary administers justice, via the
ancient, established, procedural and substantive Due Process of Law, to settle disputes
that arise under the law in support of the free-standing rule of law given “a
person of ordinary intelligence fair notice,”
[14]
liberty and justice for all DOES NOT have limited tenure.
The exact wording of the constitution
is “The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising
under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States Liberty and Justice under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States Liberty
The establishment of “Justice” was to be based on
Due Process of Law. Due Process of Law is
an established, ancient, procedural and substantive justice system for the dispassionate
protection of rights.
All constitutionally commissioned
federal employees take the oath of office 5 U.S.C. §3331
“I, [name], do solemnly
swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United
States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true
faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any
mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge
the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”
The Judicial Improvements Act
of 1990 (28 U. S.
C. § 453) established additionally the oath of office for constitutionally commissioned
judges as:
" I, [name],
do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without
respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will
faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me
as _________ under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God."
In spite of all
the checks and balances, in spite of having sworn to support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States, the Supreme Court has, with unashamed
hubris and sophistry,[17] circumvented the checks and balances created to constrain them,
and created ABSOLUTE POWER[18]
from ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY for the “malicious or corrupt” judges,[19]
the “malicious or dishonest” prosecutor,[20]
the “knowingly false testimony by police officers"[21]
and “all (malicious, corrupt, dishonest and incompetent[22])
persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial
process” [23]
acting under color of law to wit, ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION.
Because of the dysfunction in
our Legislature that has been sustained through earmarks, secret holds and the filibuster, our Legislature
cannot even do its primary job, passing effective legislation; much less effectively
assert their power of impeachment.[24] The delays caused by earmarks, secret holds and the filibuster has put
us decades behind the rest of the world as relates to Judicial Administration, Civil
Rights and Health Care. “With
5% of the world's population, our country now houses nearly 25% of the world's reported
prisoners”[25] and
the current state of our too
expensive healthcare system PROVES
IT! Are we 5 times as criminal?
Is our justice system 5 times as good?
Are our streets therefore 5 times as safe? Is our opened overpriced end of life care worth the
cost or would the money be better spent on well care?
I
read an article in the Washington Post “Convicted
defendants left uninformed of forensic flaws found by Justice Dept.” By Spencer
S. Hsu, [26][27]the
“malicious or corrupt” judges,[28] the “malicious or dishonest” prosecutor, [29] the “knowingly false testimony by police officers"[30] and “all (malicious, corrupt, dishonest and incompetent[31]) persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were
integral parts of the judicial process”
[32] acting under color of law to wit, ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION.
I
have been fighting for EIGHT years to get the Justice System, from local state court
to the United States Supreme Court to acknowledge and take responsibility for their
CORRUPTION, DISHONESTY, MALICE and INCOMPETENCE.[33] I have pushed
the issue, with uncontested undisputable evidence in hand, 4 times through the 8th Circuit
Federal Court of Appeals 07-2614, 08-1823, 10-1947 and 11-2425. I have been to the United States Supreme Court
twice
with Writs of Certiorari 07-11115 and 11-8211, with uncontested undisputable evidence
in hand and they REFUSE to acknowledge it much less take responsibility for it.
Justice and Civil rights are non-existent in the United States of America
We the
People now live at the discretion of the ABSOLUTE POWER of the
judiciary that has been criminally created from ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY for
the “malicious or corrupt” judges,[34] the
“malicious or dishonest” prosecutor, [35]
the “knowingly false testimony by police officers"[36]
and “all (malicious, corrupt, dishonest and incompetent[37])
persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial
process” [38]
acting under color of law to wit, ABSOLUTE
CORRUPTION. The ABSOLUTE
POWER enable by the “deliberate usurpation”[39] of ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY by the Supreme
Court for itself and others has enable ABSOLUTE
CORRUPTION.
