Friday, June 28, 2013

Am I the only one that can see this should be the “mere operation of law” (Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 163 (1803)): "it is a general and indisputable rule that where there is a legal right, there is also a legal remedy by suit or action at law whenever that right is invaded."

Shipment Activity--------------------------- Location--------------------- Date & Time
-- ----------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------- ------------------------
Delivered------------------------- WASHINGTON, DC 20543-- July 2, 2013 10:40 am
Available for Pickup---------- WASHINGTON, DC 20543-- July 2, 2013 10:37 am
Arrival at Unit-------------------- WASHINGTON, DC 20018-- July 2, 2013 10:29 am
Depart USPS Sort Facility--- SAINT LOUIS, MO 63155-------- June 27, 2013
Processed at USPS Origin Sort Facility----------------------------------------                        
      ----------------------------------- SAINT LOUIS, MO 63155-- June 27, 2013 8:39 pm
Dispatched to Sort Facility--- SAINT LOUIS, MO 63101-- June 27, 2013 5:27 pm
Acceptance----------------------- SAINT LOUIS, MO 63101- June 27, 2013 12:24 pm
      ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------------------
Expected Delivery By:
July 1, 2013
First-Class Mail®
Certified Mail

Andrew Downs, Clerk of the Court
THE DEADBEAT - Supreme Court of the United States
One First Street N.E.
Washington, DC 20543-0001

Re: A repeated constitutionally and lawfully unbridgeable petition for Writ of Certiorari regarding a facially IN-valid court order[1] - Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals cases 07-2614, 08-1823, 10-1947, 11-2425, and 12-2435 via "A FAILURE to COMMUNICATE!!!!!"

Dear Mr. Downs,
I acknowledge our phone conversation of June 26, 2013.  I am herewith complying with your stated requests to the best of my humble pro se indigent ability via return post of First-Class®- Certified Mail. I have to RESTATE the obvious, for self-serving criminal reasons the Supreme Court is quite literally incompetent in tracking their correspondence.  I fully realize, though I refuse to concede to it, that your self-serving criminal GOAL as with all petitions is to deny, Deny, DENY!

Any help you can give me in expediting this ALREADY 10.12 year effort, would be greatly appreciated. 

I feel like the Danish waif in the Emperor's New Cloths.   Am I the only one that can see this should be the "mere operation of law" (Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 163 (1803)):

"it is a general and indisputable rule that where there is a legal right, there is also a legal remedy by suit or action at law whenever that right is invaded."

"I am next to consider such injuries as are cognizable by the Courts of common law (7th Amendment). And herein I shall for the present only remark that all possible injuries whatsoever that did not fall within the exclusive cognizance of either the ecclesiastical, military, or maritime tribunals are, for that very reason, within the cognizance of the common law courts of justice, for it is a settled and invariable principle in the laws of England that every right, when withheld, must have a remedy, and every injury its proper redress."

Absolute immunity QUASHES legal rights!!!

As confirmed by the United States District Court, Eastern District of Missouri, Eastern Division and the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals I am indigent.  As a lone pro se indigent petitioner,[2] I obviously do not have the financial ability to bureaucratically serve all the respondents.  The Federal Government per the Constitutional Guarantee is to provide the protection of the Supreme Law of the Land for all persons equally.  Due process is defeated by your bureaucratic DENIALS.

If there is anything further I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.

Thank you in advance.
"Time is of the essence"

 David G. Jeep

a.     "notarized affidavit dated Thursday, June 27, 2013" (2 pages)
b.     "Attachment "A" " (1 page)
c.     "Attachment "B" (on 2 each pages)"

cc:  My Blog - Friday, June 28, 2013, 10:31:45 AM

[1] PENN v. U.S. 335 F.3d 786 (2003)
[2] Because I am a humble non-legal professional and I have been impoverished by this criminal issue I cite the potential for Harmless error - 28 USC § 2111,  The inherent unconstitutional denial of justice based on the malicious, corrupt, dishonest, incompetent and UNCONSTITUTIONAL ruling in Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 335 (1983), "the common law provided absolute immunity from subsequent damages liability for all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process," makes a professionally prepared petition and or appeal untenable to the average victim.  Most are not only impoverished by the injustice, but also in jail behind bars.  With 5% of the world's population our POLICE STATE now incarcerates 25% of the world's prisoners.
Eastern Missouri U.S. District Court Case No.  4:12-cv-703-CEJ 
David G. Jeep
The Government of the United States of America,[1] et al,
I state that per Andrew Downs' letters dated May 15, 2013, June 3, 2013 and our phone conversation of June 26, 2013 I have on numerous occasions mailed communication, starting in September of 2012 (USPS Shipment Info for 7012 1010 0001 4416 3690 09/14/12  1:38pm).  Specifically several copies of the above referenced EMERGENCY petition for writ of certiorari and not received any response.  I have consistently within 7 days of receipt of any communication from the court responded.  I have at times written unsolicited follow-ups to inquire as to status of the petition for writ of certiorari. 
I herewith include and make a part of this affidavit an Attachment "A" detailing 13 dated mailings in regard to my petition. 
I herewith include and make a part of this affidavit an Attachment "B" (on 2 each pages) copies of US POST OFFICE marked receipts for seven of the referenced mailings.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on, Thursday, June 27, 2013

David G. Jeep
Thursday, June 27, 2013

[1] This is not a typo, there was a motion made to correct this caption at the inception of the issue, see the court RECORD.  I am suing my Government in the respectful form of a petition!!!!!

Thanks in advance

To Kill a Mocking Bird, The Denial of Due Process
"agere sequitor esse"
"Time is of the essence"
David G. Jeep
E-mail is preferred,
(314) 514-5228

David G. Jeep
c/o The Bridge
1610 Olive Street,
Saint Louis, MO 63103-2316