Saturday, August 23, 2014

1st Follow up PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS‎ - Cause No. CR203-1336M - STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff, v. DAVID G. JEEP, Defendant

Bruce Colyer, Associate Circuit Judge
c/o Jo McElwee, Circuit Clerk
1 Court Circle, Suite 8
Camdenton, MO 65020

Re: 1st Follow up PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS‎ - Cause No. CR203-1336M - STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff, v. DAVID G.  JEEP, Defendant

Dear Sir,


I just wanted to AGAIN REMIND you of your primary MORAL and CONSTITUTIONAL obligation, as a Judicial Officer, is to “establish Justice” under color of law.[1]  I am fully aware of just how corrupt you and your Black Robed Royalist Brethren have become. 

As I would hope you know, although your “sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity[2] seem be to without bound, your UNJUST actions in 2004 created, enforced and perpetuate a MISCARRIAGE of JUSTICE in the above REFERENCED ISSUE. 

To restate the oft repeated injustice, Jack A. Bennett, Associate Circuit Judge, revoked my bound and held me without probable cause on October XX, 2003.  Mr. Devin M. Ledom, Asst. Prosecuting Attorney, W. Steven Rives, Prosecuting Attorney, W. James Icenogle, Prosecuting Attorney, withheld exculpable evidence pretrial and at trial.  Alex Little, Officer Badge #920, Tim Taylor Officer Badge #913 both perjured themselves.  That is to say:

“The undisclosed evidence demonstrates that the prosecution's case includes perjured testimony and that the prosecution knew, or should have known, of the perjury. [Footnote 7]  ”[3]

Your, Bruce Colyer, Associate Circuit Judge, culpability comes the result of your refusal to acknowledge the malice, corruption, sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity” in post trial motions.    

If there is anything further I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.
Thank you in advance.
“Time is of the essence”




David G. Jeep

cc:  My Blog 






[2] “Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.” Martin Luther King - Ch. 4 : Love in action, Sct. 3
[3] United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 103 (1976) emphasis and underlining added for clarity 




No comments: