President Barack Hussein Obama
Date of email request: September 5, 2013
Shipment
Activity-------------------------- Location--------------------- Date & Time
-- ----------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------- ------------------------
Delivered--------------- WASHINGTON, DC 20500 Sept. 12, 2013 3:56 am
Available for Pickup---------- WASHINGTON,
DC 20500 Sept. 11, 2013 12:37 pm Arrival
at Unit WASHINGTON, DC 20018--- Sept. 11, 2013 12:09 pm
Depart USPS Sort Facility-- WASHINGTON,
DC 20018------- Sept. 10, 2013
Processed through USPS Sort Facility---
---------------------------------- WASHINGTON, DC 20018- Sept. 10, 2013 7:53 am
Depart USPS Sort Facility--- SAINT
LOUIS, MO 63155--------- Sept. 5,
2013
Processed at USPS Origin Sort Facility--
----------------------------------- SAINT LOUIS, MO 63155-- Sept. 5, 2013 11:19 pm
Dispatched to Sort Facility--- SAINT
LOUIS, MO 63101--- Sept. 5, 2013
5:38 pm
Acceptance----------------------- SAINT
LOUIS, MO 63101-- Sept. 5, 2013
11:45 am
-- ----------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------- ------------------------
Expected
Delivery By:
September
9, 2013
First-Class
Mail®
Certified
Mail™
President Barack Hussein Obama
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20500-0001
Re: "equally respect the rights of property and the property in rights"[1]
Your "sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity" [2]
Petition for a Writ of Certiorari 13-5193, Jeep v. Obama/Government U.S.
forma securitatis,[3] in both law and equity for RIGHTS
Dear Mr. Obama,
I watched the movie "A Few Good Men" with Tom Cruise and Jack Nicholson (Col. Nathan R. Jessup) yesterday. You cannot see it because of your "sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity"[4] but, you have become "Col. Nathan R. Jessup" and you espouse his hate – his reckless behavior with your confirmation of "absolute immunity" for the malice, corruption, ignorance and stupidity rampant in our Justice System today. I quote from James Madison Essays for the National Gazette "Property" 27 March 1792:
"Where an excess of power prevails, property of no sort is duly respected. No man is safe in his opinions, his person, his faculties, or his possessions."
"Government is instituted to protect property of every sort, as well that which lies in the various rights of individuals as that which the term particularly expresses. This being the end of government, that alone is a just government which impartially secures to every man whatever is his own."
"If the United States mean to obtain or deserve the full praise due to wise and just governments, they will equally respect the rights of property and the property in rights: they will rival the government that most sacredly guards the former; and by repelling its example in violating the latter, will make themselves a pattern to that and all other governments."
The absolutely immune Black Robed Royalist solely-self-serving Article III Judiciary has usurped an "excess of power." They EVERYDAY deprive We the People of "property of every sort." MOST importantly the property "that which lies in the various rights of individuals." The Government of the United States of America has lost any claim to being a "wise and just government." A just government has an undeniable obligation to "equally respect the rights of property and the property in rights."[5]
In today's Jim Crow and Jane Crow world the "rights of property" takes unequal priority over the "property in rights." You can see the results in the "gap in wealth between races" and the gap in child custody and communal equity after divorce between men and woman.
This is ultimately a self defeating paradox for civilization although it is not commonly understood as such. This is, admittedly, a challenging concept. "Shallow understanding from people of good will is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection." [6] In other words "It is easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled."[7]
If "rights of property" trumps "property in rights" what happens when two persons claim the same property? If "rights" do not trump possession or claimed possession; the only dispute resolution available is nature's default survival of the fittest… violence… war. War defeats civilization's raison d'être, justice under the agreed, facially[8] understood, reckonable[9] rule of law.
"Justice is the end of government. It is the end of civil society. It ever has been and ever will be pursued until it be obtained, or until liberty be lost in the pursuit." [10] "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly."[11]
To establish Justice without conflict, we must FIRST and foremost establish and agree to facially[12] understood, reckonable[13] laws to define rights and Due Process for their enforcement i.e., a constitution.