The Supreme Court,
a delegated authority, under and criminally contrary to a sworn
to constitutional commission, has awarded themselves and others “absolute
immunity”[40] from said constitutional
commission to “do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they
forbid”[41] i.e.,
the “deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured
by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America”[42] by DENYING the constitutional checks and balances of We the People with the assurance
of governmental accountability 1st and 7th Amendment Justice,
law and equity?[43]
We the People have fallen under the despotic[44] spell of the concentrated power in the Supreme Court that
has created ABSOLUTE POWER[45] from ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY for the “malicious
or corrupt” judges,[46] the
“malicious or dishonest” prosecutor, [47]
the “knowingly false testimony by police officers"[48]
and “all (malicious, corrupt, dishonest and incompetent[49])
persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial
process” [50]
acting under color of law to wit, ABSOLUTE
CORRUPTION. The ABSOLUTE
POWER enable by the “deliberate usurpation”[51] of ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY by the Supreme
Court for itself and others has enable ABSOLUTE
CORRUPTION.
See Petition for a Writ of Certiorari 11-8211 Jeep v. Obama
I sometimes feel like the waif in “The Emperor’s New Cloths.” AM I THE ONLY ONE
THAT CAN SEE IT??
ANY assertion of personal ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY, without proof of divinity,
is a fraud, by any standard of Justice,
law and equity,[52] in a government of free and equal persons on
THIS PLANET!!!!!
ANY assertion of governmental ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY, acknowledging un-avoidable
human fallibility, is a fraud, by any standard of Justice, law and equity, in a government
of the people, by the people and for the people on THIS PLANET!!!!!
The ministerial[53] grant of “Absolute Immunity,”[54] by and for ministers, is a massive, at the
highest levels, ministerial, unconstitutional and “unlawful Conspiracy”[55] “before out of Court”[56] to obfuscate “false and malicious Persecutions.”[57]
“Immunity
is given to crime, and the records of the public tribunals are searched in vain
for any evidence of effective redress.” “The courts are in many instances
under the control of those who are wholly inimical to the impartial administration
of law and equity.” I say it NOW,
2011!!! Justice William O. Douglas said it in 1961 and 1967.
[58] Mr. Lowe of Kansas and Mr. Rainey of South Carolina
for condoning the denial of a Constitutionally secured
and congressionally un-abridge-able right to justice[61] and
"fraud upon the court."
Before they have a chance
to screw-up Healthcare for
100 years!!!!!!
Impeach the current Supreme Court FIVE for verifiable NOT "good
Behaviour,[62]" denying the establishment
of justice and abridging a Constitutionally secured and congressionally un-abridge-able
right to a redress of grievances,[63] with their deprivation
of substantive 7th Amendment[64] justice between the government
and the people, Connick, District
Attorney, et al. v. Thompson No. 09–571 Decided March 29, 2011 and
"fraud upon the court" with Ashcroft v. al-Kidd No. 10–98
Decided May 31, 2011!!!
The Right of Petition is the right to substantive
justice between the government and the people.
We do not have any individually enforceable rights in this country, "Everybody,
BUT the innocent victim, has "ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY"[65]"
for the “deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured
by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America”[66]
e.g., “To Kill a Mocking Bird, The Denial of Due Process,”[67]
“The Exclusionary Rule,” “Grounds for Impeachment.”
Most
of the 99% of Americans have not had the pleasure and are silently intimidated by
the prospect of being dragged through our corrupt COURTS kicking and screaming!!!!!! This should not be about the shibboleth of whether
this is a writ of coram nobis, writ of audita querela or writ of habeas
corpus. I have been kicking and screaming for nearly
8 years with undisputed evidence of the illegal and unconstitutional Judicial,[68] Prosecutorial,[69] Police,[70] Federal Constitutionally Commissioned Officers[71] and private[72] misconduct. I have
suffered through 411 days of illegal FEDERAL incarceration, 4 years of homelessness
and two psychological examinations. I ask
you to review Jeep v Obama 8th Circuit Court of Appeals case #11-2425,
Jeep v United States of America 10-1947,” Jeep v Bennett 08-1823, “Jeep v Jones
07-2614, and the most humble Petitions for a Wirt of Certiorari to the Supreme Court
07-11115 and 11-8211.”
