Rawlsian Justice
And
The
GOP
I
sometimes feel like the waif in "The Emperor's New Cloths"
AM I THE ONLY ONE THAT CAN SEE IT??
"A
country in which nobody is ever really responsible is
Friday, June 29, 2012, 4:13:13 PM
“Justice is the end of
government. It is the end of civil society. It ever has been and ever will be
pursued until it be obtained, or until liberty be lost in the pursuit.” It is all about Rawlsian Justice.[4] There is no
way to stop the inevitable realization of "A Theory of Justice." It
is not about economic policy it is about JUSTICE!!!!! The GOP[5] just does not
get it. Inflation is the only tool short of blood shed that will fix our
current economic issue!!!!! The conservatives in this country are sitting on
all the capital. They assert it is their rights as free market capitalist
Americans and it is. Let them sit on their capital, capital is worth nothing if
can not be maintained.
We the People need to start
spending on a better world. We need to get the money out of the mattresses and
into an economy that is driven by and for a better world. Health is just the
start. We need to educate EVERYONE for FREE!!! We need to believe in ourselves
again. Believe that We the People make this country GREAT!!! It
is not about money hoarders and capitalist. We could quite literally wake up
tomorrow and eliminate the money hoarders hold on the economy by letting loose
INFLATION!!!! Old money sitting in the bank gathering moss from lack of
activity is literally not worth ANYTHING!!!!!
The money hoarders won't invest, won't be entrepreneur
the return is not enough. The government needs to do it to change their way of
thinking. We need t START spending money on a BETTER WORLD, nuclear fuels,
better roads, better schools better everything!!!!
How can the malice, corruption, dishonesty
and incompetence[6] condoned and
supported by Supreme Court precedent be constitutional in a SANE government of
the people, by the people and for the people?
This is a massive malicious, corrupt,
dishonest and incompetent[7] self-serving
conspiracy against rights!!!
Historically, the claim of precedent and / or consensus
has been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by
claiming that the matter is already settled. Absolute Immunity even in the
supreme Court has NEVER been established without, in most cases, multiple
dissenting opinions.
To assume that the founding fathers, who had enacted the
Constitution of the United States of America as the supreme Law of the Land,
intended sub silentio to exempt[8]
ANYONE, all evidence to the contrary, especially those tasked with judicial,[9]
prosecutorial[10]and
enforcement[11]
power from its paramount binding authority is an incredible fantastic or
delusional scenario.[12]
There are no royal absolutely
immune ruling persons/class in this country i.e., no titles of nobility.[15]
We the People incorporated ourselves, in 1788, into a government
of the people, by the people and for the people to secure the Blessings of
Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity with a lawfully un-abridge-able right of
the people to justifiably petition the Government for a redress of grievances.[16]
How can the Supreme
Court, a delegated authority, acting under a sworn to constitutional
commission award themselves and others "absolute
immunity"[17]
from said constitutional commission to "do not only what their
powers do not authorize, but what they forbid"[18]
i.e., the "deprivation of any rights, privileges, or
immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of
America?"[19]
by DENYING the constitutional assurance of governmental accountability with 1st
and 7th Amendment Justice, law and equity?[20]
We the People have fallen under the despotic[21]
spell of the concentrated power[22]
in the Supreme Court that has created ABSOLUTE POWER[23]
from ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY for the "malicious or corrupt"
judges,[24] the "malicious or dishonest" prosecutor, [25]
the "knowingly false testimony by police
officers"[26]
and "all (malicious, corrupt, dishonest and incompetent[27])
persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the
judicial process" [28]
acting under color of law to wit, ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION.[29]
See
Petition for a Writ of Certiorari 11-8211
Jeep v. Obama
I sometimes feel like the waif in "The
Emperor's New Cloths." AM I THE ONLY ONE THAT CAN SEE IT??
ANY assertion of personal ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY,
without proof of divinity, is a fraud, by any standard of Justice, law and
equity,[30] in a government of
free and equal persons on THIS PLANET!!!!!