The Jim Crow era was and is based on the unwarranted, unjustifiable and categorical assertion: African Americans men can not be trust around white women[14] or property. Jim Crow uses the "rights of property" to protect white women at the expense of the "property in rights" of African Americans subjected to the deprivation of rights e.g., lynching, the humiliation of "separate and unequal facilities," "stop and frisk" and racial profiling. Is the ACTUAL lynching/humiliation, the "property in rights," incurred by innocents on the scales of blind justice worth the unwarranted, unjustifiable and categorical protection of the "rights of property?" Obviously there is a loss on one side the "property in rights" and an unwarranted, unjustifiable and categorical gain to the "rights of property" on the other. Yes rapes and theft may be reduced, but can the minimal reduction justify the unwarranted, unjustifiable and categorical humiliation of African Americans' "property in rights?" Not in a just government that acknowledges the equality of "property in rights."
"I conclude with a particularly apt quote: "The idea of universal suspicion without individual evidence is what Americans find abhorrent and what black men in America must constantly fight. It is pervasive in policing policies — like stop-and-frisk, and . . . neighborhood watch – regardless of the collateral damage done to the majority of innocents. It's like burning down a house to rid it of mice."[15]"[16]
The Constitution, the rule of law demands We the People have warrantable, justifiable, credible and reasonable probable cause… particularly describing… the persons[17] to demand the deprivation of "property in rights." Racial profiling alone does not meet the constitutional security for "property in rights" - reasonable probable cause… particularly describing… the persons[18]
In the Jane Crow era the "rights of property" include not only physical property, equity, in a domestic dispute but also "rights to paternity" of innocent children put at risk. The Jane Crow era was and is based on the unwarranted, unjustifiable and categorical assertion: the Male of the species, any species, are uncontrollably aggressively violent and can not be trust around defenseless women or children, thus women are entitled to first right of refusal to all communal "rights of property," equity, and "rights to paternity" of innocent children before, during and after resolution of any dispute.
That assertion the Male of the species, any species, are uncontrollably aggressively violent and can not be trust around defenseless women or children, thus women are entitled to first right of refusal to all to all communal "rights of property" and "rights to paternity" of innocent children before, during and after resolution of any dispute is unjustified by the REASON. You can find surveys that try and quantify the violence. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) says "More than 1 in 3 women (35.6%) and more than 1 in 4 men (28.5%) in the United States have experienced rape, physical violence, and/or stalking by an intimate partner in their lifetime"[20] and "About 1 in 4 women (24.3%) and 1 in 7 men (13.8%) have experienced severe physical violence by an intimate partner in their lifetime partner (e.g., hit with a fist or something hard, beaten, slammed against something) at some point in their lifetime." [21]
The male and female of EVERY species have been successfully procreating since the dawn of time. Now there are different levels of aggression within species or any social group of said species. There maybe some groups that have what other groups deem excessive Intimate Partner Violence (IPV). While others have NONE. The CDC worst estimate is 2 in 7 persons experience IPV in their lifetimes. There are other reports that 3 in 100 males are warrantably the perpetrators of the violence. The Jane Crow eras unfettered categorical use of the ex parte order of protection is destroying innocent men everyday!!!!!
"On some positions, Cowardice asks the question: "Is it safe?" Expediency asks the question: "Is it politic?" And Vanity comes along and asks the question: "Is it popular?" But Conscience asks the question: "Is it right?" And there comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular, but he must do it because Conscience tells him it is right. I believe today that there is a need for all people of good will to come together with a massive act of conscience and say in the words of the old Negro spiritual, "We ain't goin' study war no more." This is the challenge facing modern man."[24]
We the People have to RECOMMIT ourselves to "establish Justice" under facially[25] reckonable[26] constitutionally defined rights and the Jury System's Due Process of Law for their enforcement. It is the right thing, "The time is always right to do what's right."[27] Absolute immunity for Justice system, ""It's like burning down a house to rid it of mice."[28]"[29]
If there is anything further I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.
Thank you in advance.
"Time is of the essence"
David G. Jeep
cc: My Blog - Thursday, September 05, 2013, 10:26:43 AM
[1] "Property" by Madison published in The National Gazette, on March 27, 1792. "If the United States mean to obtain or deserve the full praise due to wise and just governments, they will equally respect the rights of property and the property in rights: they will rival the government that most sacredly guards the former; and by repelling its example in violating the latter, will make themselves a pattern to that and all other governments."
[2] "Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity" (MLK Jr., Strength to Love, 1963). Incompetence is the most insidious and it is covered up by the gratuitous grants of dishonesty, malice and corruption.
[3] "A radical solution was thus proposed in clause 61 of the charter, known as the security clause (forma securitatis)." Matthew Strickland, 'Enforcers of Magna Carta (act. 1215–1216)', Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press. [http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/theme/93691, accessed 10 July 2013]
[4] "Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity" (MLK Jr., Strength to Love, 1963). Incompetence is the most insidious and it is covered up by the gratuitous grants of dishonesty, malice and corruption.