I have referenced “To Kill a Mocking Bird,
The Denial of Due Process,” in several of my papers, I do so only because the facts
of the case in “To Kill a Mocking Bird” are generally known. The abuses are happening EVERYDAY in REAL
LIFE Mr. Thompson (No. 09–571),[73] Mr. Smith (No. 10-8145), [74] Mr. al-Kidd (No. 10–98)[75]
and me (USCA8 No. 11-2425).[76] The fact that “With 5% of the world's population,
our country now houses nearly 25% of the world's reported prisoners”[77] PROVES the existence of ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION; “We
the People” have NO ENFORCEABLE RIGHTS IN America
Evidence
as posted on this blog
Petitions for a Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court 07-11115 and 11-8211[78]
Petitions for a Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court 07-11115 and 11-8211[78]
DGJeep "The
Earth and everything that's in it" (www.dgjeep.blogspot.com)
Wednesday, April 18, 2012, 6:16:31 AM, 2012 04-18-12 The Blessings of Liberty And The Supreme Court REV 99RX
[1] “And if
you think that is a national problem, consider that the United States is by far
the World's greatest power; it is not accountable to its own people for its
abuses of power, and that abuse of power flows freely into international
circles. Given that reality, there is not a nation in the world that should not
fear us in the same way that a reasonable person fears a child with a gun.” 31
U. WEST L.A. L. REV . ( Summer 2000
) JOHN E. WOLFGRAM e.g., George Bush’s false representations of Weapons of
Mass Destruction in Iraq, “The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder” by
Famed prosecutor Vincent Bugliosi -
Underlining and parenthetical text added for emphasis.
[2] “Damages” By Dahlia Lithwick, Slate, posted Monday, Aug. 8, 2011, at 7:22 PM ET
underlining and foot note added
[3] Mr. Thompson in the New York Times in
response to the Supreme Court’s ruling in Connick, District Attorney,
et al. v. Thompson No. 09–571 Decided March 29, 2011
[6]
Justice without regard to equity impoverishes the victim at the expense of the
evil they have suffered. I have been
forced into poverty, homelessness for FOUR YEARS! The 1st Amendment secures the
constitutional right to a lawfully un-abridge-able justifiable redress of
grievance from the government: “Congress shall make no law abridging the
right of the people to petition the Government for a redress of
grievances.” The 7th Amendment secures the
right to settle all suits: “In Suits at
common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the
right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a
jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than
according to the rules of the common law” assures justice as regards
equity.
[7]
FEDERALIST No. 51, “The Structure of the Government Must Furnish the Proper
Checks and Balances Between the Different Departments” by James Madison, For
the Independent Journal. Wednesday, February 6, 17 88.
[8]
“Predictability, or as Llewellyn put it,
"reckonability," is a needful characteristic of any law worthy of the
name.” Antonin Scalia: The Rule of Law as a Law of
Rules, 56 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1175, 1175-81 (1989)
[9] SYKES v. UNITED STATES Cite
as: 564 U. S. ____ (2011) 7, SCALIA, J., dissenting, United States v.
Batchelder, 442 U. S. 123 “It is a fundamental tenet of due process that
"[n]o one may be required at peril of life, liberty or property to
speculate as to the meaning of penal statutes." Lanzetta v. New Jersey , 306 U. S.
451, 306 U. S.
453 (1939). A criminal statute is
therefore invalid if it "fails to
give a person of ordinary intelligence fair notice that his contemplated
conduct (probable cause) is forbidden." United States
v. Harriss, 347 U. S. 612,
347 U. S.
617 (1954). See Connally v. General
Construction Co., 269 U. S. 385, 269 U. S. 391-393 (1926); Papachristou v.
Jacksonville, 405 U. S. 156, 405 U. S. 162
(1972); Dunn v. United States, ante at 442 U. S. 112-113. (Underlining
and parenthetical text added for emphasis)
[11] John Emerich Edward Dalberg-Acton, 1st
Baron Acton, KCVO, DL (10
January 1834 – 19 June 1902), known as Lord Acton, wrote
to scholar and ecclesiastic Mandell Creighton, April 1887
(emphasis and underlining added)
[12]
the administration of justice: judicial proceedings; the judicial system.
[13]
ESPECIALLY as impeachment relates to the JUDICIARY with otherwise unlimited
tenure I quote from Alexander Hamilton in FEDERALIST No. 81, “And the
inference is greatly fortified by the consideration of the important
constitutional check which the power of instituting impeachments
in one part of the legislative body, and of determining upon them in the other,
would give to that body upon the members of the judicial department. This is
alone a complete security. There never can be danger that the judges, by a
series of deliberate usurpations on the authority of the legislature, would
hazard the united resentment of the body intrusted with it, while this body was
possessed of the means of punishing their presumption, by degrading them from
their stations. While this ought to remove all apprehensions on the subject, it
affords, at the same time, a cogent argument for constituting the Senate a
court for the trial of impeachments.” Alexander Hamilton in FEDERALIST No.