ANY assertion of governmental ABSOLUTE
IMMUNITY, acknowledging un-avoidable human fallibility, is a fraud, by any
standard of Justice, law and equity, in a government of the people, by
the people and for the people on THIS PLANET!!!!!
The ministerial[31] grant of "Absolute
Immunity,"[32] by and for ministers,
is a massive, at the highest levels, ministerial, unconstitutional and "unlawful
Conspiracy"[33] "before
out of Court"[34] to obfuscate "false
and malicious Persecutions."[35]
"Immunity is given to crime, and the records of
the public tribunals are searched in vain for any evidence of effective redress."
"The courts are in many instances under the control of those who are
wholly inimical to the impartial administration of law and equity." I
say it NOW, Friday, June 29, 2012!!! Justice William O. Douglas said it
in 1961 and 1967. [36]
Mr. Lowe of Kansas and Mr. Rainey of South Carolina respectively said it
originally in 1871[37].
for condoning the denial of a Constitutionally secured and
congressionally un-abridge-able right to justice[40] and
"fraud upon the court."
Before
they have a chance to screw-up Healthcare for
100
years!!!!!!
Impeach the current Supreme Court FIVE for verifiable
NOT "good Behaviour,[41]"
denying the establishment of justice and abridging a Constitutionally secured
and congressionally un-abridge-able right to a redress of grievances,[42]
with their deprivation of substantive 7th Amendment[43]
justice between the government and the people, Connick,
District Attorney, et al. v. Thompson No. 09–571 Decided March 29, 2011
and "fraud upon the court" with Ashcroft v.
al-Kidd No. 10–98 Decided May 31, 2011!!!
Judicial modesty is one of the best possible
qualifications for a Supreme Court Justice, a position that offers so much
untrammeled power and brings so much temptation along with it.
The Right of Petition is the right to substantive justice
between the government and the people. We do not have any individually
enforceable rights in this country, "Everybody, BUT the innocent victim,
has "ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY"[44]"
for the "deprivation of any rights,
privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United
States of America"[45] e.g., "To Kill a Mocking Bird, The Denial of Due
Process,"[46] "The Exclusionary Rule," "Grounds for
Impeachment."
Most of the 99% of Americans have not had the
pleasure and are silently intimidated by the prospect of being dragged through
our corrupt COURTS kicking and screaming!!!!!! I have been kicking and
screaming for nearly 9 years.[47] I have suffered
through 411 days of illegal incarceration, 5 years of homelessness and two
psychological examinations. I ask you to review Jeep v
Obama 8th Circuit Court of Appeals case #11-2425, Jeep v United
States of America 10-1947," Jeep v Bennett 08-1823, "Jeep v Jones
07-2614, and the most humble Petition for a Wirt of Certiorari to the Supreme
Court 07-11115 and 11-8211."
We hold a "4-Year-Old Can
Be Sued."[48] We can
bail out the automakers to the tune of $75-$120+ billion. [49] We can spend $1.3 trillions and rising on an attempt at
nation building in Iraq and Afghanistan. [50] We can make-work to stimulate the economy with $787
billion. [51] We can bail out the Banks to the tune of $2.5 Trillion.
[52] But we cannot AFFORD to even consider the possibility of
negligence, malice and corruption of "our chief justice (judges), our
officials (prosecutors), or any of our servants (law enforcement)" [53] and compensate the victims?
That is INSANITY!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I have referenced "To Kill a Mocking Bird, The Denial of Due
Process," in several of my papers, I do so only because the facts of the
case in "To Kill a Mocking Bird" are generally known. The abuses are
happening EVERYDAY in REAL LIFE Mr. Thompson (No.
09–571),[54]
Mr. Smith (No. 10-8145), [55]
Mr. al-Kidd (No. 10–98)[56]
and myself (USCA8 No. 11-2425).[57] The fact
that "With
5% of the world's population, our country now houses nearly 25% of the world's
reported prisoners"[58]
PROVES "We the People" have NO ENFORCEABLE RIGHTS
IN America today!!!!!!!!!!!!
