Friday, January 31, 2014

Jeep v. The Tea Party, et al No. 4:13CV2089 DDN Memorandum and Order to dismiss (Doc 6&7) dated 1-23-14

Clerk of Court - James G. Woodward
111 South 10th Street, Suite 3.300
St. Louis, MO 63102-1123

Re:      Jeep v. The Tea Party, et al No. 4:13CV2089 DDN 
       Memorandum and Order to dismiss (Doc 6&7) dated 1-23-14

Dear People,
I am at a loss?  How did the above referenced case get reassigned from David D. Noce (DDN) - United States Magistrate Judge on the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
to
John Andrew Ross District Judge on the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri without appropriate prior LEGAL notice to the petitioner? 

I make special NOTE that John Andrew Ross was a judicial member of the 21st District State Court of Missouri in 2003 when my Civil Rights were deprived by his THEN employee Commissioner Philip E. Jones, Sr.  John Andrew Ross thus has at least a portion of the respondeat superior liability for his employee’s actions.  I currently have an action before the Federal Court, Jeep v. Government of the United States, et al No. 4:13-cv-02490-RWS, confirming and asserting this deprivation.[1] 

I OBJECT to John Andrew Ross’s participation in the above CURRENT referenced issue not only because of his unannounced appointment but also his prior and CURRENT LIABILITY issues in Jeep v. Government of the United States, et al No. 4:13-cv-02490-RWS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Nonetheless I respond to WHOM IT MAY CONCERN as referenced above per the enclosed.  If there is anything further I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.
Thank you in advance.
“Time is of the essence”




David G. Jeep

enclosure
a.     “Response to Memorandum and Order to dismiss (Doc 6&7) dated 1-23-14”

cc:  My Blog - Friday, January 31, 2014, 3:40:51 PM


UNITED STATES EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
FEDERAL COURT – Eastern DIVISION

David G. Jeep,         Plaintiff,
            vs.
Tea Party / GOP / Republican Party, et al

)
)
) ) )



Case No.  4:13CV2089 DDN 




____________________________________________________________________________________________

RESPONSE to whom it may concern.


Motion to dismiss as “patently meritless” is unfortified. 
Plaintiff response:
1.    I stress as I did in the original petition, “All Defendants/Respondents are included and asserted liable, as PARTY LEADER actors, GOVERNMENT actors and as INDIVIDUAL persons - Defendants/Respondents.”   Of course per the Black Robed Royalist judiciary, no one can be held accountable to anything it is ‘absolute immunity” for ALL!!!!!
            The listed defendants were at the FOREFRONT “threaten(ing) the full faith and credit of the United States” as now PUBLICALLY confirmed by President Obama in his State of the Union Address dated January 28, 2014.
2.    I stress as I did in the original petition, “My “property in rights[2] has been deprived by the Defendant’s / Respondent’s refusal to support and defend the constitutional security of the 14th Amendment “The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned.”  The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), commonly called the Affordable Care Act (ACA) or Obamacare is authorized by law, and therefore shall not be questioned.” 
            Clearly the Tea Party / GOP / Republican Party, et al “threaten(ed) the full faith and credit of the United States” as now PUBLICALLY confirmed by President Obama in his State of the Union Address dated January 28, 2014.
3.    As regards the straw man attempt at humor as regards the reference to the American Civil War and Egyptian Pyramids, I would be happy to provide additional precedential and historical support, but first please address the issues of clear intent as to the 14th Amendment’s timely constitutional precedential protection and relation to the CIVIL WAR as it’s raison d'ĂȘtre and the HISTORICAL proof of self-serving tyrannical avariciously driven monetary policy of ancient Egypt or any or all of feudal European history that constitutional Republican Form of Government[3] by definition opposes.
4.    As additional note the amount of actual damages, punitive, damages and how to allocate them is an issue for a 7th Amendment Jury DEMAND.  “In civil cases the judge only decides whether a claim is valid and assesses damages, grants an injunction or orders some other form of redress to the plaintiff, unless a jury has been empanelled to make these decisions.”

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Signed this Tuesday, November 12, 2013
Signature of Plaintiff(s)


______________________________________________
David G. Jeep
GENERAL DELIVERY
Saint Louis, MO  63155-9999
E-Mail Dave@DGJeep.com (preferred)
(314) 514-5228



[1] Recusal/Disqualification should be in order 28 U.S.C. § 455 (b)(5)(i)
[2] “Property” James Madison Essays for the National Gazette 1791- 1792
[3] Article. IV., Section. 4. §1 US Constitution

--
Thanks in advance

To Kill a Mocking Bird, The Denial of Due Process
"agere sequitor esse"
“Time is of the essence"
David G. Jeep
http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/
E-mail is preferred Dave@DGJeep.com, DGJeep@DGJeep.com
(314) 514-5228

David G. Jeep
GENERAL DELIVERY
Saint Louis, MO 63155-9999