81, “The Judiciary Continued, and the Distribution of the Judicial Authority”
From McLEAN's Edition, New York .
Wednesday, May 28,
17 88 stated that impeachment was to be used as an integral check
for “Judicial Authority”
[15]
The Constitution for the United
States of America , Article III., Section. 1.
[16]
the system of courts of justice in a country
[17]
As regards Judges Thomas Jefferson said
“the law is nothing more than an ambiguous text, to be explained by his
sophistry into any meaning which may subserve his personal malice” (letter To John Tyler Monticello,
May 26, 1810)
[18] "All power tends to corrupt and absolute
power corrupts absolutely.” Lord Acton, John Emerich Edward (1949) wrote to scholar and ecclesiastic Mandell Creighton,
April 1887
[19] Bradley v. Fisher, supra, 80 U. S. 335, 80 U. S. 349,
note, at 80 U. S. 350, Pierson v. Ray, 386 U. S. 57
(1967) Judicial ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY is based on a skewed reading, overlooking the noted exception that absolute ANYTHING creates,
of Lord
Coke, Floyd
and Barker (1607) ruling from an acknowledged CORRUPT court, the
Star Chamber.
[22] Incompetence is the most insidious and it is
covered up by the gratuitous grant of malice, corruption and dishonesty!!!!
[23] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S.
345 (1983) ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY for “all persons --
governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process”
[24]
“And the inference is greatly fortified by the consideration of the
important constitutional check which the power of
instituting impeachments in one part of the legislative body, and
of determining upon them in the other, would give to that body upon the members
of the judicial department. This is alone a complete security. There never can
be danger that the judges, by a series of deliberate usurpations on the authority
of the legislature, would hazard the united resentment of the body intrusted
with it, while this body was possessed of the means of punishing their
presumption, by degrading them from their stations. While this ought to remove
all apprehensions on the subject, it affords, at the same time, a cogent
argument for constituting the Senate a court for the trial of impeachments.”
Alexander Hamilton in FEDERALIST No. 81, “The Judiciary Continued, and the
Distribution of the Judicial Authority” From McLEAN's Edition, New York . Wednesday, May 28, 17 88
stated that impeachment was to be used as an integral check for “Judicial
Authority”
[25]
“With 5% of the world's
population, our country now houses nearly 25% of the world's reported prisoners”
and you have the moronic audacity to ask why???? “Why We Must Fix Our Prisons”,
By Senator Jim Webb, Parade Magazine published: 03/29/2009 , U.S. Imprisons One in 100
Adults, Report Finds New York Times, By ADAM
LIPTAK, Published: February
29, 2008 , Our Real Prison Problem. Why
are we so worried about Gitmo? Newsweek by Dahlia Lithwick Published
June 5, 2009
[26] Incompetence is the most insidious and it is
covered up by the gratuitous grant of malice, corruption and dishonesty!!!!
[27] Incompetence is the most insidious and it is
covered up by the gratuitous grant of malice, corruption and dishonesty!!!!
[28] Bradley v. Fisher, supra, 80 U. S. 335, 80 U. S. 349,
note, at 80 U. S. 350, Pierson v. Ray, 386 U. S. 57
(1967) Judicial ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY is based on a skewed reading, overlooking the noted exception that absolute ANYTHING creates,
of Lord
Coke, Floyd
and Barker (1607) ruling from an acknowledged CORRUPT court, the
Star Chamber.
[31] Incompetence is the most insidious and it is
covered up by the gratuitous grant of malice, corruption and dishonesty!!!!
[32] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S.
345 (1983) ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY for “all persons --
governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process”
[33] Incompetence is the most insidious and it is
covered up by the gratuitous grant of malice, corruption and dishonesty!!!!
[34] Bradley v. Fisher, supra, 80 U. S. 335, 80 U. S. 349,
note, at 80 U. S. 350, Pierson v. Ray, 386 U. S. 57
(1967) Judicial ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY is based on a skewed reading, overlooking the noted exception that absolute ANYTHING creates,
of Lord
Coke, Floyd
and Barker (1607) ruling from an acknowledged CORRUPT court, the
Star Chamber.
[37] Incompetence is the most insidious and it is
covered up by the gratuitous grant of malice, corruption and dishonesty!!!!