DGJeep
"The Earth and everything that's in it" (www.dgjeep.blogspot.com)
Friday,
June 29, 2012, 4:13:13 PM, 2012 06-26-12 Who makes the law REV 01
David G. Jeep
c/o The Bridge, 1610 Olive Street, Saint Louis, MO 63103-2316
E-Mail Dave@DGJeep.com
(preferred) www.DGJeep.blogspot.com
(314) 514-5228
[1] "And if you think that is a national
problem, consider that the United States is by far the World's greatest power;
it is not accountable to its own people for its abuses of power, and that abuse
of power flows freely into international circles. Given that reality, there is
not a nation in the world that should not fear us in the same way that a
reasonable person fears a child with a gun." 31 U. WEST L.A. L. REV. (
Summer 2000 ) JOHN E. WOLFGRAM e.g., George Bush's false representations of
Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq, "The Prosecution of George W. Bush
for Murder" by Famed prosecutor Vincent Bugliosi - Underlining and
parenthetical text added for emphasis.
[2] "Damages" By Dahlia Lithwick, Slate, posted Monday,
Aug. 8, 2011, at 7:22 PM ET underlining and foot note added
[3] Mr. Thompson in the New York Times in
response to the Supreme Court's ruling in Connick,
District Attorney, et al. v. Thompson No. 09–571 Decided March 29, 2011
[5] G.O.P. Vowing to Take Battle Over
Health Care Law Into November, NYTimes, By JEFF
ZELENY, Published: June 28, 2012
[6] Incompetence is the
most insidiuos and it is covered up by the gratuitous grants of dishoesty,
malice andcorruption. As regards state Prosecutors, "States can discipline federal
prosecutors, rarely do" 12/08/2010 USAToday by Brad Heath & Kevin
McCoy ("Federal
prosecutors series"). The "OPR is a black
hole. Stuff goes in, nothing comes out," said Jim Lavine, the
president of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. "The
public, the defense attorneys and the judiciary have lost respect for the
government's ability to police themselves."
As regards law
enforcement "Convicted defendants left uninformed
of forensic flaws found by Justice Dept." By Spencer S. Hsu, The Washington Post published: April 16, 2012, The
Washington Post reported on cases that demonstrate problems of COMPETENCY in
forensic analysis that have been known for nearly 40 years by the
Justice Department.
[7] Incompetence is the
most insidiuos and it is covered up by the gratuitous grants of dishoesty,
malice andcorruption. As regards state Prosecutors, "States can discipline federal
prosecutors, rarely do" 12/08/2010 USAToday by Brad Heath & Kevin
McCoy ("Federal
prosecutors series"). The "OPR is a black
hole. Stuff goes in, nothing comes out," said Jim Lavine, the
president of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. "The
public, the defense attorneys and the judiciary have lost respect for the
government's ability to police themselves."
As regards law
enforcement "Convicted defendants left uninformed
of forensic flaws found by Justice Dept." By Spencer S. Hsu, The Washington Post published: April 16, 2012, The
Washington Post reported on cases that demonstrate problems of COMPETENCY in
forensic analysis that have been known for nearly 40 years by the
Justice Department.
[8] "To assume
that Congress, which had enacted a criminal sanction directed against state
judicial officials, [Footnote 2/26] intended sub silentio to exempt
those same officials from the civil counterpart approaches the incredible.
[Footnote 2/27]" Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 363 (1983) I would assert it a
fantastic or delusional scenario!!!!!
[9] ""It is a
principle of our law that no action will lie against a judge of one of the superior
courts for a judicial act, though it be alleged to have been done maliciously
and corruptly; therefore the proposed allegation would not make the declaration
good. The public are deeply interested in this rule, which indeed exists for
their benefit and was established in order to secure the independence of the
judges and prevent them being harassed by vexatious actions"