[5] "Property" by Madison published in The National Gazette, on March 27, 1792. "If the United States mean to obtain or deserve the full praise due to wise and just governments, they will equally respect the rights of property and the property in rights: they will rival the government that most sacredly guards the former; and by repelling its example in violating the latter, will make themselves a pattern to that and all other governments."
[6] Martin L. King Jr. "Letter From Birmingham Jail" April 16, 1963
[7] Mark Twain "It is easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled."
[8] PENN v. U.S. 335 F.3d 786 (2003)
[9] "reckonability" is a needful characteristic of any law worthy of the name." Antonin Scalia: The Rule of Law as a Law of Rules, 56 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1175, 1175-81 (1989)
[10] FEDERALIST No. 51, "The Structure of the Government Must Furnish the Proper Checks and Balances Between the Different Departments" For the Independent Journal. Wednesday, February 6, 1788. By James Madison
[11] Martin L. King Jr. "Letter From Birmingham Jail" April 16, 1963
[12] PENN v. U.S. 335 F.3d 786 (2003)
[13] "reckonability" is a needful characteristic of any law worthy of the name." Antonin Scalia: The Rule of Law as a Law of Rules, 56 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1175, 1175-81 (1989)
[14] Ida B. Wells (1862 – 1931), a black woman, with Frederick Douglass and other black leaders wrote sections of a pamphlet to be distributed: "Reasons Why the Colored American Is Not in the World's Columbian Exposition" detailed the progress of blacks since their arrival in America and the corrupt workings of Southern lynchings. Ida B. Wells (1862 – 1931), a black woman, argued that any relationship between a white woman and a black man was considered rape during that time period. She states, "Nobody in this section of the country believes the old threadbare lie that Negro men rape white women."
[15] "The Whole System Failed Trayvon Martin" July 15, 2013, New York Times By CHARLES M. BLOW, as quoted by
[16] On the Stop-and-Frisk Decision: Floyd v. City of New York, Memoranda and orders filed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin of Federal District Court in Manhattan, filed 8/12/13
[17] 4th Amendment: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon (reasonable) probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
[18] 4th Amendment: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon (reasonable) probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
[19] Ida B. Wells (1862 – 1931), a black woman, with Frederick Douglass and other black leaders wrote sections of a pamphlet to be distributed: "Reasons Why the Colored American Is Not in the World's Columbian Exposition" detailed the progress of blacks since their arrival in America and the corrupt workings of Southern lynchings. Ida B. Wells (1862 – 1931), a black woman, argued that any relationship between a white woman and a black man was considered rape during that time period. She states, "Nobody in this section of the country believes the old threadbare lie that Negro men rape white women."
[20] The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey: 2010 Summary Report, November 2011, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
[21] Ibid.
[22] "The Whole System Failed Trayvon Martin" July 15, 2013, New York Times By CHARLES M. BLOW
[23] On the Stop-and-Frisk Decision: Floyd v. City of New York, Memoranda and orders filed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin of Federal District Court in Manhattan, filed 8/12/13
[24]Martin Luther King, Jr. "Remaining Awake Through a Great Revolution" (31 March 1968)
[25] PENN v. U.S. 335 F.3d 786 (2003)
[26] "reckonability" is a needful characteristic of any law worthy of the name." Antonin Scalia: The Rule of Law as a Law of Rules, 56 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1175, 1175-81 (1989)
[27] Speech delivered in Finney Chapel at Oberlin College (October. 22, 1964), as reported in "When MLK came to Oberlin" by Cindy Leise (The Chronicle-Telegram; January 21, 2008) (http://chronicle.northcoastnow.com/2008/01/21/when-mlk-came-to-oberlin/ )
[28] "The Whole System Failed Trayvon Martin" July 15, 2013, New York Times By CHARLES M. BLOW, as quoted by
[29] On the Stop-and-Frisk Decision: Floyd v. City of New York, Memoranda and orders filed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin of Federal District Court in Manhattan, filed 8/12/13
--
Thanks in advance
To Kill a Mocking Bird, The Denial of Due Process
"agere sequitor esse"
"Time is of the essence"
David G. Jeep
http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/
E-mail is preferred Dave@DGJeep.com, DGJeep@DGJeep.com
(314) 514-5228
David G. Jeep
GENERAL DELIVERY
Saint Louis, MO 63155-9999