[38] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S.
345 (1983) ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY for “all persons -- governmental
or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process”
[39]
“And the inference is greatly fortified by the consideration of the
important constitutional check which the power of
instituting impeachments in one part of the legislative body, and
of determining upon them in the other, would give to that body upon the members
of the judicial department. This is alone a complete security. There never can
be danger that the judges, by a series of deliberate usurpations
on the authority of the legislature, would hazard the united resentment of the
body intrusted with it, while this body was possessed of the means of punishing
their presumption, by degrading them from their stations. While this ought to
remove all apprehensions on the subject, it affords, at the same time, a cogent
argument for constituting the Senate a court for the trial of impeachments.”
Alexander Hamilton in FEDERALIST No. 81, “The Judiciary Continued, and the
Distribution of the Judicial Authority” From McLEAN's Edition, New York . Wednesday, May 28, 17 88
stated that impeachment was to be used as an integral check for “Judicial
Authority”
[40]
“absolute immunity from
subsequent damages liability for all persons -- governmental or otherwise --
who were integral parts of the judicial process.” Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S.
325 (1983) @ Page 460 U. S. 335
(parenthetical non italic text added for clarity)
[41]
Alexander Hamilton June of 1788 at the ratification of the Constitution for the
United States of America, The Federalist Papers No. 78, “The Judiciary
Department”
[42]
Title Criminal 18, U.S.C, § 241 & 242, and Title
Civil 42 U.S.C. § 1983 & 1985
The absence of exigent circumstances should be noted.
[43]
Justice without regard to equity impoverishes the victim at the expense of the
evil they have suffered. I have been
forced into poverty, homelessness for FOUR YEARS! The 1st Amendment secures the
constitutional right to a lawfully un-abridge-able justifiable redress of
grievance from the government: “Congress shall make no law abridging the
right of the people to petition the Government for a redress of
grievances.” The 7th Amendment secures the
right to settle all suits: “In Suits at
common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the
right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a
jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than
according to the rules of the common law” assures justice as regards
equity.
[44] Montesquieu in his “De l'Espirit des Lois”
(1748) (The Spirit of the Law) defines three main kinds of political systems:
republican, monarchical, and despotic.
Driving each classification of political system, according to Montesquieu,
must be what he calls a "principle". This principle acts as a spring
or motor to motivate behavior on the part of the citizens in ways that will
tend to support that regime and make it function smoothly. For democratic
republics (and to a somewhat lesser extent for aristocratic republics), this
spring is the love of virtue -- the willingness to put the
interests of the community ahead of private interests. For monarchies, the
spring is the love of honor -- the desire to attain greater rank
and privilege. Finally, for despotisms, the spring is the fear of the
ruler. We
the People have currently despotic system in that we have NO enforceable rights in America
[45] "All power tends to corrupt and absolute
power corrupts absolutely.” Lord Acton, John Emerich Edward (1949) wrote to scholar and ecclesiastic Mandell Creighton,
April 1887
[46] Bradley v. Fisher, supra, 80 U. S. 335, 80 U. S. 349,
note, at 80 U. S. 350, Pierson v. Ray, 386 U. S. 57
(1967) Judicial ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY is based on a skewed reading, overlooking the noted exception that absolute ANYTHING creates,
of Lord
Coke, Floyd
and Barker (1607) ruling from an acknowledged CORRUPT court, the
Star Chamber.
[49] Incompetence is the most insidious and it is
covered up by the gratuitous grant of malice, corruption and dishonesty!!!!
[50] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S.
345 (1983) ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY for “all persons --
governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process”
[51]
“And the inference is greatly fortified by the consideration of the
important constitutional check which the power of
instituting impeachments in one part of the legislative body, and
of determining upon them in the other, would give to that body upon the members
of the judicial department. This is alone a complete security. There never can
be danger that the judges, by a series of deliberate usurpations
on the authority of the legislature, would hazard the united resentment of the
body intrusted with it, while this body was possessed of the means of punishing
their presumption, by degrading them from their stations. While this ought to
remove all apprehensions on the subject, it affords, at the same time, a cogent
argument for constituting the Senate a court for the trial of impeachments.”
Alexander Hamilton in FEDERALIST No. 81, “The Judiciary Continued, and the
Distribution of the Judicial Authority” From McLEAN's Edition, New York . Wednesday, May 28, 17 88
stated that impeachment was to be used as an integral check for “Judicial
Authority”
[52]
Justice without regard to equity impoverishes the victim at the expense of the evil they have suffered. I have been forced into homelessness for FOUR
YEARS! The 1st Amendment
secures the constitutional right to a lawfully un-abridge-able redress of
grievance from the government: “Congress shall make no law abridging the
right of the people to petition the Government for a redress of
grievances.” The 7th Amendment’s secures the
right to settle all disputes/suits: “In
Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty
dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a
jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than
according to the rules of the common law” assures justice as regards
equity.
[53] Ministerially created rules are SECONDARY, in
a Democratic Constitutional form of government, to the will of the people as
specifically expressed in the Constitution and the Statute law. For anyone to ministerially grant immunity
from the Constitution and Statute law is to act in direct conflict with the
tenor of the commission under which the MINISTERIAL authority was granted.
[54] “absolute immunity… for all persons --
governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process”
for the “deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the
Constitution and laws.” Briscoe
v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983) @ Page 460 U. S. 335
[55] Lord Coke Floyd
and Barker (1607) “Judge or Justice of Peace: and the Law
will not admit any proof against this vehement and violent presumption of Law,
that a Justice sworn to do Justice will do injustice; but if he hath
conspired before out of Court, this is extrajudicial; but due
examination of Causes out of Court, and inquiring by Testimonies, Et similia,
is not any Conspiracy, for this he ought to do; but subornation of Witnesses,
and false and malicious Persecutions, out of Court, to such whom
he knowes will be Indictors, to find any guilty, &c. amounts to an
unlawful Conspiracy.”
[61]
Justice without regard to equity impoverishes the victim at the expense of the evil they have suffered. I have been forced into homelessness for FOUR
YEARS! The 1st Amendment
secures the constitutional right to a lawfully un-abridge-able redress of
grievance from the government: “Congress shall make no law abridging the
right of the people to petition the Government for a redress of
grievances.” The 7th Amendment’s secures the
right to settle all disputes/suits: “In
Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty
dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a
jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than
according to the rules of the common law” assures justice as regards
equity.
[62] Article III Section 1 the Constitution for
the United States of America
"The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their
Offices during good Behaviour" Yes it is spelled wrong in the Constitution
[63]
1st Amendment, “Congress shall make no law abridging the right of the people
to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
[64] Amendment VII
In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty
dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a
jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States , than according to
the rules of the common law.
[65] “absolute immunity… for all persons --
governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process”
for the “deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the
Constitution and laws.” Briscoe
v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983) @ Page 460 U. S. 335
[67] Mr. Hoar of Massachusetts
[68]
Judge Goeke and Commissioner Jones 07-2614, Judges Bennett and Colyer, 08-1823
(combined as 10-1947 and 11-2425)
[69]
Prosecutors Devin M. Ledom, W. Steven Rives, W. James Icenogle, 08-1823
(combined as 10-1947 and 11-2425)
[70]
Police Alex Little, Officer Badge #920 and Tim Taylor Officer Badge #913,
08-1823 (combined as 10-1947 and 11-2425)
[71]
Topped off by the criminal cover-up and denial by the Federal Justice system
including the Supreme Court, the President of United states, the Attorneys
General Federal and state, the FBI and USMS. 07-2614, 08-1823, 10-1946, and
11-2425
[72]
Sharon G. Jeep and Kristen M. Capps 07-2614 (combined as 10-1947 and 11-2425)
[76] See also USCA8 07-2614,08-1823,10-1947,11-2425
and Writs of Certiorari to the Supreme Court 07-11115&11-8211
[77]
“With 5% of the world's
population, our country now houses nearly 25% of the world's reported prisoners”
and you have the moronic audacity to ask why???? “Why We Must Fix Our Prisons”,
By Senator Jim Webb, Parade Magazine published: 03/29/2009 , U.S. Imprisons One in 100
Adults, Report Finds New York Times, By ADAM
LIPTAK, Published: February
29, 2008 , Our Real Prison Problem. Why
are we so worried about Gitmo? Newsweek by Dahlia Lithwick Published
June 5, 2009
[78]
No. 11-8211 Title:
David G. Jeep, Petitioner v. Barack H. Obama, President of the United States ,
et al.
Docketed: January 10, 2012
~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and
Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